Abstract
In this paper I argue that the nature of mimetic relationships remains contentious because there are insufficient data to enable full evaluation of theoretical models. There is, however, a growing appreciation of the need to draw together empirical studies to provide foundations for theoretical work. I review some recent data that considers the responses of predators to changing numbers of defended prey items and the nature of mimicry along a palatability spectrum. A simple model of predator behaviour is constructed which combines assumptions from Pavlovian learning studies with traditional ‘number dependent’ learning models. This model has two important properties. First it shows that Pavlovian assumptions can be represented in a simple model which generates interesting predictions. Second it indicates some areas that still need detailed empirical study – most importantly perhaps is the way that predators respond to prey with different levels of edibility.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Alcock, J. (1970) Punishment levels and the response of black-capped chickadees (Parus atricapillus) to three kinds of artificial seeds. Anim. Behav. 18, 592-599.
Beccaloni, G. (1997) Vertical stratification of ithomiine butterfly (Nymphalidae: Ithomiinae) mimicry complexes in Ecuador (Lepidoptera: Nymphalidae: Ithomiinae). Trop. Lepid. 8, 103-124.
Bowers, M.D. and Farley, S. (1990) The behaviour of grey jays, Perisoreus canadensis, towards palatable and unpalatable lepidoptera. Anim. Behav. 39, 699-705.
Brower, J.V.Z. (1958) Experimental studies of mimicry in some North American butterflies. I. The monarch Danaus plexippus and viceroy Limenitis archippus archippus. Evolution 12, 32-47.
Brower, L.P., Brower, J.V.Z. and Collins, C. T. (1963) Experimental studies of mimicry. 7. Relative palatability and Müllerian mimicry among neotropical butterflies of the subfamily Heliconiinae. Zoologica 48, 65-84.
Endler, J.A. (1991) Interactions between predators and prey. In: J.R. Krebs and N.B. Davies (eds) Behavioural Ecology. Blackwell Scientific, Oxford, pp. 169-196.
Gavrilets, S. and Hastings, A. (1998) Coevolutionary chase in two-species systems with applications to mimicry. J. Theor. Biol. 191, 415-427.
Gittleman, J.L., Harvey, P.H. and Greenwood, P.J. (1980) The evolution of conspicuous colouration: some experiments in bad taste. Anim. Behav. 28, 879-899.
Grieg-Smith, P.W. (1987) Aversions of starlings and sparrows to unfamiliar, unexpected or unusual flavours and colours in food. Ethology 74, 155-163.
Huheey, J.E. (1976) Studies in warning coloration and mimicry. VII. Evolutionary consequences of Batesian-Müllerian spectrum: a model for Müllerian mimicry. Evolution 30, 86-93.
Huheey, J.E. (1988) Mathematical models of mimicry. Amer. Nat. 131,Suppl. S22-S41.
Joron, M. and Mallet, J. (1998) Diversity in mimicry: paradox or paradigm. Trends Ecol. Evol. 13, 461-466.
Joron, M., Wynne, I.R., Lamas, G. and Mallet, J. (2001) Variable selection and the coexistence of multiple mimetic forms in Heliconius numata. Evol. Ecol. (this issue)
Lea, G. and Turner, J.R.G. (1971) Experiments on mimicry. II. The effect of a Batesian mimic on its model. Behaviour 42, 131-151.
Lindström, L., Alatalo, R., Lyytinen and Mappes, J. (2000). New rare aposematic prey suffers from predation. In Lindström, L. Evolution of conspicuous signals. Biological Research Reports from the University of Jyvaskyla, 81.
MacDougall, A. and Dawkins, M.S. (1998) Predator discrimination error and the benefits of Müllerian mimicry. Anim. Behav. 55, 1281-1288.
Mallet, J. and Joron, M. (1999) The evolution of diversity in warning colour and mimicry. Ann. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 30, 201-233.
