Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-22dnz Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-26T14:57:39.632Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Work and Family Balance in Top Diplomacy: The Case of the Czech Republic

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 May 2022

Zuzana Fellegi ,
Kateřina Kočí Open the ORCID record for Kateřina Kočí [Opens in a new window]  and
Klára Benešová
Zuzana Fellegi
Affiliation:
Anglo-American University, Prague
Kateřina Kočí*
Affiliation:
Prague University of Economics and Business
Klára Benešová
Affiliation:
Anglo-American University, Prague
*
*Corresponding author. Email: katerina.koci@vse.cz
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

While female representation in the top diplomatic circles was almost nonexistent during the Czechoslovak era, the number of female diplomats in the Czech Republic has steadily increased since the fall of the state-socialist regime. Women are currently solidly represented in the Czech Ministry of Foreign Affairs (MFA), but very few (14%) reach highest diplomatic positions. This study examines the main challenges that influence the careers of top diplomats using quantitative and qualitative data, including official statistics and documents of the Czech MFA and interviews with top diplomats and officials. The results indicate that work-family conflicts are the main challenge for all diplomats. However, women are apparently affected more disproportionately because of the existing “double burden” and a specific “concept of motherhood” vested in a deeply essentialist understanding of gender roles. These barriers have origins at the personal, institutional, and state levels that are strongly interrelated and historically and politically path dependent.

Keywords

gendering diplomacyCzech RepublicForeign ServiceMinistry of Foreign Affairsgender equalitywork-family balance in diplomacy
Type
Research Article
Information
Politics & Gender , Volume 19 , Issue 1 , March 2023 , pp. 220 - 246
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2022. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of the Women, Gender, and Politics Research Section of the American Political Science Association

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Aggestam, Karin, and Towns, Ann E., eds. 2018. Gendering Diplomacy and International Negotiation. London: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Aggestam, Karin, and Towns, Ann E.. 2019. “The Gender Turn in Diplomacy: A New Research Agenda.” International Feminist Journal of Politics 21 (1): 9–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baker, Alex. 2009. “Britain’s First Diplomats.” Financial Times. November 6.Google Scholar
Bashevkin, Sylvia. 2018. Women as Foreign Policy Leaders: National Security and Gender Politics in Superpower America. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Biltekin, Nevra. 2016. “The Performance of Diplomacy: The Residence, Gender and Diplomatic Wives in the Late Twentieth-Century Sweden.” In Women, Diplomacy and International Politics since 1500, eds. Sluga, Glenda and James, Carolyn. London: Routledge, 254–68.Google Scholar
Borčany, Vít. 2017. Ženy v české evropské, zahraniční a bezpečnostní politice [Women in Czech European foreign and security policy]. Prague: AMO.Google Scholar
Buddhapriya, Sanghamitra. 2009. “Work-Life Challenges and Their Impact on Career Decisions: A Study of Indian Women Professionals.” Vikalpa 3 (1): 31–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Callen, Hilary. 1975. “The Premise of Dedication: Notes towards an Ethnography of Diplomat’s Wives.” In Perceiving Women, ed. Shirley, Ardener. New York: John Wiley and Sons, 87–104.Google Scholar
CEB (Corporate Executive Board). 2009. “The Increasing Call for Work-Life Balance.” Business Week, March 27.Google Scholar
Michael, Clinton, Totterdell, Peter, and Wood, Stephen. 2006. “A Grounded Theory of Portfolio Working: Experiencing the Smallest of Small Businesses.” International Small Business Journal: Researching Entrepreneurship 24 (2): 179–203.Google Scholar
CVVM (Centrum Pro Výzkum Veřejného Mínění [Center for Public Opinion Research]). 2016. “Názory veřejnosti na roli muže a ženy v rodině—únor 2016” [Public opinions on the role of men and woman in the family—February 2016]. https://cvvm.soc.cas.cz/cz/.Google Scholar
Czech Statistical Office. 2019. “Gender: Demography.” https://www.czso.cz/csu/gender/3-gender_obyvatelstvo (accessed December 12, 2019).Google Scholar
