Skip to main content
Log in

The Double-Edged Sword of Self-Handicapping: Discounting, Augmentation, and the Protection and Enhancement of Self-Esteem

  • Published:
Motivation and Emotion Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

A field study was conducted to test the hypothesis that discounted and augmented ability self-attributions mediate the interactive effects of claimed self-handicaps and academic success and failure on self-esteem. College students were assessed for individual differences in self-handicapping and self-esteem at the beginning of the term and then completed a checklist of claimed self-handicaps immediately preceding their first in-class exam. At the following class, graded exams were returned to the students, who then completed measures of mood, self-esteem, and performance attributions. High self-handicappers claimed more excuses prior to the test. Among failing students, claimed handicaps were associated with greater discounting of ability attributions and higher self-esteem. Among successful students, claimed handicaps were associated with augmented ability attributions and enhanced self-esteem. However, we failed to find support for sex differences in claimed self-handicapping. The implications of the present research with regard to the functional utility of self-handicapping behavior are discussed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

REFERENCES

  • Aiken, L. S., & West, S. G. (1991). Multiple regression: Testing and interpreting interactions. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berglas, S. (1988). The three faces of self-handicapping: Protective self-presentation, a strategy for self-esteem enhancement, and a character disorder. In S. L. Zelen (Ed.), Self-representation: The second attribution-personality conference, CSPP-LA, 1986 (pp. 133-169). New York: Springer-Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berglas, S., & Jones E. E. (1978). Drug choice as a self-handicapping strategy in response to noncontingent success. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 36, 405-417.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fleming, J. S., & Courtney, B. E. (1984). The dimensionality of self-esteem. II. Hierarchical facet model for revised measurement scales. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 46, 404-421.

    Google Scholar 

  • Higgins, R. L., & Harris, R. N. (1988). Strategic “alcohol” use: Drinking to self-handicap. Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 6, 191-202.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hirt, E. R., Deppe, R. K., & Gordon, L. J. (1991). Self-reported versus behavioral self-handicapping: Empirical evidence for a theoretical distinction. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 61, 981-991.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones, E. E., & Berglas, S. (1978). Control of attributions about the self through self-handicapping strategies: The appeal of alcohol and the role of underachievement. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 4, 200-206.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones, E. E., & Rhodewalt, F. (1982). The Self-Handicapping Scale. Unpublished manuscript. (Available from F. Rhodewalt, Department of Psychology, University of Utah).

  • Judd, C., & Kenny, D. A. (1981). Estimating the effects of social interventions. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kelley, H. H. (1972). Causal schemata and the attribution process. Morristown, NJ: General Learning Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kolditz, T. A., & Arkin, R. M. (1982). An impression management interpretation of the self-handicapping strategy. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 43, 492-502.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mayerson, N. H., & Rhodewalt, F. (1988). The role of self-protective attributions in the experience of pain. Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 6, 203-218.

    Google Scholar 

  • McFarland, C., & Ross, M. (1982). Impact of causal attributions on affective reactions to success and failure. Journal of Personality ad Social Psychology, 43, 937-946.

    Google Scholar 

  • Metalsky, G., Abramson, L. Y., Seligman, M. E. P., Semmel, A., & Peterson C. (1982). Attributional styles and life events in the classroom: Vulnerability and invulnerability to depressive mood reactions. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 43, 612-617.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rhodewalt, F. (1990) Self-handicappers: Individual differences in the preference for anticipatory self-protective acts. In R. Higgins, C. R. Snyder, & S. Berglas. Self-handicapping: The paradox that isn't. New York: Plenum Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rhodewalt F. (1994) Conceptions of ability, achievement goals, and individual differences in self-handicapping behavior: On the application of implicit theories. Journal of Personality, 62, 67-85.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rhodewalt, F., & Fairfield M. (1991). Claimed self-handicaps and the self-handicapper: On the relation of reductions in intended effort to performance. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 25, 402-417.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rhodewalt, F., & Hill, S. K. (1995). Self-handicapping in the classroom: The effects of claimed self-handicaps on responses to academic failure. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 17, 397-416.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rhodewalt, F., Morf, C., Hazlett, S., & Fairfield, M. (1991). Self-handicapping: The role of discounting and augmentation in the preservation of self-esteem. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 61, 121-131.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rhodewalt, F., Saltzman, A. T., & Wittmer, J. (1984). Self-handicapping among competitive athletes: The role of practice in self-esteem protection. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 5, 197-209.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosenberg, M. (1965). Society and the adolescent self-image. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, T. W., Snyder, C. R., & Handelsman M. M. (1982). On the self-serving function of an academic wooden leg: Test anxiety as a self-handicapping strategy. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 42, 314-321.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, T. W., Snyder, C. R. & Perkins, S. C. (1983). The self-serving function of hypochondriacal complaints: Physical symptoms as self-handicapping strategies. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 44, 787-797.

    Google Scholar 

  • Snyder, C. R., & Smith, T. W. (1982). Symptoms as self-handicapping strategies: The virtues of old wine in a new bottle. In G. Weary & H. L. Mirels (Eds.), Integrations of clinical and social psychology (pp. 104-127). New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Strube, M. J. (1986). An analysis of the Self-Handicapping Scale. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 7, 211-224.

    Google Scholar 

  • Strube, M. J., & Roemmele L. A. (1985). Self-enhancement, self-assessment, and self-evaluative task choice. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 49, 981-993.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tice, D. M. (1991). Esteem protection of enhancement? Self-handicapping motives and attributions differ by trait self-esteem. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 60, 711-725.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weiner, B. (1985). An attributional theory of achievement motivation and emotion. Psychological Review, 92, 548-573.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Feick, D.L., Rhodewalt, F. The Double-Edged Sword of Self-Handicapping: Discounting, Augmentation, and the Protection and Enhancement of Self-Esteem. Motivation and Emotion 21, 147–163 (1997). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1024434600296

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1024434600296

Keywords

Navigation