Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-gtxcr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-23T11:10:35.373Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Redefining Russia: Hybrid Regimes, Fieldwork, and Russian Politics

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  23 November 2010

J. Paul Goode
Affiliation:
University of Oklahoma. E-mail: paulgoode@ou.edu

Abstract

All qualitative research faces fundamental hurdles in overcoming issues of access and ensuring the credibility of one's observations. These issues are particularly acute when conducting research in hybrid regimes when the area of investigation is explicitly political and local authorities are sensitive to scrutiny. In the study of Russian politics, growing authoritarianism has meant a shrinking of the field and a corresponding adjustment in fieldwork practices. The disciplinary silence concerning the impact of regime type on fieldwork further threatens the quality and usefulness of comparative research on non-democratic regimes beyond Eurasia. The danger is that interesting and necessary questions about hybrid regimes are sacrificed as scholars opt to conduct fieldwork in more congenial locales where high status methods may be utilized. One can already see this effect as Russianists leave Russia rather than risk isolation within the discipline.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © American Political Science Association 2010

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Allina-Pisano, Jessica. 2008. The Post-Soviet Potemkin Village: Politics and Property Rights in the Black Earth. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Azhgikhina, Nadezhda. 2007. “The Struggle for Press Freedom in Russia: Reflections of a Russian Journalist.” Europe-Asia Studies 59(8): 1245–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bahry, Donna. 2005. “The New Federalism and the Paradoxes of Regional Sovereignty in Russia.” Comparative Politics 37(2): 127–46.Google Scholar
Balzer, Harley. 2003. “Managed Pluralism: Vladimir Putin's Emerging Regime.” Post-Soviet Affairs 19(3): 189227.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barros, Robert. 2005. “Secrecy and Dictatorship: Some Problems in the Study of Authoritarian Regimes.” In Political Methodology: Committee on Concepts and Methods Working Paper Series. (http://www.concepts-methods.org/papers_download.php?id_categoria=2&titulo=Political%20Methodology&id_wp=36), accessed March 16, 2010.Google Scholar
Barsegian, Igor. 2000. “When Text Becomes Field: Fieldwork in ‘Transitional’ Societies.” In Fieldwork Dilemmas: Anthropologists in Postsocialist States, ed. DeSoto, Hermine G. and Dudwick, Nora. Madison: University of Wisconsin Press.Google Scholar
Bates, Robert H., Greif, Avner, Levi, Margaret, Rosenthal, Jean-Laurent, and Weingast, Barry R.. 1998. Analytic Narratives. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Beissinger, Mark R. 2007. “Structure and Example in Modular Political Phenomena: The Diffusion of Bulldozer/Rose/Orange/Tulip Revolutions.” Perspectives on Politics 5(02): 259–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beissinger, Mark R., and Young, Crawford. 2002. “Convergence to Crisis: Pre-Independence State Legacies and Post-Independence State Breakdown in African and Eurasia.” In Beyond State Crisis? Postcolonial African and Post-Soviet Eurasia in Comparative Perspective, ed. Beissinger, Mark R. and Young, Crawford. Washington, DC: Woodrow Wilson Center Press.Google Scholar
Berg, Bruce L. 2007. Qualitative Research Methods for the Social Sciences. 6th ed. Boston: Pearson/Allyn and Bacon.Google Scholar
Bonnell, Victoria E., and Breslauer, George. 2002. “Soviet and Post-Soviet Area Studies.” In The Politics of Knowledge: Area Studies and the Disciplines, ed. Szanton, David L.. University of California Press/University of California International and Area Studies Digital Collection.Google Scholar
