Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

The Nature of Science in Science Education: An Introduction

  • Published:
Science & Education Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

After providing a definition of the nature of science (NOS) for science education, we argue that a pragmatic consensus exists regarding NOS topics most important for a scientifically literate society. Hence, NOS instruction should take a more prominent role in the science curriculum. While the relationship between a teacher's NOS knowledge and their pedagogical decision-making is not straight- forward, we maintain that a complex interplay does exist. While more science coursework and research experience have been suggested to improve science teachers' understanding of NOS, neither approach is empirically supported. However, explicit attempts at NOS instruction in science teacher education have been effective. This article, which is an abridged version of one appearing in McComas (1998), concludes with the suggestion of a desired state for NOS instruction.

Hence, it is vital that science teachers and their students gain an understanding of the nature of science, a hybrid field blending aspects of various social studies of science such as the history, sociology and philosophy of science with research from the cognitive science into a rich and useful description of what science is and how it functions.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

REFERENCES

  • Abimbola, O. A.: 1983, ‘The relevance of the “new” philosophy of science for the science curriculum’, School Science and Mathematics 83, 183–190.

    Google Scholar 

  • Aikenhead, G. & Ryan, A.: 1992, ‘The Development of a New Instrument: “Views on Science-Technology-Society” (VOSTS)’, Science Education 76, 477–491.

    Google Scholar 

  • Akindchin, F.: 1988, ‘Effect of an Instructional Package on Preservice Science Teachers, Understanding of Nature of Science and Acquisition of Science-Related Attitudes’, Science Education 72, 73–82.

    Google Scholar 

  • American Association for the Advancement of Science: 1989, Project 2061: Science for all Americans, Washington, D.C.

  • American Association for the Advancement of Science: 1993, Benchmarks for Science Literacy, New York, Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Association for Science Education: 1981, Education Through Science: An ASF Policy Statement, Hatfield, England: Author.

    Google Scholar 

  • Anderson, K. E.: 1950, ‘The Teachers of Science in a Representative Sampling of Minnesota Schools’, Science Education 34, 57–66.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bell, R., Lederman, N. G. & Abd-El-Kbalick, F.: 1997, ‘Developing and Acting Upon One's Conception of Science: The Reality of Teacher Preparation’, Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the Association for the Education of Teachers in Science, Cincinnati, 9–12, January.

  • Bentley, M. L. & Garrison, J. W.: 1991, ‘The Role of Philosophy of Science in Science Teacher Education’, Journal of Science Teacher Education 2, 67–71.

    Google Scholar 

  • Billch, V. Y. & Hassan, O. E.: 1975, ‘Factors Affecting Teachers Gain in Understanding the Nature of Science’, Journal of Research in Science Teaching 12, 209–219.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brush, S. G.: 1989, ‘History of Science and Science Education’, Interchange 20, 60–71.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burbules, N. C.: 1991, ‘Science Education and Philosophy of Science: Congruence of Contradiction?’, International Journal of Science Education 13, 227–241.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carey, L. R. & Strauss, A. N.: 1968, ‘An analysis of the understanding of the nature of science by prospective secondary science teachers’, Science Education 52, 358–363.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cawthron, F. R. & Rowell, J. A.: 1978, ‘Epistemology and Science Education’, Studies in Science Education 7, 279–304.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clough, M. P.: 1997, ‘Strategies and Activities for Initiating and Maintaining Pressure on Students' Naive Views Concerning the Nature of Science’, Interchange 28, 191–204.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clough, M. P.: 1995, ‘Longitudinal Understanding of the Nature of Science as Facilitated by an Introductory High School Biology Course’, in F. Finley, D. Alichin, D. Rhees and S. Fitfield (eds.), The Proceedings of the Third International History, Philosophy and Science Teaching Conference: Vol. II. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 202–211.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clough, M. P.: 1994, ‘Diminish Students Resistance to Biological Evolution’, The American Biology Teacher 56, 409–415.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clough, M. P. & Clark, R. L.: 1994, ‘Creative Constructivism: Challenge Your Students with an Authentic Science Experience’, The Science Teacher 61, 46–49.

    Google Scholar 

  • Conant, A. B.: 1951, On Understanding Science: An Historical Approach, New York, New American Library.

