Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

An evaluation of the gradsect biological survey method

  • Published:
Biodiversity & Conservation Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Biological surveys are necessary to gather species distribution data for the identification of priority conservation areas. The rationale of the gradsect method is that sampling (transects) oriented along the steepest environmental gradient should detect the maximum number of species in an area. The efficiency of the gradsect survey method was evaluated by comparing it to random, systematic and habitat-specific survey methods, during faunal field surveys (target groups: birds and dung beetles). Three gradsects were positioned within the study area to follow the major physiographical characteristics, incorporate all environmental strata (land facets) and yet be as logistically convenient as possible. The efficiency of survey methods was expressed as the number of species recorded per sampling unit effort and illustrated using bootstrap estimations to plot species accumulation curves. The gradsect method proved to be as efficient as the habitat-specific survey method and consiste ntly more efficient than the systematic and random surveys for both taxa sampled. The present study therefore illustrates that the gradsect survey method provides a cost-effective and swift representative sample of regional fauna. Moreover, the results indicate that land-form sequences, specifically ‘land facets’, are useful surrogates when sampling environmental diversity where distinct environmental gradients such as altitude and rainfall are absent.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • A'Bear, A.G. (1994) Report on the engineering geological map of the Limpopo-Venetia Reserve. Unpublished report, Kimberley: De Beers Farms Department.

  • Austin, M.P. and Adomeit, E.M. (1991) Sampling strategies costed by simulation. In Nature Conservation: Cost Effective Survey and Data Analysis (C.R. Margules and M.P. Austin, eds) pp. 167–75. Australia: CSIRO.

    Google Scholar 

  • Austin, M.P. and Basinski, J.J. (1978) Bio-physical Survey Techniques. In Land Use of the South Coast of New South Wales (M.P. Austin and K.D. Cocks, eds) pp. 34–54. Australia: CSIRO.

    Google Scholar 

  • Austin, M.P. and Heyligers, P.C. (1989) Vegetation survey design for conservation: gradsect sampling of forests in North-eastern New South Wales. Biol. Conserv 50, 13–32.

    Google Scholar 

  • Austin, M.P. and Heyligers, P.C. (1991) New approaches to vegetation survey design: gradsect sampling. In Nature Conservation: Cost Effective Survey and Data analysis (C.R. Margules and M.P. Austin, eds) pp. 31–37. Australia: CSIRO.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baird, I.A. and Cocks, K.D. (1983) The role of plant and animal survey in park management. In Survey Methods fors Nature Conservation (K. Meyers, C.R. Margules and I. Musto, eds ) vol. 2, pp. 349–70. Canberra: CSIRO.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barnett, V. (1991) Sample Survey: Principles and Methods. London: Edward Arnold.

    Google Scholar 

  • Belbin, L. (1993) Environmental representativeness: regional partitioning and reserve selection. Biol. Conserv. 66, 223–30.

    Google Scholar 

  • Belbin, L and Austin, M.P. (1991) ECOSIM–a simulation model for training cost-effective survey methods. In Nature Conservation: Cost Effective Survey and Data Analysis (C.R. Margules and M.P. Austin, eds) pp. 159–68. Australia: CSIRO.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burbridge, A.A. (1983) Selecting and managing parks and reserves: interpretation and communication of survey data. In Survey Methods for Nature Conservation (K. Meyers, C.R. Margules and I. Musto, eds) vol. 2, pp. 387–402. Canberra: CSIRO.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burbridge, A.A. (1991) Cost Constraints on surveys for nature conservation. In Nature Conservation: Cost Effective Survey and Data Analysis (C.R. Margules & M.P. Austin, eds) pp. 1–3. Australia: CSIRO.

    Google Scholar 

  • Busby, J.R. (1991) BIOCLIM–a bioclimatic analysis and prediction system. In Nature Conservation: Cost Effective Survey and Data Analysis (C.R. Margules and M.P. Austin, eds) pp. 64–8. Australia: CSIRO.

    Google Scholar 

  • CBD (1992) Convention on Biological Diversity. Rio de Janeiro: UNCED.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cocks, K.D. and Baird, I.A. (1991) The role of geographic information systems in the collection, extrapolation and use of survey data. In Nature Conservation: Cost Effective Survey and Data Analysis (C.R. Margules and M.P. Austin, eds) pp. 74–80. Australia: CSIRO.

    Google Scholar 

  • Currie, D.J. (1991) Energy and large-scale patterns of animal-and plant-species richness. Am. Nat. 137, 27–49.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davis, A.L.V., Doube, B.M. and McLennan, P.D. (1988) Habitat associations and seasonal abundance of coprophilous Coleoptera in the Hluhluwe region of South Africa. Bull. Ent. Res. 78, 425–34.

    Google Scholar 

  • Doube, B.M. (1983) The habitat preference of some bovine dung beetles (Coleoptera: Scarabaeidae) in Hluhluwe Game Reserve, South Africa. Bull. Ent. Res. 73, 351–71.

