Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-25wd4 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-26T06:06:28.064Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Beyond the Archive

Bridging Data Creation and Reuse in Archaeology

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 April 2018

Ixchel M. Faniel ,
Anne Austin ,
Eric Kansa ,
Sarah Whitcher Kansa ,
Phoebe France ,
Jennifer Jacobs ,
Ran Boytner  and
Elizabeth Yakel
Ixchel M. Faniel*
Affiliation:
OCLC Research, 6565 Kilgour Place, Dublin, OH 43017, USA
Anne Austin
Affiliation:
Department of History, Stanford University, Lane History Corner, 450 Serra Mall, Stanford, CA 94305, USA
Eric Kansa
Affiliation:
Alexandria Archive Institute, Open Context, 125 El Verano Way, San Francisco, CA 94127, USA
Sarah Whitcher Kansa
Affiliation:
Alexandria Archive Institute, Open Context, 125 El Verano Way, San Francisco, CA 94127, USA
Phoebe France
Affiliation:
Department of Anthropology, University of Hawaii, College of Social Sciences, 2424 Maile Way, Honolulu, Hawai‘i 96822, USA
Jennifer Jacobs
Affiliation:
Alexandria Archive Institute, Open Context, 125 El Verano Way, San Francisco, CA 94127, USA
Ran Boytner
Affiliation:
Institute for Field Research, 2999 Overland Avenue #103, Los Angeles, CA 90064, USA
Elizabeth Yakel
Affiliation:
School of Information, University of Michigan, 105 South State Street, Ann Arbor, MI 48109, USA
*
(fanieli@oclc.org, corresponding author)
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This article presents research on archaeological data creation and management practices at two excavations in Europe in order to gain a better understanding of how to align these practices with the data reuse needs of a broader research community. The Secret Life of Data project follows the life cycle of data from the field to the digital repository to better understand opportunities and challenges in data interpretation, publication, and preservation. Our “Slow Data” approach focuses not on maximizing the speed and quantity of data but, rather, on emphasizing curation, contextualization, communication, and broader understanding. Through a mixed-methods approach of interviews, field observations, and excavation data assessments, we recommended changes (both technical and organizational) to improve data creation and management practices. We report our findings and offer readers guidance on streamlining data collection for reuse during excavation.

Este artículo presenta los resultados de una investigación sobre la creación y gestión de datos arqueológicos en dos excavaciones en Europa con el objetivo de mejor entender cómo alinear esas prácticas con las necesidades de reutilización de datos de una comunidad de investigadores más amplia. El proyecto “La vida secreta de los datos” (cuya sigla en inglés es SLO-data) sigue el ciclo de vida de los datos desde su recolección en campo hasta su almacenamiento en un repositorio digital para entender oportunidades y retos relacionados con su interpretación, publicación y conservación. Nuestro enfoque basado en “datos lentos” (“Slow data”) no busca maximizar la velocidad y cantidad de datos; al contrario, enfatiza su curación, contextualización, comunicación y mayor comprensión. Gracias a un planteamiento metodológico combinado que incluyó entrevistas, observaciones de campo y evaluación de datos de excavación, se elaboró una serie de recomendaciones (tanto técnicas como administrativas) para optimizar la creación y gestión práctica de datos. Presentamos los resultados del estudio y ofrecemos consejos para racionalizar la recolección de datos en campo con el fin de facilitar su reutilización futura.

Type
SPECIAL SECTION: DIGITAL DATA REUSE IN ARCHAEOLOGY
Information
Advances in Archaeological Practice , Volume 6 , Issue 2 , May 2018 , pp. 105 - 116
Copyright
Copyright 2018 © Society for American Archaeology 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES CITED