Breslauer, George W. 1992. “In Defense of Sovietology.” Post-Soviet Affairs 8(3): 197238.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brooker, Paul. 2000. Non-Democratic Regimes: Theory, Government and Politics. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Brown, Archie. 1974. Soviet Politics and Political Science. London: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Brown, Archie. 1983. “The Power of the General Secretary of the CPSU.” In Authority, Power and Policy in the USSR, ed. Rigby, T. H., Brown, Archie, and Reddaway, Peter. London: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Brown, Archie. 1984. Political Culture and Communist Studies. Basingstoke: Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brown, Archie. 1993. “The October Crisis of 1993: Context and Implications.” Post-Soviet Affairs 9(3): 183–95.Google Scholar
Brown, Archie. 2009. “Forms without Substance.” Journal of Democracy 20(2): 4750.Google Scholar
Brownlee, Jason. 2009. “Portents of Pluralism: How Hybrid Regimes Affect Democratic Transitions.” American Journal of Political Science 53(3): 515–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brzezinski, Zbigniew, and Huntington, Samuel P.. 1964. Political Power: USA/USSR. New York: Viking Press.Google Scholar
Bunce, Valerie. 1995a. “Paper Curtains and Paper Tigers.” Slavic Review 54(4): 979–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bunce, Valerie. 1995b. “Should Transitologists Be Grounded?Slavic Review 54(1): 111–27.Google Scholar
Bunce, Valerie J., and Wolchik, Sharon L.. 2006. “International Diffusion and Postcommunist Electoral Revolutions.” Communist and Post-Communist Studies 39(3): 283304.Google Scholar
Carothers, Thomas. 2002. “The End of the Transition Paradigm.” Journal of Democracy 13(1): 521.Google Scholar
Chaisty, Paul. 2005. “Majority Control and Executive Dominance: Parliament-President Relations in Putin's Russia.” In Leading Russia: Putin in Perspective, ed. Pravda, Alex. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Chebankova, Elena A. 2005. “The Limitations of Central Authority in the Regions and the Implications for the Evolution of Russia's Federal System.” Europe-Asia Studies 57(7): 933–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chebankova, Elena A. 2006. “The Unintended Consequences of Gubernatorial Appointments in Russia, 2005–6.” Journal of Communist Studies and Transition Politics 22(4): 457–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chebankova, Elena A. 2007. “Putin's Struggle for Federalism: Structures, Operation, and the Commitment Problem.” Europe-Asia Studies 59(2): 279302.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chebankova, Elena A. 2008. “Adaptive Federalism and Federation in Putin's Russia.” Europe-Asia Studies 60(6): 9891009.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chen, Cheng, and Sil, Rudra. 2007. “Stretching Postcommunism: Diversity, Context, and Comparative Historical Analysis.” Post-Soviet Affairs 23(4): 275301.Google Scholar
Chirikova, A. 2005. “Putinskie reformy i regional'nye politicheskie protsessy v sovremennoi Rossii.” Obshchestvo i Ekonomika 1: 4395.Google Scholar
Cohen, Stephen F. 1999. “Russian Studies Without Russia.” Post-Soviet Affairs 15(1): 3755.Google Scholar
Collier, David, and Levitsky, Stephen. 1997. “Democracy with Adjectives: Conceptual Innovation in Comparative Research.” World Politics 49(3): 430–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Colton, Timothy J. 1995. “Superpresidentialism and Russia's Backward State.” Post-Soviet Affairs 11(2): 144–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Colton, Timothy J., and Hale, Henry E.. 2009. “The Putin Vote: Presidential Electorates in a Hybrid Regime.” Slavic Review 68(3): 473503.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Colton, Timothy J., and McFaul, Michael. 2003. Popular Choice and Managed Democracy: The Russian Elections of 1999 and 2000. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press.Google Scholar
