Abstract
Aims of this study were to evaluate: (1) whether upper gastrointestinal endoscopy (UGE) is used appropriately according to the American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ASGE) and British Society of Gastroenterology (BSG) guidelines in a hospital setting and (2) whether there is any relationship between appropriateness of UGE and the presence of lesions detected by endoscopy. %Indications and endoscopic findings for 734 consecutive UGE performed in 697 inpatients were retrospectively evaluated using ASGE and BSG guidelines to determine appropriateness of referrals. UGE showing endoscopic findings that had direct therapeutic or prognostic consequences were classified as “positive”; the other UGEs were classified as “negative.” In all, 46% of UGEs were “positive,” 54% “negative,” and 61.7% and 23.2% of UGEs were inappropriate according to ASGE and BSG guidelines, respectively (P < 0.001). The probability of finding a positive endoscopy was significantly higher in UGE rated as appropriate than in those rated as inappropriate on the basis of ASGE guidelines (P < 0.001), but not on the basis of BSG guidelines. Endoscopies rated as inappropriate according to ASGE and BSG criteria showed a positive finding in 37.3% and 42.3% of cases, respectively (not significant difference). Multivariate analysis showed that the positive finding is directly related to age (P < 0.05), male gender (P < 0.001), prior UGE (P < 0.05), hematemesis (P < 0.001), and inversely related with upper abdominal pain (P < 0.01) and dyspepsia (P < 0.05). In hospitalized patients, UGE is frequently used for inappropriate indications, according to both ASGE and BSG guidelines. However, the actual clinical usefulness of appropriateness criteria, such as those proposed by ASGE and BSG, is questionable, as their strict observance could lead to missing a large number of significant endoscopic findings.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Baillie J: Complications of endoscopy. Endoscopy 26:185–203, 1994
Hart R, Classen M: Complications of diagnostic gastrointestinal endoscopy. Endoscopy 22:229–233, 1990
American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy. Appropriate Use of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy. Manchester. Massachusetts, ASGE, 1992, pp 6–8
American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy. The role of endoscopy in the management of GERD: Guidelines for clinical application. Gastrointest Endosc 49:834–835, 1999
Axon ATR, Bell GD, Jones RH, Quine MA, McCloy RF. Guidelines on appropriate indications for upper gastrointestinal endoscopy. BMJ 310:853–856, 1995
Colin-Jones DG. Management of dyspepsia: Report of a working party. Lancet 1:576–579, 1988
Health and Public Policy Committee, American College of Physicians: Endoscopy in the evaluation of dyspepsia. Ann Intern Med 102:266–269, 1985
Bramble MG: Open access endoscopy–a nationwide survey of current practice. Gut 33:282–285, 1992
Charles RJ, Chak A, Cooper GS, Wong RC, Sivak MV Jr: Use of open access in GI endoscopy at an academic medical center. Gastrointest Endosc 50:480–485, 1999
Gonvers J-J, Burnand B, Froehlich F, Pache I, Thorens J, Fried M. Kosecoff J, Vader J-P, Brook RH: Appropriateness and diagnostic yield of upper gastrointestinal endoscopy in an open-access endoscopy unit. Endoscopy 28:661–666, 1996
Mahajan RJ, Marshall JB: Prevalence of open-access gastrointestinal endoscopy in the United States. Gastrointest Endosc 46:21–26, 1997
Minoli G, Prada A, Gambetta G, Formenti A, Schalling R, Lai L, Pera A: The ASGE guidelines for the appropriate use of upper gastrointestinal endoscopy in an open access system. Gastrointest Endosc 42:387–389, 1995
Zuccaro G Jr, Provencher K: Does an open access system properly utilize endoscopic resources? Gastrointest Endosc 46:15–20, 1997
Pazzi P, Scagliarini R, Felletti Spadazzi A, Trevisani L: Appropriate use and diagnostic yield of upper gastrointestinal endoscopy: A hospital-based study. 1999 ASGE Meeting, May 16- 19, Orlando, Florida. Gastrointest Endosc 49:AB147, 1999
Kahn KL, Kosecoff J, Chassin MR, Solomon DH, Brook RH: The use and misuse of upper gastrointestinal endoscopy. Ann Intern Med 109:664–670, 1988
Quine MA, Bell GD, McCloy RF, Devlin HB, Hopkins A: Appropriate use of upper gastrointestinal endoscopy-a prospective audit. Gut 35:1209–1214, 1994
Cooper GS, Blades EW: Indications, contraindications, and complications of upper gastrointestinal endoscopy. In,MV Sivak, Jr (ed). Gastroenterologic Endoscopy; 2nd ed. CDROM London; WB Saunders, Company; 1999
Naji SA, Brunt PW, Hagen S, Mowat NAG, Russell IT, Sinclair TS, Tang TMH: Improving the selection of patients for upper gastrointestinal endoscopy. Gut 34:187–191, 1993
Froehlich F, Burnand B, Vader J-P, Gonvers J-J: Endoscopies: Too many and not enough. Endoscopy 29:652–654, 1997
Froehlich F, Pache I, Burnand B, Vader JP, Fried M, Kosecoff J, Kolodny M, DuBois RW, Brook RH, Gonvers JJ: Underutilization of upper gastrointestinal endoscopy. Gastroenterology 112:690–697, 1997
Froehlich F, Burnand B, Pache I, Vader JP, Fried M, Schneider C, Kosecoff J, Kolodny M, DuBois RW, Brook RH, Gonvers JJ: Overuse of upper gastrointestinal endoscopy in a country with open-access endoscopy: a prospective study in primary care. Gastrointest Endosc 45:13–19, 1997
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Trevisani, L., Sartori, S., Gilli, G. et al. Appropriateness of Upper Gastrointestinal Endoscopy: A Hospital-Based Study. Dig Dis Sci 46, 2695–2699 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1012775429096
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1012775429096