Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-5nwft Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-05-30T19:10:26.697Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Sprinting Out of Stuckness: Overcoming Moments of Stuckness to Support the Creativity Flow in Agile Team Settings

Part of: Innovation Engineering

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 July 2019

Ashni Shah ,
Alfonso Huidobro Pereda  and
Milene Gonçalves

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Multidisciplinary agile teams working in fast paced, delivery-oriented sprint cycles of two weeks can experience moments of stuckness. Typically, these moments can be characterised by the inability to continue, which can be quite detrimental in agile settings, where time is pressured. This paper aims to explore these moments of stuckness, to understand when and why they occur and to understand the different strategies Scrum teams use to overcome them, both on a personal as well as team level. A combination of interviews and observations were conducted with six Scrum team members and two experts to understand their process and experiences while working in an agile set up. We have identified five strategies, which strongly rely on agile values of collaboration, communication, and creativity. These are: looking for expert guidance, open communication, creating spike stories, visual communication and incubation. The findings from this study provide both practice and academia with a deeper understanding into how can creativity be supported in agile settings.

Keywords

CreativityDesign processTeamworkAgileScrum
Type
Article
Information
Proceedings of the Design Society: International Conference on Engineering Design , Volume 1 , Issue 1 , July 2019 , pp. 2347 - 2356
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BYCreative Common License - NCCreative Common License - ND
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is unaltered and is properly cited. The written permission of Cambridge University Press must be obtained for commercial re-use or in order to create a derivative work.
Copyright
© The Author(s) 2019

References

Alshenqeeti, H. (2014), “Interviewing as a Data Collection Method: A Critical Review”, English Linguistics Research, Vol. 3 No. 1.Google Scholar
Amabile, T. (1983), “The social psychology of creativity: A componential conceptualization”, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, Vol. 45 No. 2, pp. 357–376.Google Scholar
Bucher, S. and Langley, A. (2016), “The Interplay of Reflective and Experimental Spaces in Interrupting and Reorienting Routine Dynamics”, Organization Science, Vol 27 No. 3, pp. 1–20.Google Scholar
Conboy, K., Wang, X. and Fitzgerald, B. (2009), “Creativity in Agile systems development: a literature review”, Information Systems–Creativity and Innovation in Small and Medium-Sized Enterprises, pp. 122–134.Google Scholar
Crilly, N. and Cardoso, C. (2017), “Where next for research on fixation, inspiration and creativity in design?”, Design Studies, No. 50, pp. 1–38.Google Scholar
Dick, M., Drangmeister, J., Kern, E. and Naumann, S. (2013), “Green software engineering with Agile methods”, In: Green and Sustainable Software (GREENS), 2013 2nd International Workshop on. IEEE.Google Scholar
Dingsøyr, T., Nerur, S., Balijepally, V. and Moe, N. (2012), “A decade of Agile methodologies: Towards explaining Agile software development”, Journal of Systems and Software, Vol. 85 No. 6, pp. 1213–1221.Google Scholar
Dooley, L.M. (2002), “Case study research and theory building”, Advances in developing human resources, Vol. 4 No. 3, pp. 335–354.Google Scholar
Dorst, K. and Cross, N. (2001), Creativity in the design process: co-evolution of problem–solution. Design studies, Vol. 22 No. 5, pp. 425–437.Google Scholar
Fowler, M. and Highsmith, J. (2001), “The Agile manifesto”, Software Development, Vol. 9 No. 8, pp. 28–35.Google Scholar
Gonçalves, M. (2017), “Design finds a way: Creative strategies to cope with barriers to creativity”, In DS 87–8 Proceedings of the 21st International Conference on Engineering Design (ICED 17) Vol 8: Human Behaviour in Design, Vancouver, Canada.Google Scholar
Gray, D. (2014), Doing research in the real world. 3rd ed. SAGE, London, pp. 266–293.Google Scholar
Hennessey, B.A. and Amabile, T.M. (2010), “Creativity”, Annual Review of Psychology, Vol. 61, pp. 569–598.Google Scholar
Highsmith, J. and Cockburn, A. (2001), “Agile software development: The business of innovation”, Computer, Vol. 34 No. 9, pp. 120–127.Google Scholar
James, M. and Walter, L. (2016), Scrum Reference Card. 1st ed. CollabNet Inc.Google Scholar
Jongerius, P. (2012), Get Agile!. Amsterdam: BIS Publ.Google Scholar
Lindsjørn, Y., Sjøberg, D.I., Dingsøyr, T., Bergersen, G.R. and Dybå, T. (2016), “Teamwork quality and project success in software development: A survey of Agile development teams”, Journal of Systems and Software, Vol. 122, pp. 274–286.Google Scholar
Nonaka, I. (1991), “The knowledge-creating company”, Harvard Business Review, Vol. 69, pp. 96–104.Google Scholar
Patton, M.Q. (2002), Qualitative research & evaluation methods. 3rd ed. SAGE, Thousand Oaks. pp. 339–418.Google Scholar
Sachs, A. (1999), “Stuckness’ in the design studio”, Design Studies, Vol. 20 No. 2, pp. 195–209.Google Scholar
Sutherland, J. and Schwaber, K. (2013), The Scrum Guide.Google Scholar
Wallas, G. (1926), The art of thought. Jonathan Cape, London.Google Scholar
Whitworth, E. and Biddle, R. (2007, August), “The social nature of Agile teams”, In: Agile conference (AGILE), 2007. pp. 26–36. IEEE.Google Scholar
Yin, R. (2009), Case study research. 1st ed. SAGE, London.Google Scholar