Skip to main content
Log in

Rapid processing of base and derived forms of words and grades 4, 5 and 6 children's spelling

  • Published:
Reading and Writing Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper emphasizes the productive aspect of morphological processingand the effect on spelling proficiency in 226 grades 4, 5 and 6 children. Two convergent studies using reaction time measures aimed at exploring ten- to twelve-year old spellers' sensitivity to, and knowledge of, derivational morphology with lexical items varying in orthographic and phonological transparency and opacity. There is some evidence, from the accurate and rapid vocal production of base forms or derived forms of source words in sentential contexts, that the depth of segmentation to base morphology and the converse process of derived morphology of words, plays a role in spelling performance of these children. There are complex orthographic, phonological and semantic factors affecting morphological processing.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Aronoff, M. (1976). Word formation in generative grammar [Linguistic Inquiry Monograph 1]. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Badecker, W. & Caramazza, A. (1989). A lexical distinction between inflection and derivation, Linguistic Inquiry 20: 108–116.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barnett, V. & Lewis, T. (1984). Outliers in statistical data, 2nd edn. New York: John Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bauer, L. (1983). Engish word formation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ben-Dror, I., Bentin, S. & Frost, R. (1995). Semantic, phonologic, and morphological skills in reading disabled and normal children: Evidence from perception and production of spoken Hebrew, Reading Research Quarterly 30: 876–893.

    Google Scholar 

  • Caramazza, A. (1988). Some aspects of language processing revealed through the analysis of acquired aphasia: The lexical system, Annual Review of Neurosciences 11: 395–421.

    Google Scholar 

  • Caramazza, A. (1991). Issues in reading, writing and speaking: A neuropsychological perspective. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carlisle, J.F. (1987). The usae of morphological knowledge in spelling derived forms by learning disabled and normal students, Annals of Dyslexia 37: 90–108.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carlisle, J.F. (1988). Knowledge of derivational morphology and spelling ability in fourth, sixth, and eighth graders, Applied Psycholinguistics 9: 247–266.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carlisle, J.F. & Nomanbhoy, D.M. (1993). Phonological and morphological awareness in first graders, Applied Psycholinguistics 14: 177–195.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carroll, J.B., Davies, P. & Richman, B. (1971). The American heritage word frequency book. Boston, MA: Houghton-Mifflin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cassar, M. & Treiman, R. (1997). The beginning of orthographic knowledge: Children's knowledge of double letters in words, Journal of Educational Psychology 89: 631–644.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chomsky, N. & Halle, M. (1968). The sound pattern of English. New York: Harper and Row.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cutler, A. (1983). Lexical complexity and sentence processing. In: G.B. Flores D'Arcais & R.J. Jarvella (eds.), The process of language understanding (pp. 43–79). New York: John Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Derwing, B.L., Smith, M.L. & Wiebe, G.E. (1995). On the role of spelling in morpheme recognition: Experimental studies with children and adults. In: L.B. Feldman (eds.), Morphological aspects of language processing (pp. 3–27). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Elbro, C. (1990). Differences in dyslexia: A study of reading strategies and deficits in a linguistic perspective. Copenhagen: Munksgaard.

    Google Scholar 

  • Elbro, C. (1991). Dyslexics and normal beginning readers read by different strategies: A com-parison of strategy distributions in dyslexics and normal readers, International Journal of Applied Linguistics 1: 19–37.

    Google Scholar 

  • Feldman, L.B. (1991). The contribution of morphology to word recognition, Psychological Research 53: 33–41.

    Google Scholar 

  • Feldman, L.B. (ed.) (1995). Morphological aspects of language processing. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fowler, A.E. & Liberman, I.Y. (1995). The role of phonology and orthography in morphological awareness. In: L.B. Feldman (ed.), Morphological aspects of language processing (pp. 157–188). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frost, R. & Katz, L. (1992). Orthography, phonology, morphology, and meaning. Amsterdam: North-Holland.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hancin-Bhatt, B. & Nagy, W. (1994). Lexical transfer and second language morphological development, Applied Psycholinguistics 15: 289–310.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hanson, V.L. & Wilkenfeld, D. (1985). Morphophonology and lexical organization in deaf readers, Language and Speech 28: 269–280.

