Hostname: page-component-7c8c6479df-ws8qp Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-03-29T00:02:42.764Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Seroprevalence of SARS-CoV-2 antibodies in the poorest region of Brazil: results from a population-based study

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 May 2021

Adriano Antunes de Souza Araújo
Affiliation:
Department of Pharmacy, Federal University of Sergipe, São Cristóvão, Sergipe, Brazil Health Sciences Graduate Program, Federal University of Sergipe, Aracaju, Sergipe, Brazil Graduate Program in Pharmaceutical Sciences, Federal University of Sergipe, São Cristóvão, Sergipe, Brazil
Lucindo José Quintans-Júnior
Affiliation:
Health Sciences Graduate Program, Federal University of Sergipe, Aracaju, Sergipe, Brazil Graduate Program in Pharmaceutical Sciences, Federal University of Sergipe, São Cristóvão, Sergipe, Brazil Department of Physiology, Federal University of Sergipe, São Cristóvão, Sergipe, Brazil
Luana Heimfarth
Affiliation:
Health Sciences Graduate Program, Federal University of Sergipe, Aracaju, Sergipe, Brazil
Dulce Marta Schimieguel
Affiliation:
Department of Pharmacy, Federal University of Sergipe, São Cristóvão, Sergipe, Brazil Graduate Program in Pharmaceutical Sciences, Federal University of Sergipe, São Cristóvão, Sergipe, Brazil
Cristiane Bani Corrêa
Affiliation:
Health Sciences Graduate Program, Federal University of Sergipe, Aracaju, Sergipe, Brazil Department of Morphology, Federal University of Sergipe, São Cristóvão, Sergipe, Brazil
Tatiana Rodrigues de Moura
Affiliation:
Health Sciences Graduate Program, Federal University of Sergipe, Aracaju, Sergipe, Brazil Department of Morphology, Federal University of Sergipe, São Cristóvão, Sergipe, Brazil
Rafael Ciro Marques Cavalcante
Affiliation:
Department of Pharmacy, Federal University of Sergipe, Lagarto, Sergipe, Brazil
Rangel Rodrigues Bomfim
Affiliation:
Department of Pharmacy, Federal University of Sergipe, Lagarto, Sergipe, Brazil
Renata Grespan
Affiliation:
Department of Physiology, Federal University of Sergipe, São Cristóvão, Sergipe, Brazil Graduate Program in Physiological Sciences, Federal University of Sergipe, São Cristóvão, Sergipe, Brazil
Lorranny Santana Rodrigues
Affiliation:
Health Sciences Graduate Program, Federal University of Sergipe, Aracaju, Sergipe, Brazil
Danillo Menezes dos Santos
Affiliation:
Health Sciences Graduate Program, Federal University of Sergipe, Aracaju, Sergipe, Brazil
Ayane de Sá Resende
Affiliation:
Health Sciences Graduate Program, Federal University of Sergipe, Aracaju, Sergipe, Brazil
Nathanielly de Lima Silva
Affiliation:
Graduate Program in Pharmaceutical Sciences, Federal University of Sergipe, São Cristóvão, Sergipe, Brazil
Anna Clara Ramos da Silva Santos
Affiliation:
Graduate Program in Pharmaceutical Sciences, Federal University of Sergipe, São Cristóvão, Sergipe, Brazil
Jéssica Maria Dantas Araújo
Affiliation:
Graduate Program in Physiological Sciences, Federal University of Sergipe, São Cristóvão, Sergipe, Brazil
Mércia Feitosa de Souza
Affiliation:
Government of Sergipe State, State Health Secretariat, Aracaju, Sergipe, Brazil
Marco Aurélio de Oliveira Góes
Affiliation:
Government of Sergipe State, State Health Secretariat, Aracaju, Sergipe, Brazil Department of Medicine, Federal University of Sergipe, Lagarto, Sergipe, Brazil
Victor Santana Santos
Affiliation:
Health Sciences Graduate Program, Federal University of Sergipe, Aracaju, Sergipe, Brazil Centre for Epidemiology and Public Health, Federal University of Alagoas, Arapiraca, Brazil
Paulo Ricardo Martins-Filho*
Affiliation:
Health Sciences Graduate Program, Federal University of Sergipe, Aracaju, Sergipe, Brazil Investigative Pathology Laboratory, Federal University of Sergipe, Aracaju, Sergipe, Brazil
*
Author for correspondence: Paulo Ricardo Martins-Filho, E-mail: prmartinsfh@gmail.com
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Population-based seroprevalence studies on coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) in low- and middle-income countries are lacking. We investigated the seroprevalence of severe acute respiratory syndrome-coronavirus-2 (SARS-CoV-2) antibodies in Sergipe state, Northeast Brazil, using rapid IgM−IgG antibody test and fluorescence immunoassay. The seroprevalence was 9.3% (95% CI 8.5–10.1), 10.2% (95% CI 9.2–11.3) for women and 7.9% (IC 95% 6.8–9.1) for men (P = 0.004). We found a decline in the prevalence of SARS-CoV-2 antibodies according to age, but the differences were not statistically significant: 0–19 years (9.9%; 95% CI 7.8–12.5), 20–59 years (9.3%; 95% CI 8.4–10.3) and ≥60 years (9.0%; 95% CI 7.5–10.8) (P = 0.517). The metropolitan area had a higher seroprevalence (11.7%, 95% CI 10.3–13.2) than outside municipalities (8.0%, 95% CI 7.2–8.9) (P < 0.001). These findings highlight the importance of serosurveillance to estimate the real impact of the COVID-19 outbreak and thereby provide data to better understand the spread of the virus, as well as providing information to guide stay-at-home measures and other policies. In addition, these results may be useful as basic data to follow the progress of COVID-19 outbreak as social restriction initiatives start to be relaxed in Brazil.