    Google Scholar 

  • Connelly, F. M., Wahlstrom, M. W., Finegold, M. & Elhaz, F.: 1977, Enquiry Teaching in Science: A Handbook for Secondary School Teachers, Toronto, Ontario Institute for Studies in Education.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dagher, Z. R. & BouJaoude, S.: 1997, ‘Scientific Views and Religious Beliefs of College Students: The Case of Biological Evolution’, Journal of Research in Science Teaching 34, 429–445.

    Google Scholar 

  • DeBoer, G.: 1991, A History of Ideas in Science Education: Implications for Practice, Teachers College Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dibbs, D. R.: 1982, An investigation into the nature and consequences of teachers implicit philosophies of science, Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Aston, Birmingham, UK.

  • Driver, R., Leach, J., Miller, A. & Scott, P.: 1996, Young Peoples Images of Science, Open University Press, Bristol, Pennsylvania.

    Google Scholar 

  • Duffee, L. & Aikenhead, G.: 1992, ‘Curriculum Change, Student Evaluation, and Teacher Practical Knowledge’, Science Education 76, 493–506.

    Google Scholar 

  • Duschl, R. A.: 1994, ‘Research on the History and Philosophy of Science’, in L.G. Dorothy (ed.), Handbook of Research on Science Teaching and Learning, MacMillan, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Duschl, R. A.: 1988, ‘Abandoning the Scientistic Legacy of Science Education’, Science Education 72, 51–62.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eichinger, D. C., Abell, S. K. & Dagher, Z. R.: 1997, ‘Developing a Graduate Level Science Education Course on the Nature of Science’, Science and Education 6, 417–429.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eisner, E. W.: 1985, Educational Imagination: On the Design and Evaluation of School Programs, Second Edition, MacMillan, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Elkana, Y.: 1970, ‘Science, Philosophy of Science and Science Teaching’, Educational Philosophy and Theory 2, 15–35.

    Google Scholar 

  • Elmer-Dewitt, P.: 1994, ‘Don't Tread on My Lab’, Time 143, 44–45.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ennis, R. H.: 1979, ‘Research in Philosophy of Science Bearing on Science Education’, in P. D. Asquith & H. E. Kyburg (eds.), Current Research in Philosophy of Science, Philosophy of Science Association, East Lansing, Michigan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eylon, B. & Linn, M.: 1989, ‘Learning and Instruction: an Examination of How Research Perspective in Science Education’, Review of Educational Research 58, 251–301.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fleury, S. C. & Bentley, M. L.: 1991, ‘Educating Elementary Science Teachers: Alternative Conceptions of the Nature of Science’, Teaching Education 3, 57–67.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fullan, M. G.: 1991, The New Meaning of Educational Change, 2nd ed., Teachers College Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gallagher, J. J.: 1991, ‘Prospective and Practicing Secondary School Science Teacher's Knowledge and Beliefs about the Philosophy of Science’, Science Education 75, 121–133.

    Google Scholar 

  • Giddings, J. G.: 1982, Presuppositions in School Science Textbooks, Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Iowa, Iowa City, Iowa.

  • Gill, W.: 1977, ‘The editors page’, The Australian Science Teachers' Journal 23, 4.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ginev, D.: 1990, ‘Towards a New Image of Science: Science Teaching and Non-analytical Philosophy of Science’, Studies in Philosophy and Education 10, 63–71.

    Google Scholar 

  • Good, T. L. & Brophy, J. E.: 1987, Looking in Classrooms, 4th Edition, New York: Harper and Row.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haggerty, S. M.: 1992, ‘Student Teachers Perceptions of Science and Science Teaching’, in S. Hills (ed.), The History and Philosophy of Science in Science Education, Kingston, Ontario: Queen's University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harms, H. & Yager, R. E.: 1981, What Research Says to the Science Teacher, Vol. 3, Washington D.C.: National Science Teachers Association.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haukoos, G. D. & Penick, T. E.: 1983, ‘The Influence of Classroom Climate on Science Process and Context Achievement of Community College Students’, Journal of Research in Science Teaching 20, 629–637

