Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-wzw2p Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-05-04T21:02:09.396Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Can urine cultures and reagent test strips be used to diagnose urinary tract infection in elderly emergency department patients without focal urinary symptoms?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  21 May 2015

James Ducharme ,
Shane Neilson  and
Jeffery L. Ginn
James Ducharme*
Affiliation:
Department of Emergency Medicine, Dalhousie University, Atlantic Health Sciences Corporation, Saint John, NB
Shane Neilson
Affiliation:
Department of Emergency Medicine, Dalhousie University, Atlantic Health Sciences Corporation, Saint John, NB
Jeffery L. Ginn
Affiliation:
Department of Emergency Medicine, Dalhousie University, Atlantic Health Sciences Corporation, Saint John, NB
*
paindoc22000@yahoo.com

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.
Objective:

To compare the results of urine cultures and reagent strip testing in 2 groups of elderly emergency department (ED) patients: an asymptomatic group unlikely to have urinary tract infection (UTI), and a group who had vague symptoms and were considered at risk for UTI.

Methods:

We performed a prospective observational convenience study with 2 groups of 100 patients aged 65 or older. The asymptomatic group consisted of afebrile patients presenting to the ED with non-infectious complaints, while the symptomatic group included patients presenting with acute confusion, weakness or fever but no apparent urinary symptoms. We defined a positive urine culture as a single organism count greater than 100 000 CFU/mL in mid-stream specimens, or greater than 1000 CFU/mL in catheter specimens. We considered reagent strips positive if they demonstrated any reaction to the leukocyte-esterase assay, the nitrite assay or both.

Results:

Of the 33 positive cultures, 10 had negative reagent strips. Thirteen of the 14 positive nitrite tests were culture positive for a specificity of 92.8% and a sensitivity of 36.1%. Positive cultures did not infer a diagnosis of UTI. Of the 67 positive reagent strips, 41 (61.2%) were associated with negative cultures. Likelihood ratios (LRs) in both groups affirmed the inability of the reagent strips to help significantly in decision making, with positive and negative LR in the indeterminate range (control group: 2.8 and 0.31, symptomatic group: 2.7 and 0.46, respectively).

Conclusion:

In the elderly, reagent testing is an unreliable method of identifying patients with positive blood cultures. Moreover, positive urine culture rates are only slightly higher in patients with vague symptoms attributable to UTI than they are in (asymptomatic) patients treated for non-urologic problems, which suggests that many positive cultures in elderly patients with non-focal systemic symptoms are false-positive tests reflecting asymptomatic bacteriuria and not UTIs. Blood cultures, regarded by many as the criterion standard for UTI, do not have sufficient specificity to confirm the diagnosis of UTI in elderly patients with non-specific symptoms.

Keywords

urinary tract infectionelderlydiagnosis
Type
Original Research • Recherche originale
Information
Canadian Journal of Emergency Medicine , Volume 9 , Issue 2 , March 2007 , pp. 87 - 92
Copyright
Copyright © Canadian Association of Emergency Physicians 2007

References

1.Foxman, B. Epidemiology of urinary tract infections: incidence, morbidity, and economic costs. Am J Med 2002;113(Suppl 1A): 5S–13S.Google Scholar
2.Orenstein, R, Wong, ES. Urinary tract infections in adults. Am Fam Physician 1999;59(5):1225–34,1237.Google ScholarPubMed
3.Nickel, JC, Pidutti, R. A rational approach to urinary tract infections in older patients. Geriatrics 1992;47:49–50, 53–5.Google ScholarPubMed
4.Barkham, TM, Martin, FC, Eykyn, SJ. Delay in the diagnosis of bacteraemic urinary tract infection in elderly patients. Age Ageing 1996;25:130–2.Google Scholar
5.Ackermann, RJ, Monroe, PW. Bacteremic urinary tract infection in older people. J Am Geriatr Soc 1996;44:927–33.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
6.Deville, WL, Yzermans, JC, van Duijn, NP, et al. The urine dipstick test useful to rule out infections. A meta-analysis of the accuracy. BMC Urol 2004;4:4.Google ScholarPubMed
7.Eidelman, Y, Raveh, D, Yinnon, AM, et al. Reagent strip diagnosis of UTI in a high-risk population. Am J Emerg Med 2002;20:112–3.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
8.Lammers, RL, Gibson, S, Kovacs, D, et al. Comparison of test characteristics of urine dipstick and urinalysis at various test cutoff points. Ann Emerg Med 2001;38:505–12.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
9.Lumbiganon, P, Chongsomchai, C, Chumworathayee, B, et al. Reagent strip testing is not sensitive for the screening of asymptomatic bacteriuria in pregnant women. J Med Assoc Thai 2002;85:922–7.Google Scholar
10.Wagenlehner, FM, Naber, KG, Weidner, W. Asymptomatic bacteriuria in elderly patients: significance and implications for treatment. Drugs Aging 2005;22:801–7.Google Scholar