Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Contrasting ā-Dependencies in Selayarese

  • Published:
Natural Language & Linguistic Theory Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper deals with wh-questions in Selayarese, discussing two superficially similar constructions that display different properties along the path between the wh-operator and the gap. The constructions behave differently with respect to weak crossover, the occurrence of overt complementizers and agreement affixes, and word order. I argue that these differences follow from the hypothesis that the gap in one wh-construction is formed by cyclic movement while the other construction involves simple binding between an A′ (non-argument) position and a null resumptive element in an A (argument) position. The resumptive A′ dependency, however, also displays some surprising movement diagnostics, and so I argue that a wh-operator enters the derivation in A′ position, binds the A position, and then undergoes movement to its overt position. The analysis also involves the postulation of a Specifier position below C′ where focus features are checked. Arguments are presented that this position is an A′ position, and that it creates an island for other cyclic movement. In addition, the extraction patterns highlight the role of agreement features on functional heads, in particular C, and the different ways in which they may be checked.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

REFERENCES

  • Aoun, Joseph: 1986, Generalized Binding, Foris, Dordrecht.

    Google Scholar 

  • Aoun, Joseph, Norbert Hornstein, David Lightfoot, and Amy Weinberg: 1987, ‘Two Types of Locality’, Linguistic Inquiry 18, 537–577.

    Google Scholar 

  • Aoun, Joseph and Yen-Hui Audrey Li: 1993, Syntax of Scope, MIT Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baker, Mark: 1988, Incorporation, University of Chicago Press, Chicago.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barss, Andrew: 1986, Chains and Anaphoric Dependence, unpublished Ph.D. dissertation, MIT.

  • Belletti, Adriana: 1988, ‘The Case of Unaccusatives’, Linguistic Inquiry 19, 1–34.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bittner, Maria and Kenneth Hale: 1996, ‘The Structural Determination of Case and Agreement’, Linguistic Inquiry 27, 1–68.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bobaljik, Jonathon: 1993, ‘Nominally Absolutive is Not Absolutely Nominative’, in J. Mead (ed.), The Proceedings of WCCFL XI, CSLI, Stanford, pp. 44–60.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brochie, Amanda: 1992, Verbal Agreement and Constituent Order in Bugis, unpublished honours thesis, University of Melbourne.

  • Browning, Marguerite A.: 1991, Null Operator Constructions, Garland, New York (published version of 1987 MIT dissertation).

    Google Scholar 

  • Ceria, Virginia G.: 1993, ‘Verb Morphology and Valence Change in Selayarese’, in G. Coelho and D. Everett (eds.), University of Pittsburgh Working Papers in Linguistics, vol. 2, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, pp. 76–185.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chao, Wynn and Peter Sells: 1983, ‘On the Interpretation of Resumptive Pronouns’, in Peter Sells and Charles Jones (eds.), NELS 13, distributed by GLSA Publications, University of Masschusetts, Amherst, pp. 46–71.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chomsky, Noam: 1976, ‘Conditions on Rules of Grammar’, Linguistic Analysis 2, 303–351.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chomsky, Noam: 1981, Lectures on Government and Binding, Foris, Dordrecht.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chomsky, Noam: 1982, Some Concepts and Consequences of the Theory of Government and Binding, MIT Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chomsky, Noam: 1995, The Minimalist Program, MIT Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chomsky, Noam and Howard Lasnik: 1993, ‘The Theory of Principles and Parameters’, to appear in J. Jacobs, A. von Stechow, W. Sternefeld and T. Vennemann (eds.), Syntax: An International Handbook of Contemporary Research, Walter de Gruyter, Berlin and New York (reprinted in Chomsky 1995).

    Google Scholar 

  • Chung, Sandra: 1982, ‘Unbounded Dependencies in Chamorro Grammar’, Linguistic Inquiry 13, 39–77.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chung, Sandra: 1987, ‘The Syntax of Chamorro Existential Sentences’, in E. Reuland and A. G. B. ter Meulen (eds.), The Representation of Indefiniteness, MIT Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts, pp. 191–225.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chung, Sandra: 1991, ‘VP's and Verb Movement in Chamorro’, Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 8, 559–619.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chung, Sandra: 1994, ‘Wh-Agreement and ‘Referentiality’ in Chamorro’, Linguistic Inquiry 25, 1–44.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chung, Sandra: 1996, ‘The Locality of Adjunct Extraction in Chamorro’, presented at the Third Meeting of the Austronesian Formal Linguistics Assocation, UCLA.