    Google Scholar 

  • Herron, M. D.: 1969, ‘Nature of Science: Panacea or Pandora's Box’, Journal of Research in Science Teaching 6, 105–107.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hodson, D.: 1991, ‘The Role of Philosophy in Science Teaching’, in M. R. Matthews (ed.), History, Philosophy, and Science Teaching: Selected Reading, New York: Teachers College Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hodson, D.: 1988, ‘Towards a philosophically more valid science curriculum’, Science Education 72, 19–40.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hurd, P. DeH.: 1960, ‘Summary’, in Rethinking Science Education: The Fifty-Ninth Yearbook of the National Society for the Study of Education, Chicago. University of Chicago Press, Chicago.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jaffe, B.: 1938, ‘The History of Chemistry and its Place in the Teaching of Chemistry’, Journal of Chemical Education 15, 383–389.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, R. L. & Peeples, E. E.: 1987, ‘The Role of Scientific Understanding in College’, The American Biology Teacher 49, 93–96.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kilborn, B.: 1982, ‘Curriculum Materials, Teaching, and Potential Outcomes for Students: a Qualitative Analysis’, Journal of Research in Science Teaching 19, 675–688.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kimball, M.: 1967, ‘Understanding the nature of science: A comparison of scientists and science teachers’, Journal of Research in Science Teaching 19, 675–688.

    Google Scholar 

  • King, B.: 1991, ‘Beginning Teachers' Knowledge of and Attitude Toward History and Philosophy of Science’, Science Education 75, 135–141.

    Google Scholar 

  • Klopfer, L.: 1969, ‘The Teaching of Science and the History of Science’, Journal of Research in Science Teaching 6, 87–95.

    Google Scholar 

  • Klopfer, L.: 1964–66, History of Science Cases (HOSC), Science Research Associates, Chicago.

    Google Scholar 

  • Knorr-Cetina, K. D.: 1981, The Manufacture of Knowledge: An Essay on the Constructivist and Contextual Nature of Science, Pergamon Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Koballa, T. & Crawley, F.: 1985, ‘The Influence of Attitude on Science Teaching and Learning’, School Science and Mathematics 85, 222–32.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kuhn, T. S.: 1970. The Structure of Scientific Revolutions, The University of Chicago Press, Chicago.

    Google Scholar 

  • Laforgia, J.: 1988, ‘The Affective Domain Related to Science and its Evaluation’, Science Education 72, 407–421.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lakin, S. & Wellington, J.: 1994, ‘Who Will Teach the “Nature of Science?”: Teachers Views of Science and Their Implications for Science Education’, International Journal of Science Education 16, 175–190.

    Google Scholar 

  • Langer, J. A. & Applebee, A. N.: 1987, How Writing Shapes Thinking: A Study of Teaching and Learning, National Council of Teachers of English. Research Report No. 22. National Council of Teachers of English, Urbana, Illinois.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lapoint, A., Mead, N. A. & Phillips, G. W.: 1989, A World of Differences: An International Assessment of Mathematics and Science, Educational Testing Service, Princeton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Latour, B.: 1987, Science in Action, Harvard University Press, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Latour, B. & Woolger, S.: 1986, Laboratory Life: The Construction of Scientific Facts, Princeton University Press, Princeton, New Jersey.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lavach, J.: 1969, ‘Organization and Evaluation of an In-service Program in the History of Science’, Journal of Research in Science Teaching 6, 166–170.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lederman, N. G.: 1992, ‘Students' and Teachers' Conceptions of the Nature of Science: A Review of the Research’, Journal of Research in Science Teaching 29, 331–359.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lederman, N. G.: 1983, Delineating Classroom Variables Related to Students' Conception of the Nature of Science, unpublished Doctoral Dissertation. Syracuse University, New York.

  • Lederman, N. G.: 1986, ‘Students and Teacher's Understanding the Nature of Science: A Reassessment’, School Science and Mathematics 86, 91–99.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lederman, N. & Zeidler, D.: 1987, ‘Science Teachers Conceptions of the Nature of Science: Do They Really Influence Teaching Behavior?’, Science Education 71, 721–734.

    Google Scholar 

  • Loving, C.: 1991, ‘The Scientific Theory Profile: A Philosophy of Science Model for Science Teachers’, Journal of Research in Science Teaching 28, 823–838.

    Google Scholar 

  • Manuel, D. E.: 1981, ‘Reflections on the Role of History and Philosophy of Science in School Science Education’, School Science Review 62, 769–771.