    Google Scholar 

  • Henderson, E.H. (1990). Teaching spelling, 2nd edn. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Henderson, L. (1985). Toward a psychology of morphemes. In: A.W. Ellis (ed.), Progress in the psychology of language, Vol. 1 (pp. 15–72). London: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Henry, M.K. (1993). Morphological structure: Latin and Greek roots and affixes as upper grade code strategies, Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal 5: 227–241.

    Google Scholar 

  • Huberty, C.J. (1975). Discriminant analysis, Review of Educational Research 45: 545–598.

    Google Scholar 

  • Javella, R.J. & Snodgrass, J.G. (1974). Seeing ring in rang and retain in retention: On recog-nizing stem morphemes in printed words, Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior 13: 590–598.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jastak, S. & Wilkinson, G.S. (1984). Wide Range Achievement Test, rev. edn. Wilmington, DE: Jastak Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • King, E.M. ed. (1982). Canadian Tests of Basic Skills: Multilevel edition/Levels 9- 12/Forms 5 & 6. Toronto: Nelson.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kreiner, D. (1992). Reaction time measures of spelling: Testing a two-strategy model of skilled spelling, Journal of Experimental Psychology: Language, Memory and Cognition 18: 765–776.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leong, C.K. (1989). The effects of morphological structure on reading proficiency: A developmental study, Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal 1: 357–379.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leong, C.K. & Parkinson, M.E. (1995). Processing of English morphological structure by poor readers. In: C.K. Leong & R.M. Joshi (eds.), Developmental and acquired dyslexia: Neuropsychological and neurolinguistic perspectives (pp. 237–261). Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mahony, D.L. (1994). Using sensitivity to word structure to explain variance in high school and college level reading ability, Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal 6: 19–44.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nunes, T., Bryant, P. & Bindman, M. (1997). Morphological spelling strategies: Developmental stages and processes, Developmental Psychology 33: 637–649.

    Google Scholar 

  • Perfetti, C.A. (1985). Reading ability. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Perfetti, C.A. (1997). The psycholinguistics of spelling and reading. In: C.A. Perfetti, L. Rieben & M. Fayol (eds.), Learning to spell: Research, theory and practice across languages (pp. 21–38). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Read, C. (1975). Children's categorization of speech sounds in English. Urbana, IL: National Center of Teachers of English.

    Google Scholar 

  • Read, C. (1986). Children's creative spelling. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rubin, H. (1988). Morphological knowledge and early writing ability, Language and Speech 31: 337–355.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sandra, D. (1994). The morphology of the mental lexicon: Internal word structure viewed from a psycholinguistic perspective, Language and Cognitive Processes 9: 227–269.

    Google Scholar 

  • Santee, J.L. & Egeth, H.E. (1982). Do reaction time and accuracy measure the same aspects of letter recognition? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 8: 489–501.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scalise, S. (1988). Inflection and derivation, Linguistics 26: 561–581.

    Google Scholar 

  • Seidenberg, M.S. (1985). The time course of information activation and utilization in visual word recognition. In: D. Besner, T.G. Waller & G.E. Mackinnon (eds.), Reading research: Advances in theory and practice, Vol. 5 (pp. 199–252). New York: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shankweiler, D., Lundquist, E., Dreyer, L.G. & Dickinson, C.C. (1996). Reading and spelling difficulties in high school students: Causes and consequences, Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Joural 8: 267–294.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shu, H. & Anderson, R.C. (1997). Role of radical awareness in the character and word acquisition of Chinese children, Reading Research Quarterly 32: 78–89.

    Google Scholar 

  • Treiman, R. (1993). Beginning to spell: A study of first-grade children. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Treiman, R. & Cassar, M. (1996). Effects of morphology on children's spelling of final consonant clusters, Journal of Experimental Child Psychology 63: 141–170.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tyler, A. & Nagy, W. (1989). The acquisition of English derivational morphology, Journal of Memory and Language 28: 649–667.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tyler, A. & Nagy, W. (1990). Use of derivational morphology during reading, Cognition 36: 17–34.

    Google Scholar 

  • Williams, E. (1981). On the notions of 'lexically related' and 'head of a word', Linguistic Inquiry 12: 245–274.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wysocki, K. & Jenkins, J. (1987). Deriving word meanings through morphological generalization, Reading Research Quarterly 22: 66–81.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Leong, C.K. Rapid processing of base and derived forms of words and grades 4, 5 and 6 children's spelling. Reading and Writing 12, 277–302 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1008168902922

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1008168902922

Navigation