Abstract
Individuals have a penchant for action, often for good reasons. But action bias arises if that penchant is carried over to areas where those reasons do not apply, hence is nonrational. Action bias is explored theoretically, and then empirically, using data from surveys of hypothetical environmental decisions. Quite apart from agency considerations, individuals like to affect outcomes when gains are reaped. Given the ability to help one of two sites, we find that decision makers choose to foster improvement rather than prevent deterioration, despite framing that makes it arbitrary which site is improved, which preserved. Strong action bias—individuals choosing to reap gains even though they must impose losses—is also observed. These concepts are related to loss aversion, status quo bias, omission bias for losses, and bright-line behavior.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Baron, Jonathan. (1994). “Nonconsequentialist Decisions,” Behavioral and Brain Sciences 17, 1–42.
Baron, Jonathan, and Ilana Ritov. (1994). “Reference Points and Omission Bias,” Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes 59, 475–498.
Breyer, Stephen. (1993). Breaking the Vicious Circle: Toward Effective Risk Regulation. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Degeorge, Francois, Jayendu Patel, and Richard Zeckhauser. (1999). “Earnings Management to Exceed Thresholds,” Journal of Business 72, 1–33.
Gordon, Danielle, and Daniel Kammen. (1996). “Uncertainty and Overconfidence in Time Series Forecasts: Application to the Standard & Poor's 500 Stock Index,” Applied Financial Economics 6, 189–198.
Gregory, Robin, Sarah Lichtenstein, and Paul Slovic. (1993). “Valuing Environmental Resources: A Constructive Approach,” Journal of Risk and Uncertainty 7, 177–197.
Hahn, Robert. (1998). The Economics and Politics of Climate Change. Washington, DC: AEI Press.
Hamilton, James, and W. Kip Viscusi. (1999). Calculating Risks? The Spatial and Political Dimensions of Hazardous Waste Policy. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Irwin, Julie, Paul Slovic, Sarah Lichtenstein, and Gary McClelland. (1993). “Preference Reversals and the Measurement of Environmental Values,” Journal of Risk and Uncertainty 6, 5–18.
Kahneman, Daniel. (1986). “Comments on the Contingent Valuation Method.” In Ronald Cummings, David Brookshire, and William Schulze eds., Valuing Environmental Goods: An Assessment of the Contingent Valuation Method. Totowa, NJ: Littlefield, pp. 185–194.
Kahneman, Daniel, and Amos Tversky. (1979). “Prospect Theory: An Analysis of Decision under Risk,” Econometrica 47, 263–291.
Knetsch, Jack. (1997). “Reference States, Fairness, and the Choice of Measure to Value Environmental Changes.” In Max Bazerman, David Messick, Ann Tenbrunsel, and Kimberly Wade-Benzoni eds., Environment, Ethics, and Behavior. San Francisco: New Lexington Press, pp. 13–32.
Knetsch, Jack, and J. A. Sinden. (1984). “Willingness to Pay and Compensation Demanded: Experimental Evidence of an Unexpected Disparity in Measures of Value,” Quarterly Journal of Economics 99, 507–521.
Laibson, David, and Richard Zeckhauser. (1998). “Amos Tversky and the Ascent of Behavioral Economics,” Journal of Risk and Uncertainty 16, 7–47.
Ludwig, Donald, Ray Hilborn, and Carl Walters. (1993). “Uncertainty, Resource Exploitation, and Conservation: Lessons from History,” Science 260, 17, 36.
Mintzer, Irving. (1987). A Matter of Degrees. Washington, DC: World Resources Institute.
Neumann, Bruce, and Laurence Friedman. (1978). “Opportunity Costs: Further Evidence Through an Experimental Replication,” Journal of Accounting Research 16, 400–410.
Odean, Terrence. (1998). “Volume, Volatility, Price, and Profit When All Traders are Above Average,” Journal of Finance 53 (6), 1887–1934.
Ritov, Ilana, and Jonathan Baron. (1990). “Reluctance to Vaccinate: Omission Bias and Ambiguity,” Journal of Behavioral Decision Making 3, 263–277.
Ritov, Ilana, and Jonathan Baron. (1992). “Status-Quo and Omission Biases,” Journal of Risk and Uncertainty 5, 49–61.
Ritov, Ilana, Jonathan Baron, and John Hershey. (1993). “Framing Effects in the Evaluation of Multiple Risk Reduction,” Journal of Risk and Uncertainty 6 (2), 145–159.
Samuelson, William, and Richard Zeckhauser. (1988). “Status Quo Bias in Decision Making,” Journal of Risk and Uncertainty 1, 7–59.
Seligman, Martin. (1975). Helplessness. San Francisco: W.H. Freeman and Company.
Seligman, Martin. (1990). Learned Optimism. New York: A.A. Knopf.
Schelling, Thomas. (1960). The Strategy of Conflict. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Schlyakhter, Alexander, Daniel Kammen, Claire Broido, and Richard Wilson. (1994). “Quantifying the Credibility of Energy Projections from Trends in Past Data,” Energy Policy 22 (2), 119–130.
Thaler, Richard. (1980). “Toward a Positive Theory of Consumer Choice,” Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization 1, 39–60.
Thaler, Richard, Daniel Kahneman, and Jack Knetsch. (1992). “The Endowment Effect, Loss Aversion, and the Status Quo Bias.” In Richard Thaler ed., The Winner's Curse. Princeton: Princeton University Press, pp. 63–78.
Thompson, Leigh, and Richard Gonzales. (1997). “Environmental Disputes: Competition for Scarce Resources and Clashing of Values.” In Max Bazerman, David Messick, Ann Tenbrunsel, and Kimberly Wade-Benzoni eds., Environment, Ethics, and Behavior. San Francisco: New Lexington Press, pp. 75–104.
Tversky, Amos, and Daniel Kahneman. (1974). “Judgment under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases,” Science 185, 1124–1131.
Viscusi, W. Kip, Wesley Magat, and Joel Huber. (1987). “An Investigation of the Rationality of Consumer Valuations of Multiple Health Risks,” Rand Journal of Economics 18, 465–479.
Viscusi, W. Kip, Wesley Magat, and Joel Huber. (1991). “Pricing Environmental Health Risks: Survey Assessments of Risk-Risk and Risk-Dollar Trade-offs for Chronic Bronchitis,” Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 21 (1), 32–51.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Patt, A., Zeckhauser, R. Action Bias and Environmental Decisions. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty 21, 45–72 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1026517309871
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1026517309871