Type
Original Paper
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BY
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s), 2021. Published by Cambridge University Press

Introduction

Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) caused by severe acute respiratory syndrome-coronavirus-2 (SARS-CoV-2) emerged in late 2019 in China and rapidly spread worldwide leading to a global health outbreak [Reference Dhama1]. Until 25 February 2021, COVID-19 has been reported in more than 113 million people worldwide, with the highest number of cases registered in USA, India and Brazil.

Although reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) is considered the gold standard technique for detecting and confirming SARS-CoV-2 infection, RT-PCR has been prioritised for symptomatic people who seek health services, making the exact number of individuals who have been infected by SARS-CoV-2 unknown. Thus, there is large number of asymptomatic cases associated with SARS-CoV-2 that are not reported.

Serological assays provide a more complete picture of infection estimates, including people who having mild or asymptomatic infection or who were never tested despite the symptoms [Reference Havers2]. Moreover, seroepidemiological studies are important to quantify the proportion of the population that remains susceptible to the virus and could be an important indicator for driving decisions by preventing subsequent waves of the COVID-19 outbreak [Reference Pollán3].

Although a variety of seroepidemiological studies have been conducted, many of them analysed small and/or non-probabilistic samples leading to limitations in providing precise estimates of seroprevalence by sex and age groups in the general population [Reference Silveira4Reference Zaidi6]. In Brazil, one of the countries most affected by the COVID-19 outbreak with more than 10 million cases and 250 000 deaths, there is a lack of large-scale diagnostic testing which is critical to controlling the virus in a long term. In this study, we investigated the seroprevalence of SARS-CoV-2 antibodies in 15 municipalities in Sergipe State, Northeast Brazil.

Methods

Study design

This was a cross-sectional study consisting of serological testing in individuals not previously tested for SARS-CoV-2 residing in Sergipe state, Northeast Brazil, from 1 July to 31 July 2020.

Study setting

Sergipe is the smallest state in Brazil and is located in the poorest region of the country. The state is divided into 75 municipalities, has an estimated population of ~2.3 million people, human development index (HDI) of 0.665 and a monthly household income per capita of less than one Brazilian minimum wage (approximately USD 190/month). Until 25 February 2021, SARS-CoV-2 had infected 149 637 people and resulted in 2940 deaths.

Sampling

Sergipe state is divided into eight administrative health regions. We selected the 15 main municipalities in the state based on the following criteria: the 10 municipalities with the largest population size and the five municipalities that provide access to other states by land. Of the 10 largest municipalities, five are in the metropolitan region (Aracaju, Barras dos Coqueiros, Laranjeiras, Nossa Senhora do Socorro and São Cristóvão) and five outside of the metropolitan area (Capela, Itabaiana, Itabaianinha, Lagarto and Nossa Senhora da Glória). The five municipalities bordering other states were Propriá, Canindé de São Francisco, Simão Dias, Tobias Barreto and Porto da Folha. These 15 municipalities have over 30 000 inhabitants and include approximately 65% of Sergipe population.

