Skip to main content
Log in

Plant quality assessment: an industrial perspective

  • Published:
New Forests Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The regions of the world using operational seedling testing to any significant extent are Canada, Britain, Sweden, and the Pacific Northwest region of the United States. Testing has been used operationally for batch culling (to ensure quality), as well as for research into improved nursery cultural practices. Savings from testing for seedling survival are substantial. However, growth gains from operational testing are more tenuous. Reduced rotation lengths and lower weeding costs are more likely to be associated with planting larger stock, rather than planting stock with higher physiological quality.

Large opportunities for savings exist for regions and organizations that produce poor quality stock, have high planting costs, or both. New tests have been developed and some are becoming operational. New tests might be more effective than existing tests. However, in the regions most involved in seedling testing, plantation survival has increased over the last ten years. Subsequently, additional investments in operational testing will likely achieve diminishing returns.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Burr, K. 1990. The target seedling concepts: Bud dormancy and cold hardiness, pp. 79–90. In: Landis, T. D. (Ed) Proceedings combined meeting of the Western Forest Nursery Associations. Rocky Mountain Forest and Range Expt. Statn. Gen. Tech. Rep. RM-167: 133–138.

  • Burr, K. and Tinus, R.W. 1988. Effect of the timing of cold storage on cold hardiness and root growth potential of Douglas-fir. In: Landis, T. D. (Ed) Proceedings combined meeting of the Western Forest Nursery Associations. Rocky Mountain Forest and Range Expt. Statn. Gen. Tech. Rep. RM-167: 133–138.

  • Carlson, W. C. and Miller, D. E. 1990. Target seedling root system size, hydraulic conductivity and water use during seedling establishment, pp. 53–66. In: Rose, R. et al. (Eds) Proceedings combined meeting of the Western Forest Nursery Associations, Target Seedling Symposium. Rocky Mountain Forest and Range Expt. Statn. Gen. Tech. Rep. RM-200.

  • Dunsworth, B. G. 1987. Stocktype handling survey. MacMillan Bloedel Limited, Land Use Planning Advisory Team, Internal Report, p. 14.

  • Dunsworth, B. G. 1988. Impact of lift date and storage on field performance forDouglas-fir and western hemlockm, pp. 199–206. In: Landis, T. D. (Ed) Proceedings combined meeting of the Western Forest Nursery Associations. Rocky Mountain Forest and Range Expt. Statn. Gen. Tech. Rep. RM-167: 133–138.

  • Grossnickle, S. C. and Folk, R. S. 1993. Stock quality assessment: Forecasting survival or performance on a reforestation site. Tree Planters Notes 44: 113–121.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grossnickle, S. C., Major, J. E., Arnott, J. T. and V. E. LeMay, V. E. 1991. Stock quality assessment through an integrated approach. New Forests 5: 77–91.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hawkins, C. D. and W.D. Binder, W. D. 1990. State of the art seedling stock quality tests based on seedling physiology, pp. 91–122. In: Landis, T. D. (Ed) Proceedings combined meeting of the Western Forest Nursery Associations. Rocky Mountain Forest and Range Expt. Statn. Gen. Tech. Rep. RM-167: 133–138.

  • Hobbs, S. D. 1984. The influence of species and stocktype selection on stand establishment: an ecophysiological perspective, PP. 179–224. In: Duryea, M. L. and Brown, G. N. (Eds) Proceedings of the SAF Physiology Working Group Technical Session, Seedling Physiology and Reforestation Success. Martinus Nighoff/Dr. W. Junk Publ.

  • Johnson, C.M. 1994. Field performance of container systems in British Columbia. For. Chron. 70: 137–139.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mason, W. L. 1991. Improving quality standards for conifer planting stock in Great Britain. Scottish Forestry 45: 28–41.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mattson, A. 1989.Root growth measurements in the nursery as ameans to reduce establishment costs. In: Proceedings IUFROWorking Group 53.02. New Zealand FRI Bulletin 156: 67–71.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mexal, J. G. and Landis, T. D. 1990. Target seedling concepts: Height and Diameter, pp. 17–36. In: Rose, R. et al. (Eds) Proceedings, Combined meeting of the Western Forest Nursery Associations, Target Seedling Symposium. Rocky Mountain For. and Range Expt. Stat. Gen. Tech. Rep. RM-200.

  • Overton, W. S. and Ching, K. K. 1978. Analysis of differences in height growth among populations in a nursery selection study of Douglas-fir. For. Sci. 24(4): 497–509.

    Google Scholar 

  • Puttenon, P. 1989. Criteria for using seedling performance potential tests. New For. 3: 67–87.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rikala, R. 1989. Planting performance of size graded Scots pine seedlings. Forestry Supplement 62: 29–37.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ritchie, G. A. 1989. Integrated growing schedules for achieving physiological uniformity in coniferous planting stock. Forestry Supplement 62: 15–32.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ritchie, G. A. and Dunlap, J. R. 1980. Root growth potential: Its development and expression in forest tree seedlings. N.Z. Jour. For. Res. 10: 214–248.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rowan, S. J. 1987. Nursery Seedling Quality Affects Growth and Survival in Outplantings. Georgia Forestry Commission, Georgia Forest Research Paper #70, 15 p.

  • Simpson D.G., Thompson, C. F. and Sutherland, C. D. 1994. Field performance potential of interior spruce seedlings: effects of stress treatments and prediction by root growth potential and needle conductance. Can. J. For. Res. 24: 576–586.

    Google Scholar 

  • Simpson, D. G. 1990. Frost hardiness, root growth capacity, and field performance relationships in interior spruce, lodgepole pine, Douglas-fir and western hemlock seedlings. Can. J. For. Res. 20: 566–572.

    Google Scholar 

  • South, D. B. and W.L. Mason, W. L. 1993. Influence of differences in planting stock size on early height growth of Sitka spruce. Forestry 66: 83–96.

    Google Scholar 

  • South, D. B., Mitchell, R. J., Zutler, B. R., Balneaves, J. M., Barber, B. L., Nelson, D. G. and Zwolinski, J. B. 1993. Integration of nursery practices and vegetation management: economic and biological potential for improving regeneration. Can. J. For. Res. 23: 2083–2092.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stjernberg, E. I. 1994. Stock handling fromnursery to planting site:An investigation into rough handling and its biological effects. In: Colombo, S. J. (Ed) Proceedings IUFRO Working Group 53.02, Making the Grade. In press.

  • Sweet, G. B. and Wareing, P. F. 1966. The relative growth rates at large and small seedlings in forest tree species. Forestry (Supp. 1) 39: 110–117.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tabbush, P. M. 1986. Rough handling, soil temperature and root development in outplanted Sitka spruce and Douglas-fir. Can. J. For. Res. 16: 1385–1388.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thompson, B. 1985. Seedling morphological evaluation – what you can tell by looking, pp. 59–71. In: Duryea, M. L. (Ed) Proceedings: Evaluating Seedling Quality: Principles, Procedures and Predictive Ability of Major Tests. Oregon State University.

  • Van den Driessche, R. 1992. Absolute and relative growth of Douglas-fir seedlings of different sizes. Tree Physiology 10: 141–152.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Dunsworth, G. Plant quality assessment: an industrial perspective. New Forests 13, 439–448 (1997). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1006519315955

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1006519315955

Keywords

Navigation