Crawford, Beverly, and Lijphart, Arend, eds. 1997. Liberalization and Leninist Legacies: Comparative Perspectives on Democratic Transitions. Berkeley: University of California International and Area Studies.Google Scholar
D'Anieri, Paul. 2006. “Explaining the Success and Failure of Post-Communist Revolutions.” Communist and Post-Communist Studies 39(3): 331–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Devine, Fiona. 2002. “Qualitative Methods.” In Theory and Methods in Political Science, ed. Marsh, David and Stoker, Gerry. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Diamond, Larry. 2002. “Thinking about Hybrid Regimes.” Journal of Democracy 13(2): 2135.Google Scholar
Donadio, Rachel. 2007. “The Iron Archives.” New York Times, April 22. (http://query.nytimes.com/gst/fullpage.html?res=9A04E6D7123FF931A15757C0A9619C8B63), accessed August 4, 2010.Google Scholar
Eckstein, Harry. 1992. Regarding Politics: Essays on Political Theory, Stability, and Change. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Ekiert, Grzegorz, and Hanson, Stephen E., eds. 2003. Capitalism and Democracy in Central and Eastern Europe: Assessing the Legacy of Communist Rule. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
El'tsin, Boris. 2000. Prezidentskii marafon. Moskva: AST.Google Scholar
Engerman, David C. 2009. Know Your Enemy: The Rise and Fall of America's Soviet Experts. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Fainsod, Merle. 1958. Smolensk Under Soviet Rule. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Fish, M. Steven. 1999. “Postcommunist Subversion: Social Science and Democratization in East Europe and Eurasia.” Slavic Review 58(4): 794823.Google Scholar
Fish, M. Steven. 2001. “Russian Studies without Studying.” Post-Soviet Affairs 17(4): 332–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fish, M. Steven. 2005. Democracy Derailed in Russia: The Failure of Open Politics. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Fleron, Frederic J. 1969. Communist Studies and the Social Sciences: Essays on Methodology and Empirical Theory. Chicago: Rand McNally.Google Scholar
Gans-Morse, Jordan. 2004. “Searching for Transitologists: Contemporary Theories of Post-Communist Transitions and the Myth of a Dominant Paradigm.” Post-Soviet Affairs 20(4): 320–49.Google Scholar
Gel'man, V., Ryzhenkov, S., and Brie, M., eds. 2000. Rossiia Regionov: Transformatsiia Politicheskikh Rezhimov. Moskva: Ves' Mir.Google Scholar
Gerschenkron, Alexander. 1960. “Reflections on Soviet Novels.” World Politics 12(2): 165–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gilison, Jerome M. 1968. “Soviet Elections as a Measure of Dissent: The Missing One Percent.” American Political Science Review 62(3): 814–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Giuliano, Elise. 2006. “Secessionism from the Bottom Up: Democratization, Nationalism, and Local Accountability in the Russian Transition.” World Politics 58(2): 276310.Google Scholar
Goode, J. Paul. 2007. “The Puzzle of Putin's Gubernatorial Appointments.” Europe-Asia Studies 59(3): 365–99.Google Scholar
Gorenburg, Dmitry P. 2003. Minority Ethnic Mobilization in the Russian Federation. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Greskovits, Béla. 2002. “The Path-Dependence of Transitology.” In Postcommunist Transformation and the Social Sciences: Cross-Disciplinary Approaches, eds. Bönker, Frank, Müller, Klaus and Pickel, Andreas. Lanham: Rowman & Littlefield.Google Scholar
Gryzmala-Busse, Anna, and Koch, Natalie. 2008. “Where have the Political Scientists Gone? AAASS Initiative to Reverse the Relative Decline in Membership among Political Scientists.” NewsNet 48(2): 13.Google Scholar
Hahn, Gordon. 2004. “Managed Democracy? Building Stealth Authoritarianism in St. Petersburg.” Demokratizatsiya 12(2): 195231.Google Scholar