  • Cinque, Guglielmo: 1990, Types of A' Dependencies, MIT Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dobrovie-Sorin, Carmen: 1990, ‘Clitic Doubling, wh-movement, and Quantification in Romanian’, Linguistic Inquiry 21, 351–397.

    Google Scholar 

  • Enç, Murvet: 1991, ‘The Semantics of Specificity’, Linguistic Inquiry 22, 1–25.

    Google Scholar 

  • Everett, Daniel: 1986, ‘Piraha Clitic Doubling and the Parametrization of Nominal Clitics’, in N. Fukui et al. (eds.), MIT Working Papers in Linguistics, vol. 8, MIT, Cambridge, Massachusetts, pp. 85–127.

    Google Scholar 

  • Everett, Daniel: 1989, ‘Clitic Doubling, Reflexives, and Word Order Alternations in Yagua’, Language 65, 339–372.

    Google Scholar 

  • Finer, Daniel: 1994, ‘On the Nature of Two A' Positions in Selayarese’, in Corver and van Reimsdijk (eds.), Studies on Scrambling, Mouton de Gruyter, Berlin, pp. 153–183

    Google Scholar 

  • Friberg, Barbara: 1988, ‘Ergativity, Focus, and Verb Morphology in Several South Sulawesi Languages’, Paper presented at the Sixth Conference on Austronesian Linguistics, Summer Institute of Linguistics, Hasnuddin University, Ujung Pandang, Sulawesi Selatan.

  • Fukui, Naoki and Margaret Speas: 1986, ‘Specifiers and Projection’, in N. Fukui, T. Rapoport, and E. Sagey (eds.), Papers in Theoretical Linguistics, MIT Working Papers in Linguistics, no. 8, pp. 128–172.

  • Georgopoulos, Carol: 1985, ‘Variables in Palauan Syntax’, Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 3, 59–84.

    Google Scholar 

  • Georgopoulos, Carol: 1991a, ‘Canonical Government and the Specifier Parameter: An ECP Account of Weak Crossover’, Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 9, 1–46.

    Google Scholar 

  • Georgopoulos, Carol: 1991b, ‘On A and A' Agreement’, Lingua 85, 134–169.

    Google Scholar 

  • Georgopoulos, Carol: 1991c, Syntactic Variables: Resumptive Pronouns and A' Binding in Palauan, Studies in Natural Language and Linguistic Theory, vol. 24, Kluwer, Dordrecht.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goodall, Grant: 1991, ‘On the Status of [Spec, IP]’, presented at the tenth Annual West Coast Conference on Formal Linguistics, Arizona State University.

  • Grimes, Joseph and Barbara Grimes: 1987, Languages of South Sulawesi, Department of Linguistics, Research School of Pacific Studies, Australian National University.

  • Guilfoyle, Eithne, Henrietta Hung, and Lisa Travis: 1992, ‘Spec of IP and Spec of VP: Two Subjects in Austronesian Languages’, Natural Language and Linguistic Theeory 10, 375–414.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haegeman, Liliane: 1985, ‘Infl, Comp, and Nominative Case Assignment in Flemish Infinitivals’, in P. Muysken and H. van Riemsdijk (eds.), Features and Projections, Foris, Dordrecht, pp. 123–137.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haïk, Isabelle: 1990, ‘Anaphoric, Pronominal, and Referential INFL’, Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 8, 347–374

    Google Scholar 

  • Hornstein, Norbert and Amy Weinberg: 1990, ‘The Necessity of LF’, The Linguistic Review 7, 129–167.

    Google Scholar 

  • Huang, Cheng-Teh James: 1982, Logical Relations in Chinese and the Theory of Grammar, unpublished Ph.D. dissertation, MIT.

