Skip to main content
Log in

Arrangements of macro- and microchromosomes in chicken cells

  • Published:
Chromosome Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Arrangements of chromosome territories in nuclei of chicken fibroblasts and neurons were analysed employing multicolour chromosome painting, laser confocal scanning microscopy and three-dimensional (3D) reconstruction. The chicken karyotype consists of 9 pairs of macrochromosomes and 30 pairs of microchromosomes. Although the latter represent only 23% of the chicken genome they contain almost 50% of its genes. We show that territories of microchromosomes in fibroblasts and neurons were clustered within the centre of the nucleus, while territories of the macrochromosomes were preferentially located towards the nuclear periphery. In contrast to these highly consistent radial arrangements, the relative arrangements of macrochromosome territories with respect to each other (side-by-side arrangements) were variable. A stringent radial arrangement of macro- and microchromosomes was found in mitotic cells. Replication labelling studies revealed a pattern of DNA replication similar to mammalian cell nuclei: gene dense, early replicating chromatin mostly represented by microchromosomes, was located within the nuclear interior, surrounded by a rim of late replicating chromatin. These results support the evolutionary conservation of several features of higher-order chromatin organization between mammals and birds despite the differences in their karyotypes.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Bajer AS, Molé-Bajer J. (1972) Spindle dynamics and chromosome movements. In: Bourne GH, Danielli JF, eds. International Review of Cytology. New York & London: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boveri T (1909) Die Blastomerehkerne von Ascaris megalocephala und die Theorie der Chromosomenin-dividualität. Arch Zellforsch 3: 181-268.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burt DW, Bruley C, Dunn IC et al. (1999) The dynamics of chromosome evolution in birds and mammals. Nature 402: 411-413.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chaly N, Brown DL (1988) The prometaphase configuration and chromosome order in early mitosis. J Cell Sci 91: 325-335.

    Google Scholar 

  • Craig JM, Bickmore WA (1994) The distribution of CpG islands in mammalian chromosomes [see comments]. [Published erratum appears in Nat Genet 1994 Aug;7(4):551.] Nat Genet 7: 376-382.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cremer T, Cremer C (2001) Chromosome territories, nuclear architecture and gene regulation in mammalian cells. Nat Rev Genet 2: 292-301.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cremer T, Kreth G, Koester H et al. (2000) Chromosome territories, interchromatin domain compartment, and nuclear matrix: an integrated view of the functional nuclear architecture. Crit Rev Eukaryotic Gene Expression 12: 179-212.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cremer M, v. Hase J, Volm T et al. (2001) Non-random radial higher-order chromatin arrangements in nuclei of diploid human cells. Chromosome Res 9: 541-567.

    Google Scholar 

  • Croft JA, Bridger JM, Boyle S, Perry P, Teague P, Bickmore WA (1999) Differences in the localization and morphology of chromosomes in the human nucleus. J Cell Biol 145: 1119-1131.

    Google Scholar 

  • Deloukas P, Schuler GD, Gyapay G et al. (1998) A physical map of 30,000 human genes. Science 282: 744-746.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dietzel S, Weilandt E, Eils R, Münkel C, Cremer C, Cremer T (1995) Three-dimensional distribution of centromeric or paracentromeric heterochromatin of chromosomes 1, 7, 15 and 17 in human lymphocyte nuclei studied with light microscopic axial tomography. Bioimaging 3: 121-133.

    Google Scholar 

  • Emmerich P, Loos P, Jauch A et al. (1989) Double in situ hybridization in combination with digital image analysis: a new approach to study interphase chromosome topography. Exp Cell Res 181: 126-140.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ferreira J, Paolella G, Ramos C, Lamond AI (1997) Spatial organization of large-scale chromatin domains in the nucleus: a magnified view of single chromosome territories. J Cell Biol 139: 1597-1610.

    Google Scholar 

  • Griffin DK, Habermann F, Masabanda J et al. (1999) Micro-and macrochromosome paints generated by flow cytometry and microdissection: tools for mapping the chicken genome. Cytogenet Cell Genet 87: 278-281.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hedges SB, Parker PH, Sibley CG, Kumar S (1996) Continental break-up and the ordinal diversification of birds and mammals. Nature 381: 226-229.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kreth G, Edelmann P, Münkel C, Langowski J, Cremer C (2001) Translocation frequencies for X and Y chromosomes predicted by computer simulations of nuclear structure. Chromosome Structure Function (in press).

  • Lander ES, Linton LM, Birren B et al. (2001) Initial sequencing and analysis of the human genome. International Human Genome Sequencing Consortium. Nature 409: 860-921.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leonhardt H, Rahn HP, Weinzierl P et al. (2000) Dynamics of DNA replication factories in living cells. J Cell Biol 149: 271-280.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lesko SA, Callahan DE, LaVilla ME, Wang ZP, Ts'o PO (1995) The experimental homologous and heterologous separation distance histograms for the centromeres of chromosomes 7, 11, and 17 in interphase human T-lymphocytes. Exp Cell Res 219: 499-506.

    Google Scholar 

  • Macgregor H, Varley J (1988) Working with Animal Chromosomes. 2nd edn. John Wiley & Sons.

  • McQueen HA, Fantes J, Cross SH, Clark VH, Archibald AL, Bird AP (1996) CpG islands of chicken are concentrated on microchromosomes. Nat Genet 12: 321-324.

    Google Scholar 

  • McQueen HA, Siriaco G, Bird AP (1998) Chicken microchromosomes are hyperacetylated, early replicating, and gene rich. Genome Res 8: 621-630.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nagele R, Freeman T, McMorrow L, Lee HY (1995) Precise spatial positioning of chromosomes during prometaphase: evidence for chromosomal order. Science 270: 1831-1835.

    Google Scholar 

  • O'Brien SJ, Menotti-Raymond M, Murphy WJ et al. (1999) The promise of comparative genomics in mammals. Science 286: 458-462, 479–481.

    Google Scholar 

  • O'Keefe RT, henderson SC, Spector DL (1992) Dynamic organization of DNA replication in mammalian cell nuclei: spatially and temporally defined replication of chromosome-specific alpha-satellite DNA sequences. J Cell Biol 116: 1095-1110.

    Google Scholar 

  • Östergren G (1945) Transverse equilibria on the spindle. Bot Nat 4: 467-468.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pettmann B, Louis JC, Sensenbrenner M (1979) Morphological and biochemical maturation of neurones cultured in the absence of glial cells. Nature 281: 378-380.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pichugin AM, Galkina SA, Potekhin AA, Punina EO, Rautian MS, Rodionov AV (2001) The detection of the size of a smallest chicken (Gallus gallus domesticus) microchromosome by pulsed-field gel electrophoresis (PFGE). Genetika (Russ.) 37: 1-4.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ponce de Leon FA, Li Y, Weng Z (1992) Early and late replicative chromosomal banding patterns of Gallus domesticus. J Hered 83: 36-42.

    Google Scholar 

  • Popp S, Scholl HP, Loos P et al. (1990) Distribution of chromosome 18 and X centric heterochromatin in the interphase nucleus of cultured human cells. Exp Cell Res 189: 1-12.

    Google Scholar 

  • Primmer CR, Raudsepp T, Chowdhary BP, Moller AP, Ellegren H (1997) Low frequency of microsatellites in the avian genome. Genome Res 7: 471-482.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pyrpasopoulou A, Meier J, Maison C, Simos G, Georgatos SD (1996) The lamin B receptor (LBR) provides essential chromatin docking sites at the nuclear envelope. Embo J 15: 7108-7119.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rice JC, Allis CD (2001) Histone methylation versus histone acetylation: new insights into epigenetic regulation. Curr Opin Cell Biol 13: 263-273.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rieder CL, Salmon ED (1994) Motile kinetochores and polar ejection forces dictate chromosome position on the vertebrate mitotic spindle. J Cell Biol 124: 223-233.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sadoni N, Langer S, Fauth C et al. (1999) Nuclear organization of mammalian genomes. Polar chromosome territories build up functionally distinct higher order compartments. J Cell Biol 146: 1211-1226.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sadoni N, Sullivan KF, Weinzierl P, Stelzer EH, Zink D (2001) Large-scale chromatin fibers of living cells display a discontinuous functional organization. Chromosoma 110: 39-51.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schermelleh L, Solovei I, Zink D, Cremer T (2001) Two-colour fluorescence labelling of early and mid-to-late replicating chromatin in living cells. Chromosome Res 9: 77-80.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schmid M, Enderle E, Schindler D, Schempp W (1989) Chromosome banding and DNA replication patterns in bird karyotypes. Cytogenet Cell Genet 52: 139-146.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith J, Burt DW (1998) Parameters of the chicken genome (Gallus gallus). Anim Genet 29: 290-294.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith J, Bruley CK, Paton IR et al. (2000) Differences in gene density on chicken macrochromosomes and microchromosomes. Anim Genet 31: 96-103.

    Google Scholar 

  • Solovei I, Walter J, Cremer M, Habermann F, Schermelleh L, Cremer T (2001) FISH on three-dimensionally preserved nuclei. In: Squire J, Beatty B, Mai S, eds. FISH: A Practical Approach. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sun HB, Yokota H (1999) Correlated positioning of homologous chromosomes in daughter fibroblast cells. Chromosome Res 7: 603-610.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sun HB, Shen J, Yokota H (2000) Size-dependent positioning of human chromosomes in interphase nuclei. Biophys J 79: 184-190.

    Google Scholar 

  • Telenius H, Pelmear AH, Tunnacliffe A et al. (1992) Cytogenetic analysis by chromosome painting using DOP-PCR amplified flow-sorted chromosomes. Genes Chromosomes Cancer 4: 257-263.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wade PA (2001) Methyl CpG binding proteins: coupling chromatin architecture to gene regulation. Oncogene 20: 3166-3173.

    Google Scholar 

  • White MJ (1961) The chromosomes. In: Methuen Monographs on Biological Subjects. London: Methuen & Co. Ltd.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zink D, Cremer T, Saffrich R et al. (1998) Structure and dynamics of human interphase chromosome territories in vivo. Hum Genet 102: 241-251.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Habermann, F.A., Cremer, M., Walter, J. et al. Arrangements of macro- and microchromosomes in chicken cells. Chromosome Res 9, 569–584 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1012447318535

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1012447318535

Navigation