Skip to main content
Log in

Artificial Neural Networks: A New Approach to Predicting Application Behavior

  • Published:
Research in Higher Education Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In this article we examine how predictive modeling can be used to study application behavior. We apply a relatively new technique, artificial neural networks, to help us predict which students are likely to apply to a large Research I institution in the Midwest. We compare the results of these new techniques to the traditional analysis tool, logistic regression modeling. The addition of artificial intelligence models is an exciting new area and this article encourages other institutional researchers to use this technique to explore the complex processes found in our educational institutions.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

REFERENCES

  • Almanac. (1997). The Chronicle of Higher Education 44: 6-7, 19.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baker, B. D., and Richards, C. E. (1999). A comparison of conventional linear regression methods and neural networks for forecasting educational spending. Economics of Education Review 18(4): 405-415.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bateman, M., and Spruill, D. (1996). Student decision-making: insights from the college choice process. College Student Journal 30: 182-186.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bruggink, T. H., and Gambhir, V. (1996). Statistical models for college admission and enrollment: a case study for a selective liberal arts college. Research in Higher Education 37(2): 221-240.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bryant, P., and Crockett, K. (1993). The admissions office goes scientific. Planning for Higher Education 22: 1-8.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carlson, S. (March 24, 2000). Neural networks may transform college planning, Chronicle of Higher Education 46: A51.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chapman, D. W. (1981). A model of student college choice. Journal of Higher Education 52(5): 490-505.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cybenko, G. (1989). Approximation by superpositions of a sigmoid function. Mathematical Control Signals Systems 2: 303-314.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dehne, G. C. (1994). Reinventing student recruitment. Trusteeship 2(3): 11-15.

    Google Scholar 

  • DesJardins, S. L., Dundar, H., and Hendel, D. D. (1999). Modeling the college application decision process in a land-grant university. Economics of Education Review 18: 117-132.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dey, E. L., Astin, A. W., and Korn, W. S. (1991). The American Freshman: Twenty-Five Year Trends, 1966-1990. Los Angeles: Higher Education Research Institute, UCLA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Etheridge, H. L., Sriram, R. S., and Hsu, H. Y. K. (Spring 2000). A comparison of selected artificial neural networks that help auditors evaluate client financial viability. Decision Sciences 31(2): 531-549.

    Google Scholar 

  • Freeman, H. B. (1984). Impact of no-need scholarships on the matriculating decision of academically talented students. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Association of Higher Education, Chicago.

  • Galotti, K. M., and Mark, M. C. (1994). How do high school students structure an important life decision? A short-term longitudinal study of the college decision-making process. Research in Higher Education 17: 589-607.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ganderton, P. T. (1992). The effect of subsidies in kind on the choice of college. The Journal of Public Economics 48: 269-292.

    Google Scholar 

  • Garson, G. D. (1998). Neural Networks: An Introductory Guide for Social Scientists. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goyette, K. (1999). Application to college: A comparison of Asian American and White high school students. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Montreal (ED432 623).

  • Hamrick, F., and Hossler, H. (1996). Diverse information-gathering methods in the post secondary decision-making process. Review of Higher Education 19: 179-198.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hearn, J. (1984). The relative roles of academic ascribed and socioeconomic characteristics in college destinations. Sociology of Education 57: 22-30.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hecht-Nielsen, R. (1990). Neurocomputing. Reading, MA: Addision-Wesley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hosmer, D. W., and Lemeshow, S. (1989). Applied Regression Analysis. New York: John Wiley and Sons.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hossler, D., Braxton, J., and Coopersmith, G. (1989). Understanding student college choice. In J. C. Smart (ed.), Higher Education: Handbook of Theory and Research, Vol. 5, pp. 231-288. New York: Agathon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hossler, D., and Gallagher, K. S. (1987). Studying student college choice: a three-phase model and the implications for policymakers. College and University 2: 207-221.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hossler, D., Schmit, J., and Vesper, N. (1999). Going to College: How Social, Economic, and Educational Factors Influence the Decisions Students Make. Baltimore: The Johns Hopkins University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hung, M. S., Hu, M. Y., Patuwo, B. E., and Shanker, M. (1996). Estimating posterior probabilities in classification problems with neural networks. International Journal of Computational Intelligence and Organizations 1: 49-60.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ihlanfeldt, W. (1980). Achieving Optimal Enrollments and Tuition Revenues. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kitano, H. H. L., and Daniels, R. (1988). Asian Americans: Emerging Minorities. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kohn, M. G., Manski, C. F., and Mundel, D. S. (1976). An empirical investigation of factors which influence college going behavior. Annals of Economic and Social Measurement 5(4): 391-418.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kolstad, A. J. (1979). The influence of high school type and curriculum on enrollment in higher education and postsecondary training. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, San Francisco (ED 173627).

