Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-2pzkn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-05-01T08:04:00.470Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Crinoid functional morphology

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  21 July 2017

Tomasz K. Baumiller*
Affiliation:
Museum of Paleontology and Department of Geological Sciences, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan 48109-1709, USA
Get access

Abstract

Recent advances in crinoid functional morphology have been concentrated predominantly in two areas, one involving the study of mutable collagenous tissues (MCTs), and the other dealing with the implications of crinoids' rheophilic nature. The presence of MCTs in crinoid cirri and stalks, and their importance to the function of these structures has been demonstrated in several studies. It has been recently reported that MCTs have contractile properties (Birenheide and Motokawa, 1996); if this is corroborated, it would help resolve many fundamental problems in crinoid functional morphology. Studies of the crinoids in their natural setting have confirmed their predominantly rheophilic nature. The application of the rheophilic paradigm and the principles of physics and engineering to crinoids has provided insights into several areas of crinoid functional morphology, including: (1) mechanics of particle interception—direct interception (and not sieving) as the dominant mode of particle capture by the tube feet (no mucus net); (2) the importance of feeding posture and orientation—(a) bilateral symmetry of the feeding posture (oral side downcurrent), (b) the problems associated with maintaining such a posture under bi- or multi-directional flow (swiveling of pinnules, arms, and /or entire filters); (3) the effect of filter resistivity on fluid interception—solid filters need high ambient current velocities; and (4) the influence of nearest neighbors on fluid interception—side-by-side neighbors might be favored over upstream–downstream neighbors.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © 1997 by The Paleontological Society 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Ausich, W. I. 1980. A model for niche differentiation in Lower Mississippian crinoid communities. Journal of Paleontology, 54:279288.Google Scholar
Ausich, W. I., and Baumiller, T. K. in press. Early history of connective tissues in the Crinoidea (Echinodermata). Geological Society of America Abstracts with Programs.Google Scholar
Baumiller, T. K. 1988. Effects of filter porosity and shape on fluid flux: implications for the biology and evolutionary history of stalked crinoids. Echinoderm Biology. A. A. Balkema, Rotterdam.Google Scholar
Baumiller, T. K. 1992. Importance of hydrodynamic lift to crinoid autecology, or, could crinoids function as kites? Journal of Paleontology, 66:558665.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baumiller, T. K. 1993a. Crinoid stalks as cantilever beams and the nature of stalk ligament. Neues Jahrbuch für Geologie and Paläontologie, Abhandlungen, 190:115133 Google Scholar
Baumiller, T. K. 1993b. Survivorship analysis of Paleozoic Crinoidea: effect of filter morphology on evolutionary rates. Paleobiology, 19:304321.Google Scholar
Baumiller, T. K. 1994. Patterns of dominance and extinction in the record of Paleozoic crinoids, p. 193198. In David, B., Guille, A., Féral, J.-P., and Roux, M. (eds.), Echinoderms Through Time (Echinoderms Dijon). A. A. Balkema, Rotterdam.Google Scholar
Baumiller, T. K., and Ausich, W. I. 1992. The Broken-stick model as a null hypothesis for crinoid stalk taphonomy and as a guide to the distribution of connective tissue in fossils. Paleobiology, 18:288298.Google Scholar
Baumiller, T. K., and Hagdorn, H. 1995. Taphonomy as a guide to functional morphology of Holocrinus, the first post-Paleozoic crinoid. Lethaia, 28:221228 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baumiller, T. K., and LaBarbera, M. 1989. Metabolic rates of Caribbean crinoids (Echinodermata), with special reference to deep-water stalked and stalkless taxa. Comparative Biochemistry and Physiology, 93A:391394.Google Scholar