  • Kayne, Richard: 1989, ‘Facets of Romance Past Participle Agreement’, in Paula Benincà (ed.), Dialect Variation and the Theory of Grammar, Foris, Dordrecht, pp. 85–103.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kayne, Richard: 1984, ‘Connectedness’, in R. Kayne, Connectedness and Binary Branching, Foris, Dordrecht, pp. 165–192.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kayne, Richard: 1994, Antisymmetry in Syntax, MIT Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts.

    Google Scholar 

  • Keenan, Edward: 1996, ‘Morphology is Structure: A Malagasy Test Case’, in Matthew Pearson and Ileana Paul (1996), pp. 92–112.

  • Kinyalolo, Kasangati K. W.: 1993, ‘Some Syntactic Properties of dò in Fòn’, Lingua 91, 201–233.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kiss, Katalin E.: 1981, ‘Structural Relations in Hungarian, a ‘Free’ Word Order Language’, Linguistic Inquiry 12, 185–213.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kitagawa, Yoshihisa: 1986, Subject in Japanese and English, unpublished Ph.D. dissertation, distributed by GLSA Publications, University of Massachusetts, Amherst.

  • Koopman, Hilda and Dominique Sportiche: 1982, ‘Variables and the Bijection Principle’, The Linguistic Review 2, 139–160.

    Google Scholar 

  • Koopman, Hilda and Dominique Sportiche: 1989, ‘Pronouns, Logical Variables, and Logophoricity in Abe’, Linguistic Inquiry 20, 555–586.

    Google Scholar 

  • Koopman, Hilda and Dominique Sportiche: 1991, ‘The Position of Subjects’, Lingua 85, 211–258.

    Google Scholar 

  • Koster, Jan: 1987, Domains and Dynasties, Foris, Dordrecht.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kroeger, Paul: 1993, Phrase Structure and Grammatical Relations in Tagalog, CSLI, Stanford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kuroda, Sige-Yuki: 1988, ‘Whether We agree or Not: A Comparative Syntax of English and Japanese’, Linguisticae Investigationes 12, 1–47.

    Google Scholar 

  • Larson, Richard: 1988, ‘The Double Object Construction’, Linguistic Inquiry 19, 335–391.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lasnik, Howard and Mamoru Saito: 1984, ‘On the Nature of Proper Government’, Linguistic Inquiry 15, 235–289.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lasnik, Howard and Mamoru Saito: 1992, Move α, MIT Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lasnik, Howard and Timothy Stowell: 1991, ‘Weakest Crossover’, Linguistic Inquiry 22, 687–720.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lefebvre, Claire (ed.): 1991, Serial Verbs: Grammatical, Comparative, and Cognitive Approaches, John Benjamins, Amsterdam.

    Google Scholar 

  • Levin, Juliette and Diane Massam: 1985, ‘Surface Ergativity: Case/Theta Relations Reexamined’, in Steven Berman et al. (eds.), Proceedings of NELS XV, GLSA, University of Massachusetts, Amherst.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mahajan, Anoop: 1990, The A/A-bar Distinction and Movement Theory, unpublished Ph.D. dissertation, MIT.

  • Mahajan, Anoop: 1992, ‘The Specificity Condition and the CED’, Linguistic Inquiry 23, 510–516.

    Google Scholar 

  • Massam, Diane: 1985, Case Theory and the Projection Principle, unpublished Ph.D. dissertation, MIT.

  • Massam, Diane: 1996, ‘Clause Structure and Case in Niuean’, paper presented at the Third Meeting of the Austronesian Formal Linguistics Assocation, UCLA.

  • May, Robert: 1985, Logical Form, MIT Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts.

    Google Scholar 

  • McCloskey, James: 1978, A Fragment of a Grammar of Modern Irish, unpublished Ph.D. dissertation, University Texas at Austin (Texas Linguistic Forum #12).

  • McCloskey, James: 1990, ‘Resumptive Pronouns, A'-Binding, and Levels of Representation in Irish’, in R. Hendrick (ed.), The Syntax of the Modern Celtic Languages, Academic Press, New York, pp. 199–248.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mithun, Marianne and Hasan Basri: 1987, ‘The Phonology of Selayarese’, Oceanic Linguistics 25, 210–254.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ouhalla, Jamal: 1993, ‘Subject Extraction, Negation, and the Anti Agreement Effect’, Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 11, 477–518.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pearson, Matthew: 1996, ‘Domain Phrases and Topic Arguments in Malagasy Existentials’, in Matthew Pearson and Ileana Paul (1996), pp. 113–141.

  • Pearson, Matthew and Ilena Paul (eds.), 1996, The Structure of Malagasy, vol. 1, UCLA Occasional Papers in Linguistics #17, UCLA.

  • Pollock, Jean-Yves: 1989, ‘Verb Movement, UG, and the Structure of IP’, Linguistic Inquiry 20, 365–424.

    Google Scholar 

  • Postal, Paul: 1971, Crossover Phenomena, Holt, Rinehart, and Winston, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Postal, Paul: 1993, ‘Remarks on Weak Crossover Effects’, Linguistic Inquiry 24, 539–556.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reinhart, Tanya: 1983, Anaphora and Semantic Interpretation, University of Chicago, Chicago.

    Google Scholar 

  • Riemsdijk, Henk van and Edwin Williams: 1982, ‘NP-Structure’, The Linguistic Review 1, 171–217.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rizzi, Luigi: 1990, Relativized Minimality, MIT Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rizzi, Luigi: 1991, ‘Residual Verb Second and the wh-Criterion’, unpublished manuscript, Université de Genève.

  • Safir, Kenneth: 1984, ‘Multiple Variable Binding’, Linguistic Inquiry 15, 603–638.

    Google Scholar 

  • Safir, Kenneth: 1996, ‘Derivation, Representation, and Resumption: The Domain of Weak Crossover’, Linguistic Inquiry 27, 313–339.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sells, Peter: 1984, Syntax and Semantics of Resumptive Pronouns, unpublished Ph.D. dissertation, University of Massachusetts. Distributed by GLSA publications, University of Massachusetts, Amherst.

  • Sells, Peter: 1995, ‘Raising and the Order of Constituents’, paper presented at the Second Meeting of the Austronesian Formal Linguistics Assocation, McGill University.

  • Shlonsky, Ur: 1992a, ‘Resumptive Pronouns as a Last Resort’, Linguistic Inquiry 23, 443–468.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shlonsky, Ur: 1992b, ‘The Representation of Agreement in Comp and Subject Clitics in West Flemish’, unpublished manuscript, Université de Genève, presented in part at the Eighth Comparative Germanic Conference, Tromsø.

  • Sportiche, Dominique: 1985, ‘Remarks on Crossover’, Linguistic Inquiry 16, 460–469.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sportiche, Dominique: 1988, ‘A Theory of Floating Quantifiers’, Linguistic Inquiry 19, 425–449.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stowell, Timothy: 1981, The Origins of Phrase Structure, unpublished Ph.D. dissertation, MIT.

  • Torrego, Esther: 1983, ‘More Effects of Successive Cyclic Movement’, Linguistic Inquiry 14, 561–565.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tuller, Laurice: 1992, ‘The Syntax of Postverbal Focus Constructions in Chadic’, Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 10, 303–334.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vikner, Sten: 1995, Verb Movement and Expletive Subjects in the Germanic Languages, Oxford Studies in Comparative Syntax, Oxford University Press, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Williams, Edwin: 1986, ‘A Reassignment of the Functions of LF’, Linguistic Inquiry 17, 265–299.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zaenen, Annie: 1983, ‘On Syntactic Binding’, Linguistic Inquiry 14, 469–504.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Linguistics, SUNY at Stony Brook, Stony Brook, NY, 11794-4376

    Daniel L. Finer

Authors
  1. Daniel L. Finer
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Finer, D.L. Contrasting ā-Dependencies in Selayarese. Natural Language & Linguistic Theory 15, 677–728 (1997). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1005801115342

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1005801115342

Keywords

Search

Navigation