Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-25wd4 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-27T17:06:50.988Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Inverse semigroups determined by their partial automorphism monoids

Part of: Semigroups

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  09 April 2009

Simon M. Goberstein
Affiliation:
Department of Mathematics and Statistics, California State University, Chico, CA 95929, USA, e-mail: SGoberstein@csuchico.edu
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

The partial automorphism monoid of an inverse semigroup is an inverse monoid consisting of all isomorphisms between its inverse subsemigroups. We prove that a tightly connected fundamental inverse semigroup S with no isolated nontrivial subgroups is lattice determined ‘modulo semilattices’ and if T is an inverse semigroup whose partial automorphism monoid is isomorphic to that of S, then either S and T are isomorphic or they are dually isomorphic chains relative to the natural partial order; a similar result holds if T is any semigroup and the inverse monoids consisting of all isomorphisms between subsemigroups of S and T, respectively, are isomorphic. Moreover, for these results to hold, the conditions that S be tightly connected and have no isolated nontrivial subgroups are essential.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Australian Mathematical Society 2006

References

[1]Clifford, A. H. and Preston, G. B., The algebraic theory of semigroups, Math. Surveys 7 (Amer. Math. Soc., Providence, RI, Vol. I, 1961; Vol. II, 1967).Google Scholar
[2]Ershova, T. I., ‘Projectivities of Brandt semigroups’, Ural. Gos. Univ. Mat. Zap. 13 (1982), 2739 (in Russian).Google Scholar
[3]Goberstein, S. M., ‘Inverse semigroups determined by their bundles of correspondences’, J. Algebra 125 (1989), 474488.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[4]Goberstein, S. M., ‘Inverse semigroups with isomorphic partial automorphism semigroups’, J. Aust. Math. Soc. 47 (1989), 399417.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[5]Goberstein, S. M., ‘PA-isomorphisms of inverse semigroups’, Algebra Universalis 53 (2005), 407432.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[6]Hall, T. E., ‘On orthodox semigroups and uniform and antiuniform bands’, J. Algebra 16 (1970), 204217.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[7]Howie, J. M., An introduction to semigroup theory (Academic Press, London, 1976).Google Scholar
[8]Jones, P. R., ‘Lattice isomorphisms of inverse semigroups’, Proc. Edinb. Math. Soc. 21 (1978), 149157.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[9]Jones, P. R., ‘Inverse semigroups determined by their lattices of inverse subsemigroups’, J. Aust. Math. Soc. 30 (1981), 321346.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[10]Jones, P. R., ‘On lattice isomorphisms of inverse semigroups’, Glasg. Math. J. 46 (2004), 193204.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[11]Munn, W. D., ‘Fundamental inverse semigroups’, Quart. J. Math. Oxford Ser. (2) 21 (1970), 157170.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[12]Petrich, M., Inverse semigroups (Wiley, New York, 1984).Google Scholar
[13]Preston, G. B., ‘Inverse semigroups: some open questions’, in: Proc. Symposium on Inverse Semigroups and Their Generalizations (Northern Illinois Univ., 1973) pp. 122139.Google Scholar
[14]Schein, B. M., ‘An idempotent semigroup is determined by the pseudogroup of its local automorphisms’, Ural. Gos. Univ. Mat. Zap. 7 (1970), 222233 (in Russian).Google Scholar
[15]Shevrin, L. N. and Ovsyannikov, A. J., Semigroups and their subsemigroup lattices (Kiuwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, 1996).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[16]Wagner, V. V., ‘On the theory of antigroups’, Izv. Vyssh. Uchebn. Zaved. Mat. No. 4 (1971), 315 (in Russian).Google Scholar