Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-t5pn6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-23T14:09:16.374Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

THE ORIGIN OF THE SYLOS POSTULATE: MODIGLIANI’S AND SYLOS LABINI’S CONTRIBUTIONS TO OLIGOPOLY THEORY

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 August 2015

Antonella Rancan
Antonella Rancan*
Affiliation:
EGSI Department, University of Molise (Italy). Email address: antonella.rancan@unimol.it.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Paolo Sylos Labini’s Oligopoly Theory and Technical Progress (1957) is considered one of the major contributions to entry-prevention models, especially after Franco Modigliani’s formalization. Nonetheless, Modigliani neglected Sylos Labini’s aim when reviewing his work (1958), particularly his demonstration of the dynamic relation between industrial concentration and economic development. Modigliani addressed only Sylos Labini’s microeconomic analysis and the determination of the long-run equilibrium price and output, concentrating on the role played by firms’ anticipations. By doing so he shifted attention from Sylos Labini’s objective analysis to a subjective approach to the oligopoly problem. This paper discusses Sylos Labini’s and Modigliani’s differing approaches, derives the origin of the Sylos postulate, and sets Modigliani’s interpretation of Sylos Labini’s oligopoly theory in the context of his 1950s research into firms’ behavior under uncertainty.

Type
Articles
Information
Journal of the History of Economic Thought , Volume 37 , Issue 3 , September 2015 , pp. 431 - 448
Copyright
Copyright © The History of Economics Society 2015 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Baumol, William J. 1958. “On the Theory of Oligopoly.” Economica 25 (99): 187–198.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bhagwati, Jagdish N. 1970. “Oligopoly Theory, Entry-Prevention, and Growth.” Oxford Economic Papers 22 (3): 297–310.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bain, Joe S. 1949. “A Note on Pricing in Monopoly and Oligopoly.” American Economic Review 39 (2): 448–464.Google Scholar
Becattini, Giacomo. 2006. “Paolo Sylos Labini: ricordo affettuoso di un maestro.” Economia e Politica Industriale 2: 7–14.Google Scholar
Breglia, Alberto. 1942. Temi di economia e di vita sociale. Milano: Giuffré.Google Scholar
Breglia, Alberto. 1955. L’economia dal punto di vista monetario. Edited by Labini, Sylos. Roma: Edizioni dell’Ateneo.Google Scholar
Chamberlin, Edward H. 1951. “Monopolistic Competition Revisited.” Economica 18 (72): 343–362.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cyert, Richard M. 1958. “Oligopoly Price Behavior and Conditions of Entry.” Working Paper no 9, Behavioral Theory of the Firm Project (January): 1–26.Google Scholar
Cyert, Richard M., and March, James G.. 1955. “Organizational Structure and Pricing Behavior in an Oligopolistic Market.” American Economic Review 45 (1): 129–139.Google Scholar
Dewey, Donald. 1969. The Theory of Imperfect Competition: A Radical Reconstruction. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Edwards, Harry R. 1955. “Price Formation in Manufacturing Industry and Excess Capacity.” Oxford Economic Papers 7 (1): 94–118.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Farrar, Donald E. and Phillips, Charles F. Jr. 1959. “New Developments on the Oligopoly Front: A Comment.” Journal of Political Economy 67 (4): 414–417.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Farrell, Michael 1971. “Philip Andrews and Manufacturing Business.” The Journal of Industrial Economics 20 (1): 10–13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fisher, Franklin M. 1959. “New Developments on the Oligopoly Front: Cournot and the Bain-Sylos Analysis.” Journal of Political Economy 67 (4): 410–413.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gilbert, Richard J. 1989. “The Role of Potential Competition in Industrial Organization.” Journal of Economic Perspectives 3 (3): 107–127.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Giocoli, Nicola. 2011. “When Low Is No good: Predatory Pricing and U.S. Antitrust Law (1950–1980).” The European Journal of the History of Economic Thought 18 (5): 777–806.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hahn, Frank H. 1955. “Excess Capacity and Imperfect Competition.” Oxford Economic Papers 7 (3): 229–240.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hall, Robert L., and Hitch, Charles J.. 1939. “Price Theory and Business Behavior.” Oxford Economic Papers 2: 12–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harrod, Roy F. 1934. “Doctrines of Imperfect Competition.” Quarterly Journal of Economics 48 (3): 442–470.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Henderson, Alexander. 1954. “The Theory of Duopoly.” Quarterly Journal of Economics 68 (4): 565–584.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hicks, John R. 1954. “The Process of Imperfect Competition.” Oxford Economic Papers 6 (1): 41–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Holt, Charles, Modigliani, Franco, Muth, John, and Simon, Herbert A.. 1960. Planning Production, Inventories and Work Forces. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
Kaldor, Nicholas. 1935. “Market Imperfection and Excess Capacity.” Economica 2 (5): 33–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Khan, Richard F. 1937. “The Problem of Duopoly.” Economic Journal 47 (185): 1–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lombardini, Siro. 1953. Il monopolio nella teoria economica. Milano: Vita e pensiero.Google Scholar
