Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-r6qrq Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-25T13:28:24.776Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Subject-verb order in spoken Arabic: Morpholexical and event-based factors

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  03 April 2009

Jonathan Owens
Affiliation:
University of Maryland and Bayreuth University
Robin Dodsworth
Affiliation:
North Carolina State University
Trent Rockwood
Affiliation:
University of Maryland

Abstract

This article explores the relationship between the global functions of variable subject-verb order and morpholexical class of subjects in the spoken Arabic of the Arabian peninsula. Using corpus-based methods, it is shown that lexical class—pronoun, pronominal, noun—definiteness, and the discourse-defined lexical specificity of a noun all correlate significantly with subject-verb or verb-subject word order. The global function of the two orders is explored using an array of measures to show that verb-subject order prototypically presents events, while subject-verb signals available referentiality. Using the quantitatively based study of Anthony Naro and Sebastiao Votre ([1999]. Discourse motivations for linguistic regularities: Verb/subject order in spoken Brazilian Portuguese. Probus 11:75–100.) on Brazilian Portuguese as a point of comparison, a typological framework is developed for understanding languages with variable subject-verb order.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2009

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Al-Rawi, Rosina-Fawzia. (1990). Studien zum Arabischen Dialekt von Abu Daby. Heidelberg: Julius Groos.Google Scholar
Benmamoun, Elabbas. (2000). The feature structure of functional categories. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Birner, Betty. (1994). Information status and word order: An analysis of English inversion. Language 70:234259.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chafe, Wallace. (1987). Cognitive constraints on information flow. In Tomlin, R. (ed.), Coherence and grounding in discourse. Amsterdam: Benjamins. 2152.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chafe, Wallace. (1994). Discourse, consciousness, and time: The flow and displacement of conscious experience in speaking and writing. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Dahlgren, Sven-Olof. (1998). Word order in Arabic. Gothenburg, Sweden: Acta Universitatis Gothoburgensis.Google Scholar
Ferrari, Lilian V. (1990). Distribution and function of word order variation in Brazilian Portuguese. Journal of Pragmatics 14:649666.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fox, Andrew. (1983). Topic continuity in Biblical Hebrew narrative. In Givón, T. (ed.), Topic continuity in discourse: A quantitative cross-language study. Amsterdam: Benjamins. 215254.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Givón, Talmy. (1983). Introduction. In Givón, T. (ed.), Topic continuity in discourse: A quantitative cross-language study. Amsterdam: Benjamins. 142.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Halliday, Michael A. K., & Hasan, Ruqaiya. (1976). Cohesion in English. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Herring, Susan C. (1990). Information structure as a consequence of word order type. Proceedings of the Berkeley Linguistics Society 16:163174.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hetzron, Robert. (1973). The presentative movement or why the ideal word order is SVOP. In Li, C. N. (ed.), Word order and word order change. Austin: University of Texas Press. 346388.Google Scholar
Holes, Clive. (2005). Dialect, culture and society in Eastern Arabia. Vol. 2. Ethnographic texts. Brill: Leiden.Google Scholar
Holes, Clive. (2009). Word order and textual function in Gulf Arabic. In Owens, J. & Elgibali, A. (eds.), Information structure in spoken Arabic. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Jacennik, Barbara, & Dwyer, Matthew. (1992). Verb-subject order in Polish. In Payne, D. (ed.), Pragmatics of word order flexibility. Amsterdam: Benjamins. 209242.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jaggar, Philip. (1983). Some dimensions of topic-NP continuity in Hausa narrative. In Givón, T. (ed.), Topic continuity in discourse: A quantitative cross-language study. Amsterdam: Benjamins. 365424.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kiss, Katalin. (1998). Identificational focus vs. information focus. Language 74:245273.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lambrecht, Knud. (1994). Information structure and sentence form: Topic, focus, and the mental representation of discourse referents. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Linell, Per. (1998). Approaching dialogue. Amsterdam: Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Liu, Anchun, & Zhang, Bojiang. (2004). The discourse function of the sentence with an indefinite NP subject. Journal of Chinese Language and Computing 14:103112.Google Scholar
Lyons, John. (1995). Linguistic semantics: An introduction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Meyer, Karen. (1992). Word order in Klamath. In Payne, D. (ed.), Pragmatics of word order flexibility. Amsterdam: Benjamins. 167192.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Minsky, Marvin. (1975). Frame-system theory. In Schank, R. & Nash-Weber, B. (eds.), Theoretical issues in natural language processing. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Myhill, John. (1992). Word order and temporal sequencing. In Payne, D. (ed.), Pragmatics of word order flexibility. Amsterdam: Benjamins. 265278.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Myhill, John, & Xing, Zhiqun. 1993. The discourse functions of patient fronting: A comparative study of Biblical Hebrew and Chinese. Linguistics 31:2557.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Naro, Anthony, & Votre, Sebastiao. (1999). Discourse motivations for linguistic regularities: Verb/subject order in spoken Brazilian Portuguese. Probus 11:75100.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Obana, Yasuko. (2003). Anaphoric choices in Japanese fictional novels: The discourse arrangement of noun phrases, zero and third person pronouns. Text 23:405443.Google Scholar
Ocampo, Francisco. (1993). The introduction of new referents in French and Spanish discourse: One constraint, two strategies. In Ashby, W. J., Mithun, M., & Perissinotto, G. (eds.), Linguistic perspectives on Romance languages: Selected papers from the XXI Linguistic Symposium on Romance Languages. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 351362.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pashova, Tsvetomira. (2003). The VS/SV alternation in modern written Arabic from a textual perspective. Zeitschrift für Arabische Linguistik 42:740.Google Scholar
Payne, Doris. (1992). Nonidentifiable information and pragmatic order rules in O'Odham. In Payne, D. (ed.), Pragmatics of word order flexibility. Amsterdam: Benjamins. 137166.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Payne, Doris. (ed.) (1992). Pragmatics of word order flexibility. Amsterdam: Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Prince, Ellen F. (1981). Toward a taxonomy of given-new information. In Cole, P. (ed.), Radical pragmatics. New York: Academic Press. 223255.Google Scholar
Quakenbush, J. Stephen. (1992). Word order and discourse type: An Austronesian example. In Payne, D. (ed.), Pragmatics of word order flexibility. Amsterdam: Benjamins. 279304.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rude, Noel. (1992). Word order and topicality in Nez Perce. In Payne, D. (ed.), Pragmatics of word order flexibility. Amsterdam: Benjamins. 193208.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sankoff, David, Tagliamonte, Sali, & Smith, Eric. (2005). Goldvarb X: A multivariate analysis application. Available at: http://individual.utoronto.ca/tagliamonte/Goldvarb/GV_index.html. Accessed September 15, 2007.Google Scholar
Sasse, Hans-Jürgen. (1987). The thetic-categorical distinction revisited. Linguistics 25:511580.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Seig, Mary Theresa. (2004). Episodic boundaries in Japanese and English narratives. In Moder, C. L. & Martinovic-Zic, A. (eds.), Discourse across languages and cultures. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 227250.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Siewierska, Anna. (1998). Variation in major constituent order: A global and a European perspective. In Siewierska, A. (ed.), Constituent order in the languages of Europe. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. 475552.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sperber, Dan, & Wilson, Deirdre. (1995). Relevance: Communication and cognition. 2nd ed.Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Tallerman, Maggie. (1998). Celtic word order: Some theoretical issues. In Siewierska, A. (ed.), Constituent order in the languages of Europe. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. 599647.CrossRefGoogle Scholar