Hale, Henry E. 2005. “Regime Cycles: Democracy, Autocracy, and Revolution in Post-Soviet Eurasia.” World Politics 58(1): 133–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hanson, Stephen E. 2007a. “Rationality, Structure, and Agency in Post-Soviet Russian Democratization.” Perspectives on Politics 5(04): 793802.Google Scholar
Hanson, Stephen E. 2007b. “The Uncertain Future of Russia's Weak State Authoritarianism.” East European Politics and Societies 21(1): 6781.Google Scholar
Hanson, Stephen E. 2008. “The Contribution of Area Studies.” Qualitative & Multi-Method Research 6(2): 3543.Google Scholar
Hanson, Stephen E., and Ruble, Blair A.. 2005. “Rebuilding Russian Studies.” Problems of Post-Communism 52(3): 4957.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hartlyn, Jonathan, and McCoy, Jennifer. 2006. “Observer Paradoxes: How to Assess Electoral Manipulation.” In Electoral Authoritarianism: The Dynamics of Unfree Competition, ed. Schedler, Andreas. Boulder: Lynne Rienner.Google Scholar
Hellman, Joel S. 1998. “Winners Take All: The Politics of Partial Reform in Postcommunist Transitions.” World Politics 50(2): 203–34.Google Scholar
Helmke, Gretchen, and Levitsky, Steven. 2004. “Informal Institutions and Comparative Politics: A Research Agenda.” Perspectives on Politics 2(04): 725–40.Google Scholar
Herrera, Yoshiko M. 2005. Imagined Economies: The Sources of Russian Regionalism. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Hough, Jerry F. 1969. The Soviet Prefects: The Local Party Organs in Industrial Decision-making. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Hough, Jerry F. 1979. How the Soviet Union is Governed. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Howard, Marc Morjé. 2003. The Weakness of Civil Society in Post-Communist Europe. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Howard, Marc Morjé, and Roessler, Philip G.. 2006. “Liberalizing Electoral Outcomes in Competitive Authoritarian Regimes.” American Journal of Political Science 50(2): 365–81.Google Scholar
Huber, Robert T. 2009. “Multi-Year Data Set for Title VIII Participant Organizations: Some Preliminary Conclusions.” NewsNet 49(3): 19.Google Scholar
Huskey, Eugene. 1999. Presidential Power in Russia. Armonk, NY: ME Sharpe.Google Scholar
Jowitt, Ken. 1992. New World Disorder: The Leninist Extinction. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Kahn, Jeffrey. 2002. Federalism, Democratization, and the Rule of Law in Russia. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Konitzer, Andrew. 2005. Voting for Russia's Governors: Regional Elections and Accountability under Yeltsin and Putin. Washington, DC: Woodrow Wilson Center Press.Google Scholar
Kryshtanovskaya, Ol'ga, and White, Stephen. 2009. “The Sovietization of Russian Politics.” Post-Soviet Affairs 25(4): 283309.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kuz'min, A.C., Melvin, N.Dzh., and Nechaev, V.D.. 2002. “Regional'nye politicheskie rezhimy v postsovetskoi Rossii: Opyt tipologizatsii.” Polis 12(3): 142–55.Google Scholar
Laitin, David D. 2000. “Post-Soviet Politics.” Annual Review of Political Science 3: 117–48.Google Scholar
Laitin, David D. 2002. “Comparative Politics: The State of the Subdiscipline.” In Political Science: The State of the Discipline, ed. Katznelson, Ira and Milner, Helen V.. New York: W.W. Norton & Company.Google Scholar
Lankina, Tomila. 2004. Governing the Locals: Local Self-Government and Ethnic Mobilization in Russia. Lanham: Rowman & Littlefield.Google Scholar
Ledeneva, Alena V. 2006. How Russia Really Works: The Informal Practices That Shaped Post-Soviet Politics and Business. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Levitsky, Stephen, and Way, Lucan A.. 2002. “The Rise of Competitive Authoritarianism.” Journal of Democracy 13(2): 5165.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lijphart, Arend. 1971. “Comparative Politics and the Comparative Method.” American Political Science Review 65(3): 682–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
