Skip to main content
Log in

Evaluation of 24-color Multifluor-Fluorescence In-situ Hybridization (M-FISH) Karyotyping by Comparison with Reverse Chromosome Painting of the Human Breast Cancer Cell Line T-47D

  • Published:
Chromosome Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Multifluor-fluorescence in-situ hybridization (M-FISH) chromosome paints for all the chromosomes in the human complement labeled with different combinations of fluorochromes is a recent technological development enabling assignment of chromosomal material to rearranged chromosomes. Little data is available on the accuracy and limitations of the approach to the analysis of complex karyotypes, which are characteristic of many malignant diseases. Here we compare M-FISH analysis of the breast-cancer-derived cell line T-47D with a previous analysis by reverse chromosome painting analysis of flow-sorted chromosomes from the same material. This demonstrated a high degree of concordance. It also illustrated the limitations of M-FISH analysis, including difficulties identifying small regions of chromosomal material and intrachromosomal rearrangements. Confirmation of selected aberrations using less-complex mixtures of painting probes and further definition of abnormalities using single copy markers may be required. The detailed karyotype description possible by M-FISH analysis contrasts with the definition in the original G-banding analysis. This and the level of concordance with reverse FISH painting supports the utility of the approach in the definition of complex karyotypes.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Kallioniemi A, Kallioniemi OP, Sudar D et al. (1992) Comparative genomic hybridization for molecular cytogenetic analysis of solid tumors. Science 258: 818–821.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Keydar I, Chen L, Karby S et al. (1979) Establishment and characterization of a cell line of human breast carcinoma origin. Eur J Cancer 15: 659–670.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Macville M, Schrock E, Padilla-Nash H et al. (1999) Comprehensive and definitive molecular cytogenetic characterization of Hela cells by spectral karyotyping. Cancer Res 59: 141–150.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Morris JS, Carter NP, Ferguson-Smith MA, Edwards PAW (1997) Cytogenetic analysis of three breast carcinoma cell lines using reverse chromosome painting. Genes Chromosomes Cancer 20: 120–139.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Schrock E, du Manoir S, Veldman T et al. (1996) Multicolor spectral karotyping of human chromosomes. Science 273: 494–497.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Speicher MR, Ballard SG, Ward DC (1996) Karyotyping human chromosomes by combinatorial multi-fluor FISH. Nat Genet 12: 368–375.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Tosi S, Giudici G, Rambaldi A et al. (1999) Characterization of the human myeloid leukemia-derived cell line GF-D8 by multiplex fluorescence in situ hybridization, subtelomeric probes, and comparative genomic hybridization. Genes Chromosomes Cancer 24: 213–221.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Uhrig S, Schuffenhauer S, Fauth C et al. (1999) Multiplex-FISH for pre-and postnatal diagnositc applications. Am J Hum Genet 65: 448–462.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Veldman T, Vignon C, Schrock E, Rowley JD, Ried T (1997) Hidden chromosome abnormalities in haematological malignancies detected by multicolour spectral karyotyping. Nat Genet 15: 406–410.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Lu, YJ., Morris, J.S., Edwards, P.A.W. et al. Evaluation of 24-color Multifluor-Fluorescence In-situ Hybridization (M-FISH) Karyotyping by Comparison with Reverse Chromosome Painting of the Human Breast Cancer Cell Line T-47D. Chromosome Res 8, 127–132 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1009242502960

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1009242502960

Navigation