Skip to main content
Log in

La Donna e Mobile – or is She? Voter Preferences and Public Support for the Performing Arts

  • Published:
Public Choice Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper investigates a referendum held in 1994 on the public support of the Zürich Opera House. The estimates demonstrate that well over 85% of the variance in the approval rates across ballot districts can be explained with a few variables characterizing the socio-economic composition of the electorate. Since these variables have been shown to influence the level of public support for the arts in representative democracies as well, our result lends support to the view that in democracies public support for the arts is coupled to the stable preferences of the electorate. This insight may, to some extent, mitigate and qualify existing fears that cultural policy is completely at the mercy of changing government ideologies and interest group influences.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Amemiya, Takeshi (1985). Advanced econometrics. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baumol, W. and Bowen, W. (1966). Performing arts: The economic dilemma. Cambridge, Mass.: Twentieth Century Fund.

    Google Scholar 

  • Becker, G. (1996). Accounting for tastes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bernholz, P. (1974). On the reasons for the influence of interest groups on political decision making. Zeitschrift für Wirtschafts-und Socialwissenschaft 94: 45–63.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bille Hansen, T. (1997). The willingness-to-pay for the Royal Theatre in Copenhagen as a public good. Journal of Cultural Economics 21: 1–28.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bishop, R.-C., Heberlein, T. (1986). Does contingent valuation work? In: R. Cummings, D. Brookshire and W. Schulze (Eds.). Valuing environmental goods: An assessment of the contingent valuation method, 123–147. Totowa, N.J.: Littlefield, Adams; Rowman and Allanheld.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carson, R. and Mitchell, R. (1989), Using surveys to value public goods: The contingent valuation method. Washington, D.C.: Resources for the future.

    Google Scholar 

  • Diamond, P.A. and Hausman, J.A. (1994). Contingent valuation: Is some number better than no number? Journal of Economic Perspectives 8: 45–64.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frey, B.S. and Pommerehne, W.W. (1989). Muses and markets: Explorations in the economics of arts. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gemerden, L. van (1989). A survey on the cultural economics of opera. In: C. Waits, W. Hendon, J. Schuster (Eds.). Cultural economics 88: A European perspective. Akron: Akron University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heilbrun, J. and Gray, C.M. (1993). The economics of art and culture: An American perspective. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holcombe, R. (1989). The median voter model in public choice theory. Public Choice 61: 115–125.

    Google Scholar 

  • Krebs, S. and Pommerehne, W.W. (1995). Politico-economic interactions of German public performing arts institutions. Journal of Cultural Economics 19: 17–32.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maddala, G.S. (1983). Limited dependent and qualitative variables in econometrics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • McFadden, D. (1973). Conditional logit analysis of qualitative choice behavior. In: P. Zarembka (Ed.). Frontiers in econometrics. New York: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • McFadden, D. and Reid, F. (1975). Aggregate travel demand forecasting from disaggregated behavioral models, Transportation Research Board. Transportation Research Record 534: 24–37.

    Google Scholar 

  • O'Hagan, J. (1996). Access to and participation in the arts: The case of those with low incomes/educational attainment. Journal of Cultural Economics 20: 269–282.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pindyck, R. and Rubinfeld, D. (1991). Econometric Models and Economic Forecast, 3rd ed., New York: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pommerehne, W. (1978). Institutional approaches to public expenditures: Empirical evidence from Swiss municipalities. Journal of Public Economics 9: 163–201.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schneider, F. and Pommerehne, W.W. (1983). Private demand for public subsidies to the arts: A study in voting and expenditure theory. In: W.S. Hendon and J.L. Shanahan (Eds.). Economics of cultural decisions. Cambridge, Mass: Abt Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schulze, G. and Rose, A. (1998). Public orchestra funding in Germany: An empirical investigation. Journal of Cultural Economics (in press).

  • Stigler, G. and Becker, G. (1977). De gustibus non est disputandum. American Economic Review 67: 76–90.

    Google Scholar 

  • Throsby, D. (1984). The measurement of willingness to pay for mixed goods. Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics 46: 279–290.

    Google Scholar 

  • Throsby, D. (1994). The production and consumption of the arts: A view of cultural economics. Journal of Economic Literature 32: 1–29.

    Google Scholar 

  • Throsby, D. and Withers, G. (1986). Strategic bias and demand for public goods: Theory and an application to the arts. Journal of Public Economics 31: 307–327.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weck-Hannemann, H. (1990). Protectionism in direct democracy. Journal of Institutional and Theoretical Economics/Zeitschrift für die gesamte Staatswissenschaft 146: 389–418.

    Google Scholar 

  • Withers, G. (1979). Private demand for public subsidies: An econometric study of cultural support in Australia. Journal of Cultural Economics 3: 53–61.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Schulze, G.G., Ursprung, H.W. La Donna e Mobile – or is She? Voter Preferences and Public Support for the Performing Arts. Public Choice 102, 129–147 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1005066823837

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1005066823837

Keywords

Navigation