Dahlerup, Drude, 1988. “From a Small to a Large Minority Women in Scandinavian Politics.” Scandinavian Political Studies 11 (4): 275–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dopita, Tomáš, Kočí, Kateřina, and Cmolíková, Klára. 2020. Uvnitř diplomacie: Jak na genderovou nerovnost v zahraniční službě [Inside diplomacy: How to deal with gender inequality in foreign service]. Prague: Grada.Google Scholar
Drew, Eileen, and Murtagh, Eamonn M.. 2005. “Work/Life Balance: Senior Management Champions or Laggards?” Women in Management Review 20 (4): 262–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eby, Lillian T. 2001. “The Boundaryless Career Experiences of Mobile Spouses in Dual-Earner Marriages.” Group & Organization Management 26 (3): 343–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
EIGE (European Institute of Gender Equality). 2020. “Gender Equality Index.” https://eige.europa.eu/gender-equality-index/2020/compare-countries (accessed November 23, 2020)Google Scholar
Elder, Glen H. 1994. “Time, Human Agency, and Social Change: Perspectives on the Life Course.” Social Psychology Quarterly 57 (1): 4–15.Google Scholar
Embassy Magazine . 2016. “Women Envoys on the Rise.” December 21. https://embassymagazine.com/women-envoys-on-the-rise/ (accessed December 29, 2021).Google Scholar
Enloe, Cynthia. 2014. Bananas, Beaches and Bases: Making Feminist Sense of International Politics. Berkeley: University of California Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Farias de Souza, Rogério, and do Carmo, Gessica Fernanda. 2018. “Brazilian Female Diplomats and the Struggle for Gender Equality.” In Gendering Diplomacy and International Negotiation, Studies in Diplomacy and International Relations, eds. Aggestam, Karin and Towns, Ann E., 107–24. London: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Fellegi, Zuzana. 2020. “Rovnost žen a mužů v České republice—jak dospět od formální úpravy k praktické aplikaci” [Equality between women and men in the Czech Republic—How to move from formal regulation to practical application]. In Právo na rovné zacházení: deset let antidiskriminačního zákona, ed. Martin Šmíd. Prague: Wolter Kluwers, 65–105.Google Scholar
Finch, Janet. 1983. Married to the Job: Wives’ Incorporation in Men’s Work. London: Allen & Unwin.Google Scholar
Flowers, Petrice R. 2018. “Women in Japan’s Ministry of Foreign Affairs.” In Gendering Diplomacy and International Negotiation, Studies in Diplomacy and International Relations, eds. Aggestam, Karin and Towns, Ann E., 125–46. London: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Fuß, Isabelle, Nübling, Matthias, Hasselhorn, Hans-Martin, Schwappach, Dacid, and Rieger, Monika A.. 2008. “Working Conditions and Work-Life Conflict in German Hospital Physicians: Psychosocial and Organizational Predictors and Consequences.” BMC Public Health 8 (1): 353.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gender Equality Index. 2020. “Czechia” https://eige.europa.eu/gender-equality-index/2020/country/CZ (accessed August 18, 2020).Google Scholar
Gerson, Katheleen. 2011. The Unfinished Revolution: Coming of Age in a New Era of Gender, Work, and Family. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Glaser, Barney G., and Strauss, Anselm L.. 1967. The Discovery of Grounded Theory: Strategies for Qualitative Research. London: Weidenfeld and Nicolson.Google Scholar
Grunow, Daniela, Begall, Katia, and Buchler, Sandra. 2018. “Gender Ideologies in Europe: A Multidimensional Framework.” Journal of Marriage and Family 80 (1): 42–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Han, Shin-Kap, and Moen, Phyllis. 1999. “Work and Family over Time: A Life Course Approach.” Annals of the American Academy 562: 98–110.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Handy, Charles. 1995. The Age of Unreason. London: Random House.Google Scholar
Hašková, Hana, and Dudová, Radka. 2017. “Precarious Work and Care Responsibilities in the Economic Crisis.” European Journal of Industrial Relations 23 (1): 47–63.Google Scholar
Hašková, Hana, and Saxonberg, Steven. 2016. “The Revenge of History—The Institutional Roots of Post-Communist Family Policy in the Czech Republic, Hungary and Poland.” Social Policy and Administration 50 (5): 559–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hašková, Hana, and Uhde, Zuzana. 2009. Women and Social Citizenship in the Czech Society: Continuity and Change. Prague: Institute of Sociology AS CR.Google Scholar
Havelková, Hana. 1995. “Dimenze ‘gender’ ve vztahu soukromé a veřejné sféry” [The “gender” dimension in the relationship between the private and public spheres]. Sociologický časopis 31 (1): 25–38.Google Scholar
Hendry, Annabel. 1998. “From Parallel to Dual Careers: Diplomatic Spouses.” In Modern Diplomacy, ed. Kurbalija, Jovan. Msida, Malta: DiploPublishing, 40–48.Google Scholar
