Skip to main content
Log in

A New Method for Estimating Dermal Absorption from Chemical Exposure. 3. Compared with Steady-State Methods for Prediction and Data Analysis

  • Published:
Pharmaceutical Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose. This paper compares unsteady-state and steady-state methods for estimating dermal absorption or analyzing dermal absorption data. The unsteady-state method accounts for the larger absorption rates during short exposure times as well as the hydrophilic barrier which the viable epidermis presents to lipophilic chemicals.

Methods. Example calculations for dermal absorption from aqueous solutions are presented for five environmentally relevant chemicals with molecular weights between 50 and 410 and log10Kow between 0.91 and 6.8: chloromethane, chloroform, chlordane, 2,3,7,8-TCDD, and dibenz(a,h)anthracene. Also, the new method is used to evaluate experimental procedures and data analyses of in vivo and in vitro permeation measurements.

Results. In the five example cases, we show that the steady-state approach significantly underestimated the dermal absorption. Also, calculating permeability values from cumulative absorption data measured for exposure periods less than 18 times the stratum corneum lag time will overestimate the actual permeability.

Conclusions. In general, steady-state predictions of dermal absorption will underestimate dermal absorption predictions which consider unsteady-state conditions. Permeability values calculated from data sets which include unsteady-state data will be incorrect. Strategies for analyzing in vitro diffusion cell experiments and confirming steady state are described.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

REFERENCES

  1. Cleek, R.L. and A.L. Bunge. A new method for estimating dermal absorption from chemical exposure. 1. General approach. Pharm. Res. 10, 497–506 (1993).

    Google Scholar 

  2. Bunge, A.L. and R.L. Cleek. A new method for estimating dermal absorption from chemical exposure. 2. Effect of molecular weight and octanol-water partitioning. Pharm. Res. 12, 87–94 (1995).

    Google Scholar 

  3. Yu, C.D., J.L. Fox, N.F.H. Ho, and W.I. Higuchi. Physical model evaluation of topical prodrug delivery—Simultaneous transport and bioconversion of vidarabine-5′-valerate I: Physical model development. J. Pharm. Sci. 68, 1341–1346 (1979).

    Google Scholar 

  4. Turi, J.S., D. Danielson, and J.W. Woltersom. Effects of poly-oxypropylene 15 stearyl ether and propylene glycol on percutaneous penetration rate of diflorasone diacetate. J. Pharm. Sci. 68, 275–280 (1979).

    Google Scholar 

  5. Woodford, R. and B.W. Barry. Optimization and bioavailability of topical steroids: Thermodynamic control. J. Invest. Derm. 79, 388–391 (1982).

    Google Scholar 

  6. Flynn, G. Physicochemical determinants of skin absorption. In Principles of Route-to-Route Extrapolation for Risk Assessment. (T.R. Gerrity, C.J. Henry, Eds.) pp. 93–127, Elsevier, New York (1990).

    Google Scholar 

  7. US EPA. Dermal Exposure Assessment: Principles and Applications. Office of Health and Environmental Assessment, Washington, DC, EPA/600/8-91/011F (1992).

    Google Scholar 

  8. Banerjee, S., S.H. Yalkowsky, and S.C. Valvani. Water solubility and octanol/water partition coefficients of organics. Limitations of the solubility-partition coefficient correlation. Environ. Sci. Tech. 14, 1227–1229 (1980).

    Google Scholar 

  9. Ellington, J.J. and F.E. Stancil. Octanol/Water Partition Coefficients for Evaluation of Hazardous Waste Land Disposal: Selected Chemical. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Athens, GA EPA/600/M-88/010 (1988).

    Google Scholar 

  10. Means, J.C., S.G. Wood, J.J. Hassett, and W.L. Banwart. Sorption of polynuclear aromatic hydrocarbons by sediment and soils. Environ. Sci. Technol. 14, 1524–1528 (1980).

    Google Scholar 

  11. Karickhoff, S.W., L.A. Carreira, C. Melton, V.K. McDaniel, A.N. Vellino, D.E. Nute. Computer prediction of chemical reactivity—the ultimate SAR, US EPA, Athens, GA, EPA/600/M-89/017 (1989).

    Google Scholar 

  12. Seidel, A. Solubilities of Organic Compounds, D. van Nostrand, NY (1941).

    Google Scholar 

  13. Sanborn, J.R., R.L. Metcalf, W.N. Bruce, and P.Y. Lu. The fate of chlordane and toxaphene in a terrestrial-aquatic model ecosystem. Environ. Entom. 5, 533–538 (1976).

    Google Scholar 

  14. Adams, W.J. and K.M. Blaine. A water solubility determination of 2,3,7,8-TCDD. Chemosphere 15, 1397–1400 (1986).

    Google Scholar 

  15. Bunge, A.L., G.L. Flynn, and R.H. Guy. A predictive model for dermal exposure assessment. In Drinking Water Contamination and Health: Integration of Exposure Assessment, Toxicology, and Risk Assessment (R. Wang, Ed.) Marcell Dekker, New York, 347–374 (1994).

    Google Scholar 

  16. ICRP (Intl. Commission on Radiological Protection). Report of the Task Group on Reference Man, ICRP No. 23, Permagon Press, New York, NY (1975).

    Google Scholar 

  17. Vecchia, B. Personal communication, Colorado School of Mines, Golden, CO (1994).

  18. Potts, R.O. and R.H. Guy. Drug transport across the skin and the attainment of steady-state flux. Proc. Intl. Symp. Control. Rel. Bioact. Mater. 21 (1994).

  19. Silcox, G.D., G.E. Parry, A.L. Bunge, L.K. Pershing, and D.W. Pershing. Percutaneous absorption of benzoic acid across human skin II: Prediction of an in vivo skin flap system using in vitro parameters. Pharm. Res. 7, 352–358 (1990).

    Google Scholar 

  20. Bogen, K.T., B.W. Colston, Jr., L.K. Machicao. Dermal absorption of dilute aqueous chloroform, trichloroethylene, and tetrachloroethylene in hairless guinea pigs. Fund. Appl. Toxicol. 18, 30–39 (1992).

    Google Scholar 

  21. Bogen, K.T., B.W. Colston, Jr., L.K. Machicao. Percutaneous absorption of dilute aqueous chlorinated organic solvents in hairless guinea pigs. In Drinking Water Contamination and Health: Integration of Exposure Assessment, Toxicology, and Risk Assessment (R. Wang, Ed.) Marcell Dekker, New York, 323–346 (1994).

    Google Scholar 

  22. Crystal Ball, Version 3.0, Decisioneering, Inc., Denver, Colorado (1993).

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Bunge, A.L., Cleek, R.L. & Vecchia, B.E. A New Method for Estimating Dermal Absorption from Chemical Exposure. 3. Compared with Steady-State Methods for Prediction and Data Analysis. Pharm Res 12, 972–982 (1995). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1016298012408

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1016298012408

Navigation