Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Plant-specific promoter sequences carry elements that are recognised by the eubacterial transcription machinery

  • Published:
Transgenic Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

During evolution the promoter elements from prokaryotes and eukaryotes have developed differently with regard to their sequence and structure, implying that in general a transfer of eukaryotic promoter sequences into prokaryotes will not cause an efficient gene expression. However, there have been reports on the functionality of the 35S promoter from cauliflower mosaic virus (CaMV) in bacteria. We therefore decided to experimentally investigate the capability of plant promoter sequences to direct gene expression in various bacteria. Accordingly, we tested ten different plant-specific promoters from Solanum tuberosum, Nicotiana tabacum, CaMV, Agrobacterium tumefaciens, and A. rhizogenes for their ability to initiate transcription in five different eubacterial species (Escherichia coli, Yersinia enterocolitica, A. tumefaciens, Pseudomonas putida, and Acinetobacter sp. BD413). To monitor the strength of the plant-specific promoters in bacteria we created fusions between these promoters and the coding region of the luciferase genes from Vibrio harveyi and measured the luminescence in the bacteria. Heterologous gene expression was observed in 50% of the combinations analysed. We then mapped the transcription start site caused by one of the plant-specific promoters, the ST-LS1 promoter from S. tuberosum, in these bacterial species. The location of the mapped transcription start site indicated that the sequences of the plant promoter themselves were recognised by the bacterial transcription apparatus. The recognition of plant-specific promoter sequences by the bacterial RNA polymerase was further confirmed by site-directed mutagenesis of the ST-LS1 promoter and the analysis of the effects of the mutations on the strength of gene expression in E. coli. Using these mutants in our reporter assays we could localise the sequences of the ST-LS1 promoter serving as –10 region in E. coli. The results of our study show that promoter sequences are much less specific than is generally assumed. This is of great importance for our knowledge about the evolution of gene expression systems and for the construction of optimised expression vectors.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Allison LA, Moyle M, Shales M and Ingles J (1985) Extensive homology among the largest subunits of eukaryotic and prokaryotic RNA polymerases. Cell 42: 599–610.

    Google Scholar 

  • Artiguenave F, Vilaginès R and Danglot C (1997) High-efficiency transposon mutagenesis by electroporation of a Pseudomonas fluorescens strain. FEMS Microbiol Lett 153: 363–369.

    Google Scholar 

  • Assaad FF and Signer ER (1990) Cauliflower mosaic virus P35S promoter activity in Escherichia coli. Mol Gen Genet 223: 517–520.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baker C and Ziff E (1981) Promoters and heterogeneous 5′ termini of the mRNAs of adenovirus serotype 2. J Mol Biol 149: 189–221.

    Google Scholar 

  • Becker J, Siegert H, Logemann J and Schell J (1994) Begleitende Sicherheitsforschung zur Freisetzung gentechnisch veränderter Petunien. In: Bundesministerium für Forschung und Technik (ed.), Biologische Sicherheit, Forschung Biotechnologie. Band 3 (pp. 563–578).

  • Barik S (1996) Site-directed mutagenesis in vitro by megaprimer PCR. In: Trower MK (ed.), in vitro Mutagenesis Protocols. Vol. 57 (pp. 203–215) Humana Press, Totowa, New Jersey.

    Google Scholar 

  • Benoist C, O'Hare K, Breathnach R and Chambon P (1980) The ovalbumin genesequence of putative control regions. Nucl Acids Res 8: 127–142.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beringer JE (1974) R factor transfer in Rhizobium leguminosarum. J Gen Microbiol 84: 188–198.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bertolla F and Simonet P (1999) Horizontal gene transfers in the environment: natural transformation as a putative process for gene transfers between transgenic plants and microorganisms. Res Microbiol 150: 375–384.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bertolla F, Pepin R, Passelegue-Robe E, Paget E, Simkin A, Nesme X et al. (2000) Plant genome complexity may be a factor limiting in situ the transfer of transgenic plant genes to the phytopathogen Ralstonia solanacearum. Appl Environ Microbiol 66: 4161–4167.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bevan M (1984) Binary Agrobacterium vectors for plant transformation. Nucl Acids Res 12: 8711–8721.