Hodges, Brian David, Kuper, Ayelet, and Reeves, Scott. 2008. “Discourse Analysis.” BMJ 337: a879.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Jazbec, Milan, Lukšíč-Hacin, Marina, Pirnat, Žiga, and Kajzer, Milena Stefanovič. 2011. Equal Opportunities in Slovenian Diplomacy. Ljubljana: Slovenian Migration Institute.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kanter, Rosabeth Moss. Men and women of the corporation. New York: Basic Books, 1977.Google Scholar
Kaufmann, Jean-Claude. 2010. Chápající rozhovor [Understanding interview]. Prague: Slon.Google Scholar
Kelliher, Clare, and Anderson, Deidre. 2010. “Doing More with Less? Flexible Working Practices and the Intensification of Work.” Human Relations 63 (1): 83–106.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kendall, Shari, and Tannen, Deborah. 2001. “Discourse and Gender.” In The Handbook of Discourse Analysis, eds. Schiffrin, Deborah, Tannen, Deborah, and Hamilton, Heidi E.. Malden, MA: Blackwell Publishers, 548–67.Google Scholar
King, Eden. 2008. “The Effect of Bias on the Advancement of Working Mothers: Disentangling Legitimate Concerns from Inaccurate Stereotypes as Predictors of Advancement in Academe.” Human Relations 61 (12): 1677–1711.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
KRI (Kenexa Research Institute). 2007. “KRI Finds That When It Comes to Work/Life Balance, Men and Women Are Not Created Equal.” July 25. https://web.archive.org/web/20071014203018/ http://www.kenexa.com/en/AboutUs/Press/2007/07JUL25.aspx (accessed December 29, 2021).Google Scholar
Krüger, Helga. 2009. “The Life-Course Regime: Ambiguities between Interrelatedness and Individualization.” In The Life Course Reader: Individuals and Societies across Time, eds. Heinz, Walter, Huinink, Johannes, and Weymann, Ansgar. Frankfurt: Campus Verlag, 159–77.Google Scholar
Krüger, Helga, and Lévy, Rene. 2001. “Linking Life Courses, Work, and the Family: Theorizing a Not So Visible Nexus between Women and Men.” Canadian Journal of Sociology 26(2): 145–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Linse, Caroline. 2004. “Challenges Facing Women in Overseas Diplomatic Positions.” In Intercultural Communication and Diplomacy, ed. Hannah, Slavik. Msida, Malta: DiploFoundation, 253–63.Google Scholar
Maříková, Hana, and Vohlídalová, Marta. 2007. Trvalá nebo dočasná změna? Uspořádání genderových rolí v rodinách s pečujícími otci [Permanent or temporary change? Organization of gender roles in families with caring fathers]. Prague: SOÚ AV ČR.Google Scholar
McCarthy, Helen. 2014. Women of the World: The Rise of the Female Diplomat. London: Bloomsbury.Google Scholar
MFA (Ministry of Foreign Affairs) of the Czech Republic. 2021. “Organizational Structure of the Ministry.” https://bit.ly/3cjglua.Google Scholar
Mildorf, Jarka Devine. 2020. The Issues Facing Partners and Spouses of European Diplomats: A Gender Perspective. Prague: Institute of International Relations.Google Scholar
Mincer, Jacob. 1978. “Family Migration Decisions.” Journal of Political Economy 86 (5): 749–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moen, Phyllis, and Sweet, Stephen. 2002. “Two Careers, One Employer: Couples Working for the Same Corporation.” Journal of Vocational Behavior 61 (3): 466–83.Google Scholar
Moguérou, Philippe. 2004. “A Double Gender-Family Inequality Phenomenon in the International Mobility of Young Researchers.” https://ideas.repec.org/p/wpa/wuwpit/0403003.html (accessed January 10, 2022).Google Scholar
Nasr, Nicole. 2019. Real Housewives of Diplomacy: A Psychological Study. Washington, DC: Academia Press.Google Scholar
Neumann, Iver. 2008. “The Body of the Diplomat.” European Journal of International Relations 14 (4): 671–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Niklasson, Birgitta. 2020. “The Gendered Networking of Diplomats.” The Hague Journal of Diplomacy 15 (1–2): 13–42.Google Scholar
Niklasson, Birgitta, and Robertson, Felicia. 2018. “The Swedish MFA: Ready to Live Up to Expectations?” In Gendering Diplomacy and International Negotiation, Studies in Diplomacy and International Relations, eds. Aggestam, Karin and Towns, Ann E.. London: Palgrave Macmillan, 65–84.Google Scholar
Opinion Research Corporation. 2008 “Answering Practices Survey of CBI Industrial Trends Survey Respondents.” April. https://ec.europa.eu/economy_finance/db_indicators/surveys/documents/workshops/2008/ec_meeting/wood_cbi.pdf (accessed January 17, 2022).Google Scholar
Pető, Andrea. 2015. “Why Are There So Few Women in V4 Diplomacy?” Visegrad Revue 12 (9): 1.Google Scholar
