Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-nr4z6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-05-20T06:13:13.816Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Factors affecting the toxicity of rotting carcasses containing Clostridium botulinum type C

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  19 October 2009

G. R. Smith
Affiliation:
Nuffield Laboratories of Comparative Medicine, Institute of Zoology, The Zoological Society of London, Regent's Park, London NW1 4RY
Ann Turner
Affiliation:
Nuffield Laboratories of Comparative Medicine, Institute of Zoology, The Zoological Society of London, Regent's Park, London NW1 4RY
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Mice killed shortly after receiving 1300–3000 spores of Clostridium botulinum type C per os were incubated at one of four chosen temperatures together with bottles of cooked meat medium seeded with a similar inoculum. After incubation the rotting carcasses were homogenized. Sterile membrane filtrates of the homogenates (10–20.8%, w/v) and pure cultures were then titrated for toxicity. A temperature of 37 °C produced less toxicity in most carcasses than in cultures. At 30 °C, however, toxicity (often 2× 105 to 2× 106 mouse intraperitoneal LD/g or ml) was roughly similar in both systems, and some carcasses and cultures were still toxic (2× 104 to 2× 105 LD/g or ml) after 349 days. Surprisingly, at 23 °C, though greatly reduced in the cultures, toxicity was high in many carcasses for at least 28 days. Little or no toxin was produced in either system at 16 °C. Unfiltered homogenates (17·8–22·5%, w/v; dose 0·25 ml per os) of toxic carcasses incubated at 30 °C for 7 days invariably produced death from botulism, often within as little as 4 h, but a 1 in 10 dilution produced less than 100% mortality.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1987

References

REFERENCES

Bowmer, E. J. (1963). Preparation and assay of the international standards for Clostridium botulinum types A, B, C, D and E antitoxins. Bulletin of the World Health Organization 29, 701709.Google Scholar
Eklund, M. W. & Poysky, F. T. (1974). Interconversion of type C and D strains of Clostridium botulinum1` by specific bacteriophages. Applied Microbiology 27, 251258.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Graham, J. M. (1978). Inhibition of Clostrium botulinum type C by bacteria isolated from mud. Journal of Applied Bacteriology 45, 205211.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Inoue, K. & Iida, H. (1970). Conversion of toxigenicity in Clostridium botulinumtype C. Japanese Journal of Microbiology 14, 8789.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lamanna, C. (1970). Critical comment on research needs in botulism: ecology, nature and action of toxin. Toxic Micro-organisms, Proceedings of the 1st US-Japan Conference on Toxic Micro-organisms, 7–10 10 1968, (ed. Herzberg, M.), pp. 230235. Washington DC: UJNR Joint Panel on Toxic Micro-organisms and the US Department of the Interior.Google Scholar
Notermans, S., Dufrenne, J. & Kozaki, S.(1980). Experimental botulism in Pekin ducks. Avian Disease 24, 658664.Google Scholar
Smart, J. L., Roberts, T. A., Mccullagh, K. G., Lucke, V. M. & Pearson, H. (1980). An outbreak of type C botulism in captive monkeys. Veterinary Record 107, 445446.Google Scholar
Smith, G. R. (1986). Individual variation in botulism. British Journal of Experimental Pathology 67, 617621.Google Scholar
Smith, G. R., Brambell, M. R., Gaynor, W. T., Greed, G. R. & Meurichy, W. De (1985). Botulism in zoological collections. Veterinary Record 117, 534.Google Scholar
Sterne, M. & Wentzel, L. M. (1952). Botulism in animals in South Africa. Report of the 14th International Veterinary Congress, London, 8–13 08 1949 3, 329331. London: HMSO.Google Scholar