Skip to main content
Log in

How Many, And Which, Plants Will Invade Natural Areas?

  • Published:
Biological Invasions Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Of established nonindigenous plant species in California, Florida, and Tennessee, 5.8%, 9.7%, and 13.4%, respectively, invade natural areas according to designations tabulated by state Exotic Pest Plant Councils. Only Florida accords strictly with the tens rule, though California and Tennessee fall within the range loosely viewed as obeying the rule. The species that invaded natural areas in each state were likely, if they invaded either of the other states at all, to have invaded natural areas there. There was a detectable but inconsistent tendency for species that invade natural areas to come from particular families. At the genus level in California and Florida, and the family level in California, there was also a tendency for natural area invaders to come from taxa that were not represented in the native flora. All three of the above patterns deserve further studies to determine management implications. Only the first (that natural area invaders of one state are likely to invade natural areas if they invade another state) seems firm enough from our data to suggest actions on the part of managers.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Bennett PM andOwens IPF (1997) Variation in extinction risk among birds: Chance or evolutionary predisposition? Proceedings of the Royal Society of London, Series B 264: 401-408

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • California Exotic Pest Plant Council (1996) Recovered from http://www.caeppc.org/info/pestplants96.html in January 1999

  • California Exotic Pest Plant Council (1999) The CalEPPC List: Exotic Pest Plants of Greatest Ecological Concern in California, California Exotic Pest Plant Council, San Juan Capistrano, California

    Google Scholar 

  • Daehler CC (1998) The taxonomic distribution of invasive angiosperm plants: Ecological insights and comparison to agricultural weeds. Biological Conservation 84: 167-180

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Daehler CC andStrong DR (1993) Prediction and biological invasions. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 8: 380

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Elton C (1958) The Ecology of Invasions by Animals and Plants. Methuen, London

  • Florida Exotic Pest Plant Council (1996) Recovered from http://www.fleppc.org/Plant list/list.htm in January 1999

  • Fox MD andFox BJ (1986) The susceptibility of natural communities to invasion. In: Groves RH andBurdon JJ (eds) Ecology of Biological Invasions, pp 57-66. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Gordon DR andThomas KP (1996) Florida's invasion by nonidigenous plants: history, screening and regulation. In: Simberloff D,Schmitz DC andBrown TC (eds) Strangers in Paradise, pp 21-38. Island Press, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  • Hickman JC (1993) The Jepson manual: higher plants of California. University of California Press, Berkeley, California aiKillefer S (1997) Recovered from http://webriver.com/tn-eppc/ exlist.htm in January 1999

    Google Scholar 

  • Lockwood JL (1999) Using taxonomy to predict success among introduced avifauna: relative importance of transport and establishment. Conservation Biology 13(3): 560-567

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lockwood JL,Moulton MP andAnderson SK (1993) Morphological assortment and the assembly of communities of introduced passeriforms on oceanic islands: Tahiti versus Oahu. American Naturalist 141(3): 398-408

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lockwood JL,Brooks TM andMcKinney ML (2000) The taxonomic homogenization of the global avifauna. Animal Conservation 3: 27-35

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nilsson G (1981) The Bird Business: A Study of the Commercial Cage Bird Trade. Animal Welfare Institute, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  • Raup DM (1975) Taxonomic diversity estimation using rarefaction. Paleobiology 1: 333-342

    Google Scholar 

  • Reichard SE (1997) Prevention of invasive plant introduction on national and local levels. In: Luken JO andThieret JW (eds) Assessment and Management of Plant Invasions, pp 215-227. Springer, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Reichard SE andHamilton CW (1997) Predicting invasions ofwoody plants introduced into North America. Conservation Biology 11: 193-203

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Richardson DM (1996) What attributes make some plant species more invasive. Ecology 77: 1655-1661

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rice WR (1989) Analyzing tables of statistical tests. Evolution 43: 223-225

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scott JK andPanetta FD (1993) Predicting the Australian weed status of southern African plants. Journal of Biogeography 20: 87-93

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Simberloff D (1996) Impacts of introduced species in the United States. Consequences 2(2): 13-24

    Google Scholar 

  • Simberloff D andBoecklen W (1991) Patterns of extinction in the introduced Hawaiian avifauna: a reexamination of the role of competition. American Naturalist 138: 300-327

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wofford BE andKral R (1993) Checklist of the Vascular Plants of Tennessee. Sida, Botanical Miscellany No. 10. Botanical Research Institute of Texas, Fort Worth, Texas

    Google Scholar 

  • Williamson M (1996) Biological Invasions. Chapman & Hall, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Williamson M andBrown KC (1986) The analysis and modeling of British invasions. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London, Series B 314: 505-520

    Google Scholar 

  • Williamson M andFitter A (1996) The characters of successful invaders. Biological Conservation 78: 163-170

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wunderlin RP (1997) A Guide to the Vascular Plants of Florida. University of Florida Press, Gainesville, Florida

    Google Scholar 

  • Zar JH (1996) Biostatistical Analysis, 3rd edn. Prentice-Hall, Upper Saddle River, New Jersey

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Julie L. Lockwood.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Lockwood, J.L., Simberloff, D., McKinney, M.L. et al. How Many, And Which, Plants Will Invade Natural Areas?. Biological Invasions 3, 1–8 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1011412820174

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1011412820174

Navigation