Skip to main content
Log in

Modeling Reputational and Informational Influences in Threshold Models of Bandwagon Innovation Diffusion

  • Published:
Computational & Mathematical Organization Theory Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Bandwagon innovation diffusion is characterized by a positive feedback loop where adoptions by some actors increase the pressure to adopt for other actors. In particular, when gains from an innovation are difficult to quantify, such as implementing quality circles or downsizing practices, diffusion is likely to occur through a bandwagon process. In this paper we extend Abrahamson and Rosenkopf&2018;s (1993) model of bandwagon diffusion to examine both reputational and informational influences on this process. We find that the distribution of reputations among the set of potential adopters affects the extent of bandwagon diffusion under conditions of moderate ambiguity, and we find that bandwagons occur even when potential adopters receive information about others&2018; unprofitable experiences with the innovation.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Abrahamson, E. (1991), "Managerial Fads and Fashions: The Diffusion and Rejection of Innovations," Academy of Management Review, 16, 586–612.

    Google Scholar 

  • Abrahamson, E. and G. Fairchild (forthcoming), "Management Fashion: Lifecycles, Triggers, and Collective Learning Processes," Administrative Science Quarterly.

  • Abrahamson, E. and C. Fombrun (1994), "Macroculture: Determinants and Consequences," Academy of Management Review, 19, 728–755.

    Google Scholar 

  • Abrahamson, E. and L. Rosenkopf (1990), "When do Bandwagon Diffusions Roll? How Far Do They Go? And When Do They Roll Backwards?: AComputer Simulation," Academy of Management Best Papers Proceedings, 50, 155–159.

    Google Scholar 

  • Abrahamson, E. and L. Rosenkopf (1993), "Institutional and Competitive Bandwagons: Using Mathematical Modeling as a Tool to Explore Innovation Diffusion," Academy of Management Review, 18, 487–517.

    Google Scholar 

  • Abrahamson, E. and L. Rosenkopf (1997), "Social Network Effects on the Extent of Innovation Diffusion: A Computer Simulation," Organization Science, 8, 289–309.

    Google Scholar 

  • Aldrich, H. (1979), Organizations and Environments. Prentice Hall Inc., Englewood Cliffs, NJ.

    Google Scholar 

  • Armour, H.O. and D.J. Teece (1978), "Organizational Structure and Economic Performance: A Test of the Multidivisional Hypothesis," Bell Journal of Economics, 10, 106–122.

    Google Scholar 

  • Arthur, W.B. (1983), "Competing Technologies and Lock-In by Historical Small Events: The Dynamics of Allocation Under Increasing Returns," Working Paper, Center for Economic Policy Research, Stanford University.

  • Banerjee, A.V. (1992), "A Simple Model of Herd Behavior," The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 3, 797–817.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baron, J.N., F.R. Dobbin, and P.D. Jennings (1986), "War and Peace: The Evolution of Modern Personnel Administration in the U.S. Industry," American Journal of Sociology, 92, 350–383.

    Google Scholar 

  • Becker, M.H. (1970), "Sociometric Location and Innovativeness: Reformulation and Extension of the Diffusion Model," American Sociological Review, 35, 267–282.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bower, J.L. and C.M. Christensen (1995), "Disruptive Technologies: Catching the Wave," Harvard Business Review, 73, 43–53.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burgelman, R.A. and B.S. Mittman (1993), "An Intraorganizational Ecological Perspective on Managerial Risk Behavior, Performance, and Survival: Individual, Organizational and Environmental Effects," in J. Baum and J. Singh (Eds.), Evolutionary Dynamics in Organizations, New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burt, R.S. (1973), "The Differential Impact of Social Integration on Participation in the Diffusion on Innovations," Social Science Research, 2, 125–144.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burt, R.S. (1980), "Innovation as a Structural Interest: Rethinking the Impact of Network Position Innovation Adoption," Social Networks, 4, 337–355.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cameron, K.S. (1998), "Strategic Organizational Downsizing: An Extreme Case," Research in Organizational Behavior, 185–230.

  • Carley, Kathleen (1991), "A Theory of Group Stability," American Sociological Review, 56(3), 331–354.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carley, Kathleen (1995), "Communication Technologies and Their Effect on Cultural Homogeneity, Consensus, and the Diffusion of New Ideas," Sociological Perspectives, 38(4), 547–571.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chandler, A. (1962), Strategy and Structure. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chatterjee, R. and J. Eliashberg (1989), "The Innovation Diffusion Process in a Heterogeneous Population: A Micromodeling Approach," Management Science, 36, 1057–1079.

    Google Scholar 

  • David, P.A. (1969), "A Contribution to the Theory of Distribution," Working Paper, Research Memorandum no. 71, Research Center in Economic Growth, Stanford University.

  • David, P.A. (1985), "Clio and the Economics of QWERTY," American Economic Review Proceedings, 75, 332–337.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davies, S. (1979), The Diffusion of Process Innovations. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davis, G.F. (1991), "Agents Without Principles?: The Spread of the Poison Pill Through the Intercorporate Network," Administrative Science Quarterly, 36, 583–613.

    Google Scholar 

  • DiMaggio, P. and W.W. Powell (1983), "The Iron Cage Revisited: Institutional Isomorphism and Collective Rationality in Organizational Fields," American Sociological Review, 48, 147–160.

    Google Scholar 

  • Farrell, J. and G. Saloner (1985), "Standardization, Compatibility and Innovation," Rand Journal of Economics, 16, 70–83.

    Google Scholar 

  • Feder, G. and G.T. O'Mara (1982), "On Information and Innovation Diffusion: A Bayesian approach," American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 64, 145–147.

