Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-wq484 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-25T15:16:06.663Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Response of a Multiple-Resistant Palmer Amaranth (Amaranthus palmeri) Population to Four HPPD-Inhibiting Herbicides Applied Alone and with Atrazine

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  22 June 2017

Jonathon R. Kohrt*
Affiliation:
Graduate Student and Professor, Department of Plant, Soil and Microbial Sciences, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI 48824
Christy L. Sprague
Affiliation:
Graduate Student and Professor, Department of Plant, Soil and Microbial Sciences, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI 48824
*
*Corresponding author’s E-mail: kohrtjon@msu.edu

Abstract

Control of multiple-resistant Palmer amaranth populations in corn will rely heavily on the use of POST 4-hydroxyphenylpyruvate dioxygenase (HPPD)-inhibiting herbicides. Therefore, field and greenhouse experiments were conducted to: (1) evaluate Palmer amaranth control with four HPPD inhibitors alone and in combination with atrazine at two application timings and (2) investigate the joint activity of HPPD-inhibiting herbicides and atrazine in atrazine-resistant (AR) and atrazine-susceptible (AS) Palmer amaranth populations. Control of the AR Palmer amaranth population varied among the HPPD-inhibiting herbicides with tolpyralate>tembotrione=topramezone>mesotrione based on GR50 values in the greenhouse. In the field, Palmer amaranth control was lower when the HPPD-inhibiting herbicides, with the exception of tolpyralate, were applied to 15- vs. 8-cm-tall Palmer amaranth. Tolpyralate controlled Palmer amaranth ≥95% at both application timings. The addition of atrazine (560 g ai ha−1) improved Palmer amaranth control with mesotrione and topramezone at the 8-cm application timing and with mesotrione and tembotrione at the 15-cm application timing. In the greenhouse, joint activity of mesotrione and atrazine and tembotrione and atrazine was synergistic with both the AR and AS Palmer amaranth populations. In the AR population, an additional 980 g ai ha−1 of atrazine (8X) was needed to cause a synergistic response compared with the AS population. Synergistic responses with mesotrione were detected with all atrazine rates for the AS population and for atrazine rates ranging from 280 to 2,240 g ai ha−1 for the AR population. Only additive responses were observed when atrazine was applied with tolpyralate and topramezone, indicating that joint activity in the form of synergism occurs more readily with the triketones compared with the benzopyrazoles. When faced with an AR Palmer amaranth population, the addition of atrazine to HPPD inhibitors may increase the overall success of weed management due to joint activity.

Type
Weed Management
Copyright
© Weed Science Society of America, 2017 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

Associate Editor for this paper: Dean Riechers, University of Illinois.