Lydall, Harold F. 1955. “Conditions of New Entry and the Theory of Price.” Oxford Economic Papers 7 (3): 300–311.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marinelli, , Luisa, Maria. 1989. “Barriere dovute ad economie di scala e condizioni all’entrata.” Studi e Ricerche, Dipartimento di Scienze Economiche. Pisa: Univeristà degli studi di Pisa, pp. 1–48.Google Scholar
Marshack, Jacob. 1949. “The Role of Liquidity under Complete and Incomplete Information.” American Economic Review 39 (3): 182–195.Google Scholar
Modigliani, Franco. 1949. “Discussion. Papers and Proceeding of the Sixty-first Annual Meeting of the American Economic Association.” American Economic Review 39 (3): 201–208.Google Scholar
Modigliani, Franco. 1958. “New Developments on the Oligopoly Front.” Journal of Political Economy 66 (3): 215–232.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Modigliani, Franco. 1959. “New Developments on the Oligopoly Front: Reply.” Journal of Political Economy 67 (4): 418–419.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Modigliani, Franco. 1963. “The Monetary Mechanism and Its Interaction with Real Phenomena.” Review of Economics and Statistics 45 (1), Part 2 Supplement: 79–107.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Modigliani, Franco. 2001 Adventures of an Economist. New York: W. W. Norton & Co.Google Scholar
Modigliani, Franco, and Cohen, Kalman J.. 1961. The Role of Anticipations and Plans in Economic Behavior and Their Use in Economic Analysis and Forecasting. Studies in Business Expectations and Planning no. 4. Champaign, IL: Bureau of Economic and Business Research,University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign.Google Scholar
Modigliani, Franco, and Labini, Paolo Sylos. Correspondence. Franco Modigliani Papers, Box CO24 David M. Rubenstein Rare Book & Manuscript Library. Durham: Duke University.Google Scholar
Napoleoni, Claudio. 1956. “Oligopolio.” Dizionario di Economia Politica. Milano: Edizioni di Comunità, pp. 1083–1105.Google Scholar
Osborne, Dale K. 1964. “The Role of Entry in Oligopoly Theory.” Journal of Political Economy 72 (4): 396–402.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Osborne, Dale K. 1973. “On the Rationality of Limit Pricing.” Journal of Industrial Economics 22 (1): 71–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Parisi, Acquaviva Daniela F., ed. 2007. Crisi del sistema economico, prezzi politici e autarchia: cinque articoli giovanili, 1937–1938. Milano: Vita e pensiero.Google Scholar
Porta, Pier Luigi. 2007. “Paolo Sylos Labini as a Historian of Economics.” Revue d’économie industrielle 118 (2nd trimester): 29–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rancan, Antonella. 2013. “Modigliani’s and Simon’s Early Contribution to Uncertainty (1952–1960).” History of Political Economy 45 (1): 1–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rancan, Antonella. 2014. “Modigliani’s Comments on Sylos Labini’s Theory of Unemployment (1956–1958).” PNL Quarterly Review 67 (270): 269–282.Google Scholar
Robinson, Joan. 1953. “Imperfect Competition Revisited.” Economic Journal 63 (251): 579–593.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Roncaglia, Alessandro. 2006. “Paolo Sylos Labini, 1920–2005.” Moneta e Credito 59 (233): 3–21.Google Scholar
Roncaglia, Alessandro. 2007. “Il pensiero economico di Paolo Sylos Labini.” Economia e Lavoro 59: 3–30.Google Scholar
Rothschild, Kurt W. 1947. “Price Theory and Oligopoly.” Economic Journal 57 (227): 299–320.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sraffa, Piero. 1926. “The Laws of Returns under Competitive Conditions.” Economic Journal 36 (144): 535–550.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stigler, George J. 1947. “The Kinky Oligopoly Demand Curve and Rigid Prices.” Journal of Political Economy 55 (5): 432–449.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stigler, George J. 1964. “A Theory of Oligopoly.” Journal of Political Economy 72 (1): 44–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stigler, George J. 1983. “Nobel Lecture: The Process and Progress of Economics.” Journal of Political Economy 91 (4): 529–545.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stigler, George, and Bain, Joe S.. 1950. “Discussion. Paper and Proceedings of the Sixty-second Annual Meeting of the American Economic Association.” American Economic Review 40 (2): 63–66.Google Scholar
Sylos Labini, Paolo. 1954. “Monopoli, ristagno economico e politica keynesiana.” Economia Internazionale 7 (3): 758–778.Google Scholar
Sylos Labini, Paolo. 1956. Oligopolio e Progresso Tecnico. Milano: Giuffré.Google Scholar
Sylos Labini, Paolo. 1957. Oligopolio e Progresso Tecnico. Milano: Giuffré.Google Scholar
Sylos Labini, Paolo. 1962. Oligopoly and Technical Progress. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Sylos Labini, Paolo. 1976. “Competition: The Product Markets.” In Wilson, T. and Skinner, A. S., eds., The Market and the State. Oxford: Clarendon Press, pp. 200–232.Google Scholar
Sylos Labini, Paolo. 1984. Le forze dello sviluppo e del declino. Roma: Editori Laterza.Google Scholar
Sylos Labini, Paolo. 2005. “Franco Modigliani and Oligopoly.” BNL Quarterly Review 58: 41–48.Google Scholar
Sylos Labini, Paolo, and Guarino, Guseppe. 1956. L’industria petrolifera negli Stati Uniti nel Canada e nel Messico. Milano: Giuffré.Google Scholar