Skip to main content
Log in

Habitat Partitioning in a Patchy Environment: Considering the Role of Intraspecific Competition

  • Published:
Environmental Biology of Fishes Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Coexistence of many size groups of conspecifics in habitat patches may complicate resource partitioning and increase intraspecific interactions. The objectives of my study were to determine partitioning of habitat among age groups of rainbow trout, Oncorhynchus mykiss, coexisting in pool habitat of a headwater stream, and to determine the role of intraspecific competition for such resource partitioning. The trout population showed size and age specific patterns of habitat use, and trout selected locations based on depth and longitudinal position. This habitat use pattern decreased intraspecific overlap among the trout age groups for use of pool space. I used a removal experiment to determine if two-year old trout constrained habitat use by the smaller conspecifics. Although the experimental results imply that recent intraspecific competition was not present, the absence of competitive exclusion was not clearly demonstrated because of low experimental power. While this study identified habitat partitioning among the trout age groups, it remains unclear whether biotic interactions or size specific requirements were causing the habitat use patterns.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References cited

  • Aadland, L.P. 1993. Stream habitat types: their fish assemblages and relationship to flow. N. Amer. J. Fish. Manage. 13: 790-806.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baltz, D.M. & P.B. Moyle. 1984. Segregation by species and size classes of rainbow trout, Salmo gairdneri, and Sacramento sucker, Catostomus occidentalis, in three California streams. Env. Biol. Fish. 10: 101-110.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baltz, D.M., B. Vondracek, L.R. Brown & P.B. Moyle. 1991. Seasonal changes in microhabitat selection by rainbow trout in a small stream. Trans. Amer. Fish. Soc. 120: 166-176.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bohlin, T. 1977. Habitat selection and intercohort competition of juvenile sea-trout Salmo trutta. Oikos 29: 112-117.

    Google Scholar 

  • Connell, J.H. 1980. Diversity and the coevolution of competitors, or the ghost of competition past. Oikos 35: 131-138.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fausch, K.D. 1984. Profitable stream positions for salmonids: relating specific growth rate to net energy gain. Can. J. Zool. 62: 441-451.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fausch, K.D. & R.J. White. 1981. Competition between brook trout (Salvelinus fontinalis) and brown trout (Salmo trutta) for positions in a Michigan stream. Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci. 38: 1220-1227.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fraser, D.F. & R.D. Cerri. 1982. Experimental evaluation of predator-prey relationships in a patchy environment: consequences for habitat use patterns in minnows. Ecology63: 307-313.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fraser, D.F. & T.E. Sise. 1980. Observations on stream minnows in a patchy environment: a test of a theory of habitat distribution. Ecology 61: 790-797.

    Google Scholar 

  • Freeman, M.C. & D.J. Stouder. 1989. Intraspecific interactions influence size specific depth distribution in Cottus bairdi. Env. Biol. Fish. 24: 231-236.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fretwell, S.D. 1972. Populations in a seasonal environment. Princeton University Press, Princeton. 217 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Greenberg, L.A. 1991. Habitat use and feeding behavior of thirteen species of benthic stream fishes. Env. Biol. Fish. 31: 389-401.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harvey, B.C. 1991. Interactions among stream fishes: predatorinduced habitat shifts and larval survival. Oecologia 87: 29-36.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harvey, B.C. & A.J. Stewart. 1991. Fish size and habitat depth relationships in headwater streams. Oecologia 87: 336-342.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jearld, A., Jr. 1983. Age determination. pp. 301-324. In: L.A. Nielsen & D.L. Johnson (ed.) Fisheries Techniques, American Fisheries Society, Bethesda.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jenkins, T.M., Jr. 1969. Social structure, position choice, and micro-distribution of two trout species (Salmo trutta and Salmo gairdneri) resident in mountain streams. Anim. Behav. Monogr. 2: 56-123.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kincaid, W.B. & G.N. Cameron. 1985. Interactions of cotton rats with a patchy environment: dietary responses and habitat selection. Ecology 66: 1769-1783.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mahon, R. & C.B. Portt. 1985. Local size related segregation of fishes in streams. Polskie Archiwum Hydrobiologii 103: 267-271.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mittelbach, G.G. 1981. Foraging efficiency and body size: a study of optimal diet and habitat use by bluegills. Ecology 62: 1370-1386.

    Google Scholar 

  • Montgomery, D.C. & E.A. Peck. 1992. Introduction to linear regression analysis, 2nd edition. John Wiley and Sons, New York. 527 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moyle, P.B. & B. Vondracek. 1985. Persistence and structure of the fish assemblage in a small California stream. Ecology 66: 1-13.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mullen, D.M. & T.M. Burton. 1995. Size-related habitat use by longnose dace (Rhinichthys cataractae). Amer. Midl. Nat. 133: 177-183.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ostfeld, R.S. 1992. Small-mammal herbivores in a patchy environment: individual strategies and population response. pp. 43-74. In: M. Hunter, T. Ohgushi & P.W. Price (ed.) Effects of Resource Distribution on Animal-Plant Interactions, Academic Press, San Diego.

    Google Scholar 

  • Power, M.E. 1987. Predator avoidance by grazing fishes in temperate and tropical streams: importance of stream depth and prey size. pp. 333-351. In: W.C. Kerfoot & A. Sih (ed.) Predation: Direct and Indirect Impacts on Aquatic Communities, University Press of New England, Hanover.

    Google Scholar 

  • Power, M.E., T. Dudley & S. Cooper. 1989. Grazing catfish, fishing birds, and attached algae in a Panamanian stream. Env. Biol. Fish. 26: 285-294.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schlosser, I.J. 1982. Fish community structure and function along two habitat gradients in a headwater stream. Ecol. Monogr. 52: 395-414.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schlosser, I.J. 1987. The role of predation in age-and size-related habitat use by stream fishes. Ecology 68: 651-659.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schlosser, I.J. 1988. Predation risk and habitat selection by two size classes of a stream cyprinid: experimental test of a hypothesis. Oikos 52: 36-40.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schoener, T.W. 1977. Competition and the niche. pp. 35-136. In: C. Gans & T.W. Tinkle (ed.) Biology of the Reptilia, Academic Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Horne, B. 1982. Niches of adult and juvenile deer mice (Peromyscus maniculatus) in seral stages of coniferous forest. Ecology 63: 992-1003.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wiens, J.A. 1976. Population responses to patchy environments. Ann. Rev. Ecol. Sys. 7: 81-120.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilkinson, L., M. Hill, P. Howe, G. Birkenbeuel, J. Beck & J. Liu. 1994. Systat for DOS: using SYSTAT, 6th edition. SYSTAT, Inc., Evanston. 866 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zar, J.H. 1996. Biostatistical analysis, 3rd edition. Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs. 662 pp.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Spina, A.P. Habitat Partitioning in a Patchy Environment: Considering the Role of Intraspecific Competition. Environmental Biology of Fishes 57, 393–400 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1007682010268

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1007682010268

Navigation