References

Literature Cited

Abendroth, JA, Blankenship, EE, Martin, AR, Roeth, FW (2011) Joint action analysis utilizing concentration addition and independent action models. Weed Technol 25:436446 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Abendroth, JA, Martin, AR, Roeth, FW (2006) Plant response to combinations of mesotrione and photosystem II inhibitors. Weed Technol 20:267274 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Almsick, AV (2009) New HPPD-inhibitors—a proven mode of action as a new hope to solve current weed problems. Outlooks Pest Manag 20:2730 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Armel, GR, Rardon, PL, McComrick, MC, Ferry, NM (2007) Differential response of several carotenoid biosynthesis inhibitors in mixtures with atrazine. Weed Technol 21:947953 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burgos, NR, Tranel, PJ, Streibig, JC, Davis, VM, Shaner, D, Norsworthy, JK, Ritz, C (2013) Review: conformation of resistance to herbicides and evaluation of resistance levels. Weed Sci 61:420 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Colby, SR (1967) Calculating synergistic and antagonistic responses of herbicide combinations. Weeds 15:2022 Google Scholar
Damalas, CA, Eleftherohorinos, IG (2001) Dicamba and atrazine antagonism on sulfonylurea herbicides used for Johnsongrass (Sorghum halepense) control in corn (Zea mays). Weed Technol 15:6267 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Flint, JL, Cornelius, PL, Barrett, M (1988) Analyzing herbicide interactions: a statistical treatment of Colby’s method. Weed Technol 2:304309 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gowing, DP (1960) Comments on tests of herbicide mixtures. Weeds 8:379391 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Green, JM (1989) Herbicide antagonism at the whole plant level. Weed Technol 3:217226 Google Scholar
Grossmann, K, Ehrhardt, T (2007) On the mechanism of action and selectivity of the corn herbicide topramezone: a new inhibitor of 4‐hydroxyphenylpyruvate dioxygenase. Pest Manag Sci 63:429439 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hart, SE, Wax, LM (1996) Dicamba antagonizes grass weed control with imazethapyr by reducing foliar absorption. Weed Technol 10:828834 Google Scholar
Hausman, NE, Singh, S, Tranel, PJ, Riechers, DE, Kaundun, SS, Polge, ND, Thomas, DA, Hager, AG (2011) Resistance to HPPD-inhibiting herbicides in a population of waterhemp (Amaranthus tubercalulatus) from Illinois, United States. Pest Manag Sci 67:258261 Google Scholar
Hausman, NE, Tranel, PJ, Riechers, DE, Hager, AG (2016) Responses of a waterhemp population resistant to HPPD-inhibiting herbicides to foliar-applied herbicides. Weed Technol 30:106115 Google Scholar
Heap, I (2016) The International Survey of Herbicide Resistant Weeds. www.weedscience.com. Accessed: February 5, 2016Google Scholar
Horak, MJ, Loughin, TM (2000) Growth analysis of four Amaranthus species . Weed Sci 48:347355 Google Scholar
Hugie, JA, Bollero, GA, Tranel, PJ (2008) Defining the rate requirements for synergism between mesotrione and atrazine in redroot pigweed (Amaranthus retroflexus). Weed Sci 56:26270 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jeanmart, S, Edmunds, AJF, Lamberth, C, Pouliot, M (2015) Synthetic approaches to the 2010–2014 new agrochemicals. Bioorg Med Chem 24:317341 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jhala, AJ, Sandell, LD, Rana, N, Kruger, GR, Knezevic, SZ (2014) Confirmation and control of triazine and 4-hydroxyphenylpyruvate dioxygenase-inhibiting herbicide-resistant Palmer amaranth (Amaranthus palmeri) in Nebraska. Weed Technol 28:2838 Google Scholar
Keeley, PE, Carter, CH, Thullen, RJ (1987) Influence of planting date on growth of Palmer amaranth (Amaranthus palmeri). Weed Sci 35:199204 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kohrt, JR, Sprague, CL, Nadakuduti, SS, Douches, D (2017) Confirmation of a three-way (glyphosate, ALS, and atrazine) herbicide-resistant population of Palmer amaranth in Michigan. Weed Sci 65:327338 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kruk, J, Holländer-Czytko, H, Oettmeier, W, Trebst, A (2005) Tocopherol as singlet oxygen scavenger in photosystem II. J Plant Phys 162:749757 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lindquist, JL, Mortenson, DA, Clay, SA, Schmenk, R, Kells, JJ, Howatt, D, Westra, P (1996) Stability of corn (Zea mays) velvetleaf (Abutilon theophrasti) interference relationships. Weed Sci 44:309313 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mitchell, G, Barlett, DW, Fraser, TEM, Hawkes, TR, Holt, DC, Townson, JK, Wichert, RA (2001) Mesotrione: a new selective herbicide for use in maize. Pest Manag Sci 57:120128 Google Scholar
Norsworthy, JK, Griffith, GM, Scott, RC, Smith, KL, Oliver, LR (2008) Confirmation and control of glyphosate-resistant Palmer amaranth (Amaranthus palmeri) in Arkansas. Weed Technol 22:108113 Google Scholar
O’Donovan, JT, O’Sullivan, PA (1982) The antagonistic action of 2,4-D and bromoxynil on glyphosate phytotoxicity to barley (Hordeum vulgare). Weed Sci 30:3034 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pallett, KE, Little, JP, Sheeky, M, Veerasekaran, P (1998) The mode of action of isoxaflutole: I. Physiological effects, metabolism, and selectivity. Pest Biochem Phys 62:113124 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schulz, A, Ort, O, Beyer, P, Kleinig, H (1993) SC‐0051, a 2‐benzoyl‐cyclohexane‐1, 3‐dione bleaching herbicide, is a potent inhibitor of the enzyme p‐hydroxyphenylpyruvate dioxygenase. FEBS Letters 318:162166 Google Scholar
Schuster, CL, Al-Khatib, K, Dille, JA (2007) Mechanism of antagonism of mesotrione on sulfonylurea herbicides. Weed Sci 55:429434 Google Scholar
Schuster, CL, Al-Khatib, K, Dille, JA (2008) Efficacy of sulfonylurea herbicide when tank mixed with mesotrione. Weed Technol 22:222230 Google Scholar
Selleck, GW, Baird, DD (1981) Antagonism with glyphosate and residual herbicide combinations. Weed Sci 29:185190 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stephenson, DO IV, Bond, JA, Landry, RL, Edwards, HM (2015) Weed management in corn with postemergence applications of tembotrione or thiencarbazone:tembotrione. Weed Technol 29:350358 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Trebst, A, Depka, B, Holländer-Czytko, H (2002) A specific role for tocopherol and of chemical singlet oxygen quenchers in the maintenance of photosystem II structure and function in Chlamydomonas reinhardtii . FEBS Letters 516:156160 Google Scholar
Wiggins, MS, McClure, MA, Hayes, RM, Steckel, LE (2015) Integrating cover crops and POST herbicides for glyphosate-resistant Palmer amaranth control in corn. Weed Technol 29:412418 Google Scholar
Williams, MM, Boydston, R, Peachey, E, Robinson, D (2011) Significance of atrazine as a tank-mix partner with tembotrione. Weed Technol 25:299302 Google Scholar
Witschel, M (2009) Design synthesis and herbicidal activity of new iron chelating motifs for HPPD-inhibitors. Bioorg Med Chem 17:42214229 Google Scholar
Wood, A (2016) Compendium of Herbicide Common Names. http://www.alanwood.net/pesticides/index. Accessed: September 15, 2016Google Scholar
Woodyard, AJ, Bollero, GA, Riechers, DE (2009a) Broadleaf weed management in corn utilizing synergistic postemergence herbicide combinations. Weed Technol 23:513518 Google Scholar
Woodyard, AJ, Hugie, JA, Riechers, DE (2009b) Interactions of mesotrione and atrazine in two weed species with different mechanisms for atrazine resistance. Weed Sci 57:369378 Google Scholar