We used the following formula to calculate the sample size for each municipality: n = Z 2*p*(1–p) / e 2, where n = sample size; Z = 1.96 for a confidence level of 95%; p = proportion of individuals exposed to SARS-CoV-2; e = margin of error of 5%. For this study, we used P = 0.5 to generate the most conservative sample size. A minimal sample size of 384 individuals in each municipality was required. We considered an overall attrition rate of 10% as acceptable and a total of 5615 individuals were included in this study.

In each municipality, households were randomly selected from a sampling frame developed from a census list. At the beginning of the visit, all household members were listed, and one individual was randomly selected for data collection.

Data collection and procedures

After obtaining written informed consent to participate, individuals were interviewed using a structured questionnaire that included clinical and demographic features. Then, the seroepidemiological survey was conducted in two steps. In the first step, we applied a lateral flow immunoassay (SARS-CoV-2 Antibody Test, Guangzhou Wondfo Biotech Co., Ltd.) using fingerstick blood specimen to detect IgM/IgG antibodies against SARS-CoV-2 within 15 min. This rapid IgM/IgG combined antibody test has been widely used in screening asymptomatic SARS-CoV-2 carriers [Reference Li7] and a weakly positive band can be considered as a positive result according to the manufacturers' instructions. The interpretation of this test was carried out by two trained researchers to minimise bias on the visualisation of the line for IgM/IgG and only consensus results were recorded. The sensitivity and specificity for this point-of-care test are 86.4% and 99.6%, respectively, according to the manufacturer when assessed on 361 confirmed SARS-CoV-2 patients and 235 negative controls (https://testecovid19.org/faq/one-step-covid-2019-test-guangzhou/).

In the second step, venous blood from individuals tested positive in the screening step was collected aseptically using venipuncture and a fluorescence immunoassay (FIA) (iChroma II, BioSys + Kovalent) for qualitative detection and differentiation of IgM and IgG antibodies against SARS-CoV-2 was performed. A result was considered negative if the automated reader obtained a readout <0.8, indeterminate if ≥0.8 and <1.1 and positive if ≥1.1. The sensitivity and specificity of the FIA are 95.8% and 97.0%, respectively, according to the manufacturer when assessed on 46 SARS-CoV-2 positive patients and 131 negative controls (http://www.biosys.com.br/wp-content/themes/transport/covid-19-images/SOLUCAOPOCT-COMPLETA-COVID-19.pdf). This test output is a numerical value and do not exhibit personal interpretation bias. A flowchart showing all steps and procedures is shown in Figure 1.

Fig. 1. Flowchart showing the major steps involved in conducting the study.

Outcome

The main outcome was seroprevalence expressed as the proportion of individuals who had a positive result in the FIA.

Data analysis

Seroprevalence with 95% confidence interval (CI) was calculated by using the Wilson procedure [Reference Wilson8] and estimated according to age (0–19, 20–59 and ≥60 years), sex and geographic region (within metropolitan area and other municipalities). Pearson's chi-square tests were performed to examine differences in seroprevalence by sex and geographic location. The Mantel−Haenszel test for trend was used to evaluate changes in seroprevalence according to age. All tests were two-sided at the 5% significance level. Analyses were performed by using R software (version 3.5.3; R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria).

Ethical considerations

This study was approved by the Ethics Committee of the Federal University of Sergipe (protocol number 33095120.4.0000.5546). Written informed consent was obtained from all study participants and positive cases were reported to the Municipal Health Secretariats.

Results

Of the 5615 individuals enrolled, 3353 (59.7%) were women and 2262 (40.3%) were men. The median age was 42 years (interquartile range (IQR): 28–57 years). Age data were missing for 40 (0.7%) participants. A total of 1909 (34.0%) individuals lived within the metropolitan area and 3706 (66.0%) outside the metropolitan area.

In the screening step, 652 had a positive rapid IgM/IgG combined antibody test. In the second step, venipuncture was performed in 619 out of 652 individuals and 520 had a positive result in the FIA. Five hundred out of 520 (96.2%) positive samples had detectable levels of SARS-CoV-2 IgG, 18 (3.4%) both IgM and IgG SARS-CoV-2 antibodies and two samples (0.4%) had detectable levels of SARS-CoV-2 only for IgM. Of the 520 individuals with SARS-CoV-2 antibodies detected using the FIA-based method, 342 (65.8%) were women, the median age was 41 years (IQR: 28–56 years) and 223 (42.9%) lived within the metropolitan area.

The seroprevalence of SARS-CoV-2 antibodies was 9.3% (95% CI 8.5–10.1), 10.2% (95% CI 9.2–11.3) for women and 7.9% (IC 95% 6.8–9.1) for men (P = 0.004). We found a decline in the prevalence of SARS-CoV-2 antibodies according to age, but the differences were not statistically significant: 0–19 years (9.9%; 95% CI 7.8–12.5), 20–59 years (9.3%; 95% CI 8.4–10.3) and ≥60 years (9.0%; 95% CI 7.5–10.8) (P = 0.517). The metropolitan area had a higher seroprevalence of SARS-CoV-2 (11.7%, 95% CI 10.3–13.2) than other municipalities (8.0%, 95% CI 7.2–8.9) (P < 0.001) (Table 1 and Fig. 2).

Fig. 2. Mapping the SARS-CoV-2 seroprevalence in Sergipe state, Northeast Brazil.

Table 1. Results of point-of-care lateral flow and fluorescence immunoassays for SARS-CoV-2 antibodies

Discussion

This household-based survey investigated the seroprevalence of SARS-CoV-2 antibodies in a population 16−20 weeks after confirmation of the first case of community transmission of SARS-CoV-2 infection in Sergipe, Northeast Brazil. Overall, the SARS-CoV-2 seroprevalence in Sergipe was 9.3%, which is higher than the prevalence reported in several geographic regions worldwide [Reference Rostami9]. Our findings also showed a higher prevalence of SARS-CoV-2 antibodies among women and within the metropolitan area.

A nationwide study performed in the USA between 23 March and 12 May 2020, using enzyme linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) showed that seroprevalence of SARS-CoV-2 ranged from 1.0% (95% CI 0.3–2.4) in San Francisco Bay area to 6.9% (95% CI 5.0–8.9) in New York [Reference Havers2]. In Spain, a serological survey using chemiluminescent immunoassay carried out between 27 April and 10 May 2020, showed a prevalence of SARS-CoV-2 antibodies for the entire country of 4.6% (95% CI 4.3–50), but in seven provinces in the central part of Spain, including Madrid, the seroprevalence was greater than 10% [Reference Pollán3]. Similar results were found in a Swiss study which found a seroprevalence about 11% in the general population of Geneva during the first week of May 2020 [Reference Stringhini10]. Contrasting findings were observed in serosurveys performed in Wuchang district, Wuhan, China [Reference Pan11], 70 districts of the 21 states of India [Reference Murhekar12] and Southern Brazil [Reference Silveira4] where the prevalence of SARS-CoV-2 antibodies was less than 2.5% in May 2020.

Recently, a nationwide study using a lateral flow point-of-care test found a SARS-CoV-2 antibody prevalence in the Northeast Brazil of 3.2% (95% CI 2.8–3.7%) during the first week of June. Seroprevalence estimates found in Aracaju (Sergipe state capital) and Itabaiana (the largest municipality outside the metropolitan area) were 0.9% (95% CI 0.1–3.2%) and 1.4% (95% CI 0.3–3.9%), respectively [Reference Hallal13]. Interestingly, although the seroprevalence in Itabaiana was similar to the estimated in the present study (2.7%), there is a significant divergence in the results of the Aracaju municipality (10.0%), which may be related especially to the sudden increase in cases of COVID-19 in the city during July 2020, considering the peak of the outbreak in the state during the first wave. In addition, it has been found that wide variations in positivity rate of SARS-CoV-2 infection can be influenced by the target population, sample size, socio-economic variables, cultural practices, political decision-making, interventions to mitigate spread of SARS-CoV-2, health infrastructure and diagnostic performance of serology assay [Reference Rostami9].

The seroprevalence of SARS-CoV-2 found in Sergipe state was distributed heterogeneously according to geographical location, with higher prevalence in metropolitan area than other municipalities. This supports the findings of previous studies which showed higher rates of SARS-CoV-2 infection in populations living in highly dense areas compared to areas with a smaller population [Reference Pollán3, Reference Stringhini10, Reference Haw14, Reference Rex, de Borges and Käfer15]. Metropolitan areas often have higher traffic of people increasing the likelihood of a healthy person enter in contact with an infected person (symptomatic or asymptomatic) and thus facilitating the spread of the virus. In addition, there is emerging evidence showing that people living in socio-economically disadvantaged neighbourhoods in Aracaju have been disproportionately impacted by COVID-19 which contributed to the increase in the number of cases and deaths in this region [Reference Martins-Filho16].

A recent systematic review and meta-analysis suggested no differences on the seroprevalence of SARS-CoV-2 according to sex and age [Reference Rostami9]. However, the results of the present study are contrasting. We found a decline in seroprevalence with increasing age despite differences were not statistically significant. The lower seroprevalence estimates among older adults in Sergipe could be associated with the social distancing measures and are a sign that targeted efforts to reduce social mixing of these people with others might have succeeded. The declining antibody detection rate by age can be a useful tool for tracking vaccine priority for population since the herd immunity is a challenge that the vaccination programmes must overcome to reduce cases, hospitalisations and deaths related to COVID-19 and the burden on health systems [Reference Anderson17]. Furthermore, our findings showed a higher prevalence of SARS-CoV-2 infection among women similar to that described in Wuhan (China) [Reference Pan11], Louisiana, Minnesota and Utah (USA) [Reference Havers2]. Gender differences in the SARS-CoV-2 prevalence have been debated worldwide and may be influenced by cultural [Reference Muurlink and Taylor-Robinson18] and unmeasured confounding factors including social and workplace exposures, interactions and behaviours [Reference Jordan and Adab19].

This study has some limitations and included especially the high probability of false-negative results though point-of-care tests are mainly within the first two weeks after SARS-CoV-2 exposure. The available evidence about the diagnostic accuracy for COVID-19 serological tests has been characterised by high risks of bias, heterogeneity and limited generalisability to point-of-care testing and to outpatient populations [Reference Lisboa Bastos20]. However, in a recent study it was found that Wondfo® SARS-CoV-2 Antibody Test had the highest sensitivity and specificity results among the lateral flow immunoassays [Reference Gutiérrez-Cobos21]. Moreover, although the findings of rapid tests may be affected by operator mistake in interpreting the results, this bias was minimised by a double check analysis performed by two trained people.

In summary, this study showed that the SARS-CoV-2 seroprevalence in Sergipe state, Northeast Brazil, after 16−20 weeks of the first case of COVID-19 was estimated to be 9.3% with higher rates in metropolitan area, among women, and a trend to decrease with age. These findings highlight the importance of serosurveillance to estimate the real impact of the COVID-19 outbreak and thereby offer data to better understand the spread of the virus, as well as providing information to guide stay-at-home measures and other policies. In addition, these results may be useful as basic data to follow the progress of COVID-19 outbreak as social restriction initiatives start to be relaxed in Brazil.

Acknowledgements

To all health professionals who are facing the COVID-19 pandemic. We acknowledge the National Council for Scientific and Technological Development (CNPq) (Funding Code 09/2018) and Coordination for the Improvement of Higher Education Personnel (CAPES) (Funding Code 001). Finally, we also acknowledge the support of all municipal health secretariats and the Government of the State of Sergipe. This study is part of the EpiSERGIPE project which is supported by grant SES/FAPESE/UFS 001/2020. The funding sources had no role in the design and conduct of the study; collection, management, analysis and interpretation of the data; preparation, review, or approval of the manuscript; and the decision to submit the manuscript for publication.

Authors' contributions

AASA, LJQJ, PRMF, MFS and MAOG: conceptualisation; project administration; funding acquisition and resources; interpreted the results; drafted the manuscript; writing − review and editing. VSS: interpreted the results; drafted the manuscript; writing − review and editing. LH, DMS, CB, TRM, RCMC, RRB and RG: conceptualisation; supervision; collected and analysed the data; interpreted the results; writing − review and editing. LSR, DMdS, ASR, NLS, ACRSS and JMDA: collected and analysed the data; interpreted the results; writing − review and editing.

Conflict of interest

The authors have declared no conflicts of interest.

Data availability statements

The data that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author, upon reasonable request.

