Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Understanding how farmers choose between organic and conventional production: Results from New Zealand and policy implications

  • Published:
Agriculture and Human Values Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Research on organic farmers is popular but has seldom specifically focused on their motivations and decision making. Results based on detailed interviews with 83 New Zealand farmers (both organic and conventional) are presented by way of a decision tree that highlights elimination factors, motivations, and constraints against action. The results show the reasons that lie behind farmers' choices of farming methods and highlight the diversity of motivations for organic farming, identifying different types of organic and conventional farmers. Policies to encourage organic production should focus on attitudes, technology, and finances.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Assouline, G. (1997). “Conditions et obstacles a la difference de modeles d'agriculture durable en Europe.” Report for Ministere de l'Environment, Paris. QAP Decision, Theys.

  • Beharrell, B. and A. Crockett (1992). “New age food! New age consumers! With or without technology fix please,” British Food Journal 94(7): 5-13.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bruckmeier, K., H. Grund, D. Symes, and A. J. Jansen (1994). “Perspectives for environmentally sound agriculture in east Germany,” Agricultural Restructuring and Rural Change in Europe, Wageningse Sociologische Studies No. 37, pp. 180-194. Wageningen Agricultural University, The Netherlands.

    Google Scholar 

  • Buttel, F. H. and G. W. Gillespie (1988). “Preferences for crop production practices among conventional and alternative farmers,” American Journal of Alternative Agriculture 3(1): 11-17.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Campbell, H., J. R. Fairweather, and D. Steven (1997). Recent Developments in Organic Food Production in New Zealand Part II: Kiwifruit in the Bay of Plenty. Studies in Rural sustainability Research Report No. 2. Department of Anthropology, University of Otago, Dunedin, New Zealand.

    Google Scholar 

  • Campbell, H. and J. R. Fairweather (1996). “Theoretical implications of organic exporting in Canterbury,” in Recent Developments in Organic Food Production in New Zealand, Part 1: Organic Food Exporting in Canterbury. Studies in Rural Sustainability Research Report No. 1. H. Campbell, Department of Anthropology, University of Otago, Dunedin, New Zealand.

    Google Scholar 

  • Conacher, A. and A. Conacher (1982). “Organic farming in Australia,” Geowest No. 18. Occasional Papers of the Department of Geography, University of Western Australia, Nedlands.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dubgaard, A. and S. N. Sorensen (1988). “Organic and biodynamic farming in Denmark: a statistical survey.” Rapport, Statens-Jordbrugsokonomiske Institut, Denmark, No. 43, 33 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fairweather, J. R (1992). “A tree model of Hawkes Bay farmers tree planting decisions.” AERU Research Report No. 215. Lincoln University.

  • Fairweather, J. R. (1995). “Dilemmas and decisions over on or off-farm work,” Rural Society 5(1): 6-19.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fairweather, J. R. (1996). “The decision making of kiwifruit growers as indicated by attitudes towards the kiwigreen programme.” Report prepared for the Kiwifruit Marketing Board. New Zealand: Tauranga.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fairweather, J. R. and H. Campbell (1996). “The decision making of organic and conventional agricultural producers.” Research Report No. 233. Agribusiness and Economics Research Unit, Lincoln University, Canterbury, New Zealand.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fairweather J. R. and N. Keating (1994). “Goals and management styles of New Zealand farmers,” Agricultural Systems 44: 181-200.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fisher, P. (1989). “Barriers to the adoption of organic farming in Canterbury.” M. Appl. Sci. Thesis. Centre for Resource Management, Lincoln College.

  • Gladwin, C. H. (1989a). Ethnographic Decision Tree Modeling. Sage: Newbury Park.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hong, C. W. (1994). “Organic farming and the sustainability of agriculture in Korea,” Extension-Bulletin, ASPAC, Food and Fertilizer Technology Center No. 388.

  • Jangu, N., J. Fairweather, and S. Martin (1995). “Decision-making by farmers: an example of ethnographic decision tree modelling.” Paper presented to the New Zealand Agricultural Economics Society Conference, Blenheim, 30 June–1 July 1995.

  • Kvist, M. (1994). “Evaluation of the grant to organic production,” Jordbruksekonomiska Meddelanden 56(12): 1302-1322.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lamb, C. (1994). “The production and marketing of organic food: an analysis of organic pea production and consumer purchase determinants,” in the 10th International Organic Agriculture IFOAM Conference. Lincoln University, (December 1994).

  • Lockeritz W. and P. Madden (1987). “Midwestern organic farming: a ten year follow up,” American Journal of Alternative Agriculture 2(2): 57-63

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • MAF (1991). “A proposed policy on organic agriculture.” Ministry of Agriculture & Fisheries Policy Position Paper No. 1. Wellington.

  • MAF (1993). “Sustainable agriculture.” Ministry of Agriculture & Fisheries Policy Position Paper No. 2. Wellington.

  • MAF (1997). “Organic farming in New Zealand: an evaluation of the current and future prospects including an assessment of research needs.” Ministry of Agriculture & Fisheries Policy Technical Paper 97/13. Wellington.

  • Milder, P. J., P. D. Negrave, and R. A. Schoney (1991). “Descriptive analysis of Saskatchewan organic producers,” Canadian Journal of Agricultural Economics 394(II): 891-899.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Padel, S. (1994). “Adoption of organic farming as an example of the diffusion of an innovation — a literature review on the conversion to organic farming.” Centre for Organic Husbandry and Agroecology Discussion Paper Series, 94/1.

  • Pryde, J. F. (1981). “Survey of New Zealand farmer intentions and opinions, September–November, 1981.” Agricultural and Economics Research Unit Research Report No. 126. Lincoln College, Canterbury, New Zealand.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sullivan, S., E. McCann, R de Young, and D. Erickson (1996). “Farmers' attitudes about farming and the environment: a survey of conventional and organic farmers,” Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 9(2): 123-143.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Svensson, I. (1991). “Governmental subsidy to organic farming 1989. A mail inquiry.” Alternativ-Odling No. 7.

  • Willer, H. and D. A. Gillmor (1992). “Organic agriculture in the Republic of Ireland.” Irish Geography 25(2): 149-159.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Agribusiness and Economics Research Unit, Lincoln University, P.O. Box 84, Canterbury, New Zealand

    John R. Fairweather

Authors
  1. John R. Fairweather
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Fairweather, J.R. Understanding how farmers choose between organic and conventional production: Results from New Zealand and policy implications. Agriculture and Human Values 16, 51–63 (1999). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1007522819471

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1007522819471

Search

Navigation