    Google Scholar 

  • Festinger, L. (1954), "A Theory of Social Comparison Processes," Human Relations, 7, 114–140.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fligstein, N. (1985), "The Spread of the Multidivisional Form Among Large Firms, 1919–1979," American Sociological Review, 50, 377–391.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fudenberg, D. and J. Tirole (1983), "Learning-by-Doing and Market Performance," Bell Journal of Economics, 14, 522–530.

    Google Scholar 

  • Galaskiewicz, J. and S. Wasserman (1989), "Mimetic Processes ithin and Interorganizational Field: An Emprical Test," Administrative Science Quarterly, 34, 454–479.

    Google Scholar 

  • Granovetter, M. (1978), "Threshold Models of Collective Behavior," American Journal of Sociology, 83, 1420–1443.

    Google Scholar 

  • Katz, M.L. and C. Shapiro (1985), "Network Externalities, Competition, and Compatibility," American Economic Review, 75, 424–440.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaufer, D.S. and K.M. Carley (1993), Communication at a Distance: The Effect of Print on Socio-Cultural Organization and Change. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Hillsdale, NJ.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kimberly, J.R. (1981), "Managerial Innovation," in P.C. Nystrom and W.H. Starbuck (Eds.), Handbook of Organizational Design, Vol. 1, New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Krackhardt, David (1997), "Organizational Viscosity and the Diffusion of Controversial Innovations," Journal of Mathematical Sociology.

  • Latane, B. (1996), "Dynamic Social Impact: The Creation of Culture by Communication," Journal of Communication, 46(4), 13–25.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lattin, J.M. and J.H. Roberts (1989), "odeling the Role of Risk-Adjusted Utility in the Diffusion of Innovations," king paper 1019, Graduate School of Business, Stanford University.

  • Mansfield, E. (1961), "Technical Change and the Rate of Imitation," Econometrica, 61, 741–766.

    Google Scholar 

  • March, J.G. and J.P. Olsen (1976), Ambiguity and Choice in Organizations. Universitetsforlaget, Bergen, Norway.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meyer, J. and B. Rowan (1977), "Institutionalized Organizations: Formal Structure as Myth and Ceremony," American Journal of Sociology, 83, 340–363.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meyer, M.W.,W. Stevenson and S. Webster (1985), Limits to Bureaucratic Growth.Walter De Gruyter, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Milliken, F. (1987), "Three Types of Perceived Uncertainty About the Environment: State, Effect, and Response Uncertainty," Academy of Management Review, 12, 133–143.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mizruchi, M. (1992), The Structure of Corporate Political Action: Interfirm Relations and Their Consequences. Harvard University Press, Boston, MA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nelson, R.R. and S.G. Winter (1982), An Evolutionary Theory of Economic Change. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oren, S. and R.G. Schwartz (1988), "Diffusion of NewProducts in Risk-Sensitive Markets," Journal of Forecasting, 7, 273–287.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pennings, J.M. and F. Harianto (1992), "The Diffusion of Technological Innovation in the Commercial Banking Industry," Strategic Management Journal, 13, 29–46.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pfeffer, J. and G.R. Salancik (1978), The External Control of Organizations: A Resource Dependence Perspective. Harper and Row, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Podolny, J.M. and D.J. Phillips (1996), "The Dynamics of Organization Status," Industrial and Corporate Change, 5, 453–371.

    Google Scholar 

  • Quirmbach, H.C. (1986), "The Diffusion of New Technology and the Market for an Innovation," Rand Journal of Economics, 17, 33–47.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reinganum, J.F. (1981), "On the Diffusion of New Technology: A Game Theoretic Approach," Review of Economic Studies, 158, 395–405.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rogers, E. (1965, 1983), Diffusion of Innovations. Free Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rogers, E.M. (1995), Diffusion of Innovations. Free Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosenkopf, L. and M.L. Tushman (1998), "The Coevolution of Community Networks and Technology: Lessons from the Flight Simulation Industry," Industrial and Corporate Change, 7, 311–346.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rumelt, R.P. (1974), "Strategy, Structure and Economic Performance," Working Paper, Graduate School of Business Administration, Harvard University.

  • Scharfstein, D. and J. Stein (1990), "Herd Behavior and Investment," American Economic Review, 80, 465–479.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schelling, T.C. (1978), Micromotives and Macrobehavior. Norton, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stoneman, P. (1981), "Intra-Firm Diffusion, Bayesian Learning and Profitability," Economic Journal, 91, 375–388.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thompson, J. (1967), Organizations in Action. McGraw-Hill, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tolbert, P.S. and L.G. Zucker (1983), "Institutional Sources of Change in the Formal Structure of Organizations: The Diffusion of Civil Service Reform, 1880–1935," Administrative Science Quarterly, 28, 22–39.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tushman, M.J. and P. Anderson (1986), "Technological Discontinuities and Organization Environments," Administrative Science Quarterly, 31, 439–465.

    Google Scholar 

  • Valente, T.W. (1995), Network Models of the Diffusion of Innovations. Hampton Press, Cresskill, NJ.

    Google Scholar 

  • Valente, T.W. (1996), "Social Network Thresholds in the Diffusion of Innovations," Social Networks, 18, 69–89.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van de Ven, A.H. (1986), "Central Problems in the Management of Innovation," Management Science, 32, 590–607.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zaltman, G., R. Duncan and J. Holbeck (1973), Innovation and Organizations. Wiley, New York.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Rosenkopf, L., Abrahamson, E. Modeling Reputational and Informational Influences in Threshold Models of Bandwagon Innovation Diffusion. Computational & Mathematical Organization Theory 5, 361–384 (1999). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1009620618662

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1009620618662

Navigation