Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-dnltx Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-19T17:03:53.797Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

7 - Ethical Considerations for Pharmacogenomics: Privacy and Confidentiality

from I - Critical Concepts

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 June 2012

Russ B. Altman
Affiliation:
Stanford University, California
David Flockhart
Affiliation:
Indiana University
David B. Goldstein
Affiliation:
Duke University, North Carolina
Get access

Summary

Discovering how individual genetic variation influences why some people respond to therapeutics but others show little improvement or have serious side effects lies at the heart of the promise of pharmacogenomics to improve health care. Realizing this goal, however, will depend on building a robust infrastructure that supports genomic medicine. These changes include developing affordable and ubiquitous genomic sequencing capability, creating expansive DNA sample sets annotated with detailed phenotypic information, educating health care providers on developments in genomic medicine, integrating diagnostic tools into clinical decision making, and attending to a complex array of social, economic, and ethical concerns that accompany each of these shifts in biomedicine. Achieving these major endeavors will depend on ensuring that the public not only understands the goals of pharmacogenomics, but also that the public actively supports and participates in basic and clinical research.

Public approval of pharmacogenomics research will depend on assurances that the risks will be minimal and that the benefits of its integration into clinical care will result in improved health care. A major issue of concern over the collection, storage, and distribution of human DNA is the risk associated with potential breaches of confidentiality and privacy and the threat of stigmatization and/or discrimination against individuals by insurance companies, employers, and others. The principle of protecting an individual's genetic information in the course of research and/or clinical care is a deeply held principle in the United States. Personal medical history has remained a sensitive and legally protected category of information. The special status of privacy of medical information has led to confidentiality protections as in physician-patient privilege. To attend to these requirements, researchers and health providers must develop strategies that secure individual genetic information and personal medical history that also enable basic and translation research.

Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2012

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Reischl, JSchroder, MLuttenberger, NPetrov, DChumann, BTernes, RSturzebecher, SPharmacogenetic research and data protection – challenges and solutionsPharmacogenomics J 2006 6 225Google Scholar
Gerstein, MBBruce, CRozowsky, JSZheng, DDu, JKorbel, JOEmanuelsson, OZhang, ZDWeissman, SSynder, MWhat is a gene, post-ENCODE? History and updated definitionGenome Res 2007 17 669Google Scholar
McGuire, ALFisher, RCusenza, PHudson, KRothstein, MAMcGraw, DMatteson, SGlaser, JHenley, DEConfidentiality, privacy, and security of genetic and genomic test information in electronic health records: points to considerGenet Med 2008 10 495Google Scholar
Keller, EF.The Century of the GeneCambridge, MAHarvard University Press 2000
Nelkin, DLindee, SDNA Mystique. The Gene as a Cultural IconNew YorkFreedman 1995
Reischl, JSchroder, MLuttenberger, NPetrov, DChumann, BTernes, RSturzebecher, SPharmacogenetic research and data protection – challenges and solutionsPharmacogenomics J 2006 6 225Google Scholar
Anderlik, MRRothstein, MAPrivacy and confidentiality of genetic information: what rules for the new scienceAnn Rev Genomics Hum Gen 2001 2 401Google Scholar
Hudson, KLHolohan, MKCollins, FSKeeping pace with the times: The Genetic Information Nondiscrimination Act of 2008N Engl J Med 2008 358 2661Google Scholar
National Conference of State Legislatureshttp://www.ncsl.org/programs/health/genetics/prt.htm 2011
Fan, CTLin, JCLee, CHTaiwan Biobank: a project aiming to aid Taiwan's transition into a biomedical islandPharmacogenomics 2008 9 235Google Scholar
Tutton, RKaye, JHoeyer, KGoverning UK Biobank: the importance of ensuring public trustTrends Biotechnol 2004 22 284Google Scholar
Collins, FS 2005
Saavedra, JMThe challenge of genetic studies in hypertensionCirc Res 2007 100 1389Google Scholar
Ginsburg, GSShah, SHMcCarthy, JJTaking cardiovascular genetic association studies to the next levelJ Am Coll Cardiol 2007 50: 930Google Scholar
National Human Genome Research Institutehttps://www.phenx.org/Default.aspx?tabid/36 2011
Lunshof, JEChadwick, RVorhaus, DBChurch, GMFrom genetic privacy to open consentNat Rev Genet 2008 9 406Google Scholar
Motluk, A 2005 http://www.newscientist.com/article/mg18825244.200-anonymous-sperm-donor-traced-on-internet.html
Markoff, J 2008 http://www.nytimes.com/2008/02/22/technology/22chip.html
Kohane, ISAltman, RBHealth-information altruists – a potentially critical resourceN Engl J Med 2005 353 2074Google Scholar
Sterling, RHenderson, GECorbie-Smith, GPublic willingness to participate in and public opinions about genetic variation research: a review of the literatureAm J Public Health 2006 96 1971Google Scholar
McGuire, ALHamilton, JALunstroth, RMcCullough, LBGoldman, ADNA data sharing: research participants’ perspectivesGenet Med 2008 10 46Google Scholar
Policy for sharing of data obtained in NIH-supported or conducted genome-wide association studies (GWAS)http://grants.nih.gov/grants/guide/notice-files/NOT-OD-07-088.html 2011
McGuire, AL.1000 genomes: on the road to personalized medicinePer Med 2008 5 195Google Scholar
Joly, YKnoppers, BMNguyen, MTStored tissue samples: through the confidentiality mazePharmacogenomics J 2005 5 2Google Scholar
McGuire, ALGibbs, RSGenetics: no longer identifiedScience 2006 312:Google Scholar
The American Society of Human Genetics 2006 http://www.ashg.org/pages/statement_nov3006.shtml
The Personal Genome Projecthttp://arep.med.harvard.edu/PGP/Anon.htm 2011
Henrikson, NBBurke, WVeenstra, DLAncillary risk information and pharmacogenetic tests: social and policy implicationsPharmacogenomics J 2008 8 85Google Scholar
Pritchard, AHarris, JPritchard, CWSt Clair, DLemmon, HLambert, JCChartier-Harlin, MCHayes, AThaker, UIwatsubo, TMann, DMLendon, CAssociation study and meta-analysis of low-density lipoprotein receptor related protein in Alzheimer's diseaseNeurosci Lett 2005 382 221Google Scholar
Cacabelos, RPharmacogenomics in Alzheimer's diseaseMethods Mol Biol 2008 448 213Google Scholar
Fernandez, CVKodish, EWeijer, CInforming study participants of research results: an ethical imperativeIRB: Ethics Hum Res 2003 25: 12Google Scholar
World Health Organisation 2003 http://www.law.ed.ac.uk/ahrb/publications/online/whofinalreport.doc
Knoppers, BMJoly, YSimard, JDurocher, FThe emergence of an ethical duty to disclose genetic research results: international perspectivesEur J Hum Genet 2006 14 1170Google Scholar
Zika, ESchulte in den Baumen, TKaye, JBrand, AIbarreta, DSample, data use and protection in biobanking in Europe: legal issuesPharmacogenomics 2008 9 773Google Scholar
Foster, MWSharp, RRShare and share alike: deciding how to distribute the scientific and social benefits of genomic dataNat Rev Genet 2007 8 633Google Scholar
Lee, SS-J.Racializing drug design”: pharmacogenomics and implications for health disparitiesAm J Public Health 2005 95 2133Google Scholar
Lee, SS-JMountain, JKoenig, BAltman, RBrown, MCamarillo, ACavalli-Sforza, LCho, MEberhardt, JFeldman, MFord, RGreely, HKing, RMarkus, HSatz, DSnipp, MSteele, CUnderhill, PThe ethics of characterizing difference: guiding principles on using racial categories in human geneticsGenome Biol 2008 9: 1Google Scholar
Rotimi, CLeppert, MMatsuda, IZeng, CAhang, HAdebamowo, CAjayi, IAniagwu, TDixon, MFukushima, YMacer, DMarshall, PNkwodimmah, CPeiffer, ARoyal, CSuda, EZhao, HWang, VOMcEwen, JThe International HapMap Consortium. Community engagement and informed consent in the International HapMap ProjectCommunity Genet 2007 10 186Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×