Abstract
We present here a path integral derivation of Mathai–Quillen formalism which gives a new interpretation of the Gauss–Bonnet–Chern theorem and Hopf–Poincaré theorem.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Atiyah, M. F. and Jeffrey, L.: Topological Lagrangian and cohomology, J.Geom.Phys. 7 (1990), 120–135.
Blau, M.: The Mathai–Quillen formalism and topological field theory, Lectures given at the Karpacz Winter School on Infinite Dimensional Geometry in Physics (17–27 February 1992).
Blau, M. and Thompson, G.: N = 2 topological gauge theory, the Euler characteristic of moduli spaces, and the Casson invariant, Comm.Math.Phys. 152 (1993), 41–71.
Bismut, J. M.: The Atiyah–Singer theorems, a probabilistic approach I, the index theorem, J. Funct.Anal. 57 (1984), 56–98.
Elworthy, K. D.: Geometric Aspects of Diffusions on Manifolds, Lecture Notes in Math. 1362, Springer, Berlin, 1988.
Ueki, N.: A stochastic approach to the Poincaré–Hopf theorem, Probab.Theory Related Fields 82 (1989), 277–293.
Witten, E.: Supersymmetry and Morse theory,J.Differential Geom. 17 (1982), 661–692.
Atiyah, M. F. and Bott, R.: The moment map and equivariant cohomology, Topology 23 (1984), 1–18.
Roe, J.: Elliptic Operators, Topology and Asymptotic Methods, Longman Scientific, New York, 1988.
Berezin, F. A.: The Method of Second Quantization, Academic Press, New York, London, 1986.
Simon, B.: Function Integration and Quantum Mechanics, Academic Press, New York, 1979.
Mathai, V. and Quillen, D.: Superconnections, Thom class and equivariant differential forms, Topology 25 (1986), 85–110.
Roger, A.:A superspace path integral proof of the Gauss–Bonnet–Chern theorem, J.Geom.Phys. 4 (1987), 417–437.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
ZHENG-DONG, W. Mathai–Quillen Formalism — From the Point of View of Path Integrals. Letters in Mathematical Physics 39, 331–340 (1997). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1007312606288
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1007312606288