Arbuckle, Benjamin S., Kansa, Sarah Whitcher, Kansa, Eric, Orton, David, Çakırlar, Canan, Gourichon, Lionel, Atici, Levent, Galik, Alfred, Marciniak, Arkadiusz, Mulville, Jacqui, Buitenhuis, Hijlke, Carruthers, Denise, De Cupere, Bea, Demirergi, Arzu, Frame, Sheelagh, Helmer, Daniel, Martin, Louise, Peters, Joris, Pöllath, Nadja, Pawłowska, Kamilla, Russell, Nerissa, Twiss, Katheryn, and Würtenberger, Doris 2014 Data Sharing Reveals Complexity in the Westward Spread of Domestic Animals across Neolithic Turkey. PLOS ONE 9 (6): e99845. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0099845.Google Scholar
Austin, Anne 2014 Mobilizing Archaeologists: Increasing the Quantity and Quality of Data Collected in the Field with Mobile Technology. Advances in Archaeological Practice 2 (1):13–23.Google Scholar
Averett, Erin Walcek, Gordon, Jody Michael, and Counts, Derek B. (editors) 2016 Mobilizing the Past for a Digital Future: The Potential of Digital Archaeology. Digital Press at the University of North Dakota, Grand Forks. Electronic document, http://dc.uwm.edu/arthist_mobilizingthepast/1.Google Scholar
Binding, Ceri, and Tudhope, Douglas 2016 Improving Interoperability Using Vocabulary Linked Data. International Journal on Digital Libraries 17 (1):5–21. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00799-015-0166-y.Google Scholar
Borgman, Christine L. 2007 Scholarship in the Digital Age. MIT Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts.Google Scholar
Buchanan, Sarah A. 2016 A Provenance Research Study of Archaeological Curation. PhD dissertation, Department of Information, University of Texas at Austin, Austin.Google Scholar
Caraher, William 2016 Slow Archaeology: Technology, Efficiency, and Archaeological Work. In Mobilizing the Past for a Digital Future: The Potential of Digital Archaeology, edited by Averett, Erin Walcek, Gordon, Jody Michael, and Counts, Derek B., pp. 421–441. Digital Press at the University of North Dakota, Grand Forks.Google Scholar
Clarke, Mary 2015 The Digital Dilemma: Preservation and the Digital Archaeological Record. Advances in Archaeological Practice 3 (4):313–330. https://doi.org/10.7183/2326-3768.3.4.313.Google Scholar
Edgeworth, Matt 2006 Acts of Discovery: An Ethnography of Archaeological Practice. PhD dissertation, Department of Archaeology and Anthropology, University of Durham, Durham, United Kingdom.Google Scholar
Faniel, Ixchel M., and Jacobsen, Trond E. 2010 Reusing Scientific Data: How Earthquake Engineering Researchers Assess the Reusability of Colleagues’ Data. Computer Supported Cooperative Work 19 (3–4):355–375. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10606-010-9117-8.Google Scholar
Faniel, Ixchel, Kansa, Eric, Kansa, Sarah W., Barrera-Gomez, Julianna, and Yakel, Elizabeth 2013 The Challenges of Digging Data: A Study of Context in Archaeological Data Reuse. In Proceedings of the 13th ACM/IEEE-CS Joint Conference on Digital Libraries, pp. 295–304. ACM, New York. https://doi.org/10.1145/2467696.2467712.Google Scholar
Faniel, Ixchel M., and Yakel, Elizabeth 2017 Practices Do Not Make Perfect: Disciplinary Data Sharing and Reuse Practices and Their Implications for Repository Data Curation. In Curating Research Data, Vol. One: Practical Strategies for Your Digital Repository, pp. 103–126. Association of College and Research Libraries, Chicago.Google Scholar
Frank, Rebecca D., Yakel, Elizabeth, and Faniel, Ixchel M. 2015 Destruction/Reconstruction: Preservation of Archaeological and Zoological Research Data. Archival Science 15 (2):141–167. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10502-014-9238-9.Google Scholar
Gordon, Jody Michael, Averett, Erin Walcek, and Counts, Derek B. 2016 Mobile Computing in Archaeology: Exploring and Interpreting Current Practices. In Mobilizing the Past for a Digital Future: The Potential of Digital Archaeology, edited by Averett, Erin Walcek, Gordon, Jody Michael, and Counts, Derek B., pp. 1–30. Digital Press at the University of North Dakota, Grand Forks.Google Scholar
Huggett, Jeremy 2015 Challenging Digital Archaeology. Open Archaeology 1 (1):79–85. Electronic document, https://doi.org/10.1515/opar-2015-0003, accessed November 15, 2017.Google Scholar