References

Dhama, K et al. (2020) Coronavirus disease 2019-COVID-19. Clinical Microbiology Reviews 33, e00028–20.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Havers, FP et al. (2020) Seroprevalence of antibodies to SARS-CoV-2 in 10 sites in the United States, March 23–May 12, 2020. JAMA Internal Medicine. Published online: 21 July 2020. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2020.4130.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Pollán, M et al. (2020) Prevalence of SARS-CoV-2 in Spain (ENE-COVID): a nationwide, population-based seroepidemiological study. The Lancet 396, 535544.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Silveira, MF et al. (2020) Population-based surveys of antibodies against SARS-CoV-2 in Southern Brazil. Nature Medicine 26, 11961199.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sood, N et al. (2020) Seroprevalence of SARS-CoV-2–specific antibodies among adults in Los Angeles county, California, on April 10–11, 2020. JAMA 323, 2425.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Zaidi, S et al. (2020) Seroprevalence of anti-SARS-CoV-2 antibodies in residents of Karachi − challenges in acquiring herd immunity for COVID 19. Journal of Public Health (Oxford, England) 43, 38. doi: 10.1093/pubmed/fdaa170.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Li, Z et al. (2020) Development and clinical application of a rapid IgM-IgG combined antibody test for SARS-CoV-2 infection diagnosis. Journal of Medical Virology 92, 15181524.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wilson, EB (1927) Probable inference, the law of succession, and statistical inference. Journal of the American Statistical Association 22, 209.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rostami, A et al. (2020) SARS-CoV-2 seroprevalence worldwide: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Clinical Microbiology and Infection 27, 331340. doi: 10.1016/j.cmi.2020.10.020.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Stringhini, S et al. (2020) Seroprevalence of anti-SARS-CoV-2 IgG antibodies in Geneva, Switzerland (SEROCoV-POP): a population-based study. The Lancet 396, 313319.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Pan, Y et al. (2020) Seroprevalence of SARS-CoV-2 immunoglobulin antibodies in Wuhan, China: part of the city-wide massive testing campaign. Clinical Microbiology and Infection 27, 253257. doi: 10.1016/j.cmi.2020.09.044.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Murhekar, M et al. (2020) Prevalence of SARS-CoV-2 infection in India: findings from the national serosurvey, May-June 2020. Indian Journal of Medical Research 152, 48.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hallal, PC et al. (2020) SARS-CoV-2 antibody prevalence in Brazil: results from two successive nationwide serological household surveys. The Lancet Global Health 8, e1390e1398.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Haw, NJL et al. (2020) Epidemiological profile and transmission dynamics of COVID-19 in the Philippines. Epidemiology and Infection 148, e204.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rex, FE, de Borges, CAS and Käfer, PS (2020) Spatial analysis of the COVID-19 distribution pattern in São Paulo State, Brazil. Ciência & Saúde Coletiva 25, 33773384.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Martins-Filho, PR et al. (2020) COVID-19 fatality rates related to social inequality in Northeast Brazil: a neighbourhood-level analysis. Journal of Travel Medicine 27, taaa128. doi: 10.1093/jtm/taaa128.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Anderson, RM et al. (2020) Challenges in creating herd immunity to SARS-CoV-2 infection by mass vaccination. Lancet (London, England) 396, 16141616.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Muurlink, OT and Taylor-Robinson, AW (2020) COVID-19: cultural predictors of gender differences in global prevalence patterns. Frontiers in Public Health 8, 174. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2020.00174.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Jordan, RE and Adab, P (2020) Who is most likely to be infected with SARS-CoV-2? The Lancet Infectious Diseases 20, 995996.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lisboa Bastos, M et al. (2020) Diagnostic accuracy of serological tests for Covid-19: systematic review and meta-analysis. BMJ 370, m2516.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gutiérrez-Cobos, A et al. (2020) Evaluation of diagnostic accuracy of 10 serological assays for detection of SARS-CoV-2 antibodies. European Journal of Clinical Microbiology & Infectious Diseases 40, 17.Google ScholarPubMed
Figure 0

Fig. 1. Flowchart showing the major steps involved in conducting the study.

Figure 1

Fig. 2. Mapping the SARS-CoV-2 seroprevalence in Sergipe state, Northeast Brazil.

Figure 2

Table 1. Results of point-of-care lateral flow and fluorescence immunoassays for SARS-CoV-2 antibodies