Abstract
The raw starch-degrading a-amylase of Bacillus sp. IMD 434 was purified to homogeneity by acetone precipitation, ion- exchange chromatography and hydrophobic interaction chromatography. The enzyme had a relative molecular mass of 69,200, displayed maximum activity at pH 6.0 and 65 °C and released large amounts of glucose and maltose on hydrolysis of starch.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Bealin-Kelly F, Kelly CT, Fogarty WM (1991) Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 36: 332–336.
Bernfeld P (1955) Methods Enzymol. 1: 149–158.
Candussio A, Schmid G, Bock A (1990) Eur. J. Biochem. 191: 177–185.
Collins BS, Kelly CT, Fogarty WM, Doyle EM (1993) Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 39: 31–35.
David MH, Gunther H, Roper H (1987) Starch 39: 436–440.
Ensari NY, Otludil B, Aytekin MC (1995) Starch 8: 315–321.
Fogarty WM, Kelly CT (1990) In: Microbial Enzymes Biotechnology. London: Elsevier Science Publishers, pp. 71–132.
Hamilton LM, Kelly CT, Fogarty WM (1999) Carbohydr. Res. (in press).
Hayashida S, Teramoto Y, Inoue T (1988) Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 54: 1516–1522.
Hayashida S, Teramoto Y, Inoue T, Mitsuiki D (1990) Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 56: 2584–2586.
Leatherbarrow RJ (1987) Enzfitter, a Non-Linear Regression Analysis Program for the IBM PC. Amsterdam: Elsevier-Biosoft.
McTigue MA, Kelly CT, Doyle EM, Fogarty WM (1995) Enzyme Microbiol. Technol. 17: 570–573.
Outtrup N, Norman BE (1984) Starch 36: 405–411.
Suzuki Y, Nagayama T, Nakano H, Oishi K (1987) Starch 39: 211–214.
Taniguchi H, Man Jae C, Yoshigi N, Maruyama Y (1983) Agric. Biol. Chem. 47: 511–519.
Teramoto Y, Kira I, Hayashida S (1989) Agric. Biol. Chem. 47: 511–519.
Tomazic SJ, Klibanov AM (1988) J. Biol. Chem. 263: 3092–3096.
Vihinen M, Mäntsälä P (1990) Biotechnol. Appl. Biochem. 12: 427–435.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Hamilton, L.M., Kelly, C.T. & Fogarty, W.M. Purification and properties of the raw starch-degrading α- amylase of Bacillus sp. IMD 434. Biotechnology Letters 21, 111–115 (1999). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1005413816101
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1005413816101