Abstract
This paper discusses stylistic conventions within broad disciplinary groupings in the language of doctoral theses. It argues that the language conventions in doctoral thesis texts reflect spohisticated learning of key disciplinary norms governing the conception, production and reporting of knowledge in particular fields. The paper shows that many conventions are subtle; they may not be readily identifiable to experienced scholars, yet doctoral students are expected to learn and master them, suggesting that discipline-specific writing norms and conventions are learned largely by tacit means during doctoral study. The paper reviews the nature of linguistic forms in doctoral theses and identifies the underlying epistemological and cultural influences which shape the writing. Doctoral theses from a range of disciplines are examined closely. Attention particularly is directed to the overall structure of argument and the techniques for coherence; the conventions for citing, acknowledging and making judgements about previous research; and the nature of the technical language of the field.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Anson, Chris M. and Forsberg, L. Lee (1990). ‘Moving beyond the academic community’, Written Communication 7, 200–231.
Bartholomae, David (1985). ‘When a writer can’t write’, in Rose, M. (ed.), Inventing the University. New York: Guildford, pp. 143–165.
Bazerman, Charles (1981). ‘What written knowledge does’, Philosophy of the Social Sciences 2, 361–387.
Bazerman, Charles (1987). ‘Codifying the social scientific style: The APA publication manual as a behaviourist rhetoric’, in Nelson, John S., Megill, Allan and McCloskey, Donald N. (eds.), The Rhetoric of the Human Sciences. Madison, Wisconsin: University of Wisconsin Press, pp. 125–144.
Becher, Tony (1987). ‘Disciplinary discourse’, Studies in Higher Education 12, 261–274.
Becher, Tony (1989). Academic Tribes and Territories: Intellectual Enquiry and the Cultures of the Disciplines. Milton Keynes: Open University Press.
Becher, Tony (1990). ‘The counter-culture of specialisation’, European Journal of Education 25, 333–346.
Berg, Robert A. (1992). ‘Equity and non equity cooperative agreements: Implications for small business performance’. Unpublished PhD thesis. University of Auckland.
Berkenkotter, C., Huckin, T. and Ackerman, J. (1988). ‘Conventions, conversations, and the writer: Case study of a student in a rhetoric PhD program’, Research in the Teaching of English 22, 9–41.
Bizzell, Patricia (1982). ‘Cognition, convention, and certainty: What we need to know about writing’, PRE/TEXT 3, 213–243.
Bizzell, Patricia (1989). ‘Cultural criticism: A social approach to studying writing’, Rhetoric Review 7, 224–230.
Crane, D. (1972). Invisible Colleges. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Dunn, Andrew M. (1993). ‘The song of the zebra finch: Contexts and possible functions’. Unpublished PhD. Australia: La Trobe University.
Gerholm, Thomas (1990). ‘On tacit knowledge in academia’, European Journal of Education 25, 263–271.
Gilbert, G. (1977). ‘Referencing as a form of persuasion’, Social Studies of Science 7, 113– 122.
Gilbert, N. and Mulkay, M. (1980). ‘Contexts of scientific discourse: Social accounting in experimental papers’, in Knorr, K. D., Khron, R. and Whitley, R. (eds.), The Social Process of Scientific Investigation. London: D. Reidel Publishers, pp. 297–321.
Gilbert, G. N. and Mulkay, M. (1984). Opening Pandora's Box. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Gillett, Sue (1990). ‘Contemporary departures from realism: Placing Australia’. Unpublished PhD thesis. Australia: La Trobe University.
Gould, Anthony J. (1989). ‘The Melbourne symphony orchestra: Factors influencing its character and identity’. Unpublished PhD thesis. Australia: La Trobe University.
Halliday, M. A. K. (1978). Language as a Social Semiotic: The Social Interpretation of Language and Meaning. London: Edward Arnold.
Halliday, M. A. K. (1994). An Introduction to Functional Grammar, 2nd ed. Melbourne: Edward Arnold.
Harriott, Vicki J. (1983). ‘Reproductive ecology and population dynamics in a scleractinian coral community’. Unpublished PhD thesis. Australia: James Cook University.
Hemmings, Brian C. (1994). ‘Senior secondary school persistence and attrition: The development and testing of a theoretical model’. Unpublished PhD thesis. Australia: University of New South Wales.
Knorr-Cetina, Karin D. (1981). The Manufacture of Knowledge. Oxford: Pergamon.
Knorr-Cetina, K. D. and Mulkay, M. (eds.) (1983). Science Observed. London: Sage.
Latour, Bruno (1987). Science In Action. Cambridge, Massachusetts: Harvard University Press.
Leslie, Susan L. (1993). ‘“A friendly debate”: Religious and political discourse in restoration England, 1668–1674’. Unpublished PhD thesis. Australia: La Trobe University.
Martin, J. R. (1992). English Text: System and Structure. Amsterdam: Benjamin.
McConchie, David (1984). ‘The geology and geochemistry of the Joffre and Whaleback Shale Members of the Brockman Iron Formation’. Unpublished PhD thesis. University of Western Australia.
Moritz, Craig C. (1984). ‘Comparative studies of evolution in Gehyra and Heteronotia (Gekkonidae: Reptilia)’. Unpublished PhD thesis. Australian National University.
Morton, Richard J. (1990). ‘The enemy within the gates: The internment of Australian citizens during the GreatWar’. Unpublished PhD thesis. Australia: La Trobe University.
Myers, G. (1985). ‘Texts as knowledge claims: The social construction of two biology articles’, Social Studies of Science 15, 595–630.
Myers, Greg (1990). Writing Biology. Madison, Wisconsin: University of Wisconsin Press.
Parry, Sharon (1997). ‘Doctoral study in its disciplinary context’. Unpublished PhD thesis. Australia: La Trobe University.
Parry, Sharon and Hayden, Martin (1994). Supervising Higher Degree Research Students: An Investigation of Practices Across a Range of Academic Departments. Canberra: Australian Government Publishing Service.
Proudford, Christine M. (1992). ‘The process of school improvement and the meaning of effective schooling: A contextual analysis of four high schools in New South Wales’. Unpublished PhD thesis. Australia: University of New England.
Swales, J. (1981). Aspects of Article Introductions. Birmingham: University of Aston Language Studies Unit. ERIC Document Service.
Torrance, M. and Thomas, G. ‘The development of writing skills in doctoral research students’, in Burgess, Robert G. (ed.), Postgraduate Education and Training in the Social Sciences. London: Jessica Kingsley Publishers, pp. 105–123.
Toulmin, S. (1972). Human Understanding. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
Walker, Richard F. (1980). ‘A semantic-syntactic analysis of child language within a functional frame’. Unpublished PhD thesis. Australia: Griffith University.
Whitley, R. (1980). ‘The context of scientific investigation’, in Knorr, Karin D., Khron, Roger and Whitley, Richard (eds.), The Social Processes of Scientific Investigation. London: D. Reidel Publishing Company, pp. 297–321.
Whitley, R. (1984). The Intellectual and Social Organisation of the Sciences. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
Wittgenstein, Ludwig (1953; First published, 1922). Philosophical Investigations. London: Routledge.
Woolgar, S. (1980). ‘Discovery: Logic and sequence in a scientific text’, in Knorr, Karin D., Khron, Roger and Whitley, Richard (eds.), The Social Processes of Scientific Investigation. London: D. Reidel Publishing Company, pp. 239–268.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Parry, S. Disciplinary discourse in doctoral theses. Higher Education 36, 273–299 (1998). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1003216613001
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1003216613001