Person, Ashley L., Colby, Sarah E., Bulova, Jessica A. and Eubanks, Janie W.. 2010. “Barriers to participation in a worksite wellness program.” Nutrition research and practice 4 (2): 149–154.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pospíšilová, Marie. 2018. “Partnery v podniku, domácnosti i životě.” PhD diss., Charles University, Faculty of Social Sciences, Department of Sociology.Google Scholar
Rumelili, Bahar, and Suleymanoglu-Kurum, Rahime. 2018. “Women and Gender in Turkish Diplomacy: Historical Legacies and Current Patterns.” In Gendering Diplomacy and International Negotiation, Studies in Diplomacy and International Relations, eds. Aggestam, Karin and Towns, Ann E.. London: Palgrave Macmillan, 87–106.Google Scholar
Robertson, Felicia and Niklasson, Birgitta. ‘The Swedish MFA: Ready to Live Up to Expectations?’ In Gendering Diplomacy and International Negotiation, Studies in Diplomacy and International Relations, eds. Aggestam, Karin and Towns, Ann E., London: Palgrave Macmillan, 2018, 65–84.Google Scholar
Topolánek, Mirek. 2007. Speech opening ceremony of the European Year of Equal Opportunities, Archa Theater, Prague, April 2. https://bit.ly/2VSqhGf (accessed January 17, 2022).Google Scholar
Stephenson, Elise. 2020. “The Most Successful Female Diplomats? Women with Wives.” BroadAgenda, August 10. https://www.broadagenda.com.au/2020/the-most-successful-female-diplomats-women-with-wives/ (accessed December 29, 2021).Google Scholar
Thorne, Barrie. 2011. “The Crisis of Care.” In At the Heart of Work and Family: Engaging the Ideas of Arlie Hochschild, eds. Garey, Anita I. and Hansen, Karen V.. New Brunswick: Rutgers University Press, 149–60.Google Scholar
Thornthwaite, Louise. 2004. “Working Time and Work-Life Balance: A Review of Employees’ Preferences.” Asia Pacific Journal of Human Resources 42 (2): 166–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Towns, Ann, and Niklasson, Birgitte. 2017. “Gender, International Status, and Ambassador Appointments.” Foreign Policy Analysis 13 (3): 521–40.Google Scholar
Tran Thanh Ha. 2014. “The Changing Role of Women in Diplomacy in the 21st Century—The Case of South Korea.” International Relations Insights & Analysis, Report No. 5. https://www.ir-ia.com/reports/IRIA_The-Changing-Role-of-Women-in-Diplomacy-in-the-21st-Century.pdf (accessed January 10, 2022).Google Scholar
UN Women. 2012. “Women’s Participation in Peace Negotiations: Connection between Presence and Influence.” https://reliefweb.int/sites/reliefweb.int/files/resources/03AWomenPeaceNeg.pdf (accessed January 10, 2022).Google Scholar
Van der Heijden, Beatrice I. J. M., and de Vos, Ans. 2015. “Sustainable Careers: Introductory Chapter.” In Handbook of research on sustainable careers, eds. De Vos, Ans and van der Heijden, Beatrice I. J. M.. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar, 1–19.Google Scholar
Teun, Van Dijk. 2001. “Critical Discourse Analysis.” In The Handbook of Discourse Analysis, eds. Schiffrin, Deborah, Tannen, Deborah, and Hamilton, Heidi E.. Malden, MA: Blackwell Publishers, 352–71.Google Scholar
Vohlídalová, Marta. 2007. “Vztah pracovního a soukromého života v perspektivě mezinárodního srovnání” [The relationship between work and private life in the perspective of international comparison]. Gender, rovné příležitosti, výzkum 8 (2): 52–59.Google Scholar
Vohlídalová, Marta. 2014. “Academic Mobility in the Context of Linked Lives.” Human Affairs 24 (1): 89–102.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Voydanoff, Patricia. 2004. “The Effects of Work Demands and Resources on Work-to-Family Conflict and Facilitation.” Journal of Marriage and Family 66 (2): 398–412.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Williams, Joan, and Boushey, Heather. 2010. “The Three Faces Of Work–Family Conflict: The Poor, the Professionals, and the Missing Middle.” Center for American Progress, Hastings College of the Law, January 25. https://www.americanprogress.org/article/the-three-faces-of-work-family-conflict/ (accessed January 10, 2022).Google Scholar
Wise, Sarah. 2003. Work-Life Balance: Literature and Research Review. London: DTI and Fair Play.Google Scholar
Wood, Molly M. 2005. “Diplomatic Wives: The Politics of Domesticity and the ‘Social Game’ in the US Foreign Service, 1905–1941.” Journal of Women’s History 31 (3): 505–30.Google Scholar
Wood, Molly M. 2007. “Diplomatic Wives: The Politics of Domesticity and the ‘Social Game’ in the U.S. Foreign Service, 1905–1941.” In The Best American History Essays, ed. Jacqueline, Jones. New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 155–74.Google Scholar
Zuo, Jiping, and Tang, Shengming. 2000. “Breadwinner Status and Gender Ideologies of Men and Women regarding Family Roles.” Sociological Perspectives 43 (1): 29–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar