Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-pftt2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-05T00:34:34.526Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

When it comes to taxes, ownership intuitions abide by the law

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 October 2023

Leo J. Kleiman-Lynch
Affiliation:
Department of Psychology, University of California, San Diego, CA, USA lkleiman@ucsd.edu memccullough@ucsd.edu; https://www.michael-mccullough.com/
Michael E. McCullough
Affiliation:
Department of Psychology, University of California, San Diego, CA, USA lkleiman@ucsd.edu memccullough@ucsd.edu; https://www.michael-mccullough.com/

Abstract

Boyer suggests that laws cannot account for ownership intuitions, but there may be situations when intuitions hew to laws almost perfectly. Laws granting governments taxation powers provide an interesting case study. We report data here suggesting that people's intuitions track law very closely, and are unaffected by manipulating a P() tag input. We propose two hypotheses to explain this finding.

Type
Open Peer Commentary
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s), 2023. Published by Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Boyer, P. (1996). What makes anthropomorphism natural: Intuitive ontology and cultural representations. Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute, 2(1), 8397.10.2307/3034634CrossRefGoogle Scholar