  • Kuan, C., and White, H. (1994). Artificial neural networks: an econometric perspective. Econometric Reviews 13(1): 1-91.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lee, T., White, H., and Granger, Clive W. J. (1993). Testing for neglected nonlinearity in time series models: a comparison of neural network methods and alternative tests. Journal of Econometrics 56(3): 269-291.

    Google Scholar 

  • Litten, L. H. (1982). Different strokes in the applicant pool: some refinements in a model of student college choice. Journal of Higher Education 53(4): 383-402.

    Google Scholar 

  • Litten, L. H., Sullivan, D., and Brodigan, D. L. (1983). Applying Market Research in College Admissions. New York: College Entrance Examination Board.

    Google Scholar 

  • Manski, C. F., and Wise, D. A. (1983). College Choice in America. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • McDonough, P. M. (1994). Buying and selling in higher education: the social construction of the college applicant. Journal of Higher Education 65(4): 427-446.

    Google Scholar 

  • McLanahan, S., and Sandefur, G. (1994). Growing Up with a Single Parent: What Hurts, What Helps. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Melia, P., and Goodman, M. (1988). Controlling demographic impacts. College and University 64: 51-63.

    Google Scholar 

  • Min, P. (1988). The Korean Family. In C. H. Mindel, R. W. Habenstein, and R. Wright Jr. (eds.), Ethnic Families in America: Patterns and Variations, pp. 199-299. New York: Elsevier.

    Google Scholar 

  • Patuwo, B. E., Hu, M. Y., and Hung, M. S. (1993). Two group classification using neural networks. Decision Sciences 24(4): 825-845.

    Google Scholar 

  • Paulsen, M. B. (1990). College choice: understanding student enrollment behavior. ERIC Digest 6. Washington, DC: ASHE-ERIC Higher Education Reports.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rainsford, G. N. (1985). Enrollment management: a president's perspective. College and University 60: 336-344.

    Google Scholar 

  • Richard, M. D., and Lippman, R. P. (1991). Neural network classifiers estimate Baysesian a posterior probabilities. Neural Computation 3: 461-483.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rumelhart, D. E., Hinton, G. E., and Williams, R. J. (1986). Learning internal representations by error propagation. In D. E. Rumelhart, and J. L. Williams (eds.), Parallel Distributed Processing: Explorations in the Microstructure of Cognition. Cambridge: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sanoff, A. P. (1994). Admissions deans on hot seat. U.S. News and World Report 117: 98-101.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sevier, R. A. (1992). Is demography destiny? Journal of College Admissions 135: 13-22.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shea, C. (1994). A flood of applications. Chronicle of Higher Education 40: A31-A32.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stanton-Salazar, R. D., and Dornbusch, S. M. (1995). Social capital in the reproduction of inequality: Information networks among Mexican-origin high school students. Sociology of Education 68: 116-135.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weiler, W. C. (1994). Transition from consideration of college to the decision to apply. Research in Higher Education 35(6): 631-646.

    Google Scholar 

  • Welki, A. M., and Navratil, F. J. (1987). The role of applicants' perceptions in the choice of college. College and University Winter: 147-160.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Stephen L. DesJardins.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

González, J.M.B., DesJardins, S.L. Artificial Neural Networks: A New Approach to Predicting Application Behavior. Research in Higher Education 43, 235–258 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1014423925000

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1014423925000

Navigation