Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-p2v8j Total loading time: 0.001 Render date: 2024-05-17T16:06:02.993Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Introduction: Risk, Social Inclusion and the Life Course

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  21 February 2013

Jens O. Zinn*
Affiliation:
School of Social and Political Sciences, University of Melbourne E-mail: jzinn@unimelb.edu.au

Abstract

In social policy debates and research over recent years, ‘risk’, ‘social inclusion’ and ‘the life course’ have become influential topics. In this themed section we will revisit these concepts and analyse how they have influenced policy debates and research in Australia and elsewhere. The contributions were developed as part of a research collaboration that brings together expertise from social policy, gender studies, risk sociology, social work, youth studies and research on ageing and old age. This introduction outlines the concepts and dimensions we found helpful for analysing social policy practice and research and the key arguments of the contributions.

Type
Themed Section on Risk, Social Inclusion and the Life Course
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2013

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Andres, L. and Wyn, J. (2010) The Making of a Generation: The Children of the ‘70s in Adulthood, Toronto: Toronto University Press.Google Scholar
Armingeon, K. and Bonoli, G. (eds.) (2006) The Politics of Post-Industrial Welfare States: Adapting Post‑War Social Policies to New Social Risks, London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Atkinson, A. (2007) ‘The distribution of earnings in OECD countries’, International Labour Review, 146, 2, 4160.Google Scholar
Australian Government (2010) Australia to 2050: Future Challenges, Intergenerational Report 2010, Canberra: Commonwealth of Australia.Google Scholar
Australian Government (2011) Realising the Economic Potential of Senior Australians: Enabling Opportunity, second report of the Advisory Panel on the Economic Potential of Senior Australians, Canberra: Commonwealth of Australia.Google Scholar
Australian Government (2012) Fact Sheet: Gender Pay Gap Statistics (Equal Opportunity for Women in the Workplace Agency), May, Canberra: Commonwealth of Australia.Google Scholar
Beck, U. (1992) Risk Society: Towards a New Modernity, London: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
Castles, F. G. (1989) ‘Social protection by other means’, in Castles, F. G. (ed.), The Comparative History of Public Policy, New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Daly, M. (2010) ‘Families versus state and market’, in Castles, F., Leibfried, S., Lewis, J., Obinger, H. and Pierson, C. (eds.),The Oxford Handbook of the Welfare State, Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 139–51.Google Scholar
Giddens, A. (1998) The Third Way: The Renewal of Social Democracy, Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
Green, D., Sawyer, A., Moran, A. and Brett, J. (2010) ‘Managing risk in community services: a preliminary study of the impacts of risk management on Victorian services and clients’, unpublished (copies available on request, ).Google Scholar
Grover, C. (2009) ‘Privatizing employment services in Britain’, Critical Social Policy, 29, 3, 487509.Google Scholar
Hacker, J. (2006) The Great Risk Shift: The Assault on American Jobs, Families, Health Care, and Retirement, New York: Open University Press.Google Scholar
Hacking, I. (1990) The Taming of Chance, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Hamilton, M. (2012) ‘The “new social contract” and the individualisation of risk in policy’, Journal of Risk Research, iFirst, doi: 10.1080/13669877.2012.726250.Google Scholar
Hood, C. (1991) ‘A public management for all seasons’, Public Administration, 69, 1, 319.Google Scholar
Hood, C. (2001) ‘New public management’, in Smelser, N. J., Wright, J. and Baltes, P. B. (eds.), International Encyclopedia of the Social and Behavioural Sciences, Amsterdam, Oxford: Elsevier Science, pp. 12553–6.Google Scholar
Hood, C. and Rothstein, H. (2000) Business Risk Management in Government: Pitfalls and Possibilities, CARR Discussion Paper No. 0 (Launch Paper), London: London School of Economics.Google Scholar
Horn, M., Scutella, R. and Wilkins, R. (2011) Social Exclusion Monitor Bulletin, September, Melbourne: Brotherhood of St Laurence and Melbourne Institute of Applied Economic and Social Research.Google Scholar
Howe, B. (2007) Weighing up Australian Values: Balancing Transitions and Risks to Work and Family in Modern Australia, Sydney: University of New South Wales Press.Google Scholar
Hutter, B. (2003) The Attractions of Risk-based Regulation: Accounting for the Emergence of Risk Ideas in Regulation, CARR Discussion Paper No. 33, London: London School of Economics.Google Scholar
Kemshall, H. (2002) Risk, Social Policy and Welfare, Buckingham: Open University Press.Google Scholar