    Google Scholar 

  • Efron, B. and Gong, G. (1983) A leisurely look at the bootstrap, the jackknife, and cross-validation. Am. Stat. 37, 36–48.

    Google Scholar 

  • Efron, B. and Tibshirani, R.J. (1993) An Introduction to the Bootstrap. New York: Chapman & Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ehrlich, P.R. (1992) Population biology of checkerspot butterflies and the preservation of global biodiversity. OIKOS 63, 6–12.

    Google Scholar 

  • Freitag, S. and van Jaarsveld, A.S. (1997) Relative occupancy, endemism, taxonomic distinctiveness and vulnerability: prioritizing regional conservation actions. Biodiv. Conserv. 6, 211–32.

    Google Scholar 

  • Freitag, S., Nicholls, A.O. and van Jaarsveld, A.S. (1996) Nature reserve selection in the Transvaal, South Africa: what data should we use? Biodiv. Conserv. 5, 685–98.

    Google Scholar 

  • Friend, G.R. and Taylor, J.A. (1984) Ground surface features attributable to feral buffalo, Bubalus bubalis. II. Their relationship to the abundance of small animal species. Aust. Wildl. Res. 11, 311–23.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gillison, A.N. (1983) Gradient orientated sampling for resource surveys–The gradsect method. In Survey Methods for Nature Conservation. (K. Meyers, C.R. Margules & I. Musto, eds) Vol. 2, pp. 349–70. Canberra: CSIRO.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gillison, A.N. and Brewer, K.R.W. (1985) The use of gradient directed transects or gradsects in natural resource surveys. J. Envir. Mngt 20, 103–27.

    Google Scholar 

  • Green, R.H. (1979) Sampling Design and Statistical Methods for Environmental Biologists. New York: John Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Greig-Smith, P. (1983) Quantitative Plant Ecology, 3rd edn. London: Blackwell Scientific Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Groombridge, B. (1992) Global Biodiversity: Status of the Earth's Living Resources. London: Chapman & Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haila, Y. and Margules, C.R. (1996) Survey research in conservation biology. Ecography 19, 323–31.

    Google Scholar 

  • Huntley, B.J. (1989) Conserving and monitoring biotic diversity–some South African examples. In Biodiversity (E.O. Wilson, ed.) pp. 248–60. Washington: National Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hutchinson, M.F., Belbin, L., Nicholls, A.O. et al. (1996) BioRap: Rapid Assessment of Biodiversity, vol. 2, Spatial Modelling Tools. Australia: CSIRO.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lambert, J.M.L. (1972) Theoretical models for large-scale vegetation survey. In Mathematical Models in Ecology (J.N.R. Jeffers, ed.) pp. 87–109. Oxford: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Liversidge, R. (1991) The Birds Around Us. Cape Town: Fontein Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lombard, A.T. (1995a) Introduction to an evaluation of the protection status of South Africa's vertebrates. S. Afr. J. Zool. 30, 63–70.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lombard, A.T. (1995b) Problems with multi-species conservation: do hotspots, ideal reserves and existing reserves coincide? S. Afr. J. Zool. 30, 145–63.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lombard, A.T., August, P.V. and Siegfried, W.R. (1992) Aproposed Geographic Information System for assessing the optimal dispersion of protected areas in South Africa. S. Afr. J. Sci. 88, 136–37.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lombard, A.T., Nicholls, A.O. and August, P.V. (1995) Where should nature reserves be in located in South Africa? A snakes perspective. Conserv. Biol. 9, 363–72.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lubchenco, J., Olson, A.M., Brubaker, L.B., Carpenter, S.R., Holland, M.M., Hubbell, S.P. and Levin, J.A. (1991) The sustainable biosphere initiative: an ecological research agenda. Ecology 72, 371–412.

    Google Scholar 

  • Margules, C.R. (1989) Introduction to some Australian developments in conservation evaluation. Biol. Conserv. 50, 1–11.

    Google Scholar 

  • Margules, C.R. and Austin, M.P. (1991) Nature Conservation: Cost Effective Survey and Data Analysis. Australia: CSIRO.

    Google Scholar 

  • Margules, C.R. and Austin, M.P. (1994) Biological models for monitoring species decline: the construction and use of databases. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. 344, 69–75.

    Google Scholar 

  • Margules, C.R. and Redhead, T.D. (1995) BioRap: Guidelines for Using the BioRap Methodology and Tools. Australia: CSIRO.

    Google Scholar 

  • Margules, C.R. and Stein, J.L. (1989) Patterns in the distribution of species and the selection of nature reserves: an example from Eucalyptus forests in south-eastern New South Wales. Biol. Conserv. 50, 219–38.

    Google Scholar 

  • Margules, C.R., Nicholls, A.O. and Pressey, R.L. (1988) Selecting networks of reserves to maximise biological diversity. Biol. Conserv. 43, 63–76.

    Google Scholar 

  • Margules, C.R., Cresswell, I.D. and Nicholls, A.O. (1994) A scientific basis for establishing networks of protected areas. In Systematics and Conservation Evaluation (P.I. Forey, C.J. Humphries and R.I. Vane-Wright, eds) pp. 327–350. Oxford: Clarendon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • May, R.M. (1994) Conceptual aspects of the quantification of the extent of biological diversity. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. Series B 345, 13–20.

