Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-sxzjt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-24T12:27:00.162Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Agricultural Contracts and Alternative Marketing Options: A Matching Analysis

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 January 2015

Ani L. Katchova
Ani L. Katchova*
Affiliation:
Department of Agricultural Economics, University of Kentucky, Lexington, KY
Get access

Abstract

The increasing use of agricultural contracts and processor concentration raises concerns that processors may offer lower contract prices in absence of local competition. This study examines the price competitiveness of marketing and production contracts depending on the availability of alternative marketing options. A propensity score matching method is used to compare prices using contract data from a farm-level national survey. The results show that the absence of other contractors or spot markets in producers' areas does not lead to statistically significant price differences in agricultural contracts for most commodities, providing evidence that most agricultural processors do not exercise market power by reducing prices when other local buyers are not available.

Keywords

agricultural pricesalternative marketing optionslocal competition, marketing contractsproduction contractspropensity score matchingQ13
Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics , Volume 42 , Issue 2 , May 2010 , pp. 261 - 276
Copyright
Copyright © Southern Agricultural Economics Association 2010

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Ahearn, M.C., Korb, P., and Banker, D. “The Industrialization and Contracting of Agriculture.” Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics 37(2005):347–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Becker, S.O., and Ichino, A. “Estimation of Average Treatment Effects Based on Propensity Scores.” The Stata Journal 2(2002):358–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Briggeman, B.C., Towe, C.A., and Morehart, M.J. “Credit Constraints: Their Existence, Determinants, and Implications for U.S. Farm and Nonfarm Sole Proprietorships.” American Journal of Agricultural Economics 91(2009):275–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Davis, C.G., and Gillespie, J.M. “Factors Affecting the Selection of Business Arrangements by U.S. Hog Farmers.” Review of Agricultural Economics 29(2007):331–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gilligan, D.O., and Hoddinott, J. “Is There Persistence in the Impact of Emergency Food Aid? Evidence on Consumption, Food Security, and Assets in Rural Ethiopia.” American Journal of Agricultural Economics 89(2007):225–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Heckman, J.J., Ichimura, H., and Todd, P. “Matching as an Econometric Evaluation Estimator.” The Review of Economic Studies 65(1998):261–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Katchova, A.L., and Miranda, M.J. “Two-step Econometric Estimation of Farm Characteristics Affecting Marketing Contract Decisions.” American Journal of Agricultural Economics 86(2004):88–102.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Key, N. “Agricultural Contracting and the Scale of Production.” Agricultural and Resource Economics Review 33(2004):255–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Key, N. “How Much do Farmers Value Their Independence?” Agricultural Economics 22(2005):117–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lynch, L., Gray, W., and Geoghegan, J. “Are Farmland Preservation Program Easement Restrictions Capitalized into Farmland Prices? What Can a Propensity Score Matching Analysis Tell Us?” Review of Agricultural Economics 29(2005):502–09.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
MacDonald, J., and Korb, P. “Agricultural Contracting Update: Contracts in 2003.” Economic Information Bulletin No. 9. Economic Research Service, U.S. Department of Agriculture, 2006.Google Scholar
MacDonald, J., Perry, J., Ahearn, M., Banker, D., Chambers, W., Dimitri, C., Key, N., Nelson, K., and Southard, L. “Contracts, Markets, and Prices: Organizing the Production and Use of Agricultural Commodities.” Agricultural Economic Report Number 837. Economic Research Service, U.S. Department of Agriculture, 2004.Google Scholar
Rosenbaum, RR., and Rubin, D.B. “The Central Role of the Propensity Score in Observational Studies for Causal Effects.” Biometrika 70(1983):41–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sexton, R.J. “Industrialization and Consolidation in the U.S. Food Sector: Implications for Competition and Welfare.” American Journal of Agricultural Economics 82(2000):1087–104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wang, W., and Jaenicke, E.C. “Simulating the Impacts of Contract Supplies in a Spot Market-Contract Market Equilibrium.” American Journal of Agricultural Economics 88(2006):1062–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Xia, T., and Sexton, R.J. “The Competitive Implications of Top-of-the-Market and Related Contract-Pricing Clauses.” American Journal of Agricultural Economics 86(2004):124–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zhang, M., and Sexton, R.J. “Captive Supplies and the Cash Market Price: A Spatial Markets Approach.” Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics 25(2000):88–108.Google Scholar