Skip to main content
Log in

Tax Setting in a Federal System: The Case of Personal Income Taxation in Canada

  • Published:
International Tax and Public Finance Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In a decentralised tax system, the effects of tax policies enacted by one government are not confined to its own jurisdiction. First, if both the regional and the federal levels of government co-occupy the same fields of taxation, tax rate increases by one layer of government will reduce taxes collected by the other. Second, if the tax base is mobile, tax rate increases by one regional government will raise the amount of taxes collected by other regional governments. These sources of fiscal interdependence are called in the literature vertical and horizontal tax externalities, respectively. Third, as Smart (1998) shows, if equalisation transfers are present, an increase in the standard equalisation tax rate provides incentives to raise taxes to the receiving provinces. A way to check the empirical relevance of these hypotheses is to test for the existence of interactions between the regional tax rate, on the one hand, and the federal tax rate, the tax rate set by competing regions, and the standard equalisation tax rate, on the other hand. Following this approach, this paper estimates provincial tax setting functions with data on Canadian personal income taxation for the period 1982–1996. We find a significant positive response of provincial tax rates to changes in the federal income tax rate, the tax rates of competing provinces, and the standard equalisation rate (only for receiving provinces). We also find that the reaction to horizontal competition is stronger in the provinces that do not receive equalisation transfers.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Alesina, A. and H. Rosenthal. (1995). Partisan Politics, Divided Government and the Economy, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Alt, J. and R. C. Lowry. (1994). “Divided Government and Budget Deficits: Evidence from the States.” American Political Science Review 88, 811–828.

    Google Scholar 

  • Anselin, L. (1988). Spatial Econometrics, Methods and Models. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic.

    Google Scholar 

  • Besley, T. J. and A. Case. (1995). “Incumbent Behaviour: Vote Seeking, Tax Setting and Yardstick Competition.” American Economic Review 85(1), 25–45.

    Google Scholar 

  • Besley, T. J. and H. S. Rosen. (1998). “Vertical Externalities inTax Setting: Evidence from Gasoline and Cigarettes.” Journal of Public Economics 70, 383–398.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bird, R. M. and E. Slack. (1983). Urban Public Finance in Canada, Butteworthm, Toronto.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boadway, R. and M. Keen. (1996). “Efficiency and the Optimal Direction of Federal-State Transfers.” International Tax and Public Finance 3(2), 137–155.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brett, C. and J. Pinkse. (2000). “The Determinants of Municipal Tax Rates in British Columbia.” Canadian Journal of Economics 33, 695–714.

    Google Scholar 

  • Büettner, T. (2001). “Local Business Taxation and Competition for Capital: The Choice of the Tax Rate.” Regional Science and Urban Economics 31, 215–245.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carroll, R. and M. Wasylenko. (1994). “Do State Business Climates Still Matter? Evidence of a Structural Change.” National Tax Journal 47, 19–37.

    Google Scholar 

  • Case, A. (1993). “Interstate Competition after TRA86.” Journal of Policy Analysis and Management 12, 136–148.

    Google Scholar 

  • Case, A., J. R. Hines and H. S. Rosen. (1993). “Budget Spillovers and Fiscal Policy Interdependence.” Journal of Public Economics 52, 285–307.

    Google Scholar 

  • Courchene, T. J. and D. A. Beavis. (1974). “Federal-Provincial Tax Equalization: An Evaluation.” Canadian Journal of Economics 6, 483–502.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dahlby, B. (1996). “Distortionary Taxation and the Design of Intergovernmental Grants.” International Tax and Public Finance 3, 397–412.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dahlby, B. and L. S. Wilson. (1999). “Vertical Fiscal Externalities and the Under-Provision of Productivity-Enhancing Activities by State Governments.” Institute for Public Economics, Research Paper 99- 4, University of Alberta.

  • Davies, J. B. and J. Zhang. (1996). “Measuring Marginal Tax Rates for Individuals in Canada: Average and Distributions Over Time.” Canadian Journal of Economics 29, 960–975.

    Google Scholar 

  • Day, K. M. (1992). “Interprovincial Migration and Local Public Goods.” Canadian Journal of Economics 25, 123–144.

    Google Scholar 

  • Doak, J. (1996). “The Relationship between Federal and Provincial Income Tax Rates in Canada Since 1965.” Canadian Tax Journal 38(5), 1227–1235.

    Google Scholar 

  • Esteller-Moré, A. and A. Solé-Ollé. (2001a). “Vertical Income Tax Externalities: Evidence from the U.S.” Regional Science and Urban Economics 31(2- 3), 247–272.

    Google Scholar 

  • Esteller-Moré, A. and A. Solé-Ollé. (2001b). “Tax Setting in a Federal System: The Case of Personal Income Taxation in Canada.” Working Paper 2001/9, Institut d'Economia de Barcelona, Barcelona.

