Skip to main content
Log in

The Effect of Cetylpyridinium Chloride (CPC) on the Cell Surface Hydrophobicity and Adherence of Candida albicansto Human Buccal Epithelial Cells in Vitro

  • Published:
Pharmaceutical Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose. This study examined the effects of cetylpyridinium chloride (CPC) on cell surface hydrophobicity (CSH) and adherence of blastospores of Candida albicans(MEN strain) to human buccal epithelial cells (EEC) in vitro.

Methods. The effect of CPC treatment of either C. albicans blastospores or BEC on their subsequent adherence was determined using 35SO4 labelled blastospores in association with a Percoll gradient. The effects of CPC treatment of blastospores on their CSH was determined using Hydrophobic Interaction Chromatography.

Results. Treatment of exponential and stationary phase blastospores with CPC (50 µg mL−1) for 0.5–30 minutes, or with CPC (0.5–50 µg mL−1) for 15 minutes resulted in significant reductions in both blastospore CSH and adherence to BEC in vitro. No correlation was apparent (r < 0.8) between reduced CSH and reduced blastospore adherence following treatment with CPC (0.5–50 µg mL−1). Significantly reduced adherence of C. albicans (stationary or exponential growth phases) to human EEC was also observed following treatment of BEC with CPC (50 µg mL−1) for 0.5–30 minutes or with CPC (0.5–50 µg mL−1) for 15 minutes. Antiadherence effects were observed at both sub and super-minimum inhibitory concentrations of CPC.

Conclusions. It is suggested that, whilst the ability of CPC to reduce the CSH of C. albicans may contribute to its reduced adherence to human BEC in vitro, reduced CSH is only one of several possible factors that contribute to the observed antiadherence effects.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

REFERENCES

  1. Odds, F. C. Candida and Candidosis, A review and bibliography. Baliere Tindall, London, 1988, p 115–230.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Douglas, L. J. Adhesion of Candida species to epithelial surfaces. CRC Crit. Rev. Microbiol. 15:27–43 (1987).

    Google Scholar 

  3. Fowler, S. and Jones, D. S. Modified adherence of Candida albicans to human buccal epithelial cells in vitro following treatment with cationic, non-antibiotic antimicrobial agents. Int. J. Pharm. 86:193–199 (1992).

    Google Scholar 

  4. Critchley, I. A. and Douglas, L. J. Isolation and partial characterisation of an adhesin from Candida albicans. J. Gen. Micro. 133:629–636 (1987).

    Google Scholar 

  5. Gorman, S. P., McCafferty, D. F., Woolfson, A. D. and Jones, D. S. A comparative study of the microbial anti-adherence capacities of three antimicrobial agents. J. Clin. Pharm. Ther. 12:393–399 (1987).

    Google Scholar 

  6. Klotz, S. A., Drutz, D. J. and Zajic, J. E. Factors governing adherence of Candida albicans species to plastic surfaces. Infect. Immun. 50:97–101 (1985).

    Google Scholar 

  7. Hazen, K. C. Participation of yeast cell surface hydrophobicity in adherence of Candida albicans to human epithelial cells. Infect. Immun. 57:1894–1900 (1989).

    Google Scholar 

  8. Reinhart, H., Muller, G. and Sobel, J. D. Specificity and mechanism of in vitro adherence of Candida albicans. Ann. Clin. Lab. Sci. 15:406–413 (1985).

    Google Scholar 

  9. Kennedy, M. J. and Sandin, R. L. Influence of growth conditions on Candida albicans adhesion, hydrophobicity and cell wall ultrastructure. J. Med. Vet. Mycol. 26:79–92 (1988).

    Google Scholar 

  10. Ener, B. and Douglas, L. J. Correlation between cell-surface hydrophobicity of Candida albicans and adhesion to buccal epithelial cells. FEMS Microbiol. Letts. 99:37–42 (1992).

    Google Scholar 

  11. Schep, L. J., Jones, D. S., Schep, G. P. and Shepherd, M. G. A method to study the adherence of Candida albicans to human buccal epithelial cells in vitro using 35SO4 radiolabelled blastospores and a Percoll gradient. Int. J. Pharm. 105:39–45 (1994).

    Google Scholar 

  12. Schep, L. J., Jones, D. S. and Shepherd, M. G. Primary interactions of three Quaternary Ammonium Compounds with blastospores of Candida albicans (MEN Strain). Pharm. Res. 12:649–652 (1995).

    Google Scholar 

  13. Jones, D. S., Gorman, S. P., McCafferty, D. F. and Woolfson, A. D. The effects of three non-antibiotic, antimicrobial agents on the surface hydrophobicity of certain microorganisms evaluated by different methods. J. Appl. Bact. 71:218–227 (1991).

    Google Scholar 

  14. Bonesvoll, P. and Gjermo, P. A comparison between chlorhexidine and some quaternary ammonium compounds with regard to retention, salivary concentration and plaque-inhibiting effect in the mouth after mouth rinses. Arch. Oral Biol. 23:289–294 (1978).

    Google Scholar 

  15. Tobgi, R. S., Samaranayake, L. P. and MacFarlane, T. W. Adhesion of Candida albicans to buccal epithelial cells exposed to chlorhexidine gluconate. J. Med. Vet. Mycol. 25:335–338 (1987).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Jones, D.S., Schep, L.J. & Shepherd, M.G. The Effect of Cetylpyridinium Chloride (CPC) on the Cell Surface Hydrophobicity and Adherence of Candida albicansto Human Buccal Epithelial Cells in Vitro . Pharm Res 12, 1896–1900 (1995). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1016231620470

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1016231620470

Navigation