Baumiller, T. K., LaBarbera, M., and Woodley, J. D. 1991. Ecology and functional morphology of the isocrinid Cenocrinus asterius (Linnaeus) (Echinodermata: Crinoidea): in situ and laboratory experiments and observations. Bulletin of Marine Science, 48:731748.Google Scholar
Baumiller, T. K., Llewellyn, G., Messing, C. G., and Ausich, W. I. 1995. Taphonomy of isocrinid stalks: influence of decay and autotomy. Palaios 10:8795.Google Scholar
Baumiller, T. K., and Rome, E. In press. The interference avoidance hypothesis and the spatial distribution of Endoxocrinus parrae (Crinoidea, Echinodermata). Echinoderms through time (Echinoderms IX, San Francisco). A. A. Balkema, Rotterdam.Google Scholar
Best, B. A. 1988. Passive suspension feeding in a sea pen: effects of ambient flow on volume flow rate and filtering efficiency. Biological Bulletin, 175:332342.Google Scholar
Birenheide, R., and Motokawa, T. 1994. Morphological basis and mechanics of arm movement in the stalked crinoid Metacrinus rotundas (Echinodermata, Crinoidea). Marine Biology, 121:273283.Google Scholar
Birenheide, R., and Motokawa, T. 1995. Motility and stiffness of cirri of the stalked crinoid Metacrinus rotundus , p. 9194. In Emson, R., Smith, A., and Campbell, A. (eds.), Echinoderm Research 1995. A. A. Balkema, Rotterdam.Google Scholar
Birenheide, R. 1996. Contractile connective tissue in crinoids. Biological Bulletin, 191.Google Scholar
Breimer, A. 1969. A contribution to the paleoecology of Palaeozoic stalked crinoids. Koninklijke Nederlandse Akademie Van Wetenschappen Proceedings, Series B, 72:139150.Google Scholar
Breimer, A., and Webster, G. D. 1975. A further contribution to the paleoecology of fossil stalked crinoids. Koninklijke Nederlandse Akademie Van Wetenschappen Proceedings, Series B, 80:149167.Google Scholar
Byrne, M., and Fontaine, A. R. 1981. The feeding behavior of Florometra serratissima (Echinodermata: Crinoidea). Canadian Journal of Zoology, 59:1118.Google Scholar
Byrne, M., and Fontaine, A. R. 1983. Morphology and function of the tube feet of Florometra serratissima (Echinodermata, Crinoidea). Zoomorphology, 102:175188.Google Scholar
Candia Carnevali, M. D., and Saita, A. 1985. Muscle system organization in the echinoderms: III. fine structure of the contractile apparatus of the arm flexor muscles of the comatulids (Antedon mediterranea). Journal of Morphology, 185:7587.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cheer, A. Y. L., and Koehl, M. A. R. 1987a. Paddles and rakes: fluid flow through bristled appendages of small organisms. Journal of Theoretical Biology, 129:1739.Google Scholar
Cheer, A. Y. L., and Koehl, M. A. R. 1987b. Fluid flow through filtering appendages of insects. IMA Journal of Mathematical Applications to Medicine and Biology, 4:185199.Google Scholar
Ciborowski, J. J. H., and Craig, D. A. 1989. Factors influencing dispersion of larval black flies (Diptera, Simuliidae): effects of current velocity and food concentration. Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Science, 46:13291341.Google Scholar
Donovan, S. K. 1989. The improbability of a muscular crinoid column. Lethaia, 22:307315.Google Scholar
Donovan, S. K. 1993. Contractile tissues in the cirri of ancient crinoids: criteria for recognition. Lethaia, 26:163169.Google Scholar
Foote, M. 1996. Ecological controls on the evolutionary recovery of post-Paleozoic crinoids. Science, 274:14921495.Google Scholar
Grimmer, J. C., and Holland, N. D. 1987. The role of ligaments in arm extension in feather stars (Echinodermata: Crinoidea). Acta Zoologica (Stockholm), 68:7982.Google Scholar
Grimmer, J. C., Holland, N. D., and Hayami, I. 1985. Fine structure of the stalk of an isocrinid sea lily (Metacrinus rotundus) (Echinodermata, Crinoidea). Zoomorphology, 105:3950.Google Scholar
Holland, N. D., and Grimmer, J. C. 1981. Fine structure of the cirri and a possible mechanism for their motility in stalkless crinoids (Echinodermata). Cell Tissue Research, 214:207217.Google Scholar
Holland, N. D., Leonard, A. B., and Strickler, J. R. 1987. Upstream and downstream capture during suspension feeding by Oligometra serripinna (Echinodermata: Crinoidea) under surge conditions. Biological Bulletin, 173:552556.Google Scholar