    Google Scholar 

  • McKenzie, N.J. and M.P. Austin (1993) A quantitative Australian approach to medium and small scale surveys based on soil stratigraphy and environmental correlation. Goederma 57, 329–55.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller, R.I. (1994) Setting the scene. In Mapping the Diversity of Nature (R.I. Miller, ed.) pp. 1–15. London: Chapman & Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nealis, V.G. (1977) Habitat associations and community analysis of South Texas dung beetles. Can. J. Zool. 55 138–47.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nicholls, A.O. (1989) How to make biological surveys go further with generalised linear models. Biol. Conserv. 50, 51–75.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nicholls, A.O. (1991) Examples of the use of Generalised Linear Models in analysis of survey data for conservation evaluation. In Nature Conservation: Cost Effective Survey and Data Analysis (C.R. Margules and M.P. Austin, eds) pp. 54–63. Australia: CSIRO.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nicholls, A.O. (in press) Integrating population abundance, dynamics and distribution into broad scale priority setting. In Conservation in a Changing World. Symposia of the Zoological Society of London (A. Balmford, J. Ginsberg and G. Mace, eds).

  • Nicholls, A.O. and Margules, C.R. (1993) An upgraded reserve selection algorithm. Biol. Conserv. 64, 165–69.

    Google Scholar 

  • Noble, I. and Norton, G. (1991) Economic aspects of monitoring for National Park management. In Nature Conservation: Cost Effective Survey and Data Analysis (C.R. Margules and M.P. Austin, eds) pp. 69–74. Australia: CSIRO.

    Google Scholar 

  • O'Connor, T.G. (1991) The vegetation types of the Venetia-Limpopo Nature Reserve. Unpublished report, Kimberley: De Beers Farms Department.

  • Pressey, R.L. (1994) Ad hoc reservations: forward of backward steps in developing representative reserve systems? Conserv. Biol. 8, 662–8.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pressey, R.L., Humphries, C.R., Margules, C.R., Vane-Wright, R.I. and Williams, P.H. (1993) Beyond opportunism: key principles for systematic reserve selection. TREE 8, 662–8.

    Google Scholar 

  • Price, G.V. (1981) Methods of Engineering Geological Mapping and their Application on a Regional Scale in South Africa. MSc Thesis, University of Pretoria.

  • Silk, J. (1979) Random sampling procedures. In Statistical Concepts in Geography (J. Silk, ed.) pp. 133–46. London: George Allen & Unwin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smartt, P.F.M. and Grainger, J.E.A. (1974) Sampling for vegetation survey: some aspects of the behaviour of unrestricted, restricted, and stratified techniques. J. Biogeogr. 1, 193–206.

    Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, J.A., Friend, G.R. and Dudzinski, M.L. (1984) Influence of sampling strategy on the relationships between fauna and vegetation structure, plant lifeform and floristics. Austr. J. Ecol. 9, 281–7.

    Google Scholar 

  • Trinder-Smith, T.H. Lombard, A.T. and Picker, M.D. (1996) Reserve scenarios for the Cape Peninsula: high-, middle-and low-road options for conserving the remaining biodiversity. Biodiv. Conserv. 5, 649–69.

    Google Scholar 

  • UNEP (1995) Global Biodiversity Assessment. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Usher, M.B. (1986) Wildlife Conservation Evaluation. London: Chapman & Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • van Jaarsveld, A.S. and Chown, S.L. (1996) Strategies and time-frames for implementing the Convention on Biological Diversity: biological requirements. S. Afr. J. Sci. 92, 459–64.

    Google Scholar 

  • Verner, J. and Ritter, L.V. (1985) A comparison of transects and point counts in oak-pine woodlands of California. Condor 87, 47–68.

    Google Scholar 

  • Williams, P., Gibbons, D., Margules, C.R. et al. (1996) A comparison of richness hotspots, rarity hotspots, and complementary areas for conserving diversity of British birds. Conserv. Biol. 10, 155–74.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, E.O. (1988) The current state of biological diversity. In Biodiversity (E.O. Wilson, ed.) pp. 3–20. Washington: National Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Zoology and Entomology, University of Pretoria, Pretoria, 0002, South Africa

    K. J. Wessels & A. S. Van Jaarsveld

  2. Department of Statistics, University of Pretoria, Pretoria, 0002, South Africa

    J. D. Grimbeek

  3. Department of Information Technology, Division of Academic Computing, University of Pretoria, Pretoria, 0002, South Africa

    M. J. Van Der Linde

Authors
  1. K. J. Wessels
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. A. S. Van Jaarsveld
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. J. D. Grimbeek
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. M. J. Van Der Linde
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Wessels, K.J., Jaarsveld, A.S.V., Grimbeek, J.D. et al. An evaluation of the gradsect biological survey method. Biodiversity and Conservation 7, 1093–1121 (1998). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1008899802456

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1008899802456

Search

Navigation