March, Luke. 2009. “Managing Opposition in a Hybrid Regime: Just Russia and Parastatal Opposition.” Slavic Review 68(3): 504–27.Google Scholar
McAuley, Mary. 2009. “The Future of the Non-Russian Researcher.” Presented at The Russian Field: A View from Abroad, St. Petersburg, Russia, May 28–31.Google Scholar
McFaul, Michael. 2002. “The Fourth Wave of Democracy and Dictatorship: Noncooperative Transitions in the Postcommunist World.” World Politics 54(2): 212–44.Google Scholar
McMann, Kelly M. 2006. Economic Autonomy and Democracy: Hybrid Regimes in Russia and Kyrgyzstan. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Mill, James. 1840. The History of British India. Volume I. London: James Madden and Co.Google Scholar
Moses, Joel C. 1974. Regional Party Leadership and Policy-Making in the USSR. New York: Praeger.Google Scholar
Munro, Neil. 2006. “Russia's Persistent Communist Legacy: Nostalgia, Reaction, and Reactionary Expectations.” Post-Soviet Affairs 22(4): 289313.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
O'Donnell, Guillermo. 1994. “Delegative Democracy.” Journal of Democracy 5(1): 5569.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
O'Donnell, Guillermo, and Schmitter, Philippe C.. 1986. Transitions from Authoritarian Rule: Tentative Conclusions about Uncertain Democracies. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
Ostrow, Joel M., Satarov, Georgiy A., and Khakamada, Irina M.. 2007. The Consolidation of Dictatorship in Russia: An Inside View of the Demise of Democracy. Westport, CT: Praeger Security International.Google Scholar
Petrov, Nikolai. 2004. “Regional Models of Democratic Development.” In Between Dictatorship and Democracy: Russian Post-Communist Political Reform, ed. McFaul, Michael, Petrov, Nikolai and Ryabov, Andrei. Washington, DC: Carnegie Endowment for International Peace.Google Scholar
Piontkovsky, Andrei. 2009. “The Dying Mutant.” Journal of Democracy 20(2): 52–5.Google Scholar
Puddington, Arch. 2008. “Is the Tide Turning?Journal of Democracy 19(2): 6173.Google Scholar
Remington, Thomas. 2009. “United Russia and the Search for an Ideological Doctrine.” Presented at American Association for the Advancement of Slavic Studies, Boston, November 12–15.Google Scholar
Rivera, Sharon Werning, Kozyreva, Polina M., and Sarovskii, Eduard G.. 2002. “Interviewing Russian Elites: Lessons from Russia.” PS: Political Science & Politics 35(4): 683–8.Google Scholar
Roberts, Cynthia, and Sherlock, Thomas. 1999. “Bringing the Russian State Back In: Explanations of the Derailed Transition to Market Democracy.” Comparative Politics 31(4): 477–98.Google Scholar
Robertson, Graeme B. 2007. “Strikes and Labor Organization in Hybrid Regimes.” American Political Science Review 101(4): 781–98.Google Scholar
Roeder, Philip G. 1993. Red Sunset: The Failure of Soviet Politics. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Rose, Richard, and Mishler, William. 2009. “Institutionalizing Popular Support for Plebiscitarian Autocracies: The Case of Russia.” Presented at APSA 2009 Annual Meeting, Toronto, Canada, September 3–6.Google Scholar
Ross, Cameron. 2005. “Federalism and Electoral Authoritarianism under Putin.” Demokratizatsiya: The Journal of Post-Soviet Democratization 13(3): 347–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rutland, Peter. 2003. “Post-Sovietology Blues: Reflections on a Tumultuous Decade.” Demokratizatsiya 11(1): 134–41.Google Scholar
Rutland, Peter. 2008 [1993]. “Sovietology: Notes for a Post-Mortem.” In The Strange Death of Soviet Communism: A Postscript, ed. Gvosdev, Nikolas K.. New Brunswick: Transaction Publishers.Google Scholar
Schedler, Andreas. 2002. “The Menu of Manipulation.” Journal of Democracy 13(2): 3650.Google Scholar
