Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-x5gtn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-05-26T11:22:15.962Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Authoritarian resurgence: towards a unified analytical framework

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  08 July 2019

Andrea Cassani Open the ORCID record for Andrea Cassani [Opens in a new window]  and
Luca Tomini
Andrea Cassani*
Affiliation:
Department of Social and Political Sciences, Università degli Studi di Milano, via Conservatorio 7, 20122 Milano, Italy
Luca Tomini
Affiliation:
Centre d'Etude de la Vie Politique, Faculté de Philosophie et Sciences Sociales, Université libre de Bruxelles, avenue Jeanne, 44, 1050 Bruxelles, Belgium
*
*Corresponding author. Email: andrea.cassani@unimi.it
Get access

Abstract

This introductory note to the Special Issue ‘Autocracy Strikes Back: Authoritarian Resurgence in the Early 21st Century’ situates this collection of articles in the burgeoning literature on authoritarian resurgence, and illustrates the conceptual terrain on which these articles make their contribution. In this regard, we discuss autocratization, authoritarian resilience, democratic transition failure, and autocracy-to-autocracy transition as processes of regime change representing different ways in which authoritarian resurgence may advance. Relatedly, we clarify how these processes of regime change differ from each other and provide a few basic coordinates to frame their comparative analysis.

Keywords

Authoritarian resilienceauthoritarian resurgenceautocracy-to-autocracy transitionautocratizationfailed democratic transition
Type
Introduction
Information
Italian Political Science Review / Rivista Italiana di Scienza Politica , Volume 49 , Special Issue 2: Autocracy Strikes Back: Authoritarian Resurgence in the Early 21st Century , July 2019 , pp. 115 - 120
Copyright
Copyright © Società Italiana di Scienza Politica 2019 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Brownlee, J, Masoud, T and Reynolds, A (2015) The Arab Spring: Pathways of Repression and Reform. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Carothers, T (2002) The end of the transition paradigm. Journal of Democracy 13, 5–21.Google Scholar
Cassani, A and Tomini, L (2019) Post-Cold War autocratization: Trends and patterns of regime change opposite to democratization. Italian Political Science Review/Rivista Italiana di Scienza Politica 49, 121–138.Google Scholar
Del Panta, G (2019) The stubbornness of authoritarianism: Autocracy-to-autocracy transitions in the world between 2000 and 2015. Italian Political Science Review/Rivista Italiana di Scienza Politica 49, 139–155.Google Scholar
Diamond, L (2002) Thinking about hybrid regimes. Journal of Democracy 13, 21–35.Google Scholar
Diamond, L (2008) The democratic rollback. The resurgence of the predatory state. Foreign Affairs 87, 36.Google Scholar
Diamond, L (2015) Facing up to the democratic recession. Journal of Democracy 26, 141–155.Google Scholar
Diamond, L and Plattner, M (eds) (1993) The Global Resurgence of Democracy. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
Diamond, L, Linz, J and Lipset, SM (eds) (1989) Democracy in Developing Countries. Boulder: Lynne Rienner.Google Scholar
Diamond, L, Plattner, M and Walker, C (eds) (2016) Authoritarianism Goes Global. The Challenge to Democracy. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
Haggard, S and Kaufman, R (1994) The challenges of consolidation. Journal of Democracy 5, 5–16.Google Scholar
Huntington, S (1991) The Third Wave: Democratization in the Late Twentieth Century. Oklahoma City: University of Oklahoma Press.Google Scholar
Levitsky, S and Way, L (2002) The rise of competitive authoritarianism. Journal of Democracy 13, 51–6.Google Scholar
Levitsky, S and Way, L (2015) The myth of democratic recession. Journal of Democracy 26, 48–58.Google Scholar
Linz, J and Stepan, A (1996) Problems of Democratic Transition and Consolidation: Southern Europe, South America and Post-Communist Europe. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
Lipset, SM (1959) Some social requisites of democracy: economic development and political legitimacy. The American Political Science Review 53, 69–105.Google Scholar
Luehrmann, A and Lindberg, S (2019) A third wave of autocratization is here: what is new about it? Democratization (online first). doi: 10.1080/13510347.2019.1582029.Google Scholar
Merkel, W (2004) Embedded and defective democracies. Democratization 11, 33–58.Google Scholar
Morlino, L (2004) What is a ‘good’ democracy? Democratization 11, 10–32.Google Scholar
Natalizia, G (2019) Black knight as a strategic choice? Causes and modes of Russia's support to the authoritarianism in Southern Caucasus. Italian Political Science Review/Rivista Italiana di Scienza Politica 49, 175–191.Google Scholar
Nathan, A (2003) China's changing of the guard: authoritarian resilience. Journal of Democracy 14, 6–17.Google Scholar
O'Donnell, G and Schmitter, P (1986) Transition From Authoritarian Rule: Tentative Conclusions About Uncertain Democracies. Baltimore: The Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
Przeworski, A (1991) Democracy and the Market: Political and Economic Reforms in Eastern Europe and Latin America. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Puddington, A and Piano, A (2005) Worrisome signs, modest shifts. Journal of Democracy 16, 103–108.Google Scholar
Resta, V (2019) The effect of electoral autocracy in Egypt's failed transition: A party politics perspective. Italian Political Science Review/Rivista Italiana di Scienza Politica 49, 157–173.Google Scholar
Ruzza, S, Gabusi, G and Pellegrino, D (2019) Authoritarian resilience through top-down transformation: Making sense of Myanmar's incomplete transition. Italian Political Science Review/Rivista Italiana di Scienza Politica 49, 193–209.Google Scholar
Schedler, A (2002) The menu of manipulation. Journal of Democracy 13, 36–50.Google Scholar
Schmitter, P (2015) Crisis and transition, but not decline. Journal of Democracy 26, 32–44.Google Scholar