Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-p2v8j Total loading time: 0.001 Render date: 2024-06-02T06:21:50.274Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

19 - Evolution of neurogenesis in arthropods

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  08 August 2009

Giuseppe Fusco
Affiliation:
Università degli Studi di Padova, Italy
Alessandro Minelli
Affiliation:
Università degli Studi di Padova, Italy
Get access

Summary

Several alternative hypotheses have been suggested that support various phylogenetic groupings of the individual euarthropod taxa, the chelicerates, myriapods, crustaceans and insects. The Tetraconata hypothesis suggests a sister-group relationship of insects and crustaceans in contrast to the traditional monophyletic grouping of myriapods and insects, the Tracheata or Atelocerata (see references in Stollewerk and Chipman 2006). The Mandibulata hypothesis suggests a clade consisting of insects, crustaceans and myriapods (see references in Harzsch et al. 2005). However, the relationships within this clade are being debated since this hypothesis excludes neither the Pancrustacea nor the Tracheata concept. The latest hypothesis suggests a sister-group relationship of chelicerates and myriapods. Although this theory was initially based on molecular phylogenetic analysis (Friedrich and Tautz 1995, Hwang et al. 2001, Kusche and Burmester 2001, Nardi et al. 2003, Mallatt et al. 2004, Pisani et al. 2004), recent morphological and molecular data on neurogenesis in these groups potentially support a close relationship (Stollewerk et al. 2001, 2003, Dove and Stollewerk 2003, Kadner and Stollewerk 2004, Stollewerk and Simpson 2005, Chipman and Stollewerk 2006, Stollewerk and Chipman 2006). On top of the various ideas on the relationships within the euarthropods, none of the groups except the insects is generally accepted as monophyletic.

New insights into the evolutionary relationships between the different taxa have been gained by comparing morphological features and expression patterns of genes involved in developmental processes.

Type
Chapter
Information
Evolving Pathways
Key Themes in Evolutionary Developmental Biology
, pp. 359 - 380
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2008