Morrell, G.M. and Turner, J.R.G. (1970) Experiments on mimicry. I. The responses of wild birds to artificial prey. Behaviour 36, 116-130.
Müller, F. (1879) Ituna and Thyridia; a remarkable case of mimicry in butterflies. Trans. Meloda, R. Entomol. Soc. Lond. xx-xxix.
Owen, R.E. and Owen, A.R.G. (1984) Mathematical paradigms for mimicry: recurrent sampling. J. Theoret. Biol. 109, 217-247.
Pearce, J.M. and Hall, G. (1980) A model for Pavlovian learning: variations in the effectiveness of conditioned but not of unconditioned stimuli. Psych. Rev. 87, 532-552.
Platt, A.P., Coppinger, R.P. and Brower, L.P. (1971) Demonstration of the selective advantage of mimetic limenitis butterflies presented to caged avian predators. Evolution 25, 692-701.
Rescorla, R.A. and Wagner, A.R. (1972) A theory of Pavlovian conditioning: variations in the effectiveness of reinforcement and nonreinforcement. In A.H. Black and W.F. Prokasy (eds) Classical Conditioning II: Current Research and Theory. Appleton-Century-Crofts, New York, p. 64.
Rowell-Rahier, M., Pasteels, J.M., Alonso-Mejia, A. and Brower, L.P. (1995) Relative unpalatability of leaf beetles with either biosynthesized or sequesteres chemical defence. Anim. Behav. 49, 709-714.
Sargent, T.D. (1995) On the relative acceptabilities of local butterflies and moths to local birds. J. Lepid. Soc. 49, 148-162.
Sheppard, P.M. (1975) Natural Selection and Heredity. London: Longman.
Speed, M.P. (1990) Mimicry and the psychology of predation. Ph.D. Thesis, The University of Leeds.
Speed, M.P. (1993) Muellerian mimicry and the psychology of predation. Anim. Behav. 45, 571-580.
Speed, M.P. (1999). Robot predators in virtual ecologies: the importance of memory in mimicry studies. Anim. Behav. 57, 203-213.
Speed, M.P. and Turner J.R.G. (1999) Learning and memory in mimicry: II. Do we understand the mimicry spectrum? Biol. J. Linn. Soc. 67, 281-312.
Speed, M.P., Alderson, N.J., Hardman, C. and Ruxton, G.D. (2000) Testing Müllerian mimicry: an experiment with wild birds. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 267, 725-731.
Srygley, R.B. and Kingsolver, J.G. (1998) Red-wing blackbird reproductive behaviour and the palatability, flight performance and morphology of temperate pierid butterflies (Colias, Pieris and Pontia). Biol. J. Linn. Soc. 64, 41-55.
Swynnerton, C.F.M. (1915) A brief preliminary statement of a few of the results of five years' special testing of the theories of mimicry. Proc. Entomol. Soc. Lond. I, xxxii-xliv.
Turner J.R.G., Kearney, E. P. and Exton L.S. (1984) Mimicry and the Monte Carlo predator: the palatability spectrum and the origins of mimicry. Biol. J. Linn. Soc. 23, 247-268.
Turner, J.R.G. (1971) Studies of Müllerian mimicry and its evolution in burnet moths and heliconid butterflies. In E.R. Creed (ed.) Ecological Genetics and Evolution, Blackwell, Oxford, pp. 224-260.
Turner J.R.G. (1984) Mimicry: the palatability spectrum and its consequences. In R.I. Vane-Wright and P.R. Ackery (eds) The Biology of Butterflies. 11 in Symposia of the Royal Entomological Society of London. Academic Press, London, pp. 141-161.
Turner, J.R.G. (1987) The evolutionary dynamics of batesian and muellerian mimicry: similarities and differences. Ecol. Entomol. 12, 81-95.
Yosef, R. and Whitman, D.W. (1992) Predator exaptations and defensive adaptations in evolutionary balance: no defence is perfect. Evolutionary Ecology, 6, 527-536.