    Google Scholar 

  • Martin, M. R.: 1972, Concepts of Science Education: A Philosophical/Analysis, Scott, Foresman, Inc., Greenview, IL.

    Google Scholar 

  • Matthews, M. R.: 1989, ‘A Role for History and Philosophy in Science Teaching’, Interchange 20, 3–15.

    Google Scholar 

  • Matthews, M. R. (ed.): 1990, History, Philosophy, and Science Teaching Select Readings, Teachers College Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Matthews, M. R.: 1990, ‘History, Philosophy and Science Teaching: What Can Be Done in an Undergraduate Course?’, Studies in Philosophy and Education 10, 93–97.

    Google Scholar 

  • Matthews, M. R.: 1994, Science Teaching the Role of History and Philosophy of Science, Routledge, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Matthews, M. R.: 1997, ‘Editorial’, Science and Education 6, 323–329.

    Google Scholar 

  • McComas, W. F. (Ed.): 1998, The nature of science in science education: Rationales and Strategies. Kluwer Academic Publishers.

  • McComas, W. F. & Olson, J. K.: 1998, ‘The nature of science in international science education standards documents’, in: McComas, W. F. (Ed.): The nature of science in science education: Rationales and Strategies. (pp. 41–52). Kluwer Academic Publishers.

  • Mellado, V.: 1997, ‘Preservice teachers' classroom practice and their conceptions of the nature of science’, Science and Education 6, 397–416.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mendelsohn, E., Weingart, P. & Whitley, R. (eds.): 1977, The Social Production of Scientific Knowledge, D. Reidel Publishing Co., Boston.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meyling, H.: 1997, ‘How to Change Students' Conceptions of the Epistemology of Science’, Science and Education 6, 397–416.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller, P. E.: 1963, ‘A Comparison of the Abilities of Secondary Teachers and Students of Biology to Understand Science’, Iowa Academy of Science 70, 510–513.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moore, J.: 1983, ‘Evolution, Education, and the Nature of Science and Scientific Inquiry’, in J. P. Zelterberg (ed.), Evolution Versus Creationism: The Public Education Controversy, Oryx Press, Phoenix.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mulkay, M. & Gilbert, N.: 1982, ‘Accounting For Error: How Scientists Construct Their Social World When They Account For Correct and Incorrect Belief’, Sociology 16, 165–183.

    Google Scholar 

  • Munby, A. H.: 1967, ‘Some implications for language in science education’, Science Education 60, 115–124.

    Google Scholar 

  • National Research Council: 1996, National Science Education Standards, National Academy Press, Washington, DC.

    Google Scholar 

  • National Science Teachers Association: 1995, A High School Framework for National Science Education Standards, Arlington, VA.

  • Nott, M. & Wellington, J.: 1995, ‘Critical Incidents in the Science Classroom and the Nature of Science’, School Science Review 76, 41–46.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nunan, E.: 1977, ‘History and philosophy of science and science teaching: A revisit’, The Australian Science Teachers' Journal 23, 65–71.

    Google Scholar 

  • O'Brien, G. E. & Korth, W. W.: 1991, ‘Teachers' Self-examination of Their Understanding of the Nature of Science: a History and Philosophy Course Responsive to Science Teachers' Needs’, Journal of Science Teacher Education 2, 94–100.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ogunniyi, M. B.: 1982, ‘An Analysis of Prospective Science Teacher's Understanding of the Nature of Science’, Journal of Research in Science Teaching 19, 25–32.

    Google Scholar 

  • Penick, J. E., Yager, R. E. & Bonnstetter, R.: 1986, ‘Teachers Make Exemplary Programs’, Educational Leadership 44, 14–20.

    Google Scholar 

  • Robinson, J. T.: 1968, The Nature of Science and Science Teaching, Wadsworth Publishing Company, Belmont, California.

