Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-75dct Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-05T04:34:06.624Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Formation of acetaldehyde from threonine by lactic acid bacteria

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 June 2009

G. J. Lees
Affiliation:
Russell Grimwade School of Biochemistry, University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria 3052, Australia
G. R. Jago
Affiliation:
Dairy Research Laboratory, Division of Food Research, C.S.I.R.O., Highett, Victoria 3190, Australia

Summary

Group N streptococci were found to cleave threonine to form acetaldehyde and glycine. Threonine aldolase, the enzyme catalysing this reaction, was found in all strains except Streptococcus cremoris Z8, an organism which had been shown previously to have a nutritional requirement for glycine. The enzyme was strongly inhibited by glycine and cysteine. The inhibition showed characteristics of allosteric inhibition and was pH-dependent. Inhibition by glycine, but not by cysteine, was highly specific. Analogues and derivatives of cysteine which contained a thiol group and a free amino group inhibited the activity of threonine aldolase. The presence of a carboxyl group was not necessary for inhibition. The cleavage of threonine by wholecell suspensions was stimulated by either an energy source to aid transport, or by rendering the cells permeable to substrate with oleate. Threonine did not appear to be degraded by enzymes other than threonine aldolase, as threonine dehydratase activity was low and NAD- and NADP-dependent threonine dehydrogenases were absent.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Proprietors of Journal of Dairy Research 1976

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Bills, D. D. & Day, E. A. (1966). Journal of Dairy Science 49, 1473.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bottazzi, V. & Dellaglio, F. (1967). Journal of Dairy Research 34, 109.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cohen, G. N. (1965). Annual Review of Microbiology 19, 105.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Coles, R. S. & Lichstein, H. C. (1963). Archives of Biochemistry and Biophysics 103, 186.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dainty, R. H. (1967). Biochemical Journal 104, 46P.Google Scholar
Friedemann, T. E. & Haugen, G. E. (1943). Journal of Biological Chemistry 147, 415.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Green, M. L. & Elliott, W. H. (1964). Biochemical Journal 92, 537.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harvey, R. J. (1960). Journal of Dairy Research 27, 41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Karasek, M. A. & Greenberg, D. M. (1957). Journal of Biological Chemistry 227, 191.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Keenan, T. W. & Bills, D. D. (1968). Journal of Dairy Science 51, 1561.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kodicek, E. (1956). In Biochemical Problems of Lipids (2nd international conference, 1953), p. 401. (Eds Popjak, G. and Le Breton, E..) London: Butterworths Scientific Publications.Google Scholar
Krauze, E., Kagan, Z. S., Yakovleva, V. I. & Kretovich, V. L. (1965). Biochemistry (Biokhimiya) 30, 287.Google Scholar
Lees, G. J. & Jago, G. R. (1976). Journal of Dairy Research 43, 63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lenti, C. & Grillo, M. A. (1953). Hoppe-Seylers Zeitschrift für Physiologische Chemie 293, 234.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Malkin, L. I. & Greenberg, D. M. (1964). Biochimica et Biophysica Acta 85, 117.Google Scholar
Mauzerall, D. & Granick, S. (1956). Journal of Biological Chemistry 219, 435.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reiter, B. & Oram, J. D. (1962). Journal of Dairy Research 29, 63.Google Scholar
Riario-Sforza, G., Pagani, R. & Marinello, E. (1969). European Journal of Biochemistry 8, 88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schirch, L. & Gross, T. (1968). Journal of Biological Chemistry 243, 5651.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schleifer, K. H. & Kandler, O. (1967). Archiv für Mikrobiologie 57, 365.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Umbarger, H. E. & Brown, B. (1957). Journal of Bacteriology 73, 105.CrossRefGoogle Scholar