Abstract
Many scholars are concerned that globalization and “scientization” of local management systems threatens the survival of valuable indigenous knowledge of agriculture and agroforestry. This paper addresses such concerns by drawing on a field study of knowledge about tree and crop cultivation in central India to examine dynamics of knowledge system change. It uses concepts from systems studies, including hierarchy, adaptability, connectedness, and scale, to show how parts of indigenous knowledge systems might be more likely to be lost or preserved under various socio-economic circumstances. It then suggests some concrete lessons for those interested in conserving indigenous knowledge: that knowledge is best conserved in situ; that concepts can be more important to communicate and preserve than mere facts or practices; that researchers might identify those parts of a knowledge system most in need of conservation attention; and that technical innovation might allow local-scale indigenous knowledge to interface more effectively with large-scale global technologies.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
REFERENCES
Agrawal, A. (1995). Dismantling the divide between indigenous and scientific knowledge. Development and Change 26: 413–439.
Allen, T. F. H., and Starr, T. B. (1982). Hierarchy:Perspectives for Ecological Complexity. University of Chicago Press, Chicago.
Apffel-Marglin, F., and Marglin, S. A. (Eds.) (1996). Decolonizing Knowledge: From Development to Dialogue. Clarendon Press, Oxford.
Bebbington, A. (1991). Indigenous agricultural knowledge systems, human interests, and critical analysis: Reflections on farmer organization in Ecuador. Agriculture and Human Values 8(1/2): 14–24.
Brodt, S. (1998). Learning From the Land: Local Knowledge Systems of Tree Management in Central India. Unpublished doctoral dissertation in Geography, University of Hawai'i, Manoa, Honolulu.
Brodt, S. (1999). Interactions of formal and informal knowledge systems in village-based tree management in central India. Agriculture and Human Values 16(4): 355–363.
Brodt, S. (2000). Explorations into the conservation of indigenous knowledge for resource management in India. In Seeland, K. and Schmitüusen, F. (eds.), Man in the Forest: Local Knowledge and Sustainable Management of Forests and Natural Resources in Tribal Communities in India. D. K. Printworld, New Delhi, pp. 49–88.
Browder, J. (1995). Redemptive communities: Indigenous knowledge, colonist farming systems, and conservation of tropical forests. Agriculture and Human Values 12(1): 17–30.
Chambers, R. (1983). Rural Development: Putting the Last First.Longman Scientific and Technical, Essex.
Checkland, P. B. (1981). Systems Thinking, System Practice. John Wiley and Sons, Chichester.
Conway, G. R. (1987). The properties of agroecosystems. Agricultural Systems 24(2): 95–117.
Dash, V. B., and Junius, A. M. M. (1983). A Hand Book of Ayurveda. Concept Publishing Co., New Delhi.
Eisemon, T. O. (1989). Schooling, cognition, and creating capacity for technological innovation in Africa. International Review of Education 35(3): 329–348.
Ellen, R., and Harris, H. (1997). Concepts of indigenous environmental knowledge in scientific and development studies literature. A critical assessment. (APTFWorking Paper 2). APTF, University of Kent, Canterbury, UK.
Escobar, A. (1995). Encountering Development: The Making and Unmaking of the ThirdWorld. Princeton University Press, Princeton.
Freebairn, D. K. (1995). Did the green revolution concentrate incomes?: A quantitative study of research reports. World Development 23(2): 265–279.
Gadgil, M., and Guha, R. (1995). Ecology and Equity: The Use and Abuse of Nature in Contemporary India. Routledge, London.
Gupta, Akhil. (1998). Postcolonial Developments: Agriculture in the Making of Modern India. Duke University Press, Durham, North Carolina.
Gupta, Anil. (1996). The Honey Bee network: Voices from grassroots innovators. Cultural Survival Quarterly Spring: 57–60.
Gupta, Anil. (1997). Creativity, innovation, entrepreneurship and networking at grassroots level. In Singh, B., and Mahanti, N. (eds.), Intellectual Property Rights and the Tribals. Inter-India Publications, New Delhi, pp. 67–80.
Hill, S. (1995). Globalization or indigenization: New alignments between knowledge and culture. Knowledge and Policy 8(2): 88–112.
Holling, C. S. (Ed.) (1978). Adaptive Environmental Assessment and Management. JohnWiley and Sons, Chichester.
Holling, C. S. (1986). The resilience of terrestrial ecosystems: Local surprise and global change. In Clark, W. C., and Munn, R. E. (eds.), Sustainable Development of the Biosphere. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp. 292–317.
Horton, R. (1982). Tradition and modernity revisited. In Hollis, M., and Lukes, S. (eds.), Rationality and Relativism. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, pp. 201–260.
Ingold, T. (1992). Culture and the perception of the environment. In Croll, E., and Parkin, D. (eds.), Bush Base: Forest Farm: Culture, Environment and Development. Routledge, London, pp. 39–56.
Jolly, J. (1977). Indian Medicine. Munshiram Manoharlal Publishers, New Delhi.
Kalland, A. (1994). Indigenous knowledge—local knowledge: Prospects and limitations. In Hansen, B. (ed.), Arctic Environment. A Report on the Seminar on Integrating Indigenous Peoples' Knowledge (September 20–23). Ministry of the Environment / The Home Rule of Greenland, Copenhagen, pp. 150–167.
Kurin, R. (1992). Indigenous agronomics and agricultural development in the Indus Basin. In Dove, M. R., and Carpenter, C. (eds.), Sociology of Natural Resources in Pakistan and Adjoining Countries. Vanguard Books, Lahore, pp. 31–64.
Mahbub-e-IIah, S. (1974). Farmers' Knowledge on Modern Agriculture and Adoption of Improved Practices. Bangladesh Academy for Rural Development, Comilla, Bangladesh.
Mahanti, N. (1997). Theme paper. InB. Singh and N. Mahanti (eds.), Intellectual Property Rights and the Tribals. Inter-India Publications, New Delhi, pp. 29–35.
Marten, G. G., and Saltman, D. M. (1986). The human ecology perspective. In Marten, G. G. (ed.), Traditional Agriculture in Southeast Asia: A Human Ecology Perspective. Westview Press, Boulder, pp. 20–53.
May, R.M. (1973). Stability and Complexity in Model Ecosystems. (Monographs in Population Biology Vol. 6). Princeton University Press, Princeton.
Prakash, G. (1999). Another Reason: Science and the Imagination of Modern India. Princeton University Press, Princeton.
Rogers, E. M. (1995). The Diffusion of Innovations (Fourth Ed.). Free Press, New York.
Seeland, K., and Schmithüusen, F. (2000). The meaning of indigenous knowledge in the use and management of renewable natural resources: Examples from applied research in India. In Seeland, K., and Schmithüusen, F. (eds.), Man in the Forest: Local Knowledge and Sustainable Management of Forests and Natural Resources in Tribal Communities in India. D. K. Printworld, New Delhi, pp. 1–10.
Shiva, V. (1997). Biopiracy: The Plunder of Nature and Knowledge. South End Press, Boston.
Sillitoe, P. (1998). The development of indigenous knowledge: A new applied anthropology. Current Anthropology 39(2): 223–252.
Thrupp, L. A. (1989). Legitimizing local knowledge: From displacement to empowerment for Third World people. Agriculture and Human Values:Summer: 13–24.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Brodt, S.B. A Systems Perspective on the Conservation and Erosion of Indigenous Agricultural Knowledge in Central India. Human Ecology 29, 99–120 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1007147806213
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1007147806213