Holland, N. D., Strickler, J. R., and Leonard, A. B. 1986. Particle interception, transport and rejection by the feather star Oligometra serripinna (Echinodermata: Crinoidea), studied by frame analysis of video tapes. Marine Biology, 93:111126.Google Scholar
Holterhoff, P. F. 1997. Filtration models, guilds, and biofacies: crinoid paleoecology of the Stanton Formation (Upper Pennsylvanian), midcontinent, North America. Palaeogeography, Palaeoclimatology, Palaeoecology, 130:177208.Google Scholar
Holterhoff, P. F. and Baumiller, T. K. 1996. Phylogenetic and paleoecological analysis of the Permian–Triassic extinction and re-radiation. Research Training Group in Biological Diversification Symposium, Abstracts.Google Scholar
Jefferies, R. P. S. 1989. The arm structure and mode of feeding of the Triassic crinoid Encrinus liliiformis. Palaeontology, 3:483497.Google Scholar
Jorgensen, C. B. 1954. Quantitative aspects of filter feeding in invertebrates. Biological Reviews, 30:391454.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jorgensen, C. B. 1966. Biology of Suspension Feeding. Pergamon, Oxford.Google Scholar
Jumars, P. A., and Gallagher, E. D. 1982. Deep-sea community structure: three plays on the benthic proscenium, p. 217255. In Ernst, W. G. and Morin, J. G. (eds.), The Environment of the Deep Sea. Prentice-Hall; Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey.Google Scholar
Kammer, T. 1985. Aerosol filtration theory applied to Mississippian deltaic crinoids. Journal of Paleontology, 59:551560.Google Scholar
Kammer, T., and Ausich, W. I. 1987. Aerosol suspension feeding and current velocities: distributional controls for Late Osagean crinoids. Paleobiology, 13:379395.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kammer, T., Baumiller, T. K., and Ausich, W. I. 1997. Species longevity as a function of niche breadth: evidence from fossil crinoids. Geology, 25:219222.Google Scholar
Koehl, M. A. R., and Strickler, J. R. 1981. Copepod feeding currents: food capture at low Reynolds number. Limnology and Oceanography, 26:10621073.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
LaBarbera, M. 1978. Particle capture by a Pacific brittle star: experimental test of the aerosol suspension feeding model. Nature, 201:11471149.Google Scholar
LaBarbera, M. 1984. Feeding currents and particle capture mechanisms in suspension feeding animals. American Zoologist, 24:7184.Google Scholar
Lahaye, M. C., and Jangoux, M. 1985. Functional morphology of the podia and ambulacral grooves of the comatulid crinoid Antedon bifida (Echinodermata). Marine Biology, 86:307318.Google Scholar
La Touche, R. W. 1978. The feeding behavior of the feather star Antedon bifida (Echinodermata: Crinoidea). Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom, 58:877890.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
La Touche, R. W., and West, A. B. 1980. Observations on the food of Antedon bifida (Echinodermata). Marine Biology, 60:3946.Google Scholar
Leonard, A. B. 1989. Functional response in Antedon mediterranea (Lamarck) (Echinodermata: Crinoidea): the interaction of prey concentration and current velocity on a passive suspension-feeder. Journal of Experimental Biology and Ecology, 127:81103.Google Scholar
Leonard, A. B., Strickler, J. R., and Holland, N. D. 1988. Effects of current speed on filtration during suspension feeding during in Oligometra serripinna (Echinodermata: Crinoidea). Marine Biology, 97:111125.Google Scholar
Liddell, D. W. 1982. Suspension feeding by Caribbean comatulid crinoids, p. 3339. In Lawrence, J. M. (ed.), International Echinoderm Conference, Tampa Bay. A. A. Balkema, Rotterdam.Google Scholar
Loudon, C. 1990. Empirical test of filtering theory: particle capture by rectangular-mesh nets. Limnology and Oceanography, 35:143148.Google Scholar
Loudon, C., and Alstad, D. N. 1990. Theoretical mechanics of particle capture: predictions for hydropsychid caddisfly distributional ecology. American Naturalist, 135:360381.Google Scholar
Macurda, D. B. Jr., and Meyer, D. L. 1974. Feeding posture of modern stalked crinoids. Nature, 247:394396.Google Scholar
Messing, C. G. 1985. Submersible observations of deep-water crinoid assemblages in the tropical western Atlantic Ocean, p. 185193. In Keegan, B. F. and O'Connor, B. D. S. (eds.), Fifth International Echinoderm Conference, 1994, Galway. A. A. Balkema, Rotterdam.Google Scholar
Messing, C. G., Rosesmyth, M. C., Mailer, S. R., and Miller, J. E. 1988. Relocation movement in a stalked crinoid (Echinodermata). Bulletin of Marine Science, 42:480487.Google Scholar
Meyer, D. L. 1971. The collagenous nature of problematical ligaments in crinoids (Echinodermata). Marine Biology, 9:235241.Google Scholar
Meyer, D. L. 1973. Feeding behavior and ecology of shallow water unstalked crinoids (Echinodermata) in the Caribbean Sea. Marine Biology, 22:105130.Google Scholar
Meyer, D. L. 1979. Morphological length and spacing of the tube feet in crinoids (Echinodermata) and their role in suspension feeding. Marine Biology, 51:361369.Google Scholar
Meyer, D. L. 1982. Food and feeding mechanisms: Crinozoa, p. 2542. In Jangoux, M. and Lawrence, J. M. (eds.), Echinoderm Nutrition. A. A. Balkema, Rotterdam.Google Scholar
Meyer, D. L., and Lane, N. G. 1976. The feeding behavior of some Paleozoic crinoids and basketstars. Journal of Paleontology, 50:472480.Google Scholar
Meyer, D. L., and Macurda, D. B. Jr. 1977. Adaptive radiation of comatulid crinoids. Paleobiology, 3:7482.Google Scholar
Meyer, D. L., and Macurda, D. B. Jr. 1980. Ecology and distribution of the shallow-water crinoids (Echinodermata) of Palau and Guam (Western Pacific). Micronesica, 16:5999.Google Scholar
Motokawa, T. 1984. Connective tissue catch in echinoderms. Biological Review, 59:255270.Google Scholar
Nichols, D. 1966. Functional morphology of the water vascular system. Physiology of Echinodermata. New York, Interscience.Google Scholar
Oji, T., and Okamoto, T. 1994. Arm autotomy and arm branching pattern as anti-predatory adaptations in stalked and stalkless crinoids. Paleobiology, 20:2739.Google Scholar
Reyss, D., and Soyer, J. 1965. Étude de deux valleés sousmarine de la mer Catalane. Bulletin de l'Institute Oceanographique de Monaco, 65:127.Google Scholar
Rosenkrantz, K. J., and Baumiller, T. K. 1994. Mutable properties of crinoid stalk ligaments: functional and evolutionary implications. Geological Society of America Abstracts with Programs, 26(7): A59.Google Scholar
Rubenstein, D. T., and Koehl, M. A. R. 1977. The mechanisms of filter feeding: some theoretical considerations. American Naturalist, 111:981994.Google Scholar
Rutman, J., and Fishelson, L. 1969. Food composition and feeding behavior of shallow-water crinoids at Eilat (Red Sea). Marine Biology, 3:981994.Google Scholar
Shimeta, J., and Jumars, P. A. 1991. Physical mechanisms and rates of particle capture by suspension feeders. Oceanography and Marine Biology Annual Reviews, 29:191257.Google Scholar
Signor, P. W. II., and Brett, C. E. 1984. The mid-Paleozoic precursor to the Mesozoic marine revolution. Paleobiology, 10:229245.Google Scholar
Silvester, N. R. 1983. Some hydrodynamic aspects of filter feeding with rectangular-mesh nets. Journal of Theoretical Biology, 103:265286.Google Scholar
Simms, M. J., and Sevastopulo, G. D. 1993. The origin of articulate crinoids. Palaeontology, 29:91109.Google Scholar
Umemura, A. 1982. Matched-asymptotic analysis of low-Reynolds number flow past two equal circular cylinders. Journal of Fluid Mechanics, 121:345363.Google Scholar
Vogel, S. 1983. How much air passes through a silkmoth's antenna? Journal of Insect Physiology, 29:597602.Google Scholar
Warner, G. F. 1977. On the shapes of passive suspension feeders, p. 567576. In Keegan, B. F., Ceidigh, P. O., and Boaden, P. J. S. (eds.), Proceedings of the 11th European Symposium on Marine Biology; Galway, 1976. Pergamon Press, Oxford.Google Scholar
Wilkie, I. C. 1983. Nervously mediated change in the mechanical properties of the cirral ligaments of a crinoid. Marine Behaviour and Physiology, 11: 134.Google Scholar
Wilkie, I. C. 1984. Variable tensility in echinoderm collagenous tissue: a review. Marine Behaviour and Physiology, 11:134.Google Scholar
Wilkie, I. C., and Emson, R. H. 1988. Mutable collagenous tissues and their significance for echinoderm palaeontology and phylogeny, p. 311330. In Paul, C.R.C. and Smith, A. B. (eds.), Echinoderm Phylogeny and Evolutionary Biology. Clarendon Press, Oxford.Google Scholar
Wilkie, I. C., Emson, R. H., and Young, C. M. 1993. Smart collagen in sea lilies. Nature 366, 519520.Google Scholar