Skip to main content
Log in

A Predictive Algorithm for Skin Permeability: The Effects of Molecular Size and Hydrogen Bond Activity

  • Published:
Pharmaceutical Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose. To develop a predictive algorithm of nonelectrolyte transport through skin based upon a partitioning-diffusion model.

Methods. Drug permeability is described by a partitioning-diffusion equation. Through free-energy relationships, partitioning is related to the drug's molecular volume (MV), and hydrogen bond donor (Hd) and acceptor (Ha) activity. Diffusion is related to the drug's MV using a theory of diffusion through lipid lamellae based on free-volume fluctuations within the lipid domain. These two explicit descriptions are combined to give an equation describing permeability in terms of the permeant's physical properties. The aqueous permeability coefficients of 37 nonelectrolytes through human epidermis were evaluated as a function of these physical properties using a multiple regression analysis.

Results. The results of the regression analysis show that 94% of the variability in the data can be explained by a model which includes only the permeant's MV, Hd and Ha. These results further provide an algorithm to predict skin permeability based upon the values of these parameters. In addition, the relative contribution of various chemical functional groups (e.g., -COOH) is derived, and can be used to predict skin transport from drug structure alone.

Conclusions. A biophysically relevant model of drug transport through human skin is derived based solely on the physical properties of the drug. The model provides an algorithm to predict permeability from the drug's structure and/or physical properties. Moreover, the model is applicable to a number of lipid barrier membranes, suggesting a common transport mechanism in all.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

REFERENCES

  1. G.B. Kasting, R.L. Smith, E.R. Cooper. Effect of lipid solubility and molecular size on percutaneous absorption. In Skin Pharmacokinetics, B. Shroot and H. Schaefer (eds.), Karger, Basel, pp. 138–153 (1987).

    Google Scholar 

  2. B.D. Anderson, W.I. Higuchi, P.V. Raykar. Heterogeneity effects on permeability-partition coefficient relationships in human stratum corneum. Pharm. Res. 5: 566–573, 1988.

    Google Scholar 

  3. B.D. Anderson, W.I. Higuchi, P.V. Raykar. Solute structure-permeability relationships in human stratum corneum. J. Invest. Dermatol. 93: 280–286, 1989.

    Google Scholar 

  4. G.L. Flynn. Physicochemical determinants of skin absorption. In Principles of Route-to-Route Extrapolation for Risk Assessment., TR Gerrity and CJ Henry (eds.), Elsevier, New York, pp. 93–127, 1990.

    Google Scholar 

  5. N. El Tayar, R-Y. Tsai, B. Testa, P-A. Carrupt, C. Hansch, A. Leo. Percutaneous penetration of drugs: A quantitative structure-permeability relationship study. J. Pharm. Sci., 80: 744–749, 1991.

    Google Scholar 

  6. R.O. Potts, R.H. Guy. Predicting skin permeability, Pharm. Res., 9: 663–669, 1992.

    Google Scholar 

  7. W.J. Pugh, J. Hadgraft. Ab initio prediction of human skin permeability coefficients. Inter. J. Pharm. 103: 163–178, 1994.

    Google Scholar 

  8. N. El Tayar, R-Y. Tsai, B. Testa, P-A. Carrupt, A. Leo. Partitioning of solutes in different solvent systems: The contribution of hydrogen-bonding capacity and polarity. J. Pharm. Sci., 80: 590–598, 1991.

    Google Scholar 

  9. M.J. Kamlet, J-L.M. Abboud, M.H. Abraham, R.W. Taft. Linear solvation energy relationship: 23: A comprehensive collection of the solvatochromatic parameters p, a and b and some methods for simplifying the generalized solvatochromatic equation. J. Org. Chem., 48: 2877–2887, 1983.

    Google Scholar 

  10. M.J. Kamlet, R.M. Doherty, J-L.M. Abboud, M.H. Abraham, R.W. Taft. Linear solvation energy relationships: 36. Molecular properties governing solubilities of organic nonelectrolytes in water. J. Pharm. Sci., 75: 338–349, 1896.

