Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-22dnz Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-27T21:11:30.024Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Making Heritage Legible: Who Owns Traditional Medical Knowledge?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  30 January 2007

Sita Reddy
Affiliation:
Center for Folklife and Cultural Heritage, Smithsonian Institution. Email: reddys@si.edu, sitareddy@mac.com

Abstract

In recent years an increasing number of state-based heritage protection schemes have asserted ownership over traditional medical knowledge (TMK) through various forms of cultural documentation such as archives, databases, texts, and inventories. Drawing on a close reading of cultural disputes over a single system of TMK—the classical South Asian medical tradition of Ayurveda—the paper traces some of the problems, ambiguities, and paradoxes of making heritage legible. The focus is on three recent state practices by the Indian government to protect Ayurvedic knowledge, each revolving around the production of a different cultural object: the translation of a seventeenth-century Dutch botanical text; the creation of an electronic database known as the Traditional Knowledge Digital Library (TKDL); and the discovery of an Ayurvedic drug as part of a bioprospecting benefit-sharing scheme. Examined together, they demonstrate that neither TMK, nor Ayurveda, nor even the process of cultural documentation can be treated as monoliths in heritage practice. They also reveal some complexities of heritage protection on the ground and the unintended consequences that policy imperatives and legibility set into motion. As the paper shows, state-based heritage protection schemes inspire surprising counterresponses by indigenous groups that challenge important assumptions about the ownership of TMK, such as locality, community, commensurability, and representation.ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS: My grateful thanks first to Vijayendra Rao and Gayatri Reddy for invaluable discussion and intellectual support; Debra Diamond, Jane Anderson, Lalitha Gopalan, Michael Sappol, Alexander Bauer, and two anonymous referees for extremely useful interdisciplinary insights; and to the Rockefeller Foundation and the Smithsonian's Center of Folklife and Cultural Heritage, particularly Richard Kurin, Carla Borden, James Early, and Peter Seitel, for the ideal fellowship and venue to get this paper written.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
© 2006 International Cultural Property Society

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Agrawal, Arun. “Indigenous Knowledge and the Politics of Classification.” International Social Science Journal 54 (2002): 173, 287–297Google Scholar
Aoki, Keith. “Intellectual property and sovereignty: Notes toward a cultural geography of authorship.” Stanford Law Review 48 (1996) no. 5: 12931355.Google Scholar
Appadurai, Arjun. Modernity at Large: Cultural Dimensions of Globalization. Delhi: Oxford University Press, 1996.
Appadurai, Arjun. “The Past as Scarce Resource.” Man, N.S. 16 (1981): 201219.Google Scholar
Appiah, Kwame Anthony. Cosmpolitanism: Ethics in a World of Strangers. New York: W. W. Norton, 2006.
Bala, Poonam. Imperialism and Medicine in Bengal: A Soci-Historical Perspective. New Delhi: Sage Publications, 1991.
Bannister, Kelly, and Katherine Barrett. “Challenging the Status Quo in Ethnobotany: A New Paradigm for Publication May Protect Cultural Knowledge and Traditional Resource.” Cultural Survival Quarterly 24, no. 4 (2001): 1013.Google Scholar
Barsh, Russel L.How Do You Patent a Landscape? The Perils of Dichotomizing Cultural and Intellectual Property.” International Journal of Cultural Property 8, no. 1 (1990): 1447.Google Scholar
Bates, Don, ed. Knowledge and the Scholarly Medical Traditions. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1995.
Benjamin, Walter. “The work of Art in the Age of Mechanical Reproduction.” in Illuminations, 217251. New York: Schocken Books, 1969.
Boxer, C.R.Two Pioneers of Tropical Medicine: Garcia d'Orta and Nicolas Monardes.” Diamante 1963, XIV, 133.Google Scholar
Boyle, James. Shamans, Software, and Spleens: Law and the Construction of The Information Society. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1999.
Boyle, James. “The Second Enclosure Movement and the Construction of the Public Domain.” Law & Contemporary Problems 66 (2003): 33.Google Scholar
Branscomb, Anne Wells. Who Owns Information? From Privacy to Public Access. New York: Basic Books, 1996.
Brass, Paul. “The Politics of Ayurvedic Education: A Case Study of Revivalism and Modernization in India.” In Education and Politics in India, edited by S. H. Rudolph and L. I. Rudolph, 342371. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1972.
Brown, Michael F.Can Culture Be Copyrighted?Current Anthropology 39, no. 2 (1998): 193222.Google Scholar
Brown, Michael F. Who Owns Native Culture? Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 2003.
Brown, Michael F.Heritage Trouble: Recent Work on the Protection of Intangible Cultural Property.” International Journal of Cultural Property, 12, no. 1 (February 2005): 4061.Google Scholar
Brown, Michael F.Heritage as Property.” In Property in Question: Value Transformation in the Global Economy, edited by Katherine Verdery and Caroline Humphrey, 4968. Oxford: Berg, 2004.
Brush, Stephen B.Is Common Heritage Outmoded?” In Valuing Local Knowledge: Indigenous People and Intellectual Property Rights, edited by Stephen Brush and Doreen Stabinsky, 143164. Washington, DC: Island Press, 1996.
Chander, Anupam, and Madhavi Sunder. “The Romance of the Public Domain.” California Law Review 92 (2004): 13311374.Google Scholar
Chatterjee, Partha. The Nation and Its Fragments: Colonial and Postcolonial Histories. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1993.
Clifford, James. The Predicament of Culture: Twentieth-Century Ethnography, Literature, and Art. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1988.
Coombe, Rosemary J. The Cultural Life of Intellectual Properties: Authorship, Appropriation, and the Law. Durham: Duke University Press, 1998.CrossRef
Cowen, Tyler. Creative Destruction: How Globalization is Changing the World's Cultures. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 2002.
Das, Veena. “Cultural Rights and the Definition of Community.” In The Rights of Subordinated Peoples, edited by Oliver Mendelsohn and Upendra Baxi, 117158. Delhi: Oxford University Press, 1994.
Das, Veena, and Deborah Poole, eds. Anthropology in the Margins of the State: Comparative Ethnographies. New Delhi: Oxford University Press, 2004.
Dasgupta, Kaushik. “The Garden of Malabar: A Biopiracy Story.” Down to Earth, Science and Environment Online, March 22, 2005http://www.downtoearth.orgaccessed September 15, 2006.Google Scholar
Davis, Michael. “Some Realism About Indigenism.” Cardozo Journal of International and Comparative Law 11 (Summer 2003): 815830.Google Scholar
Davis, Richard. Lives of Indian Images. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1999.
Dirks, Nicholas. Castes Of Mind: Colonialism and the Making of Modern India. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 2001.
Downes, David. R., and Sarah A. Laird. “Community Registries of Biodiversity-Related Knowledge The Role of Intellectual Property in Managing Access and Benefit,” UNCTAD Biotrade Initiative, 1999.
Dutfield, Graham. The Public, and Private Domains: Intellectual Property Rights in Traditional Knowledge. Science Communication 21 (2000): 274295.
The Economist, “Finding Drugs in the Library: Researchers Are Searching for New Medicines Lurking in Old Herbal Texts,” September 25, 2004.
Foucault, Michel. Birth of the Clinic: An Archeology of Medical Perception. New York: Vintage, 1975.
Foucault, Michel. Discipline and Punish. New York: Vintage Books, 1980.
Fournier, M.The Hortus Malabaricus of Hendrik van Rheede tot Drakenstein.” In Botany and History of Hortus Malabaricus, edited by K.S. Manilal. New Delhi: Oxford and IBH Publishing Co., 1980.
Greene, Shane. “Indigenous Knowledge, Incorporated.” Current Anthropology 45, no. 2 (April 2004): 211237.Google Scholar
Grove, Richard. Green Imperialism. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1995.
Grove, Richard. “Indigenous Knowledge and the Significance of South-West India for Portuguese and Dutch Constructions of Tropical Nature.” Modern Asian Studies 30, no. 1 (February 1996), 121143.Google Scholar
Gupta, Anil K. Value Addition to Local Kani Tribal Knowledge: Patenting, Licensing, and Benefit-Sharing. Report for the World Intellectual Property Organization, 2002.
Harrison, Kate. “Community Biodiversity Registers as a Mechanism for the Protection of Indigenous and Local Knowledge.” Sustainable Use of Biodiversity Program Initiative, International Development Research Centre, Canada, 2000.
Harrison, Simon. “Identity as a Scarce Resource.” Social Anthropology 7, no. 3 (1999): 239251.Google Scholar
Hayden, Corinne. “Benefit-Sharing: Experiments in Governance.” Paper presented at the SSRC Workshop on Intellectual Property, Markets and Cultural Flows, New York, October 24–25, 2003.
Hayden, Corinne. When Nature Goes Public: The Making and Unmaking of Bioprospecting in Mexico. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 2005.
Heniger, J. Hendrik Adriaan Van Rheede tot Drakenstein and Hortus Malabaricus: A Contribution to the Study of Dutch and Colonial Botany. Boston: A. A. Balkema, 1986.
Langford, Jean M. Fluent Bodies: Ayurvedic Remedies for Postcolonial Imbalance. Durham, NC: Duke University Press, 2002.
Leach, James. “Owning Creativity: Cultural Property and the Efficacy of Custom on the Rai Coast of Papua New Guinea.” Journal of Material Culture 8, no. 2 (2003): 123144.Google Scholar
Leslie, Charles M., ed. Asian Medical Systems: A Comparative Study. Berkeley: University of California Press, 1976.
Leslie, Charles, and Allan Young, eds. Paths to Asian Medical Knowledge. Berkeley: University of California Press, 1992.
Lessig, Lawrence. Free Culture: How Big Media Uses Technology and the Law to Lock Down Culture and Control Creativity. New York: Penguin, 2004.
Manilal, K.S., ed. Botany and History of Hortus Malabaricus. New Delhi: Oxford and India Book House, 1980.
Manilal, K.S..The epigraphy of the Malayalam certificates in Hortus Malabaricus.” In Botany and History of Hortus Malabaricus, edited by K.S. Manilal, 113120, 1989.
Manilal, K.S., C.R. Suresh, and V.V. Sivarajan. “A Reinvestigation of the Plants Described in Rheede's Hortus Malabaricus: An Introductory Report.” Taxon 26 (1977): 549550.Google Scholar
Mashelkar, Raghunath A. Report on Intellectual Property Rights and the Third World 12. 〈http://sustsci.harvard.edu/ists/TWAS_0202/mashelkar_undated.pdfaccessed September 15, 2006.
Merryman, John Henry. “Two Ways of Thinking About Cultural Property.” American Journal of International Law 80 (1986): 831835.Google Scholar
Merryman, John Henry. “Cultural Property Internationalism.” International Journal for Cultural Property, 12, no. 1, (February 2005).Google Scholar
Mohan Ram, H.Y.On the English Edition of Hortus Malabaricus by K.S. Manilal (2005).” Current Science 89, no. 10 (2005): 16721680.Google Scholar
Mitchell, Timothy. Rule of Experts: Egypt, Techno-Politics, Modernity. Berkeley: The University of California Press, 2002.
Nicholas, George P., and Kelly P. Bannister. “Copyrighting the Past? Emerging Intellectual Property Rights Issues in Archeology.” Current Anthropology 45, no. 3 (2004): 327350.Google Scholar
Parry, Bronwyn. Trading the Genome: Investigating the Commodification of Bio-Information. New York: Columbia University Press, 2004.
Petryna, Adriana. Life Exposed: Biological Citizens after Chernobyl. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 2003.
Posey, Darrell A., and Graham Dutfield. Beyond Intellectual Property: Toward Traditional Resource Rights for Indigenous Peoples and Local Communities. Ottawa: International Development Research Centre, 1996.
Rapp, Rayna, Deborah Heath, and Karen-Sue Taussig. “Genetic Citizenship.” In Companion to the Handbook of Political Anthropology, edited by David Nugent and Joan Vincent. Oxford: Blackwell, 2003.
Reddy, Sita. Reinventing Medical Traditions: The Professionalization of Ayurveda in America. Unpublished dissertation, University of Pennsylvania, 2000.
Reddy, Sita. “The Politics and Poetics of Magazine Medicine.” In Robert Johnston, ed. Politics of Healing: A History of Alternative Medicine in Twentieth-Century North America, Routledge, 2003.
Reddy, Sita. “Asian Medicine in America: The Ayurvedic Case.” Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science 583 (2002): 97121.Google Scholar
Reddy, Sita. “The Memory of Divine Objects: Remembrance and Repatriation” (For the Smithsonian Material Culture Forum on The Remembrance of Things, How Museums and Memory Shape One Another, held September 2005). Material Matters 54 (June 2006): 1012.Google Scholar
Report of the Department of the Ayurveda, Yoga & Naturopathy, Unani, Siddha, and Homeopathy (AYUSH), Ministry of Health and Family Welfare, Government of India, 2003.
Robbins, Bruce, and Elsa Stamatopoulou. “Reflections on Culture and Cultural Rights.” South Atlantic Quarterly 103, no. 2/3 (2004): 227259.Google Scholar
Root, Deborah. Cannibal Culture: Art, Appropriation and the Commodification of Difference. Boulder, Colorado: Westview Press, 1995.
Rose, Nikolas, and Carlos Novas, “Biological Citizenship.” In Global Assemblages: Technology, Politics, and Ethics as Anthropological Problems, edited by Aihwa Ong and Stephen J. Collier, 439463. Oxford: Blackwell, 2005.
Sarai Reader 01: The Public Domain. New Delhi, and Amsterdam: Sarai Media Collective, 2001.
Safrin, Sabrina. “Hyperownership in a Time of Biotechnological Promise: The International Conflict to Control the Building Blocks of Life.” American Journal of International Law, 98, no. 4 (2004): 641685.Google Scholar
Scott, James. Seeing Like a State: How Certain Schemes to Improve the Human Condition Have Failed. New Haven: Yale University Press, 1998.
Shiv Sharma, Pandit. Ayurvedic Medicine: Past and Present. Varanasi: Krishnadas Academy.
Shiva, Vandana et al. The Enclosure and Recovery of the Commons: Biodiversity, Indigenous Knowledge and Intellectual Property Rights, 1997.
Shiva, Vandana et al. The Enclosure. “The Neem Campaign.” Dehradun: Research Foundation for Science and Technology & Natural Resource Policy, 1993.
Strathern, Marilyn. Property, Substance and Effect: Anthropological Essays on Persons and Things. London: Athlone Press, 1999.
Strathern, Marilyn. “Multiple Perspectives on Intellectual Property.” In Protection of Intellectual, Biological and Cultural Property in Papua New Guinea, edited by Kathy Whimp and Mark Busse, 4761. Canberra: Asia Pacific Press, 2000.
Sunder, Madhavi. “Intellectual Property and Identity Politics: Playing with FireJournal of Gender, Race and Justice 4, no. 1 (2000), 6998.Google Scholar
Sunder, Madhavi. “Cultural Dissent.” Stanford Law Review 54, no. 3 (2001): 495567.Google Scholar
Taussig, Michael. The Magic of the State. New York: Routledge, 1997.
United Nations Convention on Biological Diversity. Rio de Janeiro: UNEP, 1992.
United Nations Educational, Scientific, and Cultural Organization. Convention for the Safeguarding of the Intangible Cultural Heritage. Paris: UNESCO, 2003.
Utkarsh, G.Documentation of Traditional Knowledge: People's Biodiversity Registers.” Report for the Foundation for Revitalisation of Local Health Traditions. Bangalore: FRLHT, 2002.
Watkins, Joe. “Cultural Nationalists, Internationalists and ‘Intra-nationalists’: Who's Right and Whose Right?International Journal of Cultural Property, 12, no. 1 (February 2005): 7894.Google Scholar
Weil, Stephen. “Who Owns the Nataraja?Art News, 5 (1989), 188.Google Scholar
Wujastyk, Dominik. The Roots of Ayurveda. New Delhi: India Penguin, 1988.
Zimmerman, Francis. The Jungle and the Aroma of Meats: An Ecological Theme in Hindu Medicine. Berkeley: University of California Press, 1987.
Zysk, Kenneth. Asceticism and Healing in Ancient India: Medicine in the Buddhist Monastery. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1991.