Skip to main content
Log in

An Informal Sketch of a Formal Architecture for Construction Grammar

  • Published:
Grammars

Abstract

A formal architecture for Construction Grammar (CG) is sketched. Modeling domain objects (constructs) are constituent structures with feature structures at the nodes, aka Feature Structure Trees (FTs). Constructions are partial descriptions of FTs, expressed as sets of constituent structure equations and path equations. Unification of constructions is defined. A construct c is licensed by a grammar G iff G contains a set of constructions whose unification fully describes c.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Andrews A. and C. C. Manning. Information-spreading and levels of representation, CSLI Report 93–176, 1993.

  • Copestake A., D. Flickinger, R. Malouf, S. Riehemann and I. A. Sag. Translation using Minimal Recursion Semantics. In Proceedings of the Sixth International Conference on Theoretical and Methodological Issues in Machine Translation (TMI-95), Leuven, Belgium, 1995.

  • Copestake A., D. Flickinger, I. A. Sag and C. J. Pollard. Minimal Recursion Semantics: An introduction. ms. Stanford: Center for the Study of Language and Information, 1999.

    Google Scholar 

  • Culicover P. W. and R. Jackendoff. Semantic Subordination despite Syntactic Coordination, Linguistic Inquiry, 28(2): 195–217, 1997.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fillmore C. J. Inversion and constructional inheritance. In G. Webelhuth, J.-P. Koenig and A. Kathol, editors, Lexical and Constructional Aspects of Linguistic Explanation, volume 1 of Studies in Constraint-Based Lexicalism, 113–128, CSLI Publications, Stanford, 1998.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fillmore C. J., P. Kay, A. Kathol and L. Michaelis. Construction Grammar, CSLI Publications, Stanford, forthcoming.

  • Fillmore C. J., P. Kay and M. C. OConnor. Regularity and idiomaticity in grammatical constructions: The case of let alone, Language, 64(3): 501–538, 1988.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goldberg A. E. Constructions, University of Chicago Press, Chicago and London, 1995.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haegeman L. Non-overt subjects in diary contexts. In J. Mascaró and M. Nespor, editors, Grammar in progress, John Benjamins, Amsterdam, 1990.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jackendoff R. Twistin' the night away, Language, 73(3): 534–559, 1997.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaplan R. The formal architecture of Lexical Functional Grammar. In M. Dalrymple, R. Kaplan, J. Maxwell III and A. Zaenen, editors, Formal Issues in Lexical-Functional Grammar, 7–27, CSLI Publications, Stanford, 1995.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaplan R. and J. Bresnan. Lexical Functional Grammar: A formal system for grammatical representation. In The Mental Representation of Grammatical Relations, 173–281, MIT Press, Cambridge, 1982. Also appeared in T. M. Dalrymple et al., Formal Issues in Lexical-Functional Grammar, 29-130, CSLI Publications, Stanford, 1995.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kathol A. Concrete minimalism of German. In F.-J. d'Avis and U. Lutz, editors, Zur Satzstruktur des Deutschen, number 90 in Arbeitsberichte des SFB 340, 81–106, SFB 340, Tübingen/Stuttgart, 1997.

  • Kathol A. Linear Syntax, Oxford University Press, Oxford, 2000.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kay P. Construction Grammar. In J. Verschueren, J.-O. Östman and J. Blommaert, editors, Handbook of Pragmatics, John Benjamins, Amsterdam, 1995.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kay P. and C. J. Fillmore. Grammatical constructions and linguistic generalizations: The What's x doing y? construction, Language, 75(1): 1–33, 1999.

    Google Scholar 

  • Koenig J.-P. A. Lexical underspecification and the syntax/semantics interface. Ph. D. dissertation, University of California, Berkeley, Department of Linguistics, 1994.

    Google Scholar 

  • Koenig J.-P. A. Mapping constructions as word-templates: Evidence from French. In C. Burgess, K. Dziwirek and D. Gerdts, editors, Grammatical Relations: Theoretical Approaches to Empirical Questions, 249–270, CSLI Publications, Stanford, 1995.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lambrecht K. What, me, worry?: Mad Magazine sentences revisited. In Proceedings of the Sixteenth Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society, 215–229, 1990.

  • Malouf R. A constructional approach to English verbal gerunds. In Proceedings of the Twenty-Second Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society, 255–266, 1996.

  • Michaelis L. A. and K. Lambrecht. Toward a construction-based theory of language function: The case of nominal extraposition, Language, 72(2): 215–247, 1996.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pollard C. J. and I. A. Sag. Information-based Syntax and Semantics, Vol. 1, CSLI Lecture Notes Series No. 13, CSLI Publications, Stanford, 1987.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pollard C. J. and I. A. Sag. Head-Driven Phrase Structure Grammar, University of Chicago Press and Stanford, CSLI Publications, Chicago, 1994.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pullum G. K. What's a sentence like this doing showing up in English? York Papers in Linguistics, 3: 113–115, 1973.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rizzi L. Some notes on linguistic theory and language development: The case of root infinitives. Language Acquisition, 3: 371–393, 1994.

    Google Scholar 

  • L. Rizzi. The fine structure of the left periphery. In L. Haegeman, editor, Elements of Grammar: A Handbook of Generative Syntax, Kluwer, Dordrecht, 1997.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ruwet N. Le datif épistémique en français et la Condition d'opacité de Chomsky. In Grammaire des insultes et autres études, 172–204, Seuil, Paris, 1982.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sag I. A. English relative clause constructions, Journal of Linguistics, 33(2): 431–484, 1997.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shieber S. Constraint-Based Grammar Formalisms, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, 1992.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Kay, P. An Informal Sketch of a Formal Architecture for Construction Grammar. Grammars 5, 1–19 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1014293330198

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1014293330198

Navigation