    Google Scholar 

  • Robinson, J. T.: 1969, ‘Philosophy of Science: Implications for Teacher Education’, Journal of Research in Science Teaching 6, 99–104.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rowell, J. A. & Cawthron, E. R.: 1982, ‘Image of Science: an Empirical Study’, European Journal of Science Education 4, 79–94.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rubba, P. A., Horner, J. K. & Smith, J. M.: 1981, ‘A study of two misconceptions about the nature of science among junior high school students’, School Science and Mathematics 81, 221–226.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rutherford, J., Hoton, G. & Walton, M.: 1970, Harvard Project Physics. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ryan, A. G. & Aikenhead, G. S.: 1992, ‘Students' Preconceptions about the Epistemology of Science’, Science Education 76, 559–580.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scharmann, L. C. & Harris, W. M.: 1992, ‘Teaching Evolution: Understanding and Applying the Nature of Science’, Journal of Research in Science Teaching 29, 375–388.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scheffler, I.: 1973, Reason and Teaching, Bobbs-Merrill, Indianapolis.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schmidt, D. J.: 1967, ‘Test on Understanding Science: a Comparison among School Groups’, Journal of Research in Science Teaching 4, 365–366.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schwab, J. J.: 1964, ‘The Teaching of Science as Enquiry’, in J. J. Schwab & P. F. Brandwein (eds.), The Teaching of Science, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shamos, M.: 1995, The Myth of Scientific Literacy. Rutgers University Press, New Brunswick, New Jersey.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shapin, S.: 1982, ‘History of Science and its Sociological Reconstruction’, History of Science 20, 157–211.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shymansky, J. & Penick, J.: 1988, ‘Teacher Behavior Does Make a Difference in Handson Science Classrooms’, School Science and Mathematics 81(5), 412–422.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, H. A.: 1980, ‘A Report on the Implications for the Science Community on Three Nsf-sponsored Studies of the State of Precollege Science Education’ in What are the Needs in Precollege Science. Math, and Social Science Education? Views of the Field, National Science Foundation, Washington, DC.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, M. U., Lederman, N. G., Bell, R. L., McComas, W. F. & Clough, M. P.: 1997, ‘How Great is the Disagreement About the Nature of Science? A Response to Alters (1997)’, Journal of Research in Science Teaching 34(10), 1101–1103.

    Google Scholar 

  • Songer, N. & Linn, M.: 1991, ‘How Do Students' Views of Science Influence Knowledge Integration?’, Journal of Research in Science Teaching 28, 761–784.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stake, R. E. & Easley, J. A.: 1978, Case Studies in Science Education, Volumes I and II. U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington, DC.

    Google Scholar 

  • Summers, M.: 1982, ‘Philosophy of Science in the Science Teacher Education Curriculum’, European Journal of Science Education 4, 19–27.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tobias, S.: 1990, They're Not Dumb: They're Different: Stalking the Second Tier, Research Council, Tuscon, Arizona.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wandersee, J.: 1986, ‘Can the History of Science Help Science Educators Anticipate Students' Misconceptions’, Journal of Research in Science Teaching 23, 581–597.

    Google Scholar 

  • Welch, W.: 1979, ‘Twenty Years of Science Education’, Review of Research in Education 7, 282–306.

    Google Scholar 

  • Welch, W. W.: 1984, ‘A Science-Based Approach to Science Learning’, in D. Holdzkom & Lutz (eds.), Research Within Reach: Science Education. National Science Teachers Association, Washington, DC.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weiss, I. R.: 1993, ‘Science Teachers Rely on the Textbook’, in R. E. Yager (ed.), What Research Says to the Science Teacher, Volume and Seven: The Science. Technology, Society Movement, National Science Teachers Association, Washington, DC.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yager, R. E.: 1966, ‘Teacher Effects upon the Outcomes of Science Instruction’, Journal of Research in Science Teaching 4, 236–242.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zeidler, D. & Lederman, N.: 1987, ‘Science Teacher's Conceptions of the Nature of Science: Do They Really Influence Teaching Behavior’, Science Education 71, 721–734.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zeidler, D. & Lederman, N.: 1989, ‘The Effects of Teachers' Language on Students' Conceptions of the Nature of Science’, Journal of Research in Science Teaching 26, 771–783.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Center to Advance Science Education, School of Education, The University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, 90089-0031, USA

    William F. McCOMAS & Hiya Almazroa

  2. Science Education Center, The University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA, 52242-1478, USA

    Michael P. Clough

Authors
  1. William F. McCOMAS
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Hiya Almazroa
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Michael P. Clough
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

McCOMAS, W.F., Almazroa, H. & Clough, M.P. The Nature of Science in Science Education: An Introduction. Science & Education 7, 511–532 (1998). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1008642510402

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1008642510402

Keywords

Search

Navigation