Huvila, Isto 2011 The Politics of Boundary Objects: Hegemonic Interventions and the Making of a Document. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology 62 (12):2528–2539. DOI:10.1002/asi.21639.Google Scholar
Kansa, Eric C. 2015 Reimagining Archaeological Publication for the 21st Century. In Across Space and Time: Papers from the 41st Conference on Computer Applications and Quantitative Methods in Archaeology, Perth, 25–28 March 2013, edited by Traviglia, Arianna, pp. 367–378. Amsterdam University Press, Amsterdam.Google Scholar
Kansa, Eric C. 2016 Click Here to Save the Past. In Mobilizing the Past for a Digital Future, edited by Averett, Erin Walcek, Gordon, Jody Michael, and Counts, Derek B., pp. 443–474. Digital Press at the University of North Dakota, Grand Forks.Google Scholar
Kansa, Eric C., Kansa, Sarah Whitcher, and Arbuckle, Benjamin 2014 Publishing and Pushing: Mixing Models for Communicating Research Data in Archaeology. International Journal of Digital Curation 9 (1): 57–70.Google Scholar
Kansa, Eric C., Kansa, Sarah Whitcher, and Watrall, Ethan (editors) 2011 Archaeology 2.0: New Tools for Communication and Collaboration. Cotsen Institute of Archaeology Press, Los Angeles.Google Scholar
Khazraee, Emad, and Gasson, Susan 2015 Epistemic Objects and Embeddedness: Knowledge Construction and Narratives in Research Networks of Practice. Information Society 31 (2):139–159. https://doi.org/10.1080/01972243.2015.998104.Google Scholar
Kintigh, Keith, and Altschul, Jeff 2010 Sustaining the Digital Archaeological Record. Heritage Management 3:264–274.Google Scholar
Kratz, John, and Strasser, Carly 2014 Data Publication Consensus and Controversies. F1000Research 3. Electronic document, http://f1000research.com/articles/3-94/v1.Google Scholar
McManamon, Francis P., and Kintigh, Keith 2010 Digital Antiquity: Transforming Archaeological Data into Knowledge. SAA Archaeological Record 10 (2):37–40.Google Scholar
Maltby, Mark (editor) 2006 Integrating Zooarchaeology. Proceedings of the 9th ICAZ Conference. Oxbow Books, Oxford.Google Scholar
Marwick, Ben 2016 Computational Reproducibility in Archaeological Research: Basic Principles and a Case Study of Their Implementation. Journal of Archaeological Method and Theory 24 (2):424–450.Google Scholar
Mickel, Allison 2015 Reasons for Redundancy in Reflexivity: The Role of Diaries in Archaeological Epistemology. Journal of Field Archaeology 40 (3):300–309. https://doi.org/10.1179/2042458214Y.0000000002.Google Scholar
Peer, Limor, Green, Ann, and Stephenson, Elizabeth 2014 Committing to Data Quality Review. International Journal of Digital Curation 9 (1):263–291. https://doi.org/10.2218/ijdc.v9i1.317.Google Scholar
Richards, Julian 1997 Preservation and Re-use of Digital Data: The Role of the Archaeology Data Service. Antiquity 71 (274):1057–1059.Google Scholar
Roosevelt, Christopher H., Cobb, Peter, Moss, Emanuel, Olson, Brandon R., and Ünlüsoy, Sinan 2015 Excavation Is Destruction Digitization: Advances in Archaeological Practice. Journal of Field Archaeology 40 (3):325–346. https://doi.org/10.1179/2042458215Y.0000000004.Google Scholar
VanDerwarker, Amber M., and Peres, Tanya M. (editors) 2010 Integrating Zooarchaeology and Paleoethnobotany: A Consideration of Issues, Methods, and Cases. Springer, New York.Google Scholar
Wallis, Jillian 2014 Data Producers Courting Data Reusers: Two Cases from Modeling Communities. International Journal of Digital Curation 9 (1):98–109. https://doi.org/10.2218/ijdc.v9i1.304.Google Scholar
Wallis, Jillian, Rolando, Elizabeth, and Borgman, Christine 2013 If We Share Data, Will Anyone Use Them? Data Sharing and Reuse in the Long Tail of Science and Technology. PLOS ONE 8 (7): e67332. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0067332.Google Scholar
Wang, Tricia 2013 Big Data Needs Thick Data. Ethnography Matters (blog), May 13, 2013. Electronic document, http://ethnographymatters.net/blog/2013/05/13/big-data-needs-thick-data/.Google Scholar
Yakel, Elizabeth, Faniel, Ixchel, Kriesberg, Adam, and Yoon, Ayoung 2013 Trust in Digital Repositories. International Journal of Digital Curation 8 (1):143–156. https://doi.org/10.2218/ijdc.v8i1.251.Google Scholar