Kohli, M. (1986) ‘Social organisation and subjective construction of the life course’, in Sørensen, A. B., Weinert, F. E. and Sherrod, L. R. (eds.), Human Development and the Life Course: Multidisciplinary Perspectives, Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum, pp. 271–92.Google Scholar
Levitas, R. (1996) ‘The concept of social exclusion and the new Durkeimian hegemony’, Critical Social Policy, 16, 5, 520.Google Scholar
Levitas, R. (2012) ‘The just's umbrella: austerity and the big society in coalition policy and beyond’, Critical Social Policy, 3, 3, 320–42.Google Scholar
Levitas, R., Pantazis, C., Fahmy, E., Gordon, D., Lloyd, E. and Patsios, D. (2007) The Multi‑Dimensional Analysis of Social Exclusion, A Research Report for the Social Exclusion Task Force, http://www.cabinetoffice.gov.uk/social_exclusion_task_force/publications/multidimensional.aspx [accessed 30.06.2007].Google Scholar
Levy, R., Widmer, E. and Kellerhals, J. (2002) ‘Modern family or modernized family traditionalism? Master status and the gender order in Switzerland’, Electronic Journal of Sociology, 6, 4.Google Scholar
Lewis, J. (2001) ‘The decline of the male breadwinner model: implications for work and care’, Social Politics, 8, 2, 152–69.Google Scholar
Luhmann, N. (1995) Social Systems, Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Marston, G., Moss, J. and Quiggin, J. (2010) ‘Shifting risk?’, in Marston, G., Moss, J. and Quiggin, J. (eds.), Risk, Welfare and Work, Melbourne: Melbourne University Press, pp. ixxviii.Google Scholar
Mendes, P. (2001) ‘Blaming the messenger: the media, social workers and child abuse’, Australian Social Work, 54, 2, 2736.Google Scholar
Moran, M. (2007) The British Regulatory State: High Modernism and Hyper-Innovation, Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
OECD (2012) ‘Social Expenditure in OECD countries in percentage of GDP, 1980–2012’, www.oecd.org/els/socialpoliciesanddata/socialexpendituredatabasesocx.htm [accessed 29.10.2012].Google Scholar
Quiggin, J. (2009) ‘An agenda for social democracy’, Australian Public Policy Program Working Paper P09#3, Brisbane: University of Queensland, www.uq.edu.au/rsmg/WP/WPP09_3.pdf [accessed 11.12.2012].Google Scholar
Quiggin, J. (2010) ‘Risk shifts in Australia: implications of the financial crisis’, in Marston, G., Moss, J. and Quiggin, J. (eds.), Risk, Welfare and Work, Melbourne: Melbourne University Press, pp. 323.Google Scholar
Rowntree, B. S. (1902) Poverty: A Study of Town Life, London: Thomas Nelson.Google Scholar
Rudd, K. (2009) ‘The global financial crisis’, The Monthly, February.Google Scholar
Saunders, P. (2008) ‘The experience of contracting out employment services in Australia’, in Lilley, P. and Hartwich, O. (eds.), Paying for Success: How to Make Contracting Out Work in Employment Services, London: Policy Exchange, pp. 1533.Google Scholar
Scutella, R., Kostenko, W. and Wilkins, R. (2009) Estimates of Poverty and Social Exclusion in Australia: A Multidimensional Approach, Melbourne Institute Working Paper No. 26/09, Melbourne: Melbourne Institute of Applied Economic and Social Research.Google Scholar
Silver, H. (2010) ‘Understanding social inclusion and its meaning for Australia’, Australian Journal of Social Issues, 45, 2, 183211.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smyth, P. (2010a) In or Out? Building an Inclusive Nation, Melbourne: Brotherhood of St Laurence.Google Scholar
Smyth, P. (2010b) ‘The historical context for action’, in McClelland, A. and Smyth, P. (eds.), Social Policy in Australia: Understanding for Action, Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 93111.Google Scholar
Taylor-Gooby, P. (ed.) (2004) New Risks, New Welfare: The Transformation of the European Welfare State, Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Taylor-Gooby, P. (2009) Reframing Social Citizenship, Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Taylor-Gooby, P. and Stoker, G. (2011) ‘The Coalition programme: a new vision for Britain or politics as usual?’, The Political Quarterly, 82, 1, 415.Google Scholar
Warner, J. (2006) ‘Inquiry reports as active texts and their function in relation to professional practice in mental health’, Health, Risk & Society, 8, 3, 223–37.Google Scholar
Whelan, J., Stone, C., Lyons, M., Wright, N.-N., Long, A., Ryall, J., Whyte, G. and Harding-Smith, R. (2012) Big Society and Australia: How the UK Government is Dismantling the State and What It Means for Australia, Sydney: Centre for Policy Development, http://cpd.org.au/wp-content/uploads/2012/05/cpd_big_society-FINAL-WEB-VERSION.pdf.Google Scholar
Wilkinson, R. G. and Pickett, K. (2009) The Spirit Level: Why More Equal Societies Almost Always Do Better, London: Allen Lane.Google Scholar
Wright, S., Marston, G. and McDonald, C. (2011) ‘The role of non-profit organizations in the mixed economy of welfare-to-work in the UK and Australia’, Social Policy and Administration, 45, 3, 299318.Google Scholar
Wyn, J. and Woodman, D. (2006) ‘Generation, youth and social change in Australia’, Journal of Youth Studies, 9, 5, 495514.Google Scholar