Schmitter, Philippe C., and Karl, Terry Lynn. 1994. “The Conceptual Travels of Transitologists and Consolidologists: How Far to the East Should They Attempt to Go?Slavic Review 53(1): 173–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schmitter, Philippe C., and Karl, Terry Lynn. 1995. “From an Iron Curtain to a Paper Curtain: Grounding Transitologists or Students of Postcommunism?Slavic Review 54(4): 965–78.Google Scholar
Sharafutdinova, Gulnaz. 2006. “When Do Elites Compete? The Determinants of Political Competition in Russian Regions.” Comparative Politics 38(3): 273–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sharafutdinova, Gulnaz. 2007. “Why Was Democracy Lost in Russia's Regions? Lessons from Nizhnii Novgorod.” Communist and Post-Communist Studies 40(3): 363–82.Google Scholar
Sharafutdinova, Gulnaz. 2010. “What Explains Corruption Perceptions? The Dark Side of Political Competition in Russia's Regions.” Comparative Politics 42(2): 147–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shevtsova, Lilia. 2007. Russia—Lost in Transition: The Yeltsin and Putin Legacies. Washington, DC: Carnegie Endowment for International Peace.Google Scholar
Shevtsova, Lilia. 2009. “The Return of Personalized Power.” Journal of Democracy 20(2): 61–5.Google Scholar
Silitski, Vitali. 2009. “Tools of Autocracy.” Journal of Democracy 20(2): 42–6.Google Scholar
Skilling, H. Gordon, and Griffiths, Franklyn. 1971. Interest Groups in Soviet Politics. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Smyth, Regina, Lowry, Anna, and Wilkening, Brandon. 2007. “Engineering Victory: Institutional Reform, Informal Institutions, and the Formation of a Hegemonic Party Regime in the Russian Federation.” Post-Soviet Affairs 23(2): 118–37.Google Scholar
Solomon, Susan Gross, and Skilling, H. Gordon. 1983. Pluralism in the Soviet Union: Essays in Honor of H. Gordon Skilling. New York: St. Martin's Press.Google Scholar
Stoner-Weiss, Kathryn. 2006. Resisting the State: Reform and Retrenchment in Post-Soviet Russia. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Taylor, Brian D. 2007. “Force and Federalism: Controlling Coercion in Federal Hybrid Regimes.” Comparative Politics 39(4): 421–40.Google Scholar
Tompson, William. 2005. “Putting Yukos in Perspective.” Post-Soviet Affairs 21(2): 159–81.Google Scholar
Treisman, Daniel S. 1997. “Russia's ‘Ethnic Revival’: The Separatist Activism of Regional Leaders in a Postcommunist Order.” World Politics 49(2): 212–49.Google Scholar
Tucker, Joshua A. 2002. “The First Decade of Post-Communist Elections and Voting: What Have We Studied, and How Have We Studied It?Annual Review of Political Science 5(1): 271304.Google Scholar
Tucker, Joshua A. 2007. “Enough! Electoral Fraud, Collective Action Problems, and Post-Communist Colored Revolutions.” Perspectives on Politics 5(3): 535–51.Google Scholar
Way, Lucan A. 2005. “Authoritarian State Building and the Sources of Regime Competitiveness in the Fourth Wave: The Cases of Belarus, Moldova, Russia, and Ukraine.” World Politics 57(2): 231–61.Google Scholar
Way, Lucan A. 2008. “The Real Causes of the Color Revolutions.” Journal of Democracy 19(3): 5569.Google Scholar
White, Stephen, Kryshtanovskaia, Olga, Kukolev, Igor, Mawdsley, Evan, and Saldin, Pavel. 1996. “Interviewing the Soviet Elite.” Russian Review 55(2): 309–16.Google Scholar
Wilson, Andrew. 2005. Virtual Politics: Faking Democracy in the Post-Soviet World. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Wilson, Kenneth. 2006. “Party-System Development Under Putin.” Post-Soviet Affairs 22(4): 314–48.Google Scholar
Zakaria, Fareed. 2004. The Future of Freedom: Illiberal Democracy at Home and Abroad. New York: W.W. Norton.Google Scholar
Supplementary material: File

Goode supplementary material

Explanatory file

Download Goode supplementary material(File)
File 26.1 KB
Supplementary material: File

Goode supplementary material

Datafile

Download Goode supplementary material(File)
File 70.7 KB