    Google Scholar 

  • Broer I, Dröge-Laser W and Gerke M (1996) Examination of the putative horizontal gene transfer from transgenic plants to Agrobacteria. In: Schmidt ER and Hankeln T (eds), Transgenic Organism and Biosafety, Horizontal Gene Transfer, Stability of DNA and Expression of Transgenes (pp 66–70).

  • Brosius J (1984) Plasmid vectors for the selection of promoters. Gene 27: 151–160.

    Google Scholar 

  • Corden J, Wasylyk B, Buchwalder A, Sassone-Corsi P, Kedinger C and Chambon P (1980) Promoter sequences of eukaryotic protein-coding genes. Science 209: 1406–1414.

    Google Scholar 

  • Corden C, Cadena DL, Ahearn JM and Dahmus ME (1985) A unique structure at the carboxy terminus of the largest subunit of eukaryotic RNA polymerase II. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 82: 7934–7938.

    Google Scholar 

  • De Lorenzo V, Herrero M, Jakubzik U and Timmis KN (1990) Mini-Tn5 transposon derivatives for insertion mutagenesis, promoter probing, and chromosomal insertion of cloned DNA in gram-negative eubacteria. J Bacteriol 172: 6568–6572.

    Google Scholar 

  • De Vries J and Wackernagel W (1998) Detection of nptII (kanamycin resistance) genes in genomes of transgenic plants by marker-rescue transformation. Mol Gen Genet 257: 606–613.

    Google Scholar 

  • De Vries J, Meier P and Wackernagel W (2001) The natural transformation of the soil bacteria Pseudomonas stutzeri and Acinetobacter sp. by transgenic plant DNA strictly depends on homologous sequences in the recipient cells. FEMS Microbio Lett 195: 211–215.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eckes P, Rosahl S, Schell J and Willmitzer L (1986) Isolation and characterisation of a light-inducible, organ-specific gene from potato and analysis of its expression after tagging and transfer into tobacco and potato shoots. Mol Gen Genet 205: 14–22.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fassler JS and Gussin GN (1996) Promoters and basal transcription machinery in eubacteria and eukaryotes: concepts, definitions, and analogies. Meth Enzymol 273: 3–29.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gebhard F and Smalla K (1998) Transformation of Acinetobacter sp. strain BD413 by transgenic sugar beet DNA. Appl Environ Microbiol 64: 1550–1554.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gelvin SB, Gordon MP, Nester EW and Aronson AI (1981) Transcription of the Agrobacterium Ti plasmid in the bacterium and in crown gall tumors. Plasmid 6: 17–29.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gmünder H and Kohli J (1989) Cauliflower mosaic virus promoters direct efficient expression of a bacterial G418 resistance gene in Schizosaccharomyces pombe. Mol Gen Genet 220: 95–101.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goldberg M (1978) Thesis, Stanford University.

  • Hanahan D (1983) Studies on transformation of Escherichia coli with plasmids. J Mol Biol 166: 557–580.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harley CB and Reynolds RP (1987) Analysis of E. coli promoter sequences. Nucl Acids Res 15: 2343–2361.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hawley DK and McClure WR (1983) Compilation and analysis of Escherichia coli promoter DNA sequences. Nucl Acids Res 11: 2237–2255.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hirt H, Kögl M, Murbacher T and Heberle-Bors E (1990) Evolutionary conservation of transcriptional machinery between yeast and plants as shown by the efficient expression from the CaMV 35S promoter and 35S terminator. Curr Genet 17: 473–479.

    Google Scholar 

  • Höfgen R and Willmitzer L (1990) Biochemical and genetic analysis of the different patatin isoforms expressed in various organs of potato (Solanum tuberosum). Plant Sci 66: 221–230.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hood EE, Helmer GL, Fraley RT and Chilton M-D (1986) The hypervirulence of Agrobacterium tumefaciens A281 is encoded in a region of pTiBo542 outside of T-DNA. J Bacteriol 168: 1291–1301.

    Google Scholar 

  • James P, Whelen S and Hall BD (1991) The RET1 gene of yeast encodes the second-largest subunit of RNA polymerase III. J Biol Chem 266: 5616–5624.

    Google Scholar 

  • Janssens A, Engler P, Zambryski P and Van Montagu M (1984) The nopaline C58 T-DNA is transcribed in Agrobacterium tumefaciens. Mol Gen Genet 195: 341–350.

    Google Scholar 

  • Juni E and Janik A (1969) Transformation of Acinetobacter calcoaceticus (Bacterium anitratum). J Bacteriol 98: 281–288.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kumar A, Malloch RA, Fujita N, Smillie DA, Ishihama A and Hayward RS (1993) The minus 35-recognition region of Escherichia coli sigma 70 is inessential for initiation of transcription at an ‘extended minus 10’ promoter. J Mol Biol 232: 406–418.

    Google Scholar 

  • Langer D, Hain J, Thuriaux P and Zillig W (1995) Transcription in Archaea: similarity to that in Eukarya. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 92: 5768–5772.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lewin A, Strauch E, Hertwig S, Hoffmann B, Nattermann H and Appel B (1996) Comparison of plasmids of strains of Yersinia enterocolitica Biovar 1A with the virulence plasmid of a pathogenic Y. enterocolitica strain. Zbl Bakt 285: 52–63.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lewin A, Jacob D, Freytag B and Appel B (1998) Gene expression in bacteria directed by plant-specific regulatory sequences. Trans Res 7: 403–411.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lisser S (1994) Determination of common structural features in E. coli promoters by computer analysis. Eur J Biochem 223: 823–830.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mémet S, Gouy M, Marck C, Sentenac A and Buhler JM (1988) RPA190, the gene coding for the largest subunit of yeast RNA polymerase A. J Biol Chem 263: 2830–2839.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mercer DK, Scott KP, Melville CM, Glover LA and Flint HJ (2001) Transformation of an oral bacterium via chromosomal integration of free DNA in the presence of human saliva. FEMS Microbiol Lett 200: 163–167.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mudge SR, Lewis-Henderson WR and Birch RG (1996) Comparison of Vibrio and firefly luciferases as reporter gene systems for use in bacteria and plants. Aust J Plant Physiol 23: 75–83.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nap JP, Bijovoet J and Stiekema WJ (1992) Biosafety of kanamycin-resistant transgenic plants. Transgenic Res 1: 239–249.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nielsen KM, van Weerelt MDM, Berg TN, Bones AM, Hagler AN and van Elsas JD (1997) Natural transformation and availability of transforming DNA to Acinetobacter calcoaceticus in soil microcosms. Appl Environ Microbiol 63: 1945–1952.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nielsen KM, Bones AM, Smalla K and van Elsas JD (1998) Horizontal gene transfer from transgenic plants to terrestrial bacteria–a rare event? FEMS Microbiol Rev 22: 79–103.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ozoline ON, Deev AA and Arkhipova MV (1997) Non-canonical sequence elements in the promoter structure. Cluster analysis of the promoters recognized by Escherichia coli RNA polymerase. Nucl Acids Res 25: 4703–4709.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pandolfini T, Storlazzi A, Calabria E, Defez R and Spena A (2000) The spliceosomal intron of the rolA gene of Agrobacterium rhizogenes is a prokaryotic promoter. Mol Microbiol 35: 1326–1334.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pobjecky N, Rosenberg GH, Dinter-Gottlieb G and Käufer NF (1990) Expression of the CaMV 35S promoter in Schizosaccharomyces pombe. Mol Gen Genet 220: 314–316.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pribnow D (1975a) Nucleotide sequence of an RNA polymerase binding site at an early T7 promoter. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 72: 784–788.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pribnow D (1975b) Bacteriophage T7 early promoters: nucleotide sequence of two RNA polymerase binding sites. J Mol Biol 99: 419–443.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rocha-Sosa M, Sonnewald U, Frommer W, Stratmann M, Schell J and Willmitzer L (1989) Both developmental and metabolic signals activate the promoter of class I patatin gene. EMBO J 8: 23–29.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosenberg M and Court D (1979) Regulatory sequences involved in the promotion and termination of RNA transcription. Annu Rev Genet 13: 319–353.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rüth J, Hirt H and Schweyen RJ (1992) The cauliflower mosaic virus 35S promoter is regulated by cAMP in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Mol Gen Genet 235: 365–372.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sambrook J, Fritsch EF and Maniatis T (1989) Molecular Cloning–A Laboratory Manual. 2nd edn, Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schaller H, Gray C and Herrmann K (1975) Nucleotide sequence of a RNA polymerase binding site from the DNA of bacteriophage fd. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 72: 737–741.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schlüter K, Fütterer J and Potrykus I (1995) ‘Horizontal’ gene transfer from a transgenic potato line to a bacterial pathogen (Erwinia chrysanthemii) occurs–if at all–at an extremely low frequency. Bio/Technol 13: 1094–1098.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schröder G, Klipp W, Hildebrand A, Ehring R, Koncz C and Schröder J (1983) The conserved part of the T-region in Ti-plasmids expresses four proteins in bacteria. EMBO J 2: 403–409.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schröder G, Waffenschmidt S, Weiler EW and Schröder J (1984) The T-region of Ti plasmids codes for an enzyme synthesizing indole-3-acetic acid. Eur J Biochem 138: 387–391.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sentenac A, Riva M, Thuriaux P, Buhler J-M, Treich I, Carles C et al. (1992) Yeast RNA polymerase subunits and genes. In: McKnight SL and Yamamoto KR (eds), Transcriptional Regulation. (pp. 27–54) Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press, Cold Spring Harbor, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shaw CH, Carter GH, Watson MD and Shaw CH (1984) A functional map of nopaline synthase promoter. Nucl Acids Res 12: 7831–7846.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith MW, Feng D-F and Doolittle RF (1992) Evolution by acquisition: the case for horizontal gene transfer. Trends Biochem Sci 17: 489–493.

    Google Scholar 

  • Soppa J (1999) Transcription initiation in archaea: facts, factors and future aspects. Mol Microbiol 31: 1295–1305.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sweetser D, Nonet M and Young RA (1987) Prokaryotic and eukaryotic RNA polymerases have homologous core subunits. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 84: 1192–1196.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wösten MMSM (1998) Eubacterial sigma-factors. FEMS Microbiol Rev 22: 127–150.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yano R and Nomura M (1991) Suppressor analysis of temperature-sensitive mutations of the largest subunit of RNA polymerase I in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Mol Cell Biol 11: 754–764.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yokoyama R, Hirose T, Fujii N, Aspuria ET, Kato A and Uchimiya H (1994) The rolC promoter of Agrobacterium rhizogenes Ri plasmid is activated by sucrose in transgenic tobacco plants. Mol Gen Genet 244: 15–22.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zillig W, Palm P, Langer D, Klenk HP, Lanzendörfer M, Hüdepohl U et al. (1992) RNA-polymerase and transcription in archaebacteria. Biochem Soc Symp 58: 79–88.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Robert Koch-Institut, Nordufer 20, 13353, Berlin, Germany

    Daniela Jacob, Astrid Lewin, Beate Meister & Bernd Appel

Authors
  1. Daniela Jacob
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Astrid Lewin
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Beate Meister
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Bernd Appel
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Jacob, D., Lewin, A., Meister, B. et al. Plant-specific promoter sequences carry elements that are recognised by the eubacterial transcription machinery. Transgenic Res 11, 291–303 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1015620016472

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1015620016472

Search

Navigation