    Google Scholar 

  11. M.H. Abraham, P.L. Grellier, D.V. Prior, P.P. Duce, J.J. Morris, P.J. Taylor. Hydrogen bonding. Part 7. A scale of solute hydrogen-bond acidity based on log K values for complexation in tetrachloromethane. J. Chem. Soc. Perkin Trans., II: 699–711, 1989.

    Google Scholar 

  12. M.H. Abraham, P.L. Grellier, D.V. Prior, J.J. Morris, P.J. Taylor. Hydrogen bonding. Part 10. A scale of solute hydrogen bond basicity using log K values for complexation in teetrachloromethane. J. Chem. Soc. Perkin Trans., II: 521–529, 1990.

    Google Scholar 

  13. M.H. Abraham. Application of solvation equations to chemical and biochemical processes. Pure & Appl Chem., 65: 2503–2512, 1993.

    Google Scholar 

  14. M.H. Abraham, H.S. Chadha, R.C. Mitchell. Hydrogen bonding part 33; The factors that influence the distribution of solutes between blood and brain. J. Pharm. Sci., 83: 1257–1268, 1994.

    Google Scholar 

  15. R. Collander,. The partitioning of organic compounds between higher alcohols and water. Acta Chem. Scand., 5: 774–780, 1951.

    Google Scholar 

  16. M.H. Cohen, D. Turnbull. Molecular transport in liquids and glasses. J. Chem. Phys., 31: 1164–1168, 1959.

    Google Scholar 

  17. H. Trauble. The movement of molecules across lipid membranes: A molecular theory. J. Memb. Biol., 4: 193–208, 1971.

    Google Scholar 

  18. W.R. Lieb, W.D. Stein. Non-Stokesian nature of transverse diffusion within red cell membranes. J. Memb. Biol., 92: 111–119, 1986.

    Google Scholar 

  19. W.R. Lieb, W.D. Stein. In “Transport and Diffusion across Cell Membranes”, W.D. Stein, Academic Press, New York, 1986.

    Google Scholar 

  20. K.A. Dill, J. Naghizadeh, J.A. Marqusee. Chain molecules at high densities at interfaces. Ann. Rev. Phys. Chem., 39: 425–461, 1988.

    Google Scholar 

  21. T-X. Xiang, C. Xueling, B.D. Anderson. Transport methods for probing the barrier domain of lipid bilayers. Biophys. J., 63: 78–88, 1992.

    Google Scholar 

  22. T-X. Xiang, B.D. Anderson. Molecular distributions in interphases: Statistical mechanical theory combined with molecular dynamics simulation of model lipid bilayers. Biophys. J., 66: 561–573, 1994.

    Google Scholar 

  23. A. Bondi. van der Waals volumes and radii. J. Phys. Chem., 68: 441–451, 1964.

    Google Scholar 

  24. C. Ackermann, G.L. Flynn, W.M. Smith. Ether-water partitioning and permeability through hairless mouse skin in vitro. II. Hydrocortisone 21-n-alkyl ester, alkanol and hydrophilic compounds. Int. J. Pharm., 36: 67–71, 1987.

    Google Scholar 

  25. C.R. Sanders, J.P. Schwonek. An approximate model and empirical energy function for solute interactions with a waterphophatidykcholine interface. Biophys. J., 65: 1207–1218, 1993.

    Google Scholar 

  26. R.J. Scheuplein, I.H. Blank. Permeability of the skin. Physiol. Rev., 51: 702–747, 1971.

    Google Scholar 

  27. R.L. Cleek, A.L. Bunge. A new method for estimating ermal absorption from chemical exposure. I. General approach. Pharm. Res., 10: 497–506, 1993.

    Google Scholar 

  28. G.B. Kasting, P.J. Robinson. Can we assign an upper limit to skin permeability? Pharm. Res., 10: 930–931, 1993.

    Google Scholar 

  29. M.H. Abraham, H.S. Chadha, R.C. Mitchell. The factors that influence skin penetration of solutes. J. Pharm. Pharmacol., 47: 8–16, 1995.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Potts, R.O., Guy, R.H. A Predictive Algorithm for Skin Permeability: The Effects of Molecular Size and Hydrogen Bond Activity. Pharm Res 12, 1628–1633 (1995). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1016236932339

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1016236932339

Navigation