Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-wq484 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-27T22:17:45.864Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

A Statistical Derivation of Langmuir's Adsorption Isotherm

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  24 October 2008

R. H. Fowler*
Affiliation:
Trinity College

Extract

The commonest form of Langmuir's adsorption isotherm is

where θ is the fraction of the surface of the solid covered by adsorbed molecules, p the gas pressure in equilibrium with the adsorbed layer and A = A (T) a function of the temperature alone. This formula is usually derived by a kinetic argument which balances the rates of deposition and re-evaporation. It is perhaps not without interest to show that formula (1) and similar formulae can be obtained directly by the usual statistical methods which evaluate all the properties of the equilibrium state of any assembly. The ordinary derivation is apt to obscure the essentially thermodynamic character of (1) and to lead one to think that its form depends on the precise mechanisms of deposition and re-evaporation, whereas in fact it depends only on the whole set of states, adsorbed and free, accessible to the molecules in question. By suitable use of the usual technique for handling assemblies obeying the Fermi-Dirac statistics the saturation effect can be naturally incorporated in the theory ab initio.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge Philosophical Society 1935

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

* See for example, Fowler, , Statistical Mechanics (1929), § 21·4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

* It will be sufficiently obvious that in this section the superior affix 2 refers to the second type of system and does not denote a square.

Equations equivalent to these or their generalizations were first given by kinetic arguments by Henry, , Phil. Mag. 44 (1922), 689.CrossRefGoogle Scholar