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Anderson, D. 1973. Embryology and Phylogeny in Annelids and Arthropods. Oxford: Pergamon Press.Google Scholar
Bate, M. 1976. Embryogenesis of an insect nervous system. I. A map of thoracic and abdominal neuroblasts in Locusta migratoria. Journal of Embryology and Experimental Morphology 35, 107–123.Google ScholarPubMed
Bate, M. & Grunewald, E. B. 1981. Embryogenesis of an insect nervous system II. A class of neuron precursor cells and the origin of the intersegmental connectives. Journal of Embryology and Experimental Morphology 61, 317–330.Google Scholar
Berger, C., Urban, J. & Technau, G. M. 2001. Stage-specific inductive signals in the Drosophila neuroectoderm control the temporal sequence of neuroblast specification. Development 128, 3243–3251.Google ScholarPubMed
Chipman, A. D. & Stollewerk, A. 2006. Specification of neural precursor identity in the geophilomorph centipede Strigamia maritima. Developmental Biology 290, 337–350.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Doe, C. Q. 1992. Molecular markers for identified neuroblasts and ganglion mother cells in the Drosophila central nervous system. Development 116, 855–863.Google ScholarPubMed
Doe, C. Q., Chu-LaGraff, Q., Wright, D. M. & Scott, M. P. 1991. The prospero gene specifies cell fates in the Drosophila central nervous system. Cell 65, 451–464.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dohle, W. 1964. Die Embryonalentwicklung von Glomeris marginata (Villers) im Vergleich zur Entwicklung anderer Diplopoden. Zoologische Jahrbücher, Abteilung für Anatomie 81, 241–310.Google Scholar
Dohle, W. & Scholtz, G. 1988. Clonal analysis of the crustacean segment: the discordance between genealogical and segmental borders. Development 104 (supplement), 147–160.Google Scholar
Dove, H. & Stollewerk, A. 2003. Comparative analysis of neurogenesis in the myriapod Glomeris marginata (Diplopoda) suggests more similarities to chelicerates than to insects. Development 130, 2161–2171.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Friedrich, M. & Tautz, D. 1995. Ribosomal DNA phylogeny of the major extant arthropod classes and the evolution of myriapods. Nature 376, 165–167.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Galant, R., Skeath, J. B., Paddock, S., Lewis, D. L. & Carroll, S. B. 1998. Expression pattern of a butterfly achaete-scute homolog reveals the homology of butterfly wing scales and insect sensory bristles. Current Biology 8, 807–813.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Goodman, C. S. & Doe, C. Q. 1993. Embryonic development of the Drosophila central nervous system. In Bate, M. & Martinez-Arias, A. (eds.) The Development of Drosophila melanogaster. New York: Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press, pp. 1131–1206.Google Scholar
Hartenstein, V. & Campos-Ortega, J. A. 1984. Early neurogenesis in wildtype Drosophila melanogster. Roux's Archive of Developmental Biology 193, 308–325.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harzsch, S. 2006. Neurophylogeny: architecture of the nervous system and a fresh view on arthropod phylogeny. Integrative and Comparative Biology 46, 162–194.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harzsch, S., Müller, C. H. G. & Wolf, H. 2005. From variable to constant cell numbers: cellular characteristics of the arthropod nervous system argue against a sister-group relationship of Chelicerata and ‘Myriapoda’ but favour the Mandibulata concept. Development Genes & Evolution 215, 53–68.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Heymons, R. 1901. Die Entwicklungsgeschichte der Scolopender. Zoologica 13, 1–224.Google Scholar
Hwang, U. W., Friedrich, M., Tautz, D., Park, C. J. & Kim, W. 2001. Mitochondrial protein phylogeny joins myriapods with chelicerates. Nature 413, 154–157.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kadner, D. & Stollewerk, A. 2004. Neurogenesis in the chilopod Lithobius forficatus suggests more similarities to chelicerates than to insects. Development Genes & Evolution 214, 367–379.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Knoll, H. J. 1974. Untersuchungen zur Entwicklungsgeschichte von Scutigera coleoptrata L. (Chilopoda). Zoologische Jahrbücher, Abteilung für Anatomie 92, 47–132.Google Scholar
Kusche, K. & Burmester, T. 2001. Diplopod hemocyanin sequence and the phylogenetic position of the Myriapoda. Molecular Biology and Evolution 18, 1566–1573.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mallatt, J. M., Garey, J. R. & Shultz, J. W. 2004. Ecdysozoan phylogeny and Bayesian inference: first use of nearly complete 28S and 18S rRNA gene sequences to classify the arthropods and their kin. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 31, 178–191.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mathew, A. P. 1956. Embryology of Heterometrus scaber. Bulletin of the Center of Research of the Institute (University of Travancore) 1, 1–96.Google Scholar
Nardi, F., Spinsanti, G., Boore, J. L.et al. 2003. Hexapod origins: monophyletic or paraphyletic?Science 299, 1887–1889.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Pioro, H. L. & Stollewerk, A. 2006. The expression pattern of genes involved in early neurogenesis suggests distinct and conserved functions in the diplopod Glomeris marginata. Development Genes & Evolution 216, 417–430.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Pisani, D., Poling, L. L., Lyons-Weiler, M. & Hedges, S. B. 2004. The colonization of land by animals: molecular phylogeny and divergence times among arthropods. BMC Biology 2, 1.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Pistillo, D., Skaer, N. & Simpson, P. 2002. scute expression in Calliphora vicina reveals an ancestral pattern of longitudinal stripes on the thorax of higher Diptera. Development 129, 563–572.Google ScholarPubMed
Schachtner, J., Schmidt, M. & Homberg, U. 2005. Organization and evolutionary trends of primary olfactory centers in Tetraconata (Crustacea + Hexapoda). Arthropod Structure & Development 34, 257–299.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Scholtz, G. 1992. Cell lineage studies in the crayfish Cherax destructor (Crustacea, Decapoda): germ band formation, segmentation and early neurogenesis. Roux's Archive of Developmental Biology 202, 36–48.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Skaer, N., Pistillo, D. & Simpson, P. 2002. Transcriptional heterochrony of scute and changes in bristle pattern between two closely related species of blowfly. Developmental Biology 252, 31–45.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Skeath, J. B. 1999. At the nexus between pattern formation and cell-type specification: the generation of individual neuroblast fates in the Drosophila embryonic central nervous system. BioEssays 21, 922–931.3.0.CO;2-T>CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Stollewerk, A. 2002. Recruitment of cell groups through Delta/Notch signalling during spider neurogenesis. Development 129, 5339–5348.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Stollewerk, A. & Chipman, A. D. 2006. Neurogenesis in chelicerates and myriapods and its importance for understanding arthropod relationships. Integrative and Comparative Biology 46, 195–206.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Stollewerk, A. & Simpson, P. 2005. Evolution of early development of the nervous system: a comparison between arthropods. BioEssays 27, 874–883.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Stollewerk, A., Tautz, D. & Weller, M. 2003. Neurogenesis in the spider: new insights from comparative analysis of morphological processes and gene expression patterns. Arthropod Structure & Development 32, 5–16.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Stollewerk, A., Weller, M. & Tautz, D. 2001. Neurogenesis in the spider Cupiennius salei. Development 128, 2673–2688.Google ScholarPubMed
Strausfeld, N. J., Strausfeld, C., Stowe, S., Rowell, D. & Loesel, R. 2006a. The organization and evolutionary implications of neuropils and their neurons in the brain of the onychophoran Euperipatoides rowelli. Arthropod Structure & Development 35, 169–196.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Strausfeld, N. J., Strausfeld, C., Stowe, S., Rowell, D. & Loesel, R. 2006b. Arthropod phylogeny: onychophoran brain organization suggests an archaic relationship with a chelicerate stem lineage. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London Biological Science 273, 1857–1866.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tiegs, O. S. 1940. The embryology and affinities of the Symphyla based on the study of Hanseniella agilis. Quarterly Journal of Microscopic Science 82, 1–225.Google Scholar
Tiegs, O. S. 1947. The development and affinities of the Pauropoda based on the study of Pauropus sylvaticus. Quarterly Journal of Microscopic Science 82, 165–267 and 276–336.Google Scholar
Truman, J. W. & Ball, E. E. 1998. Patterns of embryonic neurogenesis in a primitive wingless insect, the silverfish, Ctenolepisma longicaudata: comparison with those seen in flying insects. Development Genes & Evolution 208, 357–368.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ungerer, P. 2006. Aspekte der Neurogenese von Orchestia cavimana (Amphipoda, Malacostraca, Crustacea). Unpublished Ph.D. thesis, Humboldt-University of Berlin.Google Scholar
Weller, M. & Tautz, D. 2003. Prospero and Snail expression during spider neurogenesis. Development Genes & Evolution 213, 554–566.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Weygoldt, P. 1985. Ontogeny of the arachnid central nervous system. In Barth, F. G. (ed.) Neurobiology of Arachnids. Berlin: Springer Verlag, pp. 20–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wheeler, S. R., Carrico, M. L., Wilson, B. A., Brown, S. J. & Skeath, J. B. 2003. The expression and function of the achaete-scute genes in Tribolium castaneum reveals conservation and variation in neural pattern formation and cell fate specification. Development 130, 4373–4381.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wheeler, S. R., Carrico, M. L., Wilson, B. A. & Skeath, J. B. 2005. The Tribolium columnar genes reveal conservation and plasticity in neural precursor patterning along the embryonic dorsal-ventral axis. Developmental Biology 279, 491–500.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Whitington, P. M. 2004. The development of the crustacean nervous system. In Scholtz, G. (ed.) Evolutionary Developmental Biology of Crustacea, Crustacean Issues 15. Lisse, Netherlands: Balkema, pp. 135–167.Google Scholar
Whitington, P. M., Meier, T. & King, P. 1991. Segmentation, neurogenesis and formation of early axonal pathways in the centipede, Ethmostigmus rubripes (Brandt). Roux's Archive of Developmental Biology 199, 349–363.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Winter, G. 1980. Beiträge zur Morphologie and Embryologie des vorderen Körperabschnitts (Cephalosoma) der Pantopoda Gerstaecker, 1863. I. Zur Entstehung des Zentralnervensystems. Zeitschrift für systematische Zoologie und Evolutionsforschung 18, 27–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wülbeck, C. & Simpson, P. 2000. Expression of achaete-scute homologues in discrete proneural clusters on the developing notum of the medfly Ceratitis capitata, suggests a common origin for the stereotyped bristle patterns of higher Diptera. Development 127, 1411–1440.Google ScholarPubMed
Wülbeck, C. & Simpson, P. 2002. The expression of pannier and achaete-scute homologues in a mosquito suggests an ancient role of pannier as a selector gene in the regulation of the dorsal body pattern. Development 129, 3861–3871.Google Scholar
Yoshikura, M. 1955. Embryological studies on the liphistiid spider, Heptathela kimurai, part II. Kumamoto Journal of Science B 2, 1–86.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×