    Google Scholar 

  • Feldstein, M. and G. Metcalf. (1987). “The Effect of Federal Tax Deductibility on State and Local Taxes and Spending.” Journal of Political Economy 95, 710–736.

    Google Scholar 

  • Figlio, D. N., V.W. Kolpin and W. E. Reid. (1999). “Do States PlayWelfare Games?” Journal of Urban Economics 46, 437–454.

    Google Scholar 

  • Flowers, M. R. (1988). “Shared Tax Sources in a Leviathan Model of Federalism.” Public Finance Quarterly 16, 67–77.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goodspeed, T. J. (2000). “Tax Structure in a Federation.” Journal of Public Economics 75, 493–506.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gordon, R. H. (1983). “An Optimal Taxation Approach to Fiscal Federalism.” Quarterly Journal of Economics 98, 567–586.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hausman, J. (1978). “Specification Tests in Econometrics.” Econometrica 46, 1251–1271.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hausman, J. and W. Taylor. (1987). “Panel Data and Unobservable Individual Effects.” Econometrica 49, 1377–1395.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hayashi, M. and R. Boadway. (2001). “An Empirical Analysis of Intergovernmental Tax Interaction: The Case of Business Income Taxes in Canada.” Canadian Journal of Economics 34, 481–503.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heyndels, B. and J. Vuchelen. (1998). “Tax Mimicking Among Belgian Municipalities.” National Tax Journal 51, 89–101.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holtz-Eakin, D. (1986). “Unobserved Tastes and the Determination of Municipal Services.” National Tax Journal, 39, 527–532.

    Google Scholar 

  • Howard, R., G. C. Ruggieri and VanWart. (1995). “Federal Tax Changes and Marginal Tax Rates, 1986 and 1993.” Canadian Tax Journal 43, 906–922.

    Google Scholar 

  • Inman, R. P. and D. L. Rubinfeld. (1996). “Designing Tax Policy in Federalist: An Overview.” Journal of Public Economics 60, 307–334.

    Google Scholar 

  • Keen, M. (1998). “Vertical Tax Externalities in the Theory of Fiscal Federalism.” IMF Staff Papers 45, 454–485.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kelejian, H. H. and I. Prucha. (1997). “A Generalized Spatial Two Stage Least Squares Procedure for Estimating a Spatial Autoregressive Model with Autoregressive Disturbances.” Journal of Real Estate Finance and Economics 1, 99–121.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ladd, H. (1993). “State Responses to the TRA86 RevenueWindfalls: A New Test of the Flypaper Effect.” Journal of Policy Analysis and Management 12(1), 82–103.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mendoza, E. G., A. Razin and L. L. Tesar. (1994). “Effective Tax Rates in Macroeconomics: Cross-Country Estimates of Tax Rates on Factor Incomes and Consumption.” Journal of Monetary Economics 34, 297–327.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mundlak, Y. (1978): “On the Pooling of Time Series and Cross-Section Data.” Econometrica 46, 69–85.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oates, W. E. (1972). Fiscal Federalism, Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.

  • Perry, J. (1989). “A Fiscal History of Canada.” Canadian Tax Paper, 85, Canadian Tax Foundation.

  • Reschovsky, A. (1980). “An Evaluation of Metropolitan Area Tax Base Sharing.” National Tax Journal 33, 55–66.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smart, M. (1998). “Taxation Incentives and Deadweight Loss in a System of Intergovernmental Transfers.” Canadian Journal of Economics 31, 189–206.

    Google Scholar 

  • Staiger, D. and J. H. Stock. (1997). “Instrumental Variables Regression with Weak Instruments.” Econometrica 65, 557–586.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tiebout, C. M. (1956). “A Pure Theory of Local Expenditures.” Journal of Political Economy 64, 416–424.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wildasin, D. E. (1991). “Income Redistribution in a Common Labor Market.” American Economic Review 81, 757–774.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, J. (1999). “Theories of Tax Competition.” National Tax Journal 52, 269–304.

    Google Scholar 

  • Winer, S. and D. Gauthier. (1982). “Internal Migration and Fiscal Structure.” Study prepared for the Economic Council of Canada, Ottawa.

  • Zodrow, G. R. and P. Mieszkowsky. (1986). “Pigou, Tiebout, Property Taxation, and the Underprovision of Local Public Goods.” Journal of Urban Economics 19, 356–370.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Albert Solé-Ollé.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Esteller-Moré, A., Solé-Ollé, A. Tax Setting in a Federal System: The Case of Personal Income Taxation in Canada. International Tax and Public Finance 9, 235–257 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1016212110137

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1016212110137

Navigation