Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-m9kch Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-02T16:29:48.528Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Building a pedagogic spellchecker for L2 learners of Spanish

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 June 2023

Miguel Blázquez-Carretero Open the ORCID record for Miguel Blázquez-Carretero [Opens in a new window]
Miguel Blázquez-Carretero*
Affiliation:
University of the Philippines Diliman, Philippines (mblazquez@up.edu.ph)
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

In 2016, Lawley proposed an easy-to-build spellchecker specifically designed to help second language (L2) learners in their writing process by facilitating self-correction. The aim was to overcome the disadvantages to L2 learners posed by generic spellcheckers (GSC), such as that embedded in Microsoft Word. Drawbacks include autocorrection, misdiagnoses, and overlooked errors. With the aim of imparting explicit L2 spelling knowledge, this correcting tool does not merely suggest possible alternatives to the detected error but also provides explanations of any relevant spelling patterns. Following Lawley’s (2016) recommendations, the present study developed a prototype computer-based pedagogic spellchecker (PSC) to aid L2 learners in self-correcting their written production in Spanish. First, a corpus was used to identify frequent spelling errors of Spanish as a foreign language (SFL) learners. Handcrafted feedback was then designed to tackle the commonest misspellings. To subsequently evaluate this PSC’s efficacy in error detection and correction, another learner Spanish corpus was used. Sixty compositions were analysed to determine the PSC’s capacity for error recognition and feedback provision in comparison with that of a GSC. Results indicate that the PSC detected over 90% of the misspellings, significantly outperforming the GSC in error detection. Both provided adequate feedback on two out of three detected errors, but the pedagogic nature of the former has the added advantage of facilitating self-learning (Blázquez-Carretero & Woore, 2021). These findings suggest that it is feasible to develop spellcheckers that provide synchronous feedback, allowing SFL learners to confidently self-correct their writing while saving time and effort on the teacher’s part.

Keywords

written corrective feedbackautomated written evaluationcomputer-generated feedbackself-correctionspellingSpanish as a foreign language
Type
Research Article
Information
ReCALL , Volume 35 , Issue 3 , September 2023 , pp. 321 - 338
Check for updates
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2023. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of EUROCALL, the European Association for Computer-Assisted Language Learning

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Barcroft, J. & Rott, S. (2010) Partial word form learning in the written mode in L2 German and Spanish. Applied linguistics, 31(5): 623−650. https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/amq017 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bestgen, Y. & Granger, S. (2011) Categorising spelling errors to assess L2 writing. International Journal of Continuing Engineering Education and Life Long Learning, 21(2–3): 235–252. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJCEELL.2011.040201 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bitchener, J. & Knoch, U. (2010) Raising the linguistic accuracy level of advanced L2 writers with written corrective feedback. Journal of Second Language Writing, 19(4): 207−217. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2010.10.002 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blázquez-Carretero, M. (2019) Using bigrams to detect written errors made by learners of Spanish as a foreign language. CALL-EJ, 20(2): 55–69. http://callej.org/journal/20-2/Carretero2019.pdf Google Scholar
Blázquez-Carretero, M. (2022) Is it worth correcting L2 learners’ written work? In García Orta, M. J. & Martín Santos, R. (eds.), El poder de la comunicación: periodismo, educación y feminismo. Madrid: Dykinson S.L., 829–862. 'https://www.researchgate.net/publication/366544503_Is_it_worth_correcting_L2_learners'_written_work Google Scholar
Blázquez-Carretero, M. & Fan, C. (2019) The efficacy of spell check packages specifically designed for second language learners of Spanish. Pertanika Journal of Social Sciences & Humanities, 27(2): 847–861. http://www.pertanika.upm.edu.my/pjssh/browse/regular-issue?article=JSSH-3837-2018 Google Scholar
Blázquez-Carretero, M. & Woore, R. (2021) Can a ‘pedagogical’ spellchecker improve spelling accuracy in L2 Spanish? Language Learning & Technology, 25(2): 135–157. http://hdl.handle.net/10125/73437 Google Scholar
Blázquez-Carretero, M. & Woore, R. (2023) Spelling Spanish: L2 learners’ interaction with spellcheckers [Manuscript in preparation].Google Scholar
Brown, G. D. A. & Ellis, N. C. (1994) Handbook of spelling: Theory, process and intervention. Chichester: Wiley.Google Scholar
Brown, H. D. (1994) Principles of language learning and teaching. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall Google Scholar
Cestero Mancera, A. M. & Penadés Martínez, I. (2009) Corpus de textos escritos para el análisis de errores de aprendices de E/LE (CORANE) [CD-ROM]. Alcalá de Henares: Universidad de Alcalá.Google Scholar
Chacón-Beltrán, R. (2017) Free-form writing: Computerized feedback for self-correction. ELT Journal, 71(2): 141−149. https://doi.org/10.1093/elt/ccw064 Google Scholar
Chen, C.-F. E. & Cheng, W.-Y. E. (2008) Beyond the design of automated writing evaluation: Pedagogical practices and perceived learning effectiveness in EFL writing classes. Language Learning & Technology, 12(2): 94−112. https://doi.org/10125/44145 Google Scholar
Cotos, E. (2011) Potential of automated writing evaluation feedback. CALICO Journal, 28(2): 420−459. https://doi.org/10.11139/cj.28.2.420-459 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Council of Europe (2001) Common European framework of reference for languages: Learning, teaching, assessment. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Craik, F. I. M. & Tulving, E. (1975) Depth of processing and the retention of words in episodic memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 104(3): 268−294. https://doi.org/10.1037/0096-3445.104.3.268 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ellis, N. C. & Beaton, A. (1993) Psycholinguistic determinants of foreign language vocabulary learning. Language Learning, 43(4): 559−617. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-1770.1993.tb00627.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Figueredo, L. (2006) Using the known to chart the unknown: A review of first-language influence on the development of English-as-a-second-language spelling skill. Reading and Writing, 19(8): 873−905. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-006-9014-1 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Frazer, K. A., Murray, S. S., Schork, N. J. & Topol, E. J. (2009) Human genetic variation and its contribution to complex traits. Nature Reviews Genetics, 10(4): 241−251. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrg2554 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Goswami, U. (1988) Children’s use of analogy in learning to spell. British Journal of Developmental Psychology, 6(1): 21−33. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2044-835X.1988.tb01077.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goulandris, N. K. (1994) Teaching spelling: Bridging theory and practice. In Brown, G. D. A. & Ellis, N. C. (eds.), Handbook of spelling: Theory, process and intervention. Chichester: Wiley, 407−423.Google Scholar
Graham, S. & Santangelo, T. (2014) Does spelling instruction make students better spellers, readers, and writers? A meta-analytic review. Reading and Writing, 27(9): 1703−1743. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-014-9517-0 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grgurović, M., Chapelle, C. A. & Shelley, M. C. (2013) A meta-analysis of effectiveness studies on computer technology-supported language learning. ReCALL, 25(2): 165−198. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0958344013000013 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Guichon, N., Bétrancourt, M. & Prié, Y. (2012) Managing written and oral negative feedback in a synchronous online teaching situation. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 25(2): 181–197. https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2011.636054 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harvey-Scholes, C. (2018) Computer-assisted detection of 90% of EFL student errors. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 31(1–2): 144−156. https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2017.1392322 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Heift, T. (2008) Corrective feedback in CALL: A longitudinal study of learner uptake. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Association of Applied Linguistics, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
Heift, T. & Hegelheimer, V. (2017) Computer-assisted corrective feedback and language learning. In Nassaji, H. & Kartchava, E. (eds.), Corrective feedback in second language teaching and learning: Research, theory, applications, implications. New York: Routledge, 51–65. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315621432-5 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Heift, T. & Rimrott, A. (2008) Learner responses to corrective feedback for spelling errors in CALL. System, 36(2): 196−213. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2007.09.007 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Heift, T. & Schulze, M. (2007) Errors and intelligence in computer-assisted language learning: Parsers and pedagogues. New York: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203012215 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hernández García, F. (2017) La detección y corrección de errores en la deixis temporal del verbo en redacciones escritas en inglés como lengua extranjera. Estudios de lingüística inglesa aplicada, 17: 183−207. https://doi.org/10.12795/elia.2017.i17.08 Google Scholar
Kang, E. & Han, Z. (2015) The efficacy of written corrective feedback in improving L2 written accuracy: A meta-analysis. The Modern Language Journal, 99(1): 1−18. https://doi.org/10.1111/modl.12189 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kelley, A. & Kohnert, K. (2012) Is there a cognate advantage for typically developing Spanish-speaking English-language learners? Language, Speech, and Hearing Services in Schools, 43(2): 191–204. https://doi.org/10.1044/0161-1461(2011/10-0022)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kellogg, R. T. (2001) Competition for working memory among writing processes. The American Journal of Psychology, 114(2): 175−191. https://doi.org/10.2307/1423513 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lawley, J. (2015) New software to help EFL students self-correct their writing. Language Learning & Technology, 19(1): 23−33. https://doi.org/10125/44396 Google Scholar
Lawley, J. (2016) Spelling: Computerised feedback for self-correction. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 29(5): 868−880. https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2015.1069746 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lázaro Ibarrola, A. (2013) Reformulation and self-correction: Insights into correction strategies for EFL writing in a school context. Vigo International Journal of Applied Linguistics, 10: 29−49. https://revistas.uvigo.es/index.php/vial/article/view/55/55 Google Scholar
Lee, I. (1997) ESL learners’ performance in error correction in writing: Some implications for teaching. System, 25(4): 465−477. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0346-251X(97)00045-6 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lee, I. (2013) Research into practice: Written corrective feedback. Language Teaching, 46(1): 108−119. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0261444812000390 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Li, Z., Feng, H.-H. & Saricaoglu, A. (2017) The short-term and long-term effects of AWE feedback on ESL students’ development of grammatical accuracy. CALICO Journal, 34(3): 355–375. https://doi.org/10.1558/cj.26382 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lin, P.-H., Liu, T.-C. & Paas, F. (2017) Effects of spell checkers on English as a second language students’ incidental spelling learning: A cognitive load perspective. Reading and Writing, 30(7): 1501−1525. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-017-9734-4 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Long, M. H. (1996) The role of the linguistic environment in second language acquisition. In Ritchie, W. C. & Bhatia, T. K. (eds.), Handbook of second language acquisition. San Diego: Academic Press, 413−468. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-012589042-7/50015-3 Google Scholar
Lozano, C. (2022) CEDEL2: Design, compilation and web interface of an online corpus for L2 Spanish acquisition research. Second Language Research, 38(4): 965−983. https://doi.org/10.1177/02676583211050522 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Manchón, R. M. (2014) The internal dimension of tasks: The interaction between task factors and learner factors in bringing about learning through writing. In Byrnes, H. & Manchón, R. M. (eds.), Task-based language learning: Insights from and to L2 writing. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 27−52. https://doi.org/10.1075/tblt.7.02man Google Scholar
Manchón, R. M. & Vasylets, O. (2019) Language learning through writing: Theoretical perspectives and empirical evidence. In Schwieter, J. W. & Benati, A. (eds.), The Cambridge handbook of language learning. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 341−362. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108333603.015 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marcos-Miguel, N. (2013) Analyzing instruction and learning of derivational morphology in the Spanish foreign language classroom. University of Pittsburgh, PhD dissertation.Google Scholar
Mitton, R. (2010) Fifty years of spellchecking. Writing Systems Research, 2(1): 1−7. https://doi.org/10.1093/wsr/wsq004 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mitton, R. & Okada, T. (2007) The adaptation of an English spellchecker for Japanese writers. London: Birkbeck ePrints. https://eprints.bbk.ac.uk/id/eprint/592/ Google Scholar
Nagata, R., Takamura, H. & Neubig, G. (2017) Adaptive spelling error correction models for learner English. Procedia Computer Science, 112: 474–483. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2017.08.065 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nation, I. S. P. (1990) Teaching and learning vocabulary: Teaching methods. Boston: Heinle & Heinle.Google Scholar
Nation, I. S. P. (2001) Learning vocabulary in another language. Stuttgart: Ernst Klett Sprachen. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139524759 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nesi, H. (2014) Dictionary use by English language learners. Language Teaching, 47(1): 38−55. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0261444813000402 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Park, E. S. & Kim, O. Y. (2019) Learners’ engagement with indirect written corrective feedback: Depth of processing and self-correction. In Leow, R. P. (ed.), The Routledge handbook of second language research in classroom learning. New York: Routledge, 214−228.Google Scholar
Quinn, C. (2015) Training L2 writers to reference corpora as a self-correction tool. ELT Journal, 69(2): 165−177. https://doi.org/10.1093/elt/ccu062 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ranalli, J. (2018) Automated written corrective feedback: How well can students make use of it? Computer Assisted Language Learning, 31(7): 653–674. https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2018.1428994 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ranalli, J. & Yamashita, T. (2022) Automated written corrective feedback: Error-correction performance and timing of delivery. Language Learning & Technology, 26(1): 1−25. http://hdl.handle.net/10125/73465 Google Scholar
Real Academia Española (2008) Banco de datos (CREA). Corpus de Referencia del español Actual. http://www.rae.es Google Scholar
Real Academia Española (2014) Diccionario de la lengua española (23 ed.). Madrid: Espasa. http://www.rae.es Google Scholar
Rimrott, A. & Heift, T. (2006) Language learners and generic spell checkers in CALL. CALICO Journal, 23(1): 17−48. https://doi.org/10.1558/cj.v23i1.17-48 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rimrott, A. & Heift, T. (2008) Evaluating automatic detection of misspellings in German. Language Learning & Technology, 12(3): 73−92. https://doi.org/10125/44156 Google Scholar
Rodríguez, A. J., Villoria, D. B. & Paredes, A. F. (1997) Las redacciones en lengua extranjera en bachillerato y COU: Investigación pedagógica. Valladolid: Universidad de Valladolid.Google Scholar
Saint Pierre, A. & Génin, E. (2014) How important are rare variants in common disease? Briefings in Functional Genomics, 13(5), 353−361CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
San Mateo, A. (2016) Un corpus de bigramas utilizado como corrector ortográfico y gramatical destinado a hablantes nativos de español. Revista signos, 49(90): 94−118. https://doi.org/10.4067/S0718-09342016000100005 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sánchez Jiménez, D. (2009) Una aproximación a la didáctica de la ortografía en la clase de ELE. MarcoELE. Revista de didáctica ELE, 9: 1−22. https://marcoele.com/descargas/9/sanchez_ortografia.pdf Google Scholar
Sánchez Jiménez, D. (2010) El análisis de errores ortográficos de estudiantes filipinos en el aprendizaje de español como LE y su aplicación didáctica. En actas del I Congreso de Español como Lengua Extranjera en Asia-Pacífico. Manila: Instituto Cervantes, 106−126.Google Scholar
Sánchez-Gutiérrez, C. H. (2013) Priming morfológico y conciencia morfológica. Una investigación con estudiantes norteamericanos de E/LE. Salamanca University, Spain, PhD dissertation.Google Scholar
Schmidt, R. (2010) Attention, awareness, and individual differences in language learning. In Chan, W. M., Chi, S., Cin, K. N., Istanto, J., Nagami, M., Sew, J. W., Suthiwan, T. & Walker, I. (eds.), Proceedings of CLaSIC 2010, Singapore, December 2-4. Singapore: National University of Singapore, Centre for Language Studies, 721–737.Google Scholar
Schmidt, R. W. (1990) The role of consciousness in second language learning. Applied Linguistics, 11(2): 129−158. https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/11.2.129 Google Scholar
Sinclair, J. (1991) Corpus, concordance, collocation. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Stevenson, M. & Phakiti, A. (2014) The effects of computer-generated feedback on the quality of writing. Assessing Writing, 19: 51–65. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asw.2013.11.007 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Touchie, H. Y. (1986) Second language learning errors: Their types, causes, and treatment. JALT Journal, 8(1), 75−80 Google Scholar
van Beuningen, C. G., de Jong, N. H. & Kuiken, F. (2008) The effect of direct and indirect corrective feedback on L2 learners’ written accuracy. ITL: International Journal of Applied Linguistics, 156(1): 279−296. https://doi.org/10.2143/ITL.156.0.2034439 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vickers, C. H. & Ene, E. (2006) Grammatical accuracy and learner autonomy in advanced writing. ELT Journal, 60(2): 109−116. https://doi.org/10.1093/elt/cci097 Google Scholar
Warschauer, M. (2010) New tools for teaching writing. Language Learning & Technology, 14(1): 3−8. https://doi.org/10125/44196 Google Scholar
Webb, S. (2021) Word families and lemmas, not a real dilemma: Investigating lexical units. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 43(5): 973−984. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263121000760 CrossRefGoogle Scholar