Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-qsmjn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-24T15:31:17.378Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Subject, topic and Sesotho passive*

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  17 February 2009

Katherine Demuth
Katherine Demuth*
Affiliation:
Brown University
*
Department of Cognitive and Linguistic Sciences, Brown University, Box 1978, Providence, RI 02912, USA
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Counter to findings in English, German and Hebrew, recent acquisition studies have shown that the passive is acquired early in several non-Indo-European languages. In an attempt to explain this phenomenon, this paper addresses certain typological phenomena which influence the early acquisition of passives in Sesotho, a southern Bantu language. After outlining the structure of the Sesotho passive and its syntactic and discourse functions, I examine Sesotho-speaking children's spontaneous use of passives, showing that the acquisition of passives in Sesotho is closely linked to the fact that Sesotho subjects must be discourse topics. I conclude that a detailed examination of how passive constructions interact with other components of a given linguistic system is critical for developing a coherent and universally applicable theory of how passives are acquired.

Type
Articles
Information
Journal of Child Language , Volume 17 , Issue 1 , February 1990 , pp. 67 - 84
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1990

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

*

Data for this paper were collected in Lesotho and were supported by Fulbright-Hays and Social Science Research Council doctoral dissertation research grants. Preliminary preparation of this paper was conducted with support of NICHD Developmental Training Grant 5T32 HD07181, administered through the University of California at Berkeley. An earlier version of this paper was presented at the Child Development Conference, Boston University, in October 1985. I thank Ruth Berman, Melissa Bowerman, Nancy Budwig, Eve Clark, Mark Johnson, Henriette Lempert, 'Malillo Machobane, Michael Maratsos, Salikoko Mufwene, Steven Pinker, Dan Slobin, Robert Van Valin and Kenneth Wexler for discussion, comments and suggestions. The final interpretations, however, remain my own.

References

REFERENCES

Berman, R. (1985). The acquisition of Hebrew. In Slobin, D. (ed.), The crosslinguistic study of language acquisition. Vol. 1, pp. 255–371. Hillsdale NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Borer, H. & Wexler, K. (1987). The maturation of syntax. In Roeper, T. & Willaims, E. (eds), Parameter setting and language acquisition. Dordrecht: Reidel.Google Scholar
Bresnan, J. (1982). The passive in lexical theory. In Bresnan, J. (ed.), The mental representation of grammatical relations. Cambridge MA: M.I.T. Press.Google Scholar
Bresnan, J. & Kanerva, J. (1989). Locative inversion in Chichewa: a case study of factorization in grammar. Linguistic Inquiry 20. 1–50.Google Scholar
Bresnan, J. & Mchombo, S. (1987). Topic, pronoun, and agreement in Chichewa. Language 63. 741–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chomsky, N. (1965). Aspects of the theory of syntax. Cambridge MA: M.I.T. Press.Google Scholar
Chomsky, N. (1981). Lectures on government and binding. Dordrecht: Foris.Google Scholar
Cole, D. T. (1955). An introduction to Tsviana grammar. Cape Town: Longman.Google Scholar
Demuth, K. (1984). Aspects of Sesotho acquisition. Bloomington: Indiana University Linguistics Club.Google Scholar
Demuth, K. (1987). Acquisition of impersonal passives: a matter of case. Paper presented at the Boston University Conference on Language Development.Google Scholar
Demuth, K. (1989). Maturation, continuity and the acquisition of Sesotho passive. Language 65. 56–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Doke, C. M. & Mofokeng, S. M. (1957). Textbook of Southern Sotho grammar. Cape Town: Longman.Google Scholar
Foley, W. & Van Valin, R. (1984). Functional syntax and universal grammar. Cambridge: C.U.P.Google Scholar
Givón, G. (1979). On understanding grammar. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Givón, G. (1984). Syntax: a functional-typological introduction. Amsterdam: Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Horgan, D. (1978). The development of the full passive. Journal of Child Language 5. 65–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jackendoff, R. (1972). Semantic interpretation in generative grammar. Cambridge MA: M.I.T. Press.Google Scholar
Keenan, E. (1976). Remarkable subjects in Malagasy. In Li, C. (ed.), Subject and topic. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Keenan, E. (1985). Passive in the world's languages. In Shopen, T. (ed.), Language typology and syntactic description, vol. 1, pp. 243–281. Cambridge: C.U.P.Google Scholar
Kimenyi, A. (1980). A relational grammar of Kinyarwanda. Berkeley: University of California Press. (University of California Publications in Linguistics 91).Google Scholar
Li, C. & Thompson, S. (1976). Subject and topic: a new typology of language. In Li, C. (ed.), Subject and topic. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Louwrens, L. J. (1981). The relevance of the notions given and new discourse information in the study of North Sotho syntax. South African Journal of African Languages 1. 21–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Machobane, M. (1987). The Sesotho passive constructions. Working Papers in Linguistics 4. 33–52. Montreal: McGill University.Google Scholar
Maratsos, M. P., Fox, D., Becker, J. & Chalkley, M. A. (1985). Semantic restrictions on children's passives. Cognition 19. 167–91.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Maratsos, M. P., Kuczaj, S. A., Fox, D. & Chalkley, M. A. (1979). Some empirical studies in the acquisition of transformational relations: passives, negatives and the past tense. In Collins, W. A. (ed.), Children's language and communications (The Minnesota Symposium on Child Psychology 12. 1–45). Hillsdale NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Mills, A. (1985). The acquisition of German. In Slobin, D. (ed.), The crosslinguistic study of language acquisition, vol. 1, pp. 141–254. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Paroz, R. A. (1959). Elements of Southern Sotho. Morija: Morija Sesuto Book Depot.Google Scholar
Perlmutter, D. (1978). Impersonal passives and the unaccusative hypothesis. Proceedings of the Fourth Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society 4. 157–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pinker, S., Lebeaux, D. & Frost, L. A. (1987). Productivity and constraints in the acquisition of the passive. Cognition 26. 195–267.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Pye, C. (1988). Precocious passives (and antipassives) in Quiche Mayan. Paper presented at the Child Language Research Forum, Stanford University.Google Scholar
Savasir, I. (1983). How many futures? A study of future reference in early child language. Unpublished M.A. dissertation, University of California, Berkeley.Google Scholar
Slobin, D. I. (1966). Grammatical transformations and sentence comprehension in childhood and adulthood. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behaviour 5. 219–227.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Strohner, H. & Nelson, K. E. (1974). The young child's development of sentence comprehension: influence of event probability, nonverbal context, syntactic form and strategies. Child Development 45. 564–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Suzman, S. (1985). Learning the passive in Zulu. Papers & Reports on Child Language Development 24. 131–7.Google Scholar
Suzman, S. (1987). Passives and prototypes